Legal problems as Essential Tools for Public Policy Mindy Sweeney.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
CH THE SUPREME COURT AMERICAN GOVERNMENT.
Advertisements

Oregon’s Smoking Policy Disclosure Law An opportunity to educate about the benefits of no-smoking policies.
The Intersection of the law and the 3 Branches of Government
Pre-emption and Local Control Bill Roach, Office of the Attorney General Threase Harms-Hassoun, CAFE Iowa CAN.
Protecting Children and Families from Tobacco: What is preemption? Thanks to: Donald A. Potts, MD, Independence, MO Professor Emeritus, UMKC School of.
Presented by: Jennifer Cofer – American Lung Association (ALA) Claudia Flores Rodas – The Campaign for Tobacco-Free Kids (CTFK)
Smoke Free Mecklenburg Good for Health. Good for Business.
Presentation to Spark NH July 27, 2012 Jack Lightfoot, Child and Family Services Based on materials from NH Center for Nonprofits Alliance for Justice.
Recent Initiatives to Control Contraband: US & NY 2nd Bi-National Conference on Contraband Micah Berman, J.D. Director, Center for Public Health and Tobacco.
Advocacy fundamentals great lakes alliance region.
Review 1.What is the primary goal of Interest Groups? 2.Give 3 reasons behind the growth of Interest Groups in the United States 3.What are the reasons.
Article III of the Constitution
Lawmaking Chapter 2 Notes.
Public Health Prevails Over Preemption in South Carolina
GA’s first constitution was a provisional government called
Form of Government 1 Responsibilities of the Strong Mayor drafted by the City Attorney’s Office December 2010.
Model Ordinance Language for Smokefree Success Maggie Mahoney, JD Tobacco Control Legal Consortium Bronson Frick Americans for Nonsmokers’
The Supreme Court at Work. Basic Facts About the Supreme Court 9 Justices on the Court Each “term” begins first Monday in October and lasts until they.
Supreme Court American Government. The Court  The Supreme Court is the ultimate court of the land  There are 9 judges that make up the Supreme Court.
Smoke-Free Opportunities in Condominiums and Coops Change is in the Air.
Our Government in Action
FEDERAL COURTS AND KANSAS STATE COURTS By: Alisha Talsma All information obtained from Clack, G. (Ed.).(2004).Outline of the American Legal System(5 th.
The Judicial Branch Federal Courts Today in Class Take out your quick and dirty notes (homework from last night) Take your phone and sign on to socrative.com.
Chapter Two The Texas Constitution. Copyright © Houghton Mifflin Company. All rights reserved. 2-2 The Beginning Any legislative member introduces a joint.
Washington Communities for Tobacco Prevention Spokane Regional Health District Board of Health September 27, 2012.
Judicial Do you Remember What is the highest court in the Land? What is the highest court in the Land? Who appoints the justices to the Supreme Court,
Charter Review Recommendations - 1 Presentation Title Subtitle (optional) Date Vancouver City Council Workshop/Public Hearing Staff, Title Charter Review.
Last Topic - Constitutions of United States and its silent Features Silent Features 1.Preamble 2. Introduction and Evolution 3. Sources 4. Significance.
Campaign Success: Focus on Employees and their Health Dawn Berney, MPA Wisconsin Public Health and Health Policy Institute Teresa Ryan, BS Tobacco-Free.
1 MO Constitution Bowl Questions Question: Setting are two clicks for question. Answer: There are two clicks before answer.
Elections in Oregon Produced by the League of Women Voters® of Oregon Education Fund.
The U.S. Supreme Court. U.S. Supreme Court Today  Chief Justice John Roberts, Jr.  Associate Justices: ANTONIN SCALIA ANTHONY M. KENNEDY CLARENCE THOMAS.
THE US SUPREME COURT March 10, ORIGINAL v APPELLATE (1.) A COURTS AUTHORITY TO HEAR AND RULE ON A CASE FIRST (2.) A COURT THAT HEARS A CASE AFTER.
MS’s State and Local Government
Georgia’s General Assembly  Meets each year for a 40 day session that starts the 2 nd Monday in January.  Can pass legislation on taxes, education, contracts,
Smokefree Legislation Success from the Ground Up MICHAEL C. CALDWELL, MD, MPH Past President, National Association of County & City Health Officials Commissioner,
ELECTIONS IN OREGON Produced by the League of Women Voters® of Oregon Education Fund.
A View From Above: The National Perspective on Becoming Smokefree American Public Health Association Conference November 8, 2006 Cynthia Hallett, MPH Executive.
Vocab Declaration of Rights- Similar to the Bill of Rights, it outlines the rights of all NC citizens General Assembly- Head of the Legislative Branch,
The Federal Court System Chapter 18. Section 1: The National Judiciary The Creation of a National Judiciary Articles of Confederation  no national courts.
Implementation of the Massachusetts Smoke-free Workplace Law American Public Health Association November 8, 2006.
Discussion of Ethics & Campaign Finance Reform Packet Presented by Thomas B. Drage, Jr., County Attorney, and Dana Crosby, Assistant County Attorney June.
PRECINCT DELEGATES The most important elected official.
The Judicial Branch The Supreme Court and other federal courts.
Illinois Government Legislative Executive Judicial.
The Tobacco Technical Assistance Consortium What is TTAC? What Does It Do?
No Smoking in the Country? Getting Smokefree Laws in Rural America Sherry L. Tomasky, MA American Cancer Society Syracuse, NY.
Implementing the Clean Indoor Air Act (CIAA) BOCC Briefing January 29, 2008.
Public Hearing on the Red Light Camera Ordinance Presented by Dana Crosby, Assistant County Attorney July 13, 2010 Board of County Commissioners.
NCTOH 11/021 Alliance Members Public Health and Community Advocates Business Owners & LAW ENFORCEMENT Theresa Boschert,J.D. BREATH.
The Judicial Branch The Supreme Court and other federal courts.
Legal Resources for Tobacco Control Advocates Kerry Cork, Staff Attorney Tobacco Control Legal Consortium.
3/9/20161 Introduction to Law. 3/9/20162 Intro to Law Laws reflect life Laws reflect life Laws reflect our values and morals. Right from Wrong Laws reflect.
Goal 5 Political and Legal Systems and the Balance of Competing Interests and Conflicts.
What’s the Law Got to Do With It? How and When to Work with Lawyers for Policy Change National Conference on Tobacco or Health San Francisco 11/20/02.
Smoke-free Casinos: The Colorado Experience Kimberly Hills Executive Director Colorado Tobacco Education and Prevention Alliance (CTEPA)
CLEAN INDOOR AIR & HEALTH PROTECTION CLEAN INDOOR AIR & HEALTH PROTECTION Amendment of Ch July 10, 2012 City Council Meeting - Smoking Regulations.
Intro to the Appellate Process When a party loses at trial they have the right to appeal the decision. An appeal is always about whether the law was correctly.
The Judicial Branch “The judicial Power of the United States shall be vested in one supreme Court, and in such inferior Courts as the Congress may from.
Progress Against Preemption: Developments in the Fight to Restore Local Control Liz Williams, Project Manager Americans for Nonsmokers’ Rights
Implementing an Effective Sustainability Plan
POLITICS IN ACTION PART 2
Our Government in Action
State Government.
American Government The Federal Judiciary.
NEW YORK STATE-Government in Albany
Government in Georgia.
Magruder’s American Government
Interest Group Tactics
INITIATIVE CASE STUDY INITIATIVE 940.
Presentation transcript:

