LANSCE Update for BESAC July 23, 2002 Paul W. Lisowski LANSCE Division Leader Los Alamos National Laboratory.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES Environment, Safety and Health Steve Hoey, ESH Manager NSLS-II Project Advisory Committee Meeting March 29, 2012.
Advertisements

Recommendations Ward Plummer BESAC Subpanel Review of IPNS and LANSCE/Lujan Center Recommendations Ward Plummer Washington, D. C. December 11, 2000.
1 BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES Procurement Dave Paveglio, Contract Administrator NSLS-II PAC Meeting May 25, 2007.
An Advanced Linear Accelerator Facility for Microelectronic Dose Rate Studies P.E. Sokol and S.Y.Lee Indiana University.
LANSCE Short-Pulse Target Operation High-power Targetry for Future Accelerators September 11, June 2003 Richard Werbeck Los Alamos National Laboratory.
Los Alamos National Laboratory PWL 1-8/2/01 LANSCE Status and Progress Update Presentation to Basic Energy Sciences Advisory Committee August 2, 2001 Paul.
NPDgamma Liquid Hydrogen Target Safety Review Project and Safety At LANL November 29-30, 2005.
Overview of the ARCS Project Plan: The View at One Year Doug Abernathy ARCS Instrument Scientist ARCS IDT Meeting Lujan Center, LANL September 30, 2002.
Geoff Pile FAC Review - Undulator 12 November 2008 LCLS Undulator System Overview and Fabrication Geoff Pile.
Accelerator Systems Division FACET Project Management John Seeman for the FACET Study Group PPA Directorate Stanford Linear Accelerator Center DOE FACET.
Office of Science U.S. Department of Energy U.S. Department of Energy’s Office of Science Dr. Raymond L. Orbach Under Secretary for Science U.S. Department.
CD FY08 Tactical Plan Status FY08 Tactical Plan Status Report for Network Infrastructure Upgrades Rick Finnegan April 22, 2008.
NPDgamma Liquid Hydrogen Target Safety Review At LANL November 29-30, 2005.
Linac Front-End R&D --- Systems Integration and Meson Lab Setup
October 24, 2000Milestones, Funding of USCMS S&C Matthias Kasemann1 US CMS Software and Computing Milestones and Funding Profiles Matthias Kasemann Fermilab.
Introduction and Charge to the Review of ESS Target building and Instrument Hall design requirements Roland Garoby November 2014, Lund
Robert Haight Los Alamos National Laboratory IAEA Technical Meeting on IFMIF FZK Karlsruhe October 4-6, 2005 LANSCE Nuclear Data Measurement Capabilities.
NuMI NuMI Overview NBI 2002 S. Childress (FNAL) 14 March ‘02 NuMI / MINOS Overview.
In-Kind Contribution Management Update Allen Weeks March 20, Lund.
A U.S. Department of Energy Office of Science Laboratory Operated by The University of Chicago Argonne National Laboratory Office of Science U.S. Department.
BESAC Subpanel Review of IPNS and LANSCE/Lujan Center Washington, D. C. December 11, 2000 IntroductionWard Plummer, Chair Evaluation Procedure &Jack E.
Slide 1 6-Nov-98PHOBOS Review: Cost & Schedule Cost & Schedule S. Steadman, MIT PHOBOS Cost & Schedule Review Technical Advisory Committee BNL November.
Facility Evaluation Andrew Taylor BESAC Subpanel Review of IPNS and LANSCE/Lujan Center BESAC Sub-Panel Review of IPNS and LANSCE/LUJAN Facility Evaluation.
January LEReC Review 12 – 13 January 2015 Low Energy RHIC electron Cooling Kerry Mirabella Cost, Schedule, Personnel.
LANSCE Update for BESAC February 26, 2002 Paul W. Lisowski LANSCE Division Leader Los Alamos National Laboratory.
CD FY08 Tactical Plan Status FY08 Tactical Plan Status Report for Network Infrastructure Upgrades Rick Finnegan April 22, 2008.
ISOLDE: Status report building th ISCC meeting CERN, 22 October 2013 Maria Borge, Erwin Siesling.
Operated by Los Alamos National Security, LLC for the U.S. Department of Energy’s NNSA U N C L A S S I F I E D Slide 1 From US Navy Mate to Division Leader.
Recommendations of the Programme Advisory Committee for Condensed Matter Physics 19 th meeting, November 2003 Wojciech Nawrocik JINR Scientific Council,
The Materials Test Station: An Accelerator Driven Neutron Source for Fusion Materials Testing Eric Pitcher Presented at: Sixth US-PRC Magnetic Fusion Collaboration.
F Proton Plan Eric Prebys, FNAL Accelerator Division.
January LEReC Review 12 – 13 January 2015 Low Energy RHIC electron Cooling Kerry Mirabella Cost, Schedule, Personnel.
LIGO-G M Organization and Budget Gary Sanders NSF Operations Review Caltech, February 26, 2001.
BESAC Workshop on Opportunities for Catalysis/Nanoscience May 14-16, 2002 William S. Millman Basic Energy Sciences May 14, 2002 Catalysis and Nanoscience.
HWDB: Operations at the Spallation Neutron Source Workshop on Accelerator Operations August 6-10, 2012 Glen D. Johns Accelerator Operations Manager.
1 Status of FNPB Geoff Greene / Nadia Fomin University of Tennessee.
Response to TAC8 and Annual Review Recommendations John Haines Head of Target Division April 2, 2014.
ECOOL Meeting 03/26/10 1 Low-E cooler baseline decisions: 1.FNAL’s cooling section “as is” – with weak solenoids, correctors, etc. (to prevent over focusing.
Welcome and Presentation of Charge Steve Holmes Accelerator Advisory Committee ( May 10-12, 2005.
1 How Can We Get More Neutrons? Upgrade Paths for the EDM Geoff Greene University of Tennessee /Oak Ridge National Laboratory Oct 2006.
Proton Improvement Plan Bill Pellico April 19, 2013 NOvA collaboration Meeting Bill Pellico NOvA.
1 AGS RSVP Review 4-5 November 2004 Upgrade and Operations Cost & Schedule Summary Philip Pile Collider-Accelerator Department 4 Nov 2004.
O AK R IDGE N ATIONAL L ABORATORY U. S. D EPARTMENT OF E NERGY The Spallation Neutron Source Project: Update T. E. Mason Oak Ridge National Laboratory.
Texas Nodal Program ERCOT Readiness Update TPTF June 23, 2008.
1 FLITECAM December 11, 2008 Ian McLean (Principal Investigator) UCLA Infrared Laboratory University of California, Los Angeles.
Power Upgrade Project SNS September 21-22, TBM Cost Estimate Cost Estimate Schedule Approach Tom Mann October 27, 2005.
OSTP and Neutron Science OSTP is authorized to (under PL , National Science and Technology Policy, Organization, and Priorities Act of 1976): Advise.
U N C L A S S I F I E D Operated by the Los Alamos National Security, LLC for the DOE/NNSA Los Alamos National Laboratory Maintenance Work Planner Training.
1 BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES NSLS-II Project Status Steve Dierker Associate Laboratory Director for Light Sources NSLS-II Project Director Accelerator.
Operated by Los Alamos National Security, LLC for the U.S. Department of Energy’s NNSA U N C L A S S I F I E D Slide 1 Tested by Fire – How two recent.
Assembly 12/14/06 #1 Assembly and Commissioning Paul Huffman.
ESS | title of presentation | 2012-xx-xx | name of presenter Roles and Responsibilities sub title.
European Spallation Source Overview and Status Technical Advisory Committee 1-2 April 2015 James H. Yeck ESS CEO & Director General
RLSR 16/4/2015 UK Financial Plan & Risks. Content Finances – FY 2014/15 – Cost to Completion Risks – Top level to completion – R9 working space – Summary.
LCLS 2009 NSLS-II 2015 APS 1995 BES Light & Neutron Sources SPEAR ALS 1993 HFIR 2008 SNS
Nuclear Physics LOS ALAMOS NATIONAL LABORATORY 1 Line B preparations Hardware issues Install Fast Kicker (up to 200  C/sec). Reinstall Line B transport.
Operated by Los Alamos National Security, LLC for the U.S. Department of Energy’s NNSA U N C L A S S I F I E D Slide 1 Catastrophic Equipment Failure During.
Jefferson Lab Overview
Making Difficult Decisions in a Transparent Way –
Analyses to Support Waste Disposition of SNS Inner Reflector Plug
John T. Seeman DOE PEP-II Operations Review April 26, 2006
Strategic Planning Update
LANSCE Status and Progress Update
Mark McKinnon EVLA Project Manager
Nuclear Data Research at LANSCE with Possible Relevance to IFMIF
FY2018 LABORATORY CALENDAR
Imaging & Engineering STAP Meeting 12th-13th of April 2018
Spectroscopy STAP Meeting ESS, 8th of April 2019
Test Beamline System Requirements and Charge to PDR Committee
SNS-PPU upgrades the existing accelerator structure
Presentation transcript:

LANSCE Update for BESAC July 23, 2002 Paul W. Lisowski LANSCE Division Leader Los Alamos National Laboratory

CY2001 Run Cycle CY2002 Outage CY2002-CY2003 Run Cycle Summary Outline

Lujan Neutron Scattering Center Weapons Neutron Research Facility Proton Radiography 800 MeV Proton Linear Accelerator LANSCE is a unique multidisciplinary facility for science and technology with three operational user facilities

Lujan Center had a highly successful run cycle in 2001 Delivered 2499 hours, or 131% of our goal of 2735 hours at 75% availability Delivered an integrated charge of 83% of our goal with 54 µA average current Performed 113 user experiments with 91% reliability of beam delivery and over 95% instrument availability Supported 270 user visits, 150 unique users Commissioned five new scattering instruments and one nuclear science instrument; –SMARTS, HIPPO, PROTEIN, PHAROS (Rebuilt), and ASTERIX –DANCE Developed and implemented a new generation of data acquisition and chopper control systems. Obtained approval for actinide experiments. Lujan Center Materials Science Characterizing Components and Materials Plutonium Science Highlights:

LANSCE has established an operations schedule for that is similar to 2001 Major milestones for the CY2002 schedule –December 24, 2001Cease CY2001 operations –January 2, 2002Begin CY2002 outage (17 weeks) –April 22-23Materials Program Advisory Committee Review Meeting –June 1Schedule Published on Web –May 1, 2002Begin CY user facility turn-on (37 days) –May 27, 2002Begin Proton Radiography operations –June 3, 2002Begin Proton Storage Ring operations –June 19, 2002Begin WNR Low-power operations –July 7, 2002Begin Lujan Center tune-up –July 26, 2002Begin scheduled user facility operations –January 26, 2003Cease CY operations

The Lujan outage schedule in CY2002 was aggressive and completed in time to start user program Old Lujan Target removed and placed in storage as a low-current spare, and new Lujan Target installed Integrated shielding package installed on FPs 11, 12, 13 New redundant personnel protection system on all flight paths New mercury shutter reservoirs for older flight paths, with upgraded piping and sensor systems Computerized control of all shutters, with data available in the Central Control Room Data acquisition conversion of User Program instruments done ASTERIX instrument rebuilt NODF (Formerly Neutron Powder Diffractometer) upgrade underway NPD before major surgery FP 12 & 13 are ready for beam

The Mark-II TMRS design with stainless steel and beryllium reflectors is installed and operational at 100 µA Beam window and guard ring Middle beryllium reflector Upper SST reflector Lower flight path liners and water moderators Service Connections Beam Diagnostic Lower Be/SST composite reflector LH 2 Moderator Upper tungsten target 3m

We are expanding the size and quality of our user program consistent with our strategic plan and previous BESAC recommendations Deliver beam at 100 µA with >75% availability for 2616 hours for user program, supplemented by 336 hours for instrument tune-up and 384 hours of contingency Limit beam down-times longer than 8 hours to <10% of scheduled time Deliver 95% instrument reliability Increase sample environment support –11T Magnet –Cryofurnace –More staff support Increase user base * by 15% * Based on number of users on scheduled proposals in CY compared with users in CY2001 Number Year We made major progress in 2001 towards establishing a significant user base at Lujan Center

Rotation model for CY user program in neutron scattering maximizes the number of instruments NPD SMARTS HIPD HIPPO SCD FDS SPEAR LQD ASTERIX PROTEIN PHAROS Full Support for User Program 4 FTE 0.5 FTE Institutional & Friendly User Support

May Turn-on 1L Maintenance Lujan User Program Sole Use Contingency / Lab Closure 2003 Outage LANSCE will continue a predictable, repetitive 28-day operating cycle with contingency in CY JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctober NovemberDecember January Lujan Tune Up WNR User Program WNR Low Power A 28-day cycle Lujan/WNR Sole Use Lujan Target Maintenance Sole Use Accelerator Maintenance LANSCE Operating Schedule for CY

Beam delivery to Lujan will increase 25% after installation of a switchyard kicker system during the CY2003 outage Target 4 90L 30L 15L 15R 30R 60R 90R Target 2 120L Weapons Neutron Research Facility Area C Line B Ultra-Cold Neutrons (future) Proton Radiography Area A (inactive) Lujan Center ER-1 Target ER A/B H+ Source H- Source Isotope Production Facility (construction) Drift Tube Linear Accelerator Line D Side-Coupled Linear Accelerator PSR

We are aggressively implementing the November 2000 BESAC recommendations in our operations and governance Provide a single Steward of this facility Develop an adequately-funded, actionable implementation plan for FY2002, sustainable over the period Specify a ramp-up schedule for LANSCE/Lujan to full functional status by FY 2003 Increase the LANSCE/Lujan user base to ~1000 by 2006 Responsibility assigned to NNSA, Executive Council established Completed externally and internally peer-reviewed bottom- up cost estimate for LANSCE Completed as part of cost estimate. Funding increment of $10M in 2003 LANSCE operations budget Began process with successful CY2001 operating cycle user visits, 150 unique users RecommendationAction

Summary In 2001 LANSCE completed an excellent scientific program at all facilities with the largest number of users to date Proposals for LANSCE use in 2002 were evaluated and an operations schedule was developed using lessons learned from 2001 LANSCE completed an aggressive, well-managed outage on schedule and is operational The Mark-I Lujan target-moderator-reflector system has been moved to storage and is available as a 55 µA backup The Mark-II Lujan target-moderator-reflector system has been installed and is operational at 100 µA The Switchyard Kicker project is proceeding well and the equipment will be installed and commissioned in 2003 The Lujan Center user program will start on July 26, 2002 and run until January 26, 2002.

Fig. 8 in OSTP Report on Needs of Major Neutron Scattering Facilities & Instruments in the US (FY00). OSTP report uses ~4, actual data is 6.3 (25 users/4 instruments run in 2000) Instrument throughput: users per instrument in FY2001

Fig. 12 in OSTP Report on Needs of Major Neutron Scattering Facilities & Instruments in the US (FY00). OSTP report indicates ~38, actual data is 21. Number of research facility support staff (includes staff that support use and instrument ops, but excludes support of source operations)

Fig. 13 in OSTP Report on Needs of Major Neutron Scattering Facilities & Instruments in the US (FY00). *Based on FY00 data from OSTP report. Research facility support staff per instrument in FY2001

Fig. 14 in OSTP Report on Needs of Major Neutron Scattering Facilities & Instruments in the US (FY00). *Based on FY01 and FY00 data from OSTP report. Users per research facility support staff member in FY2001

Fig. 16 in OSTP Report on Needs of Major Neutron Scattering Facilities & Instruments in the US (FY00). *Data based on FY01 and FY00 information provided in OSTP report. US neutron scattering users by field of research for FY2001.

Fig. 17 in OSTP Report on Needs of Major Neutron Scattering Facilities & Instruments in the US (FY00). *Data based on FY01 and FY00 information provided in OSTP report. Share of users at US neutron facilities by scientific field FY2001

Fig. 18 in OSTP Report on Needs of Major Neutron Scattering Facilities & Instruments in the US. *Data based on FY01 and FY00 information provided in OSTP report. Share of scientific field by users at each US facility in FY2001

Fig. 19 in OSTP Report on Needs of Major Neutron Scattering Facilities & Instruments in the US (FY00). *Data based on FY01 and FY00 information provided in OSTP report. Number of users by individual affiliation in FY2001