Classroom Diagnostic Tools. Pre-Formative Assessment of Current CDT Knowledge.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Chad Allison May 2013  1-2 Formal Classroom Evaluations  Drop-in Visits.
Advertisements

PORTFOLIO.
Charlotte Danielson’s The Four Domains of Teaching Responsibility
Teacher Evaluation New Teacher Orientation August 15, 2013.
Data to Instruction Eric Lech Session Objectives Understand differences in assessments and their impact on instruction Understand the.
California Standards for the Teaching Profession
Marshal Hurst LDC/MDC Coordinator Professional Development (501)
C OLLABORATIVE A SSESSMENT S YSTEM FOR T EACHERS CAST
SEED MAT Mentor Training MAT Overview Roles and Responsibilities Internship Realities Internship Rotation Cycles Danielson Frameworks.
Activity: Introducing Staff to Danielson’s Framework for Teaching
National Association for Sport and Physical Education (NASPE) PE Coordinator’s Mini-Conference Wednesday, March 14, 2012 Framework for Effective Teaching.
August 2014 The Oregon Matrix Model was submitted to USED on May 1, 2014 and is pending approval* as of 8/8/14 *Please note content may change Oregon’s.
Classroom Diagnostic Tools and Keystone Exams PAIUCC Meeting, September 17, 2010 PAIUCC Meeting Classroom Diagnostic Tools and.
Ramapo Teachers’ Association APPR Contractual Changes.
By: Michele Leslie B. David MAE-IM WIDE USAGE To identify students who may be eligible to receive special services To monitor student performance from.
UDL and Teacher Evaluation Dr. Katie Novak. UDL Planning: Hotel ADLER DOLOMITI in Val Gardena You want your learners to explore the Dolomitis. In this.
The Framework for Teaching An Overview of the Danielson Model.
Assessment Literacy & Student Growth within the Teacher Professional Growth and Effectiveness System (TPGES) The goal of this session is to make visible.
Evaluating Teacher Performance: Getting it Right CPRE Annual Conference November 21-23, 2002 Charlotte Danielson
What should be the basis of
Matt Moxham EDUC 290. The Idaho Core Teacher Standards are ten standards set by the State of Idaho that teachers are expected to uphold. This is because.
Differentiated Supervision
Teacher Evaluation Ashley Greene 10/29/13.
Webcast October 11, Felicia Cumings Smith Associate Commissioner.
Meeting SB 290 District Evaluation Requirements
Teachscape Overview John Monahan, Instructional Supervisor
Interstate New Teacher Assessment and Support Consortium (INTASC)
The Danielson Framework and Your Evaluation AK Teaching Standard DP_8c: Engages in Instructional Development Activities Danielson Domain 4e: Growing and.
CLASS Keys Orientation Douglas County School System August /17/20151.
CKEC ISLN January 2013 Math Network Update Debbie Waggoner CKEC Math Specialist debbiewaggoner-ckecmath.weebly.com.
Teacher Induction Program Why you are here The Allegheny Intermediate Unit offers this program for our staff and those in school districts,
Your Name Teaching Portfolio (Begin Year-End Year)
PROGRESS MONITORING OF ACADEMIC ACHIEVEMENT Baldwin-Whitehall School District 2nd Quarter Data.
Welcome to... Introduction to A Framework for Teaching 10/12/2015pbevan 1.
Ready, Set, Grow! PVAAS Teacher Specific Reporting
THE DANIELSON FRAMEWORK. LEARNING TARGET I will be be able to identify to others the value of the classroom teacher, the Domains of the Danielson framework.
The Delaware Performance Appraisal System II for Teachers Training Module 2 The Delaware Framework Review and Components 1-5 Training for Teachers.
The Danielson Framework Emmanuel Andre Owings Mills High School Fall 2013.
Using Teacher Evaluation as a Tool for Professional Growth and School Improvement Redmond School District
Making a Difference in Heidi A. Ramírez, PhD Chief Academic Officer Milwaukee Public Schools.
1 Introducing Danielson’s Framework for Teaching NYCDOE | November
Classroom Diagnostic Tools Analyzing the Data Grades 3-6 Samantha Glass and Lori Rodgers 11/1/
Introduction to Kentucky’s Professional Growth and Effectiveness System and Framework for Teaching.
Standards Aligned System What is SAS? A collaborative product of research and good practice Six distinct elements Clear Standards Fair.
Teacher Induction Program Why you are here The Allegheny Intermediate Unit offers this program for our teachers and those in school districts,
Teacher Effectiveness Who begins in ? Teaching Specialists Special Education Teachers English as a Second Language Teachers Gifted Teachers.
 Development of a model evaluation instrument based on professional performance standards (Danielson Framework for Teaching)  Develop multiple measures.
BY COURTNEY N. SPEER TECHNOLOGY AS A TOOL SPRING Professional Growth & Self- Reflection.
PGES: The Final 10% i21: Navigating the 21 st Century Highway to Top Ten.
The Framework for Teaching Charlotte Danielson Danielson’s Framework for Teaching Domain 3: Instruction Communicating Clearly and Accurately Using Questioning.
Boot Camp 2014 The 4 Cs in the Common Core. Marta Stirling School Library Coordinator, East River Joan Upell School Library Coordinator, West River.
Day 7 Domain 3: Instruction Year 2 Induction Pennsbury School District Maureen Gradel.
Co-Teaching Webinar 3: Evaluation Webinar
DPASII Criterion Rubrics for Teachers. Component 1: Planning and Preparation Criterion 1a: Selecting Instructional Goals ELEMENT Value, sequence and alignment.
Introduction to... Teacher Evaluation System Teacher Effectiveness 12/6/
Assessing Teacher Effectiveness Charlotte Danielson
Doing Teacher Evaluation Right: 5 Critical Elements: Evidence.
FOUR DOMAINS Domain 4: Domain 1: Professional Planning & Responsibilities Preparation Domain 3: Domain 2: Instruction Classroom Environment.
Curriculum and Instruction: Management of the Learning Environment
Teacher Evaluation University of New England - EDU 704 Dr. William Doughty Submitted By: Teri Gaston.
NM Teacher Evaluation Planning & Preparation Creating an Environment of Learning Professionalism Teaching for Learning Evaluation.
Welcome to... Introduction to A Framework for Teaching 7/8/2016pbevan 1.
Welcome Learning Targets for Today I will build schema for Danielson’s Framework for Teaching. I will connect Framework principles to powerful planning.
Cohort Training, Phase II November 29 – 30, 2012.
MSBSD Educator Evaluation
Outcome: Participants will be able to identify and apply teacher behaviors that support a learner-centered environment. Indicator: Participants will explore.
An Introduction to Teacher Evaluation
Changes to the Educator Evaluation System
Classroom Diagnostic Tools Pennsylvania Department of Education
Standards Aligned System Integration Trainer Professional Development
Presentation transcript:

Classroom Diagnostic Tools

Pre-Formative Assessment of Current CDT Knowledge

We Need to Use the Data

PVAAS Pilot

PA Assessments

About the CDT  Administered using a computer-adaptive approach  What does this mean? The assessment will adjust items based on student responses.  Difficulty will either increase or decrease depending on if the student answers items correctly.  This is designed to minimize frustration and help in determining a student’s strengths and areas of need in the diagnostic categories.

The CDT Cycle Share Reflect and Monitor Instruct Interpret Analyze Assess

Impact on Instruction  Teachers will receive immediate and actionable data to be used for targeting instruction.  The CDT reports provide direct links to resources on the SAS site.  The reports also show the progress of students across test administrations.

Common Questions  How many times should the students sit for the assessments during a school year?  3 times at a minimum of 5-6 weeks between administration  How many questions are there?  Students will be presented with items regardless of current level.  How much time is required to finish the assessments?  Between 45 and 90 minutes.

Common Questions  Are the questions presented on grade level?  No. The questions allow for more advanced content or lower-level content depending on need.  Are there constructed response questions?  No. All questions are multiple choