ISO 25964: a standard in support of interoperability Stella G Dextre Clarke Project Leader, ISO NP 25964.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Stella G Dextre Clarke Project Leader, ISO NP 25964
Advertisements

Thesaurus speed dating conclusions. The ideal thesaurus… …is tailor-made for the special needs of its user community. In other words, it is different.
Planning controlled vocabularies for the UK public sector Stella G Dextre Clarke Consultant to Office of the e-Envoy.
BS 8723 advances to encompass interoperability Stella G Dextre Clarke Convenor, IDT/2/2 Working Group of BSI.
BS 8723 : a new British Standard for structured vocabularies Stella G Dextre Clarke Information Consultant.
Thesauri, interoperability and the role of ISO 25964
Update on BS 8723 and ISO NP Stella G Dextre Clarke Convenor, IDT/2/2 Working Group of BSI and Project Leader for ISO NP
ISO – plans and progress towards the revised international standard for thesauri Stella G Dextre Clarke Project Leader, ISO NP
Advanced Searching Engineering Village.
6. Applying metadata standards: Controlled vocabularies and quality issues Metadata Standards and Applications Workshop.
Applying ISO25964 to thesaurus mapping and other forms of linkage Stella Dextre Clarke Convenor, ISO TC46/SC9 WG8 1.
Thesauri, Terminologies and the Semantic Web
Standards for networked knowledge organisation systems Ron Davies European Library Automation Group Bucharest, April 2006.
SKOS and Other W3C Vocabulary Related Activities Gail Hodge Information International Assoc. NKOS Workshop Denver, CO June 10, 2005.
Thesaurus Design and Development
A Registry for controlled vocabularies at the Library of Congress
1 Languages for aboutness n Indexing languages: –Terminological tools Thesauri (CV – controlled vocabulary) Subject headings lists (CV) Authority files.
Practical approaches to standardizing vocabularies: the Cultural Heritage experience. Phil Carlisle English Heritage National Monuments Record and European.
Thesaurusmanagement Quickstart Introduction. What are controlled vocabularies? organized arrangement of words and phrases used to index content and/or.
1/ 27 The Agriculture Ontology Service Initiative APAN Conference 20 July 2006 Singapore.
PREMIS Tools and Services Rebecca Guenther Network Development & MARC Standards Office, Library of Congress NDIIPP Partners Meeting July 21,
Information Extraction with Linked Life Data 19/04/2011.
9/10/20151 SKOS. 9/10/20152 SKOS Describes thesauruses and taxonomies Properties: broader, narrower, subject, related Classes: Concept, Collection
Terminology services and the DDC: the High-Level Thesaurus and beyond Presented to the symposium Dewey goes Europe: on the use and development of the Dewey.
Rutherford Appleton Laboratory SKOS Ecoterm 2006 Alistair Miles CCLRC Rutherford Appleton Laboratory Semantic Web Best Practices and Deployment.
Indexing Knowledge Daniel Vasicek 2014 March 27 Introduction Basic topic is : All Human Knowledge Who Cares? Simple Examples.
A J Miles Rutherford Appleton Laboratory SKOS Standards and Best Practises for USING Knowledge Organisation Systems ON THE Semantic Web NKOS workshop ECDL.
The Use and Development of Object Name Thesauri Phil Carlisle.
AthenaPlus: WP4 Eva Coudyzer Koninklijke Musea voor Kunst en Geschiedenis Europeana Overlegplatform, 7 juni 2013.
Economic Botany Mark Jackson Giardino d’Inverno 16:00-17:30TDWG 2013 Florence.
Biosafety Clearing House Training Workshop December, 2008 Bangkok.
Multilingual Information Exchange APAN, Bangkok 27 January 2005
Vocabularies in the VO Alasdair J G Gray Norman Gray Iadh Ounis.
Nancy Lawler U.S. Department of Defense ISO/IEC Part 2: Classification Schemes Metadata Registries — Part 2: Classification Schemes The revision.
D4: SKOS and HIVE—Enhancing the Creation, Design and Flow of Information Speakers: Hollie White Jane Greenberg Coordinator: Alan Keely.
