CHEP06, Mumbai-India, Feb 2006V. Daniel Elvira 1 The CMS Simulation Validation Suite V. Daniel Elvira (Fermilab) for the CMS Collaboration.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
CBM Calorimeter System CBM collaboration meeting, October 2008 I.Korolko(ITEP, Moscow)
Advertisements

Use of G EANT 4 in CMS AIHENP’99 Crete, April 1999 Véronique Lefébure CERN EP/CMC.
LC Calorimeter Testbeam Requirements Sufficient data for Energy Flow algorithm development Provide data for calorimeter tracking algorithms  Help setting.
HEP Experiments Detectors and their Technologies Sascha Marc Schmeling CERN.
Lauri A. Wendland: Hadronic tau jet reconstruction with particle flow algorithm at CMS, cHarged08, Hadronic tau jet reconstruction with particle.
The CMS Detector Paoti Chang National Taiwan University
W. Clarida, HCAL Meeting, Fermilab Oct. 06 Quartz Plate Calorimeter Prototype Geant4 Simulation Progress W. Clarida The University of Iowa.
First CMS Results with LHC BeamToyoko Orimoto, Caltech 1 First CMS Results with LHC Beam Toyoko Orimoto California Institute of Technology On behalf of.
Upgrading the CMS simulation and reconstruction David J Lange LLNL April CHEP 2015D. Lange.
First CMS Results with LHC BeamToyoko Orimoto, Caltech 1 First CMS Results with LHC Beam Toyoko Orimoto California Institute of Technology On behalf of.
Introduction to Hadronic Final State Reconstruction in Collider Experiments Introduction to Hadronic Final State Reconstruction in Collider Experiments.
25/03/2003Simulation Application for the LHCb Experiment CHEP March 2003 Presented by: W. Pokorski / CERN Authors: I. Belyaev, Ph. Charpentier,
14 Overview of Geant4 Examples 2 nd Finnish Geant4 Workshop 6-7 June 2005 Dennis Wright (SLAC)
In order to acquire the full physics potential of the LHC, the ATLAS electromagnetic calorimeter must be able to efficiently identify photons and electrons.
US News from the LPC Muon Group E. James, M. Mulders, N. Terentiev* CMS EMU Meeting University of California, Davis Feb , 2005.
Cosmic Rays Data Analysis with CMS-ECAL Mattia Fumagalli (Università di Milano Bicocca) CIAO!
17-19 Oct, 2007Geant4 Japan Oct, 2007Geant4 Japan Oct, 2007Geant4 Japan 2007 Geant4 Japan.
Evaluation of G4 Releases in CMS (Sub-detector Studies) Software used Electrons in Tracker Photons in the Electromagnetic Calorimeter Pions in the Calorimeter.
A data-driven performance evaluation method for CMS RPC trigger system & Study of Muon trigger efficiencies with official Tag & Probe package for ICHEP.
Approved Plots from CMS First Beam Runs 2-October-2008.
LCG Meeting, May 14th 2003 V. Daniel Elvira1 G4 (OSCAR_1_4_0) Validation of CMS HCal V. Daniel Elvira Fermilab.
Readiness of CMS Simulation towards LHC Startup Outline  Introduction  Framework and Interface with GEANT4  Detector specific components  How have.
CHEP 2006 D. Elvira, M. Stavrianakou, FNAL 1 The CMS Object-Oriented Simulation V. Daniel Elvira and Maya Stavrianakou, FNAL On behalf of the CMS collaboration.
1 ACFA8, July , 2005, Youngjoon Kwon (Yonsei Univ.) Simulation / Recon. Workgroup summary for ACFA8  The Framework for Sim./Recon. Status report.
BeamCal Simulations with Mokka Madalina Stanescu-Bellu West University Timisoara, Romania Desy, Zeuthen 30 Jun 2009 – FCAL Meeting.
Summary of Simulation and Reconstruction Shaomin CHEN (Tsinghua University)  Framework and toolkit  Application in ILC detector design Jupiter/Satellites,
CMS Calorimeter HB- HB+ HE- HE+ HF- HF+ HO-2 HO-1 HO0 HO+1 HO+2
CHEP07 conference 5 September 2007, T. Cornelissen 1 Thijs Cornelissen (CERN) On behalf of the ATLAS collaboration The Global-  2 Track Fitter in ATLAS.
The CMS detector as compared to ATLAS CMS Detector Description –Inner detector and comparison with ATLAS –EM detector and comparison with ATLAS –Calorimetric.
Introduction to CMSSW Framework Concepts Simulation & Reconstruction Liz Sexton-Kennedy January 10, 2008.
May 1-3, LHC 2003V. Daniel Elvira1 CMS: Hadronic Calorimetry & Jet/ Performance V. Daniel Elvira Fermilab.
The CMS Simulation Software Julia Yarba, Fermilab on behalf of CMS Collaboration 22 m long, 15 m in diameter Over a million geometrical volumes Many complex.
Development of Digital Hadron Calorimeter Using GEM Shahnoor Habib For HEP Group, UT Arlington Oct. 12, 2002 TSAPS Fall ’02, UT Brownsville Simulation.
The Compact Muon Solenoid. What does CMS do? The Compact Muon Solenoid is a general purpose particle detector installed at point 5 of the Large Hadron.
CMS H4 ECAL testbeam data comparison with simulation F.Cossutti a), B. Heltsey b), P. Meridiani c), C. Rovelli c) a) INFN Trieste b) Cornell University.
Jessica Leonard, U. Wisconsin, December 19, 2006 Preliminary Exam - 1 H->  Jessica Leonard University of Wisconsin - Madison Preliminary Examination.
First CMS Results with LHC Beam
CP violation in B decays: prospects for LHCb Werner Ruckstuhl, NIKHEF, 3 July 1998.
24/08/2009 LOMONOSOV09, MSU, Moscow 1 Study of jet transverse structure with CMS experiment at 10 TeV Natalia Ilina (ITEP, Moscow) for the CMS collaboration.
Calibration of the ZEUS calorimeter for hadrons and jets Alex Tapper Imperial College, London for the ZEUS Collaboration Workshop on Energy Calibration.
Geant4 Tutorial, Oct28 th 2003V. Daniel Elvira Geant4 Simulation of the CMS 2002 Hcal Test Beam V. Daniel Elvira Geant4 Tutorial.
TeV muons: from data handling to new physics phenomena Vladimir Palichik JINR, Dubna NEC’2009 Varna, September 07-14, 2009.
TeV Muon Reconstruction Vladimir Palichik JINR, Dubna NEC’2007 Varna, September 10-17, 2007.
2005/07/12 (Tue)8th ACFA Full simulator study of muon detector and calorimeter 8th ACFA Workshop at Daegu, Korea 2005/07/12 (Tue) Hiroaki.
Study of Calorimeter performance using the LC full simulator The 8th ACFA Workshop Yoshihiro Yamaguchi (Tsukuba U.) M. -C. Chang (RCNS, Tohoku U.) K. Fujii.
BESIII offline software group Status of BESIII Event Reconstruction System.
Introduction to Hadronic Final State Reconstruction in Collider Experiments Introduction to Hadronic Final State Reconstruction in Collider Experiments.
CMS Status & Commissioning Menu: 1 Recent Progress Commissioning Prior to and After First Beam Commissioning with first LHC Events Outlook Wolfgang Funk.
David Lange Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory
Monthly video-conference, 18/12/2003 P.Hristov1 Preparation for physics data challenge'04 P.Hristov Alice monthly off-line video-conference December 18,
20 October, 2010Mike Hildreth - CHEP 2010, Taipei, Taiwan Validation and Tuning of the CMS Full Simulation Mike Hildreth Université de Notre Dame du Lac.
A. Parenti 1 RT 2007, Batavia IL The CMS Muon System and its Performance in the Cosmic Challenge RT2007 conference, Batavia IL, USA May 03, 2007 Andrea.
IOP HEPP Conference Upgrading the CMS Tracker for SLHC Mark Pesaresi Imperial College, London.
Approved Plots from CMS Cosmic Runs (mostly CRUZET, some earlier)
PEDESTAL STABILITY OF HCAL DURING GLOBAL RUNS AND 2009 CASTOR DQM ANALYSIS Emine GÜRPINAR Cukurova University 7/31/2018.
The Compact Muon Solenoid Detector
Testbeam comparisons arXiv:
5% The CMS all silicon tracker simulation
Individual Particle Reconstruction
Pedro Arce (CERN/CIEMAT)
Project Presentations August 5th, 2004
The KL reconstruction for the Belle experiment at KEK B-factory
Detector Optimization using Particle Flow Algorithm
Geant4 in HARP V.Ivanchenko For the HARP Collaboration
Status of CEPC HCAL Optimization Study in Simulation LIU Bing On behalf the CEPC Calorimeter working group.
Use of GEANT4 in CMS The OSCAR Project
Steve Magill Steve Kuhlmann ANL/SLAC Motivation
PHYS 3446 – Lecture #17 Particle Detection Particle Accelerators
LC Calorimeter Testbeam Requirements
PHYS 3446 – Lecture #18 Monday ,April 9, 2012 Dr. Brandt Calorimeter
Presentation transcript:

CHEP06, Mumbai-India, Feb 2006V. Daniel Elvira 1 The CMS Simulation Validation Suite V. Daniel Elvira (Fermilab) for the CMS Collaboration

CHEP06, Mumbai-India, Feb 2006V. Daniel Elvira 2 Simulation Software in CMS Detector Simulation GenerationDigitization Pool HepMC data file Pool SimHit data file Pool Digi data file Reconstruction Generation – MC truth information from particle gun or physics generator about vertices and particles. Stored in HepMC format. Detector Simulation – Hit objects with timing, position, energy loss information. Based on the Geant4 tool kit. Digitization – Constructs Digi objects which include realistic modeling of electronic signal. Digi objects. Reconstruction – Physics Objects: vertices, photons, e, , jets,……

CHEP06, Mumbai-India, Feb 2006V. Daniel Elvira 3 Physics Software Validation Elements to validate: Geometry description & magnetic field map Physics of EM and Had showers in Geant4 - hits Digitization Model - digis Reconstruction Algorithms – physics objects For absolute validation: Use visualization tools, TB experiments, reference plots The Simulation Validation Suite (SVS) validates in an automated way each new release of the CMS simulation software, comparing values of quantities related to geometry, field, hits with reference values from a previously (absolutely) validated version. Expansion to “Physics Software Validation Suite” including digis, reco ……in progress

CHEP06, Mumbai-India, Feb 2006V. Daniel Elvira 4 CMS Detector Systems 22 m long & 15 m in diameter Solenoid Magnet: 4 Tesla Field Electromagnetic Calorimeter (Ecal) Hadronic Calorimeter (Hcal) Silicon Tracker Muon System More than 1 Million Geometrical volumes SVS modular structure follows the detector sub-systems

CHEP06, Mumbai-India, Feb 2006V. Daniel Elvira 5 SVS: General Description SVS software sub-systems (dedicated simulation packages) Pre-generated samples: single particles, pp physics (Pool files, ROOT browsable, HepMC format) OVAL: testing tool created by CMS to detect changes in software behavior. Used as the SVS integration tool. It executes scripts and shell commands to control the suite execution and perform comparison tests. SimG4TrackerValidation SimG4EcalValidation SimG4HcalValidation SimG4MuonValidation SimG4GeomValidation SimG4FieldValidation SimG4GlobalValidation Validation branch (Pool files, ROOT browsable) On the fly analysis: basic G4 objects processed into information to construct validation quantities. OVAL Configuration file: commands, tolerance values

CHEP06, Mumbai-India, Feb 2006V. Daniel Elvira 6 SVS: General Description (II) ROOT Analysis Macros Construct Validation Quantities Create/fill histograms Read reference files Perform Validation Tests:   or Kolmogorov-Smirnov Validation branch (Pool files, ROOT browsable) One or more tests per sub-detector: low/high level quantities, different sub-detector components. Reference Histograms from previous version (ROOT file) List of differences for quantities not passing the tests (ASCII files) OVAL Configuration file: commands, tolerance values Results are reviewed by system experts: approve & release, or investigate problems (LCG PI Statistics Testing toolkit, or ROOT)

CHEP06, Mumbai-India, Feb 2006V. Daniel Elvira 7 Tracker Validation Tracking system: Silicon Strip Tracker - Tracker Inner Barrel (TIB), Tracker Outer Barrel (TOB), Tracker Inner Disks (TID) and Tracker End Cap (TEC) Pixel Detector - Pixel Barrel and Pixel End Cap. Validation Quantities: Energy deposition Distribution of track entry and exit points Number of hits Time of flight,……, etc Sample: Single muons, electrons or pions with p T =15 GeV in 12 bins of in the range 3<  <3 (1,500 events) Reference Distribution Current Distribution Identical Distributions

CHEP06, Mumbai-India, Feb 2006V. Daniel Elvira 8 Ecal Validation Electromagnetic Calorimeters: Ecal Barrel – Ecal Endcap (crystals) Preshower (Si/lead)  vs  hit occupancy in crystals E1, E2x2, E3x3, E4x4, E5x5 depositions E1/E4, E4/E9, …, E9/E25 ratios Percent of E in Barrel, Endcap, Preshower Longitudinal shower development Low Level Test: Single 30 GeV photons (2,000 events) E25 resolution vs the incident energy Longitudinal shower development vs energy Coefficient of Lead absorption vs incident energy (preshower) High Level Test: Single 10GeV, 20GeV, 30GeV, 40GeV, 50GeV (2,000 events)

CHEP06, Mumbai-India, Feb 2006V. Daniel Elvira 9 Ecal Validation (II)

CHEP06, Mumbai-India, Feb 2006V. Daniel Elvira 10 Hcal Validation Hadronic Calorimeters: Hcal Barrel – Hcal Endcap (copper/scint.) Hcal Forward (steel/quartz fibers) E depositions in each HB layer Time dist. of Hit energy in 7x7 tower matrix Number of hits in Ecal and Hcal Energy in 1x1, 3x3, 5x5 tower matrices Single 50 GeV pions (1,000 events) Layer 0 Time distribution in 7x7 tower matrix Total energy in Hcal Total energy in long fibers (HF) Total energy in short fibers (HF) …………

CHEP06, Mumbai-India, Feb 2006V. Daniel Elvira 11 Muon Validation Muon System: Drift Tubes (DT) in central region. Cathode Strip Chambers (CSC) in forward region. Resistive Plate Chambers (RPC) in both for trigger. Single 100 GeV muons (1,000 events) E lost by  in all full CMS detector For 100 GeV   ~8 GeV For each muon: Energy lost Deviation in position Deviation in angle (deg) Number of tracking steps For each type of muon process (ionization, bremsstrahlung, e+e− production, muon nuclear interaction, decay and capture): Energy of secondary particles Angle of secondary track with respect to primary muon track

CHEP06, Mumbai-India, Feb 2006V. Daniel Elvira 12 Geometry Validation Computes the number of volumes and materials and the total number of radiation lengths through the CMS detector. Sample The geometry summary: number of different materials, number logical volumes, physical volumes. The number of radiation lengths after traversing the full detector. Validation Quantities 1,000  of E=10 TeV and random ,  (= neutral geantinos since physics/field off) Material Budget (ROOT tree, histos, or ascii file) For each Geant4 step of each muon: Accumulated track length, volume name, volume copy number, accumulated material budget (Number of radiation lengths), material radiation length. At the end of track: Accumulated material budget.

CHEP06, Mumbai-India, Feb 2006V. Daniel Elvira 13 Field Validation Checks the tracking in the CMS magnetic field. The test compares the deviation at the end of the track in position and direction. 400 single muon events in four groups of 100 events with different energies: 1, 10, 100, 1000 GeV. The muons behaves as charged geantinos (physics is off). Change in track angle, momentum, kinetic energy. Sample Validation Quantities

CHEP06, Mumbai-India, Feb 2006V. Daniel Elvira 14 Global Validation Sub-system packages: dedicated validation tests for individual sub-systems. Geometry sub-set, field off. Global package: validates entire detector with real field, using pp physics samples. For example, min-bias. 1.Monte Carlo Number of vertices from Geant4 Number of tracks from Geant4 Number generated particles Position (x,y,z) of each Geant4 vertex p T of each Geant4 track Energy of each Geant4 track 2. Electromagnetic Calorimeter Number of Ecal hits Energy of each Ecal hit Time of flight for each Ecal hit Global  of each Ecal hit Global  of each Ecal hit Number of preshower Hits Energy of each preshower hit Time of flight for each preshower hit Global  of each preshower hit Global  of each preshower hit

CHEP06, Mumbai-India, Feb 2006V. Daniel Elvira 15 Global Validation (II) 3. Hadronic Calorimeter Number of hits Energy of each hit Time of flight for each hit Global  of each hit Global  of each hit 4. Tracker Number of Pixel hits Global  of each Pixel hit Global  of each Pixel hit Time of flight of forward Pixel hits Time of flight of barrel Pixel hits Global R of barrel Pixel hits Global Z of forward Pixel hits Number of Silicon hits Global  of each Silicon hit Global  of each Silicon hit Time of flight of forward Silicon hits Time of flight of barrel Silicon hits Global R of barrel Silicon hits Global Z of forward Silicon hits 5. Muon Number of hits Global  of hits Global  of hits Time of flight for DT hits Global R of DT hits Time of flight for CSC hits Global Z of CSC hits Time of flight for RPC barrel hits Global R of RPC barrel hits Time of flight for RPC forward hits Global Z of RPC barrel hits

CHEP06, Mumbai-India, Feb 2006V. Daniel Elvira 16 Summary & Outlook CMS simulation validation suite for hit derived quantities is operational – being ported to the CMSSW framework Iterate on validation quantities Optimize sample types, size, test tolerance values In progress: Expand Physics Validation Suite to include Digis (pulse shape, pedestals, gains) In the future: Incorporate reconstructed physics objects: jets, e, , 