Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

MARTIN COMMUNITY COLLEGE ACHIEVING THE DREAM COMMUNITY COLLEGES COUNT IIPS Conference Charlotte, North Carolina July 24-26, 2006 Session: AtD – Use of.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "MARTIN COMMUNITY COLLEGE ACHIEVING THE DREAM COMMUNITY COLLEGES COUNT IIPS Conference Charlotte, North Carolina July 24-26, 2006 Session: AtD – Use of."— Presentation transcript:

1 MARTIN COMMUNITY COLLEGE ACHIEVING THE DREAM COMMUNITY COLLEGES COUNT IIPS Conference Charlotte, North Carolina July 24-26, 2006 Session: AtD – Use of Data Mary M. Cauley

2  AtD Colleges must use data relative to student success to plan and evaluate interventions.  Martin Community College (MCC) used student engagement data in plans to increase student success.

3 MCC is a small, rural, single-campus institution with fewer than 1,000 students.

4 Research shows that the more actively engaged students are - - ־ with faculty and staff ־ with other students ־ with the subject matter they study - - the more likely they are to learn and to stay in college until they achieve their academic goals.

5 Student engagement is a valuable yardstick for assessing whether and to what extent an institution’s educational practices are likely to produce successful results. The term “successful results” is defined as more students across all groups learning at higher levels and achieving their academic goals.

6 MCC wanted to know: MCC wanted to know: ־ if our students are actively engaged in the institution, and if so, - at what level they are engaged. To do this, we asked our students about their level of engagement. To do this, we asked our students about their level of engagement. We listened to student voices through the administration of the Community College Survey of Student Engagement (CCSSE) We listened to student voices through the administration of the Community College Survey of Student Engagement (CCSSE)

7 A growing body of research has identified institutional practices and student behaviors that promote student engagement. A growing body of research has identified institutional practices and student behaviors that promote student engagement. The CCSSE survey targets these areas for improvement. The CCSSE survey targets these areas for improvement.

8 Good practice in undergraduate education: Encourages student-faculty contact. Encourages student-faculty contact. Develops reciprocity and cooperation among students. Develops reciprocity and cooperation among students. Encourages active learning. Encourages active learning. Gives prompt feedback. Gives prompt feedback. Emphasizes time on task. Emphasizes time on task. Communicates high expectations. Communicates high expectations. Respects diverse talents and ways of knowing. Respects diverse talents and ways of knowing.

9 CCSSE measures students’ levels of engagement in good educational practices and what they gain from their college experience. CCSSE measures students’ levels of engagement in good educational practices and what they gain from their college experience. The good practices in undergraduate education are used as benchmarks. The good practices in undergraduate education are used as benchmarks. Benchmarks are groups of conceptually related items that address key areas of student engagement, learning, and persistence. Benchmarks are groups of conceptually related items that address key areas of student engagement, learning, and persistence.

10 CCSSE’s 5 benchmarks denote areas that educational research has shown to be important in quality educational practice. CCSSE’s 5 benchmarks denote areas that educational research has shown to be important in quality educational practice. Benchmarks of effective educational practice: Benchmarks of effective educational practice: 1. Active and collaborative learning. 2. Student effort. 3. Academic challenge. 4. Student-faculty interaction. 5. Support for learners.

11 Benchmark No. 1 Active and Collaborative Learning 4a. Asked questions in class or contributed to class discussions. 4a. Asked questions in class or contributed to class discussions. 4b. Made a class presentation. 4b. Made a class presentation. 4f. Worked with other students on projects during class. 4f. Worked with other students on projects during class. 4g. Worked with classmates outside of class to prepare class assignments. 4g. Worked with classmates outside of class to prepare class assignments. 4h. Tutored or taught other students 4h. Tutored or taught other students 4i. Participated in a community based project as a part of a regular course. 4i. Participated in a community based project as a part of a regular course. 4r. Discussed ideas from your readings or classes with others outside of class (students, family members, co- workers, etc.) 4r. Discussed ideas from your readings or classes with others outside of class (students, family members, co- workers, etc.)

12 These benchmarks are tools that can be used to compare college performance across benchmarks, to similarly-sized institutions, and to the full CCSSE population of community colleges. These benchmarks are tools that can be used to compare college performance across benchmarks, to similarly-sized institutions, and to the full CCSSE population of community colleges.

13 Part-time vs. full-time student enrollment status: Research samples are based on classes not students. Research samples are based on classes not students. CCSSE samples entire classes of students. CCSSE samples entire classes of students. Therefore, more full-time students are selected for the surveys, simply because the full-time students are enrolled in more classes than part-time students. Thus, the full-time students are more likely to be selected. Therefore, more full-time students are selected for the surveys, simply because the full-time students are enrolled in more classes than part-time students. Thus, the full-time students are more likely to be selected. While 2/3 of the students attending participating community colleges attend part time, the survey showed the opposite. While 2/3 of the students attending participating community colleges attend part time, the survey showed the opposite.

14 CCSSE assigns weights to responses based on respondents’ enrollment status, thereby producing more accurate measures of student engagement. CCSSE assigns weights to responses based on respondents’ enrollment status, thereby producing more accurate measures of student engagement. When aggregate data are reported for both part- time and full-time students, it is weighted by enrollment status. When aggregate data are reported for both part- time and full-time students, it is weighted by enrollment status. Goal: To increase community college student engagement and ultimately completion rates. Goal: To increase community college student engagement and ultimately completion rates. We can use survey results to improve our programs and services for students. We can use survey results to improve our programs and services for students.

15 CCSSE 2005 Survey MCC Respondents CCSSE Colleges Population Gender Male Male15.2%40.7% Female Female84.8%59.3%

16 CCSSE 2005 Survey MCC Respondents CCSSE Colleges Population Enrollment Status Full time Full time77.5%40.2% Part time Part time22.5%59.8%

17 Five ways you can analyze and interpret your CCSSE results: (Consider the results in terms of your own college mission, institutional focus, and student characteristics.) 1. Compare your college to the national average. (Look at areas in which you are most different. Then identify strengths and areas for improvement.) 2. Compare your college to “high performing colleges.”

18 3. Measure your college’s performance in terms of your least-engaged student group. You can use your raw data file to look at a. first-generation students b. developmental students c. high-risk students (single parents, having to care for dependents attending college part time, low income, etc.) You can also compare engagement levels of You can also compare engagement levels of a. minority groups b. returning female students c. other groups

19 4. Gauge work in areas most strongly valued. Examine results in light of your institution’s vision, mission, and/or strategic objectives. Which of the benchmarks are most important to your college? 5. Compare where you are now with where you want to be. Perform a gap analysis—where you are now versus where you want to be. What issues have been identified for your college through self-study for reaffirmation of accreditation? Or recommendations from the visiting team?

20 Report to the faculty and to the college community on actions taken in response to the survey results. Report to the faculty and to the college community on actions taken in response to the survey results. Involve your students in discussions about your CCSSE survey results. The survey emphasizes that students have a role to play in their own learning, and these are their observation on their educational experiences. Encourage student-faculty discussions. Involve your students in discussions about your CCSSE survey results. The survey emphasizes that students have a role to play in their own learning, and these are their observation on their educational experiences. Encourage student-faculty discussions.

21 Both positive and negative survey data can help improve educational practice and performance. Use the positive data to showcase your college’s best practices. Both positive and negative survey data can help improve educational practice and performance. Use the positive data to showcase your college’s best practices.

22 Sources of Research 1984 – National Institute of Education 1984 – National Institute of Education 1987 – “Seven Principles for Good Practice in Undergraduate Education. Chickering and Gamson 1987 – “Seven Principles for Good Practice in Undergraduate Education. Chickering and Gamson 1991- How College Affects Students. Pascarella and Teranzini 1991- How College Affects Students. Pascarella and Teranzini 1993 – Leaving College. Tinto 1993 – Leaving College. Tinto Thank you


Download ppt "MARTIN COMMUNITY COLLEGE ACHIEVING THE DREAM COMMUNITY COLLEGES COUNT IIPS Conference Charlotte, North Carolina July 24-26, 2006 Session: AtD – Use of."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google