1 Issues in Reusing and Sharing the Content of Thesauri and Taxonomies in OOR Marcia Zeng NKOS (Networked Knowledge Organization Systems/Services) My participating.
In pursuit of interoperability: Can we standardize mapping types? Stella G Dextre Clarke Project Leader, ISO NP
Themes Architecture Content Metadata Interoperability Standards Knowledge Organisation Systems Use and Users Legal and Economic Issues The Future.
ISO : a new standard for development of thesauri and exchange of thesaurus data Stella G Dextre Clarke and Johan De Smedt.
MD9.6 Release: Highlights Increased the character limit for all URL resources to 600 characters. Data_Center/Service_Provider Data_Set_Citation/Service_Citation.
Incorporating ARGOVOC in DSpace-based Agricultural Repositories Dr. Devika P. Madalli & Nabonita Guha Documentation Research & Training Centre Indian Statistical.
Coastal Atlas Interoperability - Ontologies (continued) Luis Bermudez Stephanie Watson Marine Metadata Interoperability Initiative 1.
Overview of ISO NP Stella G Dextre Clarke Convenor, IDT/2/2 Working Group of BSI and Project Leader for ISO NP
The UNESCO Thesaurus Meeting for Managers of UNESCO Documentation Networks Meron Ewketu UNESCO Library June
Coastal Atlas Interoperability - Ontologies (Advanced topics that we did not get to in detail) Luis Bermudez Stephanie Watson Marine Metadata Interoperability.
Evolving MARC 21 for the future Rebecca Guenther CCS Forum, ALA Annual July 10, 2009.
PREMIS Controlled vocabularies Rebecca Guenther Sr. Networking & Standards Specialist, Library of Congress PREMIS Implementation Fair San.
Update on ISO 25964: Thesauri and interoperability with other vocabularies Reported by Doug Tudhope TPDL – – NKOS workshop 1.
Controlled Vocabulary & Thesaurus Design Resources & Future Directions.
It’s all semantics! The premises and promises of the semantic web. Tony Ross Centre for Digital Library Research, University of Strathclyde
SKOS. Ontologies Metadata –Resources marked-up with descriptions of their content. No good unless everyone speaks the same language; Terminologies –Provide.
Oreste Signore- Quality/1 Amman, December 2006 Standards for quality of cultural websites Ministerial NEtwoRk for Valorising Activities in digitisation.
Types of mapping recommended in ISO 25964, and the question of reciprocity Stella G Dextre Clarke Project Leader, ISO NP
APS Taxonomy Project Arthur Smith, American Physical Society April 2014.
FSR, Feb 2014, Rome Which knowledge organization systems for conceptual interoperability? Claudio Gnoli ISKO Italy.
Trait ontology approach Marie-Angélique LAPORTE NCEAS June 7 th 2010.
Margherita Sini, FAO 1 / 19 Using RSS to Share KOS Metadata Margherita Sini, Gauri Salokhe IV Ecoterm Vienna, Austria April.
Controlled Vocabulary & Thesaurus Design Associative Relationships & Thesauri.
“New Dimensions in KOS” CENDI/NKOS Workshop September 11, 2008 Washington, DC, USA An international conference to share and advance knowledge and experience.
A Portrait of the Semantic Web in Action Jeff Heflin and James Hendler IEEE Intelligent Systems December 6, 2010 Hyewon Lim.
OWL Web Ontology Language Summary IHan HSIAO (Sharon)
Charles Copp, Neil Caithness & Richard White.  Evaluation, selection and acquisition of existing thesauri  Thesaurus modelling - logical and physical.
Charlyn P. Salcedo Instructor Types of Indexing Languages.
1 How do we describe something? n What something is about? –What the content of an object is “about”? n Different methods (Wilson, 1968) –counting terms.
Information Organization
Diane Vizine-Goetz OCLC Research
From a thesaurus standard to a general knowledge organization standard?! 04/12/2018.
PREMIS Tools and Services
Taxonomy of public services
Cultivating Semantics for Data in Agriculture and Nutrition
Presentation transcript:

ISO 25964: a standard in support of interoperability Stella G Dextre Clarke Project Leader, ISO NP 25964

Overview What is ISO 25964? How does it support interoperability Recommended types of mapping The need for compound equivalence mappings Brief comparison with SKOS

What is ISO 25964? ISO 25964: Thesauri and interoperability with other vocabularies Part 1: Thesauri for information retrieval Part 2: Interoperability with other vocabularies It updates ISO 2788 and ISO 5964 Part 1, to be published in 2011, covers monolingual and multilingual thesauri Part 2, to be published in 2012, covers mapping between thesauri and other types of vocabulary information retrieval seen as main application; mapping applies to index terms or to search terms

ISO 2788 (1986) ISO 5964 (1985) + New content, adapted from BS ISO Part 1 (expected 2011) ISO Part 2 (expected 2012) extensive revision

How ISO evolved from BS 8723, with much reworking BS 8723 Part 1 Part 2Part 5Part 4Part 3 ISO Part 1Part 2

What’s in Part 1? All that was in ISO 2788 and ISO 5964, revised and extended to include: thesaurus content and construction, mono- or multi- lingual. guidance on applying facet analysis to thesauri guidance on managing thesaurus development and maintenance functional requirements for software to manage thesauri a data model and derived XML schema

How does Part 1 support interoperability? Standardization of syntactics and semantics, especially in the relationships between concepts, promotes interoperability between thesauri Implementation of the multilingual features promotes interoperability across languages The ISO data model is broadly compatible with SKOS, which enables publication on the Semantic Web. Greater compatibility awaits SKOS extension to allow for compound equivalence, arrays, node labels and concept groups.

What’s in Part 2? Models for mapping Guidelines for mapping Recommendations on mapping types How to handle pre-coordination Mapping to vocabularies other than thesauri: classification schemes, file plans, taxonomies, subject heading schemes, ontologies, synonym rings, terminologies and name authority lists Brief guidance on handling mappings data

What do we mean by “Models for mapping”? E F G H AB CD PQRS

And what do we recommend? E F G H AB CD PQRS

How does Part 2 support interoperability? The focus is on mapping, defined as the “process of establishing relationships between the concepts of one vocabulary and those of another” Recommended types of mapping are based on the standard internal relationship types, basically: equivalence, hierarchical and associative Greater differentiation of mapping types is allowed, but is optional, to avoid complexity in simple applications

ISO mapping types with examples Basic mapping types: Equivalence Laptop computers EQ Notebook computers Hierarchical Roads NM Streets; Streets BM Roads Associative e-Learning RM Distance education “Exact” or “Inexact” equivalence Aubergines =EQ Egg-plants Horticulture ~EQ Gardening

Subdivisions of ISO mapping types Basic mapping types: Equivalence Simple Compound Intersecting compound equivalence Cumulative compound equivalence Hierarchical Broader Narrower Associative “Exact” or “Inexact” applies to simple but not compound equivalence

Equivalence subdivisions with examples Simple Laptop computers EQ Notebook computers Compound Intersecting compound equivalence Women executives EQ Women + Executives Cumulative compound equivalence Inland waterways EQ rivers | canals

Intersecting versus cumulative equivalence

Do we really need compound equivalence? Try a practical example Thesaurus A Animal products Edible fats and oils Fats Oils Vegetable products Thesaurus B Fats and oils Animal fats Butter Margarine Suet Vegetable fats Vegetable oils Linseed oil Olive oil Sunflower oil

Mappings from A to B Animal products NM Animal fats Edible fats and oils NM Butter Margarine Olive oil Suet Sunflower oil Fats EQ Animal fats | Vegetable fats Oils NM Vegetable oils Vegetable products EQ Vegetable fats | Vegetable oils

Mappings from B to A Fats and oils EQ Fats | Oils Animal fats EQ Fats + Animal products Butter BM Animal products Edible fats and oils Fats Margarine BM Animal products Edible fats and oils Fats Suet BM Animal products Edible fats and oils Fats Vegetable fats EQ Fats + Vegetable products Vegetable oils EQ Oils + Vegetable products Linseed oil BM Oils Vegetable products Olive oil BM Edible fats and oils Oils Vegetable products Sunflower oil BM Edible fats and oils Oils Vegetable products

cf. SKOS (Simple Knowledge Organization System) data model Basic mapping “properties” skos:closeMatch skos:exactMatch skos:relatedMatch skos:broadMatch skos:narrowMatch

Comparison of mapping types SKOSISO skos:closeMatchEquivalence skos:exactMatchExact equivalence skos:relatedMatchAssociative skos:broadMatchHierarchical (broader) skos:narrowMatch Hierarchical (narrower) No provisionCompound equivalence

Want a copy of ISO ? Publication is expected very soon. Order it from your national standards body (e.g. BSI, DIN, NISO) We don’t know what price ISO will put on it, but it is unlikely to be cheap. However, the XML schema for exchange of thesaurus data is in an Annex which will be available online without charge or password control. Go to

Want a copy of ISO ? A draft will be issued later in 2011, “ISO DIS ”, with the hope of attracting comments from potential users The official way to get it is through your national standards body (e.g. BSI, DIN) Distribution policies vary from one country to another; but for a couple of months the draft should be available online free of charge and free of passwords, on the BSI site. Send me an and I’ll alert you when the DIS is released.