August 20, 20041 Learning-Centered Education Bob Lingard.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Collegial Coaching Rebecca Derenge Title I, Reading Coordinator Teamwork Collegial.doc.
Advertisements

A GUIDE TO CREATING QUALITY ONLINE LEARNING DOING DISTANCE EDUCATION WELL.
Purpose of Instruction
The Role of Academic Leadership in Student Success August 21, 2012 Deans and Department Chairs` Dialogue Southern Utah University Charles Schroeder, Consultant.
Comparison of Teacher-Centered and Learner-Centered Paradigms From Figure 1-2 in Huba and Freed, Learner-Centered Assessment on College Campuses: Shifting.
Comparison of Teacher-Centered and Learner-Centered Paradigms From Figure 1-2 in Huba and Freed, Learner-Centered Assessment on College Campuses: Shifting.
Teaching Methods Related to Student Progress in Lower-level STEM Courses Steve Benton, Ph.D. Senior Research Officer IDEA Emeritus Professor, Kansas State.
What are your students learning? Classroom Assessment Strategies Center for Teaching & Learning Oregon State University
NSF ADVANCE: Institutional Transformation for Faculty Diversity ADVANCE Faculty Work Life Survey: Comparison of Statistically Significant Gender Differences.
October 23, 2004 Using the Kolbe Conative Index ™ for Improving Retention of Computer Science Students Robert Lingard Elizabeth Berry Brenda Timmerman.
November 8, 2003 Assessment of Active Learning with Upper Division Computer Science Students Brenda Timmerman Robert Lingard California State University,
October 20, 2005 Using the Kolbe A ™ Conative Index to Study Retention of Computer Science Students Robert Lingard Brenda Timmerman Elizabeth Berry California.
2002 ASEE/IEEE FIE Conference1 Teaching Teamwork Skills in Software Engineering Based on an Understanding of Factors Affecting Group Performance Robert.
6/21/20151 Active Learning with Upper Division Computer Science Students Brenda Timmerman Robert Lingard G. Michael Barnes California State University,
Origins of the Gender Gap: Pre-College and College Influences on Differences Between Men and Women Linda J. Sax Casandra E. Harper University of California.
Comparison of Teacher-Centered and Learner-Centered Paradigms George Watson Institute for Transforming Undergraduate Education
1 Student Learning Assessment Assessment is an ongoing process aimed at understanding & improving student learning Formative Assessment – Ongoing feedback.
Managing Large Classes with Group Work
Experience in Applying Online Learning Techniques in Computer Science & Engineering Dr. Aiman H. El-Maleh Computer Engineering Department King Fahd University.
Colorado Learning About Science Survey for Experimental Physics Benjamin Zwickl, Heather Lewandowski & Noah Finkelstein University of Colorado Physics.
Responding to the challenges of internationalisation in an environment of change Hazel Horobin, Miyoung Oh, Chris Cutforth Faculty of Health and Wellbeing.
SLIDE 1 Innovations Conference March SLIDE 2 The National Lone Star Report Aligning Technology with Student Success.
Rediscovering Research: A Path to Standards Based Learning Authentic Learning that Motivates, Constructs Meaning, and Boosts Success.
DIXIE STATE UNIVERSITY The Faculty Role in Student Retention
Evaluation of a Laptop Program Deborah L. Lowther Steven M. Ross Gary R. Morrison.
Derek Herrmann & Ryan Smith University Assessment Services.
SENSE 2013 Findings for College of Southern Idaho.
Mountain View College Spring 2008 CCSSE Results Community College Survey of Student Engagement 2008 Findings.
Adding Challenge to Challenge and Engagement Assessment Committee February 7, 2006.
MARTIN COMMUNITY COLLEGE ACHIEVING THE DREAM COMMUNITY COLLEGES COUNT IIPS Conference Charlotte, North Carolina July 24-26, 2006 Session: AtD – Use of.
2009 National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE) Report Institutional Research & Information November 18, 2009.
SITE Conference – 3/ Successful Online Assessment, Evaluation, and Interaction Techniques Presented by: Dr. Barbara K.Mckenzie – Dept. of MIT, State.
Learning Communities in the Community College San Jose City College.
Robert W. Lingard California State University, Northridge EEET July 11, 2009.
Engineer Engineering Education Teamwork, Part 1 Coach Michael Hanyak Chemical Engineering Department Coach Daniel Hyde Computer Science Department.
A review of the last decade of research in problem-based learning Lauren E.M. Dahlquist.
Navigator of the SEAS An Experience In Three Acts And An Encore.
ENHANCING STUDENT ENGAGEMENT AT IWU DR. MARY ANN SEARLE VICE PRESIDENT FOR ENROLLMENT & STUDENT AFFAIRS.
2009 National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE) Report Institutional Research & Information November 18, 2009.
Teaching Thermodynamics with Collaborative Learning Larry Caretto Mechanical Engineering Department June 9, 2006.
Teaching in a Web-Based Distance Learning Environment: An Evaluation Summary Based on Four Courses Charles Graham, Joni M. Craner, Byung-ro Lim, & Kursat.
Learner-Centered Teaching In Engineering/Technology Classrooms Steven A. Freeman Iowa State University Center for Excellence in Learning and Teaching.
1 This CCFSSE Drop-In Overview Presentation Template can be customized using your college’s CCFSSE/CCSSE results. Please review the “Notes” section accompanying.
Evidence and Standard Two. The Big Picture The Big Picture Standard Two is about: Curriculum Curriculum Planned, overseen curriculum – with clear outcomes.
University Senate Meeting January 25, General Issues Required to report on 14 Standards, including all the Federal Requirements Core requirements:
Assessing Your Assessments: The Authentic Assessment Challenge Dr. Diane King Director, Curriculum Development School of Computer & Engineering Technologies.
The Art of Mixing Oil and Water: Assessment & Part-Time Faculty Presented to the 8 th Annual Western Region Assessment Conference, March 19, 2004 and to.
Intel ISEF Educator Academy Intel ® Education Programs 2013 Intel ISEF Educator Academy Phoenix, Arizona Action Plan – China 1.
April 8, 2004Washington University Teaching Center Self-Evaluation as an Instructor; Course Redesign Regina Frey, Director Washington University Teaching.
Engineering Education Research and the Scholarship of Teaching Engineering: An Initial Introduction Alisha A. Weathers Waller, Ph.D.
August 15th 2007 Assessment of Student Learning Outcomes by Kirby Hayes.
1 Results From UNCG’s Spring 1998 Sophomore Survey Office of Institutional Research September 1998 The University of North Carolina at Greensboro.
Building Learning Communities with Hybrid Courses NMC Online Conference on Social Computing November 2004 Robert Kaleta and Alan Aycock University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee.
The Gold Standard… Faculty are Key.  Annual Assessment based on  Address each SLO  Be specific, measurable, student- focused  Align the new.
Institutional Effectiveness: Sophomores’ Evaluations of UNC Charlotte Findings from the Sophomore Surveys Cathy Sanders Director of Assessment.
The Transformation of Undergraduate Education through Faculty Development and Course Design – Part 1 George Watson (with acknowledgement to.
 2005 Nancy Raulston, LLC. All rights reserved. (415) | | p e r s p e c t i v e 2 Creating an Effective.
Use of Surveys N J Rao and K Rajanikanth
RESULTS OF THE 2009 ADMINISTRATION OF THE COMMUNITYCOLLEGE SURVEY OF STUDENT ENGAGEMENT Office of Institutional Effectiveness, September 2009.
A Professional Development Series from the CDC’s Division of Population Health School Health Branch Professional Development 101: The Basics – Part 1.
CDIO: Overview, Standards, and Processes (Part 2) Doris R. Brodeur, November 2005.
The University of Texas-Pan American Susan Griffith, Ph.D. Executive Director National Survey of Student Engagement 2003 Results & Recommendations Presented.
+ A Case Study of Teaching Job Interviews in Introductory Public Speaking Chris Cruz-Boone California State University, Bakersfield College to Workplace:
National Survey of Student Engagement Executive Snapshot 2007.
Department of Political Science & Sociology North South University
Robert W. Lingard California State University, Northridge
Robert W. Lingard California State University, Northridge
Robert W. Lingard California State University, Northridge
The Heart of Student Success
Cooperative Learning Concepts
Presentation transcript:

August 20, Learning-Centered Education Bob Lingard

November 8, Learning-Centered Education Bob Lingard

3 Characteristics of Learning-Centered Education (Kay M. McClenney) Student participation in a diverse array of engaging learning experiences that are aligned with expected outcomes and designed in accord with good educational practice

4 Characteristics of Learning-Centered Education Clearly-defined outcomes for student learning Systematic assessment and documentation of student learning Institutional and individual reflection and action typically prompted and supported by data about student learning and institutional performance

5 Characteristics of Learning-Centered Education Emphasis on student learning in processes for recruitment, hiring, orientation, deployment, evaluation, and development of personnel Focus on learning consistently reflected in key institutional documents and policies, collegial effort, and leadership behavior

6 Examples of Learning- Centered Practices (Arizona University System)  Collaborative group learning, both inside and outside the classroom  Individual student research and discovery  Research and discovery by students and faculty together

7 Examples of Learning- Centered Practices  Problem-based inquiry learning  Student-faculty studio and performance activities  Asynchronous distance learning  Synchronous interactive distance learning  Service learning activities

8 Examples of Learning- Centered Practices  Hands-on, experimental learning activities  On-site field experiences  Self-paced tutorials

9 An Example (Think-Pair-Share) Students are given a problem/question to answer (E.g., What are the risks facing your team’s project?) They share their answer with one other person Finally, they get together with their team and arrive at a consensus

November 8, 2003 Assessment of Active Learning with Upper Division Computer Science Students Brenda Timmerman Robert Lingard California State University, Northridge 33 rd ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference

November 8, Active Learning Techniques Activities other than passive listening Short writing exercises minute papers, entrance and exit summaries Frequent class discussions Cooperative Learning Sharing information in groups or pairs Group projects – simple and complex

November 8, Alumni Survey Who were surveyed? All Computer Science Graduates from the last five years, 416 students What was asked? Questions about the respondents, gender, country of origin, etc Extent of their experience with active learning Usefulness of classes on the job Value of active learning techniques on the job

November 8, Course Usefulness

November 8, Ratings of Learning Styles

November 8, Value of Active Learning Techniques

November 8, US Born vs. Non US Born Ratings

November 8, Male vs. Female Ratings

November 8, Non US Male vs. Non US Female Ratings

November 8, Importance of Group Projects

November 8, Summary and Conclusions Encouraging results Student seem to feel that Active Learning is beneficial Improved communication skills Observed by instructors and claimed by students Women and students not born in the US rated active learning most valuable