Legal problems as Essential Tools for Public Policy Mindy Sweeney

Republican Governor elected on anti-tax 400 House Members 281-R, 119-D 24 Senate Members 18-R, 6-D

 March 12, 2002, Colebrook passed a warrant article for clean indoor air. The article followed the same model as the Keene ordinance, no smoking in restaurants with the exemption for those establishments with cocktail lounges, so long as they have floor to ceiling walls and a door that separates the lounge from the rest of the restaurant, and they install a separate ventilation system.  The vote passed with 71 to 45

April 9 th there was a public hearing on the implementation of the article. Opposition spoke and convinced the town selectmen for a second town vote on the issue after threatening they could petition the Superior Court for a special town meeting. An informational public hearing was organized for May 14 th and a special town meeting was set for May 29 th at which a vote by the towns people would take place again.

 During the time before the second vote, SFNHA worked with the locals to provide a letter from Dr. Robert Soucy (the town health officer and physician who introduced the article) to all registered voters.  Our contract grassroots person from ACS did a training with local folks and youth to help prepare them for the May 14 th public hearing.

SFNHA paid for CDC ads to run in the local papers and sent two postcard mailings.

May 29 th, 2003 the town had their special town meeting and voted 262 to 106 to keep the warrant article.

August 16, 2002 – the town was given notice from Coos Superior Court that they were being sued by the Colebrook House, a local restaurant, over the ordinance. A hearing was set for October 31, 2002.

The Town of Colebrook The Colebrook House In the right corner, we have In the left corner, we have

The town hired Sheehan, Phinney and Bass, an expensive law firm in Concord who had strong links to the tobacco industry, to represent them. Their affiliate Sheehan, Phinney Capital Group lobby for Philip Morris U.S.A.

 In February 2003, The Colebrook House filed an appeal to the NH Supreme Court.  The NH Supreme Court accepted the case in March 2003 and set a date of April 18th for the plaintiff to file their brief, and a date of May 18th for the defendant to file their brief.

 With strong support from American’s for Nonsmokers’ Rights, the Tobacco Technical Assistance Consortium (TTAC) were able to offer financial support to write an amicus brief in support of the town of Colebrook.  TTAC also put us in touch with the Tobacco Control Resource Center, located at Northeastern Law School, who actually wrote the amicus brief.

 On May 18th, 2003, SFNHA had the Tobacco Control Resource Center (Bob Kline, Northeastern School of Law) submit an amicus brief in support of the town.  The Tobacco Control Resource Center also located an attorney willing to deliver the brief to the court.

Seven Organizations signed onto the amicus brief 1.American Lung Association of NH 2.American Cancer Society 3.American Heart Association of NH 4.Smoke-Free NH Alliance 5.NH Public Health Association 6.NH Medical Society 7.Tobacco Control Resource Center

Oral arguments were heard on July 10 th, 2003 by the NH Supreme Court judges. 15 minutes were given to each side and the judges asked questions.

The court had 2 questions: Does the NH Indoor Smoking Act set a floor or a ceiling with respect to the regulation of smoking in restaurants? What was the Legislature’s intent in including provision 77 in the Indoor Smoking Act?

On August 19, 2003, a verdict was returned on the case in favor of the Colebrook House. The Court ruled that the current NH Indoor Smoking Act does preempt local communities from passing stronger restrictions than the state law.

As a result of the Supreme Court Ruling, every city in NH lost their authority to enforce any restrictions stronger than the state law. SFNHA & its partners have developed a strategy to strengthen the current NH Indoor Smoking Act and include anti-preemptive language.

Americans for Nonsmokers Rights TTAC Northeastern School of Law Tobacco Resource Control Center