Chittenden County Park and Ride and Intercept Plan Public Meeting February 17, 2010.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Module 3 SMART PARKING. Module 3 Smart Parking Introduction This is one of seven Transit Oriented Development training modules developed by the Regional.
Advertisements

January 8, 2014 FMATS College Road Corridor Study FMATS Technical Committee Update.
An Advanced Transit Alternative for The Princetons Alain L Kornhauser 24 Montadale circle Board Chair Advanced Transit Association Founder ALK Transportation.
St. Tammany Parish Steering Committee Strengths & Weaknesses Assessment January 29, 2003.
 Awarded Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG) Grant for integrated land use and transportation planning efforts ( )  Consultant.
SR 50/UCF Connector Alternatives Analysis Orange County Board of County Commissioners January 13, 2015.
December 13, 2010 Developing Bicycle Performance Measures for Integrated Multi-Modal Corridor Management.
1 Corey W. Hill Chief of Public Transportation May 20, 2008 May 20, 2008.
Markham Centre TDM and Land Development Case Study ACT Canada – TDM Summit October 21, 2008.
 City of Mesa Council Presentation October 23, 2014.
Business Logistics 420 Public Transportation Lectures 8: The Performance and Condition of Transit in the United States.
Davie Road/S.R. 84 Transit Facility Demand Estimation Presented by Jeff Weidner & Jeremy Mullings Florida Department of Transportation Yongqiang Wu & Kasey.
Module 3 SMART PARKING 1. Module 3 Smart Parking Goals for Smart Parking Balance parking supply and demand Consider innovative parking management policies.
DATS Bicycle Planning 2009 Bicycle Advisory Committee Kickoff Danville Area Transportation Study July 13, 2009.
Centers and Corridors Parking Project Boise Land Use and Transportation Committee Meeting June 22,
Rapid Transit System Steering Committee Meeting December 4, 2012.
MECKLENBURG COUNTY PARK AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT CAPITAL NEEDS ASSESSMENT PROCESSES Citizens Capital Budget Advisory Committee Presentation November 1,
TRB Transportation Planning Applications Conference Houston, Texas May 2009 Ann Arbor Transportation Plan Update-- Connecting the Land Use & Transportation.
Availability of suitable space for expansion Lack of flexibility in allowed uses.
HSTP PLAN DEVELOPMENT Skagit-Island Human Services Transportation Plan July 10, 2014.
Calculating Transportation System User Benefits: Interface Challenges between EMME/2 and Summit Principle Author: Jennifer John Senior Transportation Planner.
Pacheco Transit Center Regional Express Bus Hub and Park and Ride Project Description and Background TRANSPAC TAC Meeting November 19, 2009.
Greater Mankato Transit Redesign Study Study Overview and Initial Existing Conditions September 2011 In association with: LSA Design and Public Solutions.
Performance Analysis Presentation to the National Capital Region Transportation Planning Board (NCR-TPB) November 28, 2012 Adopted: July 18, 2012 Item.
Alachua County Future Traffic Circulation Corridors Map Project July 10 th, 2007.
Public Comment Mobility Vision Plan 2035 MVP Website 2035 MVP Brochure and Survey. Provides specific information on the Plan Update. Survey – your opinion.
I-95 Transit & TDM Plan I-95 Transit and TDM Plan I-95 Corridor Stakeholder and Service Provider Meeting #2 June 13, 2011.
1 DRAFT April 2009 Public Meeting May 11, 2009 Kari Hackett, H-GAC.
East Portland In Motion covers all of Portland east of 82 nd Avenue. This represents 28% of the city’s population and 23% of its land area. East Portland.
OPEN HOUSE #4 JUNE AGENDA OPEN HOUSE 6:00 PM  Review materials  Ask questions  Provide feedback  Sign up for list  Fill out comment.
Good Afternoon/Introductions. Missoula’s LRTP Process Missoula Growth Workshop Base Case Scenario Envision Missoula Workshops Vision Scenario Envision.
Regional Priority Bus Transit Conference June 24, 2009.
Montgomery County Rapid Transit System (RTS) Service Planning and System Integration Study Steering Committee Meeting Presented to Montgomery County Department.
PROJECT UPDATE PUBLIC OPEN HOUSE #3 OCTOBER 17 4:30 PM – 6:30 PM Dakota County Northern Service Center.
Comprehensive Plan Update Kevin O’Neill Seattle Bicycle Advisory Board September 2, 2015.
Transportation leadership you can trust. presented to 12 th Annual TRB Transportation Planning Application Conference presented by Dan Goldfarb, P.E. Cambridge.
Metro’s Capital Improvement Needs Presented to the National Capital Region Transportation Planning Board By Tom Harrington, Director of Long Range Planning.
Regional Transit Study Project Update. Four open houses held between November , 2009 Informed and engaged the public in the study process Provided.
DC Circulator Transit Development Plan TPB Access for All Advisory Committee October 28, 2010.
Siskiyou County Short Range Transit Plan Draft Final Report Presentation to the Steering Committee LSC Transportation Consultants.
Phase 2: Data Collection Findings and Future Steps.
JUNE 27, 2013 ARB INFORMATIONAL UPDATE: ASSOCIATION OF BAY AREA GOVERNMENTS’/ METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION’S DRAFT SUSTAINABLE COMMUNITIES STRATEGY.
Planning For an Upper Valley Transportation Facility October 1 st, 2009 Howe Library, Hanover, NH Upper Valley Lake Sunapee Regional Planning Commission.
Atlanta Regional Commission Tom Weyandt, Department Director Comprehensive Planning May 2008.
1 1 City Commission Workshop for the DRAFT Basis of Design Report December 14, 2015 CRAVEN THOMPSON & ASSOCIATES, INC.
San Diego Regional Comprehensive Plan Presentation to Senate Transportation and Housing Committee February 8, 2005.
Keeping Our Air Clean Local and Regional Strategies to Improve Air Quality in Chittenden County Presentation to: CCMPO – February 17, 2010.
Chittenden County Metropolitan Planning Organization Communities working together to meet Chittenden County’s transportation needs 30 Kimball Ave., Suite.
EASTSIDE ACTIVITY CENTER MASTER PLAN PROPOSED COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT CPA Board of County Commissioners Hearing May 13, 2008.
Livingston County Transportation Connectivity Plan Final Report December 2013.
Valley Metro Update Open House and Public Hearing March 9, 2007.
City Council – Project Update September 14, 2015.
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN UPDATE MEETING 2 – TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT 12/12/2013.
Virginia House Bill 2 – Funding the Right Projects Intelligent Transportation System Activities May 19, 2016.
2040 LONG RANGE PLAN UPDATE Congestion Management Process Plan (CMPP) Major Update February 24, 2016.
DESTINATION 2030 Regional Local Personal Adopted May 24, 2001.
Burlington Transportation Alternatives Presented by: UVM Service Learners May 2004.
2035 General Plan Update Planning Commission Study Session on Draft Circulation Element February 2, 2016.
Chelan County Transportation Element Update
Regional Roads Committee
About Texas A&M College Station, Texas
Public Workshop #1 August 18, 2010.
San Mateo Countywide Transportation Plan update
Transportation Management Plan Modernization Project
A&M Association of Commuter Transportation July 31, 2007
GMT NEXT GEN TRANSIT PLAN FARE ANALYSIS FINDINGS
Transportation Impact Analysis Guidelines Update Phase II
Status Report on Rochester’s DMC Transportation Plan
Transportation Management Plan Modernization Project
New Hanover Comprehensive Plan
Presentation transcript:

Chittenden County Park and Ride and Intercept Plan Public Meeting February 17, 2010

1 AGENDA  Introductions  Project Overview & Purpose of Meeting  Existing Conditions – Preliminary Findings  Next Steps – Example Goals  Questions and Comments

2 Plan Purpose and Major Steps  Build off Previous Plans  2004 and 1999 Chittenden County Park and Ride Prioritization  1993 Colchester-Essex-Burlington P&R Studies  Develop Plan Guided by Overall Program Goals and Objectives  Include P&Rs in Chittenden County Commuter Shed  Identify Upgrades to Existing Facilities and Locations for New Facilities  Update Prioritization Methodology  Develop Implementation Plan

3 How the Plan Fits In  Document Existing Conditions  Inventory of Existing Facilities  Analysis of Travel Demand Characteristics  Develop Goals and Objectives  Identify and Prioritize Projects  Develop Implementation Plan  Final and Draft Plan PLAN PRIORITIZE PROJECT DEFINITION BUILD ENGINEERING, PERMITS, ROW OPERATE

4 Plan Management and Public Involvement  Park and Ride Advisory Committee  CCMPO  VTrans  CCTA  CATMA  Local Motion  Municipal Staff/Officials  Survey & Employer Interviews  Public Meetings  Initial to Gather Issues  Location Specific Meetings TBD  Review and Comment on Draft Plan  CCMPO Board Review and Adoption

5 Planning Framework – Service Areas  Core  South  Southeast  East  Northeast  North

6 Facility Type INTERCEPT PARK & RIDE

7 Park and Ride Facility Inventory  Physical Characteristics  Number of spaces  Type of Facility  Surface, striping and lighting  Shelter, bike rack, transit service  Ownership  General Performance Assessment  Accessibility  Safety  Congestion  Multi-Modal Access

8 Capacity and Ownership VTransMunicipalPrivate

9 Other Park and Ride Facilities  CATMA Intercept Facilities (Car to Shuttle)  Gilbane (included in inventory)  North Avenue (included in inventory)  Winooski Garage  Fanny Allen  CCTA Park and Ride (Car to Express Transit)  St. Albans Link Express — Highgate Commons — Collins-Perley Sports Center – St. Albans Link  Middlebury Link Express — Charlotte CITGO Station — Exchange Street Storage  Montpelier Link Express — VT Department of Employment & Training  Milton Commuter (Starting Soon) — Milton Town Offices

10 Performance Issues  General Accessibility  Gilbane and North Avenue  Waterbury/Exit 10  Bristol  Safety  Seven of Nineteen facilities located near High Crash Locations  Congestion Issues  Waterbury/Exit 10  Richmond/Exit 11  St. Albans/Exit 19  Berlin/Exit 9

11 Performance: Multi-Modal Access

12 Travel Characteristics: Worker Flows IN-BOUNDOUT-BOUND

13 Commuter Flows by Corridor - Verification

14 Travel Characteristics: Mode Share  Transit’s mode share has probably increased  Transit accounts for about 30% of Park and Ride demand Source: 2000 Census Transportation Planning Package

15 CATMA Mode Shares – A Target for Chittenden County

16 Demand versus Supply

17 Preliminary Observations  Inventory & Performance  Limited intercept facilities  Good visibility except: — Exit 10/Waterbury, Bristol, Gilbane, North Ave  Safety (7 of 19 are near HCLs)  Minimal congestion except: — Exit 10/Waterbury, Richmond, Exit 19/St. Albans, Exit 7/Berlin  Good multi-modal access  Location with high occupancies and minimal room for expansion — Exit 11/Richmond, Exit 19/St. Albans, Exit18 Georgia  Travel Characteristics  Overall – 64% of Chittenden County employees live in the County  Significant in-bound commuter flows  Transit riders are an important user of park-and-rides (30%)  Higher car-pool mode shares than rest of state  North Corridor houses the largest number of employees & has the highest percentage of car-poolers  Biggest gap between car-poolers and spaces occurs in the North  Park and ride facilities need to be better located to better serve demand

18 NEXT STEP: Goals and Objectives  EXAMPLES….  Locate facilities to meet demand  Locate and design facilities consistent with local land use plans  Serve multiple uses  Address safety and congestion issues at existing locations  Design and locate facilities to provide seamless transitions between all modes  Incorporate technology (traveler information)  Incorporate landscaping and public art  Minimize capital and operating costs  Seek public and private funding

19 Questions and Comments  Do you have any issues and concerns about existing facilities?  What types of services or amenities are important?  Do we need more park and ride facilities? If yes, do you have a location in mind?  What goals should be included into the plan?