1 Meta-ethics Section 5 Naturalism & Non-naturalism.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Diversity in Management Research
Advertisements

Theories of Knowledge Knowledge is Justified-True-Belief Person, S, knows a proposition, y, iff: Y is true; S believes y; Y is justified for S. (Note:
Hermeneutic Phenomenology: An Approach to Understanding Families Catherine A. Chesla J FAM NURS 1995; 1;63.
Empiricism on a priori knowledge
“Why Abortion is Immoral” Donald B. Marquis  Marquis holds that to resolve the morality of abortion it is necessary to first determine why it is that.
LOCKE’S ATTACK ON INNATISM Text source: Essay Concerning Human Understanding, book 1, chapters 1-3.
Chapter Twelve: The Fact-Value Problem Chapter Twelve: The Fact-Value Problem Metaethics ► Philosophizing about the very terms of ethics ► Considering.
Meta-Ethics Slavery is evil Honesty is a virtue Abortion is wrong ‘Meta’ from Greek meaning ‘above’ or ‘after’
Chapter One: Dr. Frankena
Moral Reasoning Making appropriate use of facts and opinions to decide the right thing to do Quotations from Jacob Needleman’s The American Soul A Crucial.
UI 305: Judicial Reasoning Prof. H. Hamner Hill Spring 2010.
The moral importance of agency Frederike Kaldewaij Philosophy Department, Utrecht University Expert Meeting Fish welfare:
 Humans are metaphysically free  Our choices define us and as a result our intuitions about the human condition are satisfied.  Dualism  Kant  Existentialism.
Ethics in Research: A Primer Dr. Jack Russell Weinstein Department of Philosophy and Religion University of North Dakota UND Graduate Research Assistant.
By Saša Žiković Discussant: Iftekhar Hasan Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute 1.
A Student’s Guide to Methodology Justifying Enquiry 3 rd edition P ETER C LOUGH AND C ATHY N UTBROWN.
Philosophy in Practice Week 7: Philosophy in Practice Week 7: National identity and special bonds of solidarity: what is it and why does it matter to political.
Moral Realism & the Challenge of Skepticism
Judgement, Motivation and Reason Sarah Sawyer University of Sussex.
INTRODUCTION TO PHILOSOPHY AND ETHICS 8.1 Forensics October 27, 2014.
Error theory Michael Lacewing
Ethics. Investigation into the foundations of moral claims.
The very idea Key resources: Meta-ethics in a small nutshell (short) Meta-ethics in a small nutshell Meta-ethics in a much larger nutshell (longer) Meta-ethics.
Introducing metaethics Michael Lacewing
Ethics of Administration Chapter 1. Imposing your values? Values are more than personal preferences Values are more than personal preferences Human beings.
Reality, knowledge, truth and objectivity HEM4112 – Lecture 2 Mari Elken.
Kantian ethics (& suicide): Kantian ethics (& suicide): Immanuel Kant ( ). A German philosopher. Ought implies Can Maxims Categorical Imperative.
Match the word with the definition.  ___ Epistemology  ___ Ethics  ___ Metaphysics  ___ Logic  ___ Teleology,  ___ Deontology,  ___ virtue theory.
The Nature of Morality General Overview “We are discussing no small matter, but how we ought to live” (Plato in the Republic ca. 390B.C.)
Sources of Knowledge Dr. Syed Rifaat Hussain Professor and Chairman, DSS Department, QAU, Islamabad.
+ Ethics II The nature of moral knowledge. + Moral knowledge Do you know the difference between right and wrong? Does anybody? Is moral knowledge even.
UI 305: Judicial Reasoning Prof. H. Hamner Hill Spring 2015.
Section 1 Moral Standing, Value, Rights and Rightness
1 Meta-ethics Section 1 Non-cognitivism, Prescriptivism and Projectivism.
Ethical non-naturalism
Meta-ethics Meta-ethical Questions: What does it mean to be good/bad? What constitutes the nature of being good or bad?
1 Value-theory & the Good Life Section 4 The Good Life, Needs, Virtue & Morality.
Introduction to Ethics Lecture 7 Mackie & Moral Skepticism
© Michael Lacewing Is morality objective? The state of the debate Michael Lacewing
1 Meta-ethics Section 3 Moral Realism. 2 Holds that moral properties are real & independent of people’s states of mind. Moral claims can be true or false.
Ethics 160 Moral Arguments. Reasons and Arguments Different claims have different uses in our language. Sometimes, a claim or claims are used as a reason.
Responsibility & Free Will
Cognitivist and Non-Cognitivist LO: I will understand GE Moore’s idea of naturalistic fallacy. Ethical judgments, such as "We should all donate to charity,"
INTUITIONISM: GE Moore, PRITCHARD & ROSS LO: I will understand GE Moore’s idea of naturalistic fallacy. STARTER TASK: Read through the exam essay from.
A Study of Ethical Thinking You get to decide what works for You.
Basic Principles: Ethics and Business
META-ETHICS: NON-COGNITIVISM A2 Ethics. This week’s aims To explain and evaluate non-cognitivism To understand the differences between emotivism and prescriptivismemotivismprescriptivism.
What is truth. Common theories Truth is correspondence between a proposition and a fact Truth is the coherence of propositions (or beliefs) Truth is what.
Chapter 2: Readings in Moral Theory Jeremy Bentham, “The Principle of Utility” – Consequentialism: the rightness or wrongness of an action depends entirely.
Basic concepts in Ethics
Chapter 7: Induction.
What is Philosophy?.
Moral Realism and the Challenge of Skepticism
Homework 3 Powerpoints.
Business Research Methods William G. Zikmund
Basic Principles: Ethics and Business
The Naturalistic Fallacy:
Recap Key-Terms Cognitivism Non-Cognitivism Realism Anti-Realism
Meta-Ethics Objectives:
Non-Naturalism Recap What does it mean to call morality non-naturalist? What arguments does Moore give for this position?
Metaethics.
The Philosophiser A compendium of philosophical questions to get you thinking about thinking. Made by Mike Gershon –
Outline the naturalistic fallacy
Do these phrases describe: Meta or Normative ethics?
Intuitionism Explore and Evaluate the strengths and problems of Intuitionism as ethical language.
Cognitive vs Non-Cognitive
Chapter 2: How to Think about Morality
Business Research Methods William G. Zikmund
Basic Principles: Ethics and Business
Introduction - Naturalism
Presentation transcript:

1 Meta-ethics Section 5 Naturalism & Non-naturalism

2 Theories that aspire to supply the basis for the moral truths claimed by moral realism & the moral knowledge claimed to be possible by moral cognitivism.

3 Non-naturalism Moral truths can be known not by reasoning from definitions or experience but intuitively. Hard to see how such truths could be learned.

4 Ethical Naturalism Moral truths result from & are underpinned by natural facts, & the relevant facts are necessarily connected to the corresponding ethical truths & constitute them.

5 Distinct From… Ontological naturalism: general metaphysical thesis about the nature of facts. Methodological naturalism: concerns how we may properly investigate them.

6 Ontological & Methodological Naturalism Both are consistent with ethical naturalism where they grant that moral propositions can be underpinned by natural facts (supervenience).

7 Restrictive Versions Restrictive versions of both these kinds of naturalism hold that there are no facts about desirability, rightness or reasons for action. Conflict with ethical naturalism. Moral realists need to reject these versions.

8 Can Natural Facts Constitute Ethical Ones? Non-naturalism: regards the supervenience of ethical truths on natural ones as mysterious. Naturalism: (certain) natural truths constitute ethical ones. Necessarily related.

9 What Kind of Facts are Relevant? Philippa Foot — facts about causing harm are necessarily related to ethical conclusions. Other examples include facts about animal suffering & welfare.

10 Further Examples John Searle — facts about words spoken can generate obligations, in the context of human institutions. Obligations to keep promises. Implicit benefits to human welfare of (some) institutions make the related obligations moral ones.

11 Think About… ways of reasoning from empirical facts to moral conclusions.

12 Non-naturalism V Restrictive Forms Non-naturalism is attractive when naturalism is interpreted in restrictive forms (since the latter preclude ethical truths). But ethical naturalists need not endorse restrictive interpretations.

13 Ethical Naturalism Coheres with the accounts of ‘oughts’, moral motivation & moral goodness presented in the other Sections of this Chapter. Coheres with the accounts of intrinsic value, rightness & moral obligation presented elsewhere in the book.