BASIC REQUIREMENTS Self-evaluation with honest introspection. Collective efforts with commitment and time investment. Creative and positive role of.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Teacher Foundation A Look at the Evaluation Process by The Teacher Foundation (TTF)
Advertisements

District Accreditation
The First Year Experience – Again Presented to The 16 th International Conference on the First Year Experience July 7-10, 2003 Vancouver, British Columbia.
WASC Review: Whats happened so far. May 19, 2008 In-service.
Jennifer Strickland, PhD,
QUALITY ASSURANCE AND MAINTENANCE (PREPARATION FOR RE- ACCREDITATION)
Quarry Bay School What is CoIS? The Council of International Schools is an organisation in International Education for the.
Presenters: Lisa McLaughlin, Institutional Data Coordinator Best Practices: Program Review TCUs Chief Academic Officers Annual Meeting.
Selected Items from a Report of the Higher Learning Commission Comprehensive Evaluation Visit to OSU Pam Bowers Director, University Assessment & Testing.
September 8, /8/2014 Margarita Pillado -- Faculty Accreditation Coordinator -- Los Angeles Pierce College 1.
TTU Quality Enhancement Plan (QEP) Improving Critical Thinking and Real-World Problem Solving Skills Through Active Learning TTU Quality Enhancement Plan.
Gateway Engineering Education Coalition Engineering Accreditation and ABET EC2000 Part II OSU Outcomes Assessment for ABET EC200.
World Bank Learning Seminar Quality Assurance in Tertiary Education (CIEP, Sevres, France, June 18-20, 2006) Welcome to presentation by Prof. V. S. Prasad.
SEM Planning Model.
College Strategic Plan by
Coordinator of Assessment Coordinate assessment efforts on campus Maintain the NCCC General Education Assessment Plan Collect assessment results from course.
College Strategic Plan by Strategic Planning and Quality Assurance Committee.
Quality Assurance Programme Higher Education Commission, Islamabad (Prof. Dr. Riaz Hussain Qureshi)
1 Focus on Quality and the Academic Quality Improvement Program At Cuyahoga Community College.
Strategic Priorities for Taking Charge of our Future.
Maureen Noonan Bischof Eden Inoway-Ronnie Office of the Provost Higher Learning Commission of the North Central Association Annual Meeting April 22, 2007.
Sharifah Hapsah Shahabudin Vice Chancellor 11 th Malaysian Education Summit 2007 Malaysian Education: Winning in the Global Race 11 th Malaysian Education.
CALORX TEACHERS’ UNIVERSITY PREPARATION FOR NATIONAL ASSESSMENT & ACCREDITATION COUNCIL (NAAC)’s ACCREDITATION CALORX TEACHERS’ UNIVERSITY (Teacher Education.
LOGO Internal Quality Assurance Model: Evidence from Vietnamese Higher Education Tang Thi Thuy, Department of International and Comparative Education,
Charlene M. L. Roach & Gloria Davis-Cooper 34 th Teaching Public Administration Conference 2011 Panel Democratic Learning Experiences.
Maryland Technology Grant “ Our goal is to ensure that all Maryland teacher candidates are proficient in integrating technology in the classroom for teaching.
Learning Objective III: Diverse Learners Teacher candidates and candidates for other professional school personnel roles exhibit knowledge, competence,
Accreditation, SLOs and You – What are the patient outcomes? or Will the patient survive? Facilitators: Janet Fulks and Phillip Maynard.
PLACE OF QUALITY ASSURANCE IN ENHANCEMENT OF ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE OF MAKERERE UNIVERSITY BY SAM LUBOGA ACTING DIRECTOR QUALITY ASSURANCE DIRECTORATE 9/23/20151.
Accreditation follow-up report. The team recommends that the college further refine its program review, planning, and resource allocation processes so.
State Quality Assurance Cell Dept. of Collegiate Education, GoK CEQE CONTINUOUS EVALUATION FOR QUALITY & EXCELLENCE Dept. of Collegiate Education.
ACCREDITATION Goals: Goals: - Certify to the public and to educational organizations that the school is recognized as an effective institution of learning.
Mia Alexander-Snow, PhD Director, Office for Planning and Institutional Effectiveness Program Review Orientation 1.
Quality and San Juan College Dr. Carol Spencer. About San Juan College.
Building and Recognizing Quality School Systems DISTRICT ACCREDITATION © 2010 AdvancED.
SACS-CASI Southern Association of Colleges and Schools Council on Accreditation and School Improvement FAMU DRS – QAR Quality Assurance Review April 27-28,
ABET 2000 Preparation: the Final Stretch Carnegie Institute of Technology Department Heads Retreat July 29, 1999.
Primary Purposes of the Evaluation System
A Student Learning Outcomes Assessment Process at the Academic Program Level Christina Horne, Nita Paris, & Valerie Whittlesey Kennesaw State University-
Developing a QEP that is Relevant to the Institutional Vision and Mission SACS/COC 2005 Dr. Robert R. Bell, PRESIDENT Dr. Leo McGee, Associate Vice-President.
Copyright  Altran SDB, All rights reserved. ALTRAN SDB.
Los Angeles Mission College Institutional Self Study for Reaffirmation of Accreditation
HLC Re-accreditation Update GENERAL FACULTY MEETING JANUARY 15, 2014.
AHPGS ON SITE VISIT NOVEMBER 2015 Vice -Deanship for Development and Quality November 2015.
CAMPUS AND COMMUNITY OPEN SESSION MARCH 25 Higher Learning Commission Re-accreditation.
August 2, Welcome Who is the TSD Continuous Improvement Team ? What is the work of the TSD Continuous Improvement Team? What is.
About District Accreditation Mrs. Sanchez & Mrs. Bethell Rickards Middle School
What is Regional Accreditation? Regional Accreditation is a time-tested model of professional peer review that supports education excellence. Accreditation.
KSU’s Quality Enhancement Plan.  Current Core Requirement 2.12  The institution has developed an acceptable Quality Enhancement Plan (QEP) that (1)
The Georgia Department of Juvenile Justice Board of Education Presentation May 26, 2011.
What’s Going on at SCC Presented by: Corinna Evett.
Indian higher Education April 7, Growth Of Higher Education Institutions Fold Increase Universities (in Ten) Colleges.
Cal Poly Pomona University Strategic Plan 2011 ‐ 2015 Partial Assessment of Progress Presented to the University Strategic Planning Committee (USPC) 12/4/2014.
2018 Institution Self Evaluation Report (ISER) Joanne Whitaker and Sunny Pai Co-Chairs for ISER September 12, 2016.
1 Institutional Quality and Accreditation: A Workshop on the Basics.
Academic Program Review Workshop 2017
Adult College and Career Education Leadership
Workshop 1 Self-Assessment Committee (SAC)
Presenters: Lisa McLaughlin, Institutional Data Coordinator
National Assessment and Accreditation
Welcome ‘NAAC’ PEER TEAM COLLEGE PROFILE
1Ganesh Hegde, Asst. Adviser, NAAC Quality issues in Higher Education and Challenges of NAAC Assessment Dr. Ganesh Hegde Asst. Adviser, NAAC.
Use of ICT in Accreditation in Large Jurisdictions
10th meeting of dqac chairman and coordinatorS with Hon’ble VC
Undergraduate – Entering Students Survey Fall 2011
University Community Briefing
Understanding and Preparing for Accreditation
February 21-22, 2018.
Istanbul University, Department of Economics BEYAZIT-FATIH ISTANBUL
Presentation transcript:

BASIC REQUIREMENTS Self-evaluation with honest introspection. Collective efforts with commitment and time investment. Creative and positive role of head of the institution. Steering committee for compilation and analysis of data, work distribution and review meetings. Coordinator with dedication, knowledge of modern technology, communication skill, rapport with all the stakeholders.

SELF STUDY REPORT (Cycle -2) Submitted to National Assessment and Accreditation Council Bangalore By AAA-G COLLEGE OF EVALUATION Managed by Knowledge Consortium of Gujarat Ahmedabad Website: Phone:

CONTENTS Preface01 Contents02 A.Executive Summary03-04 B.Profile of the College05-14 C.Criterion-wise inputs Criterion I: Curricular Aspects15-24 Criterion II: Teaching – Learning and Evaluation Criterion III: Research, Consultancy and Extension53-90 Criterion IV: Infrastructure and Learning Resources Criterion V: Student Support and Progression Criterion VI: Governance, Leadership and Management Criterion VII: Innovations and Best Practices D.Evaluative Report of the Departments E.Post-accreditation Initiatives F.Declaration by Head of the Institution218

G.Annexure: I:Audited Income and Expenditure Statement of Last Four Years II:Certificate of recognition under section 2(f) and (B) by UGC Act III:Latest letter of affiliation from the parent University232 IV:NAAC Accreditation Certificate233 V:Quality Profile certificate by NAAC234 VI:NAAC Peer Team Report VII: Abbreviations 244 VIII:Master Plan/Aerial view of the campus245

CRITERION-VI GOVERNANCE, LEADERSHIP AND MANAGEMENT

AAA-G ASSESSMENT OF  University  Affiliated college  Teacher education institution

CriteriaUniversitiesAffiliated colleges Colleges of Education ICurricular Aspects IITeaching-Learning and Evaluation IIIResearch, Consultancy and Extension IVInfrastructure and Learning Resources 100 VStudent Support and Progression100 *VIGovernance, Leadership and Management *VIIInnovations and Best Practices Total Score1000 *For Colleges of Education: VI: Governance and Leadership VII: Innovative Practices Criteria and Weightages (AAA-G)

Key Aspects Criterion I Curricular Aspects Pre-determined Weightage 1.1Curricular Planning and Implementation Academic Flexibility30 1.3Curricular Enrichment30 1.4Feedback System20 Total100 CRITERIA AND KEY ASPECTS FOR ASSESSMENT

Key Aspects Criterion II Teaching Learning and Evaluation Pre-determined weightage 2.1Student Enrolment and Profile Catering to Student Diversity50 2.3Teaching-Learning Process Teacher Quality80 2.5Evaluation Process and Reforms Student Performance & Learning Outcomes 40 Total350

Key Aspects Criterion III Research,Consultancy and Extension Pre- determined Weightage 3.1Promotion of Research20 3.2Resource Mobilization for Research Research Facilities10 3.4Research Publications and Awards Consultancy10 3.6Extension Activities and Institution Social Responsibility Collaboration20 Total150

Key Aspects Criterion IV Infrastructure and Learning resources Pre-determined weightage 4.1Physical facilities30 4.2Library as learning resource20 4.3IT infrastructure30 4.4Maintenance of campus facilities20 Total100

Key Aspects Criterion V Student Support and Progression Pre- determined weightage 5.1Student Mentoring and Support Students’ progression30 5.3Students’ participation and activities 20 Total100

Key Aspects Criterion VI Governance, leadership and management Pre-determined Weightage 6.1.Institutionals vision and leadership Strategy development and deployment Faculty Empowerment strategies30 6.4Financial Management and Resource mobilization Internal quality assurance system30 Total100

Key Aspects Criterion VII Innovations and Best practices Pre-determined weightages 7.1Environment consciousness30 7.2Innovations30 7.3Best Practices40 Total100