One Common Voice One Plan February 11, 2010 Office of Educational Improvement and Innovation and Office of Field Services.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Michigan Department of Education Office of Education Improvement and Innovation One Voice – One Plan Michigan Continuous School Improvement (MI-CSI) Plan.
Advertisements

One Voice – One Plan Office of Education Improvement and Innovation MI-CSI: Plan Stage Develop Improvement Plan.
Michigan Department of Education School Improvement Plan SIP February 2011.
™ Goals Management Overview For ISD/RESA Support Personnel and NCA Field Consultants February 11, 2011 Carrie Finke Professional Learning Division AdvancED.
A Quick Look at MDE’s Program Evaluation Tool. At the top of an index card, identify a hobby, sport, or activity in which you enjoy participating. Then.
The Marzano School Leadership Evaluation Model Webinar for Washington State Teacher/Principal Evaluation Project.
Service Agency Accreditation Recognizing Quality Educational Service Agencies Mike Bugenski
1 Michigan Department of Education Office of School Improvement One Common Voice – One Plan Michigan Continuous School Improvement (MI-CSI)
Designing and Implementing An Effective Schoolwide Program
Michigan’s School Improvement Process Model Plan Study Gather Data Do Student Achievement.
1 School Improvement Plan - School Improvement Management System - Feb. 27, 2008 Albert Mayo (AdvancED)
1 Michigan Department of Education Office of School Improvement ISD/RESA Workshop February 26, 2008.
One Common Voice – One Plan School Improvement Module: Plan
District Improvement Facilitators Network January 30,
LEA Planning Cycle March 4, 2010 Office of Educational Improvement and Innovation and Office of Field Services.
Michigan Department of Education Office of Education Improvement and Innovation One Voice – One Plan Michigan Continuous School Improvement (MI-CSI) Study.
One Voice – One Plan Michigan Continuous School Improvement (MI-CSI)
Student Learning Objectives 1 Implementing High Quality Student Learning Objectives: The Promise and the Challenge Maryland Association of Secondary School.
Data Driven Continuous Improvement May 5, 2010
Michigan Department of Education Office of Field Services LEA Planning Cycle 101 v. 2.
Student Growth 2.0 Fall,  Face-to-Face Sessions  Student Growth 2.0  Rater Agreement Practices  TPEP/ Washington State Learning Standards.
One Voice – One Plan Office of Education Improvement and Innovation MI-CSI: Do Stage Implement Plan and Monitor Plan.
The LEA Planning Cycle Application
1 One Common Voice – One Plan Michigan Continuous School Improvement MI- CSI.
Title I Schoolwide Program The Planning Year An Overview Thursday, September 20, 2012.
1 Michigan Department of Education Office of School Improvement One Common Voice – One Plan Michigan Continuous School Improvement (MI-CSI)
PILOT REQUIREMENTS FOR EACH DISTRICT: Select a minimum of 10% of schools to participate. A minimum of 1 school MUST meet the minimum participant requirements.
OFFICE OF FIELD SERVICES SPRING PLANNING WORKSHOP 2012.
1 One Common Voice – One Plan Michigan Continuous School Improvement MI- CSI.
Michigan Department of Education Office of Education Improvement and Innovation One Voice – One Plan Michigan Continuous School Improvement (MI-CSI) Study.
Laying the Groundwork for the New Teacher Professional Growth and Effectiveness System TPGES.
School Improvement Planning Today’s Session Review the purpose of SI planning Review the components of SI plans Discuss changes to SI planning.
One Voice – One Plan Office of Education Improvement and Innovation MI-CSI: Gather Stage Get Ready.
Michigan Department of Education Office of Field Services Consolidated Application Schedule.
Michigan Department of Education Office of Education Improvement and Innovation One Voice – One Plan Michigan Continuous School Improvement (MI-CSI) Study.
One Common Voice – One Plan School Improvement Module 2
1. Housekeeping Items June 8 th and 9 th put on calendar for 2 nd round of Iowa Core ***Shenandoah participants*** Module 6 training on March 24 th will.
1 Technology Review NCA CASI / MDE Spring School Improvement Conference Apr. 8, 2008 Albert Mayo (AdvancED,
AdvancED District Accreditation Process © 2010 AdvancED.
Building and Recognizing Quality School Systems DISTRICT ACCREDITATION © 2010 AdvancED.
SACS-CASI Southern Association of Colleges and Schools Council on Accreditation and School Improvement FAMU DRS – QAR Quality Assurance Review April 27-28,
TECHNOLOGY PLANNING FOR Mary Mehsikomer Division of School Improvement November 2006.
1 School Improvement Planning and your Title I, Part A Programs
Why Do State and Federal Programs Require a Needs Assessment?
Michigan Department of Education Office of Education Improvement and Innovation One Voice – One Plan Michigan Continuous School Improvement (MI-CSI)
Michigan School Improvement Framework. The Vision… Provide a comprehensive framework based on current research and best practice to serve as a road map.
The Michigan Statewide System of Support for Title I Schools.
One Common Voice One Plan March 31, 2010 Office of Educational Improvement and Innovation and Office of Field Services.
One Voice – One Plan Office of Education Improvement and Innovation MI-CSI: Study Stage Analyze Data.
Systems Accreditation Berkeley County School District School Facilitator Training October 7, 2014 Dr. Rodney Thompson Superintendent.
Welcome to today’s Webinar: Tier III Schools in Improvement We will begin at 9:00 AM.
The Michigan Department of Education Program Evaluation Tool (PET) Lessons Learned & Support Documents.
Hudson Area Schools - Lincoln Elementary School Improvement Professional Development Friday, February 26, 2010.
SACS/CASI District Accreditation  January 2007  April 2007  May 2007  January – April 2008  Board Approval for Pursuit of District Accreditation.
Moving Title IA School Plans into Indistar ESEA Odyssey Summer 2015 Presented by Melinda Bessner Oregon Department of Education.
1 One Common Voice – One Plan School Improvement Module 3 Study: Analyze Data Set Goals and Measurable Objectives Research Best Practice.
School Improvement “Proper Prior Planning Prevents Poor Performance” February 2010 Detroit Public Schools Diane Fleming, Regional Superintendent Arveneda.
August 2, Welcome Who is the TSD Continuous Improvement Team ? What is the work of the TSD Continuous Improvement Team? What is.
1 One Common Voice – One Plan School Improvement Stage 3 Plan: Develop School Improvement Plan.
The Importance of Professional Learning in Systems Reform AdvancED Performance Accreditation Bev Mortimer Concordia Superintendent
Systems Accreditation Berkeley County School District Accreditation Team Chair Training October 20, 2014 Dr. Rodney Thompson Superintendent.
Office of Service Quality
Vision Statement We Value - An organization culture based upon both individual strengths and relationships in which learners flourish in an environment.
March  Third annual 2141 Club meeting  Recognizing new members  Introductions  Developing a support network.
Building and Recognizing Quality School Systems DISTRICT ACCREDITATION GRAVES COUNTY SCHOOLS © 2010 AdvancED.
LEA Planning Cycle March 31, 2010 Office of Educational Improvement and Innovation and Office of Field Services.
District Accreditation
Facilitators of School Improvement
LEA Planning Cycle.
Presentation transcript:

One Common Voice One Plan February 11, 2010 Office of Educational Improvement and Innovation and Office of Field Services

Welcome and introductions Linda Forward Mike Radke Diane Joslin-Gould Leah Breen Scott Koziol Dodie Raycraft Fiona Hinds 2

Who’s here? 3

Training of trainer session Update trainers with requirements for school and district reporting Explore AdvancED tool for submitting reports Provide customizable materials and guides to train their constituents 4

Expectations of trainers As a team, conduct MAISA regional training sessions Provide assistance when needed 5

Goal of session 6 Promote the understanding of the school improvement goal development process and the LEA Planning Cycle Application as supported by quality reporting through the online system.

7 Continuous improvement model Getting Ready Collect Data Build Profile Data Profile Process Profile Analyze Data Data Analysis Process Analysis Summary Report Set Goals Set Measurable Objectives Research Best Practice Develop Action Plans Implement Plan Monitor Plan Evaluate Plan A comprehensive needs assessment Improvement Plan Gather Study Plan Do

8 MDE - AdvancED School improvement Tasks Training and Support Communication Frequently Asked Questions Contact MDE - NCA Give Us Your Feedback

New language in online system 9 Former languageNew language Comprehensive Needs Assessment CNA School Process Rubrics (90) SPR (90) EdYES! ReportEducation Yes! Subset (40) EdYES! (40) District Comprehensive Needs Assessment District Process Rubrics DPR

School level online requirements 10 MDE Schools NCA Schools School Process Rubrics 90 SPR(90) Or Education YES! Subset 40 Standards Assessment Report (SAR) Or Self Assessment (SA) School Improvement Plan Schoolwide or Targeted Assistance Components School Process Profile

District level online requirements 11 MDE Districts NCA Districts District Process Rubrics (DPR) District Standards Assessment Report (SAR) District Improvement Plan LEA Planning Cycle Application District Process Profile

Current School Requirements Time lineWho SPR (90) or Education YES! Subset (40) or NCA SAR or SA March 12, 2010All MDE schools or All NCA schools School Improvement Plan (including Title I Schoolwide or Targeted components) Due September 1All schools in any district receiving Title I funds School time lines 12 Handout # 1 NEW!

Upcoming District Requirements Time lineWho DPRDue: April 1, 2010 All MDE districts and districts not involved in district accreditation NCA District Accreditation SAR 6 months to 6 weeks prior to QAR visit or April 1, 2010 whichever comes first All NCA districts in district accreditation. District Improvement PlanDue: June 30, 2010All districts LEA Planning Cycle Application (LEAPC) Due: June 30, 2010 All districts that complete a Consolidated Application District time lines 13 Handout # 1 NEW!

14 ESEA & PA 25 OEII Ed YES! External NCA District Improvement Process Coherent Plan for Improvement Common vision Common language Continuous Improvement OSE-EIS OFS Common vision

15 Do Implement Plan Monitor Plan Evaluate Plan Plan Develop Action Plan Student Achievement Gather Getting Ready Collect District Data Build District Profile Study Analyze Data Set Goals Set Measurable Objectives Research Best Practice Process cycle for continuous improvement

16 MDE Plan ISD/RESA Plan District Plan School Plan Classroom A vertically aligned system for..

Alignment 17 School A School C School B District Office Cooperation Collaboration Communication

Setting the context 18 It’s easier when we all pull TOGETHER

19 Do Implement Plan Monitor Plan Evaluate Plan Plan Develop Action Plan Student Achievement Gather Getting Ready Collect District Data Build District Profile Study Analyze Data Set Goals Set Measurable Objectives Research Best Practice Process cycle for continuous improvement

20 Continuous district improvement Getting Ready Collect Data Build Profile District Data Profile District Process Profile Analyze Data District Data Analysis District Process Analysis Summary Report Set Goals Set Measurable Objectives Research Best Practice Develop Action Plans Implement Plan Monitor Plan Evaluate Plan A comprehensive needs assessment District Improvement Plan Gather Study Plan Do

1.District Data Profile 2.District Data Analysis 3.District Process Profile 4.District Process Analysis 5.Summary Report 21 District comprehensive needs assessment

22 District data profile and analysis District Data Profile Achievement Demographic Process Perception Collect & analyze this data set

23 District data profile and analysis * These reports are recommended, but not required and they are not all encompassing.

24  Comprehensive needs assessment 1.District Data Profile 2.District Data Analysis 3.District Process Profile 4.District Process Analysis 5.Summary Report 

25 MDE Districts District Process Rubrics (DPR) District process profile Identifies strengths and challenges in system processes and protocols of practice. NCA Districts District Standards Assessment Report (SAR)

26 Handout # 2 District Performance Indicators MDE district level 19 performance indicators District process profile

27 NCA Districts will complete SAR template District process profile

28 District process rubrics & SAR template Download the District Process Rubrics or SAR Word Template for help preparing your report offline. You must complete the District Process Rubrics or the SAR online. Important!

29 District process profile online

30   Comprehensive needs assessment 1.District Data Profile 2.District Data Analysis 3.District Process Profile 4.District Process Analysis 5.Summary Report  

31 Data Profile and Analysis Process Profile and Analysis Summary Report Goals Strengths Challenges A comprehensive needs assessment

School Comprehensive Needs Assessment District Comprehensive Needs Assessment District Comprehensive Needs Assessment School Improvement Plans District Improvement Plans ISD/RESA Improvement Plans ISD/RESA Comprehensive Needs Assessment ISD/RESA Comprehensive Needs Assessment School Data Profile School Process Profile District Process Profile Data Profile Process Profile Data Profile Process Profile District Process Profile District Data Profile Ed YES! Report 40 or 90 Indicators Self Assessment Or SAR MDE NCA Consolidated Application Student Achievement 19 Indicators District Data Profile 32 District SAR System/ESA SAR School Comprehensive Needs Assessment School Process Profile School Data Profile

33 It’s all about Goals School Improvement Plan LEA Planning Cycle Application District Improvement Plan School Process Rubrics (90)/ SAR Education Yes! Subset (40)/ SA District Process Rubrics/ District SAR G O A L S MANAGEMENT

34 Goals management template Download the Goals Management Template for help preparing your goals offline. You must enter your goals in the online Goals Management system. Important!

Student goal Gap & cause for gap Measurable objective Strategy Activities Fiscal resources District goals management 35

Goal statement All students will be proficient in reading. Goals Important! student focused stated broadly based on data analysis 36

Student goal Gap and cause for gap Measurable objective Strategy Activities Fiscal resources 37  District Goals management

When considering the percent of students proficient, there is a 21% difference between students without disabilities and students with disabilities as measured by the MEAP; additional data analysis identifies informational reading as the primary cause for gap. Important! Consider multiple data sources 38 Gap and cause for gap Gap Cause

Student goal Gap and cause for gap Measurable objective Strategy Activities Fiscal resources 39   District Goals management

 Specific  Measurable  Attainable  Realistic  Time-bound It is critical to determine how you will monitor and measure your progress as you begin to plan. SMART objectives Important! 40 Measurable objective

All students will increase skills in the area of informational reading: the percentage of non-disabled students proficient on the MEAP will increase from 56% ( ) to 65% and the percentage of students with disabilities proficient on the MEAP will increase from 35% ( ) to 52% by the end of the school year. 41 specific measurable time bound attainable & realistic Measurable objective

Student goal Gap and cause for gap Measurable objective Strategy Activities Fiscal resources 42    District Goals management

Criteria for Strategy Statement Begin each statement with “District staff will...” (and/or which specific group of teachers). Use an action verb of observable behavior which must be done. Write clear, concise statements that describe what you intend to accomplish. (Be specific.) Make sure each strategy addresses the issue and connects back to the measurable objective. Research and evidence based 43 Strategy

District staff will implement effective, research based informational reading strategies. 44 Strategy

Student goal Gap and cause for gap Measurable objective Strategy Activities Fiscal resources 45     District Goals management

Criteria for Activities Describes an adult activity/action (what adults will do to assist students in meeting the measurable objective). Linked to the strategy statement. Includes specific steps that include:  activity  staff responsible  timeline for implementation,  resources needed  funding source and amount  monitoring plan and evidence of success. 46 Important! Activities and Fiscal Resources are not included in the LEA Planning Cycle Application Activities and fiscal resources

47 What might be an appropriate activity for this strategy? Activities and fiscal resources Strategy: District staff will implement effective, research based informational reading strategies.

48 MDE-AdvancED online tool Handout # 3 tutorial

49 Goals management

Take a break! 50 Login to your account

51 In teams, develop three district “test” goals, measurable objectives, strategies, activities and resources which will be used during the LEA Planning Cycle portion of this session. Team activity

52 Approval Important! A district must approve goals/objectives/strategies within Goals Management in order for them to be available for the LEA Planning Cycle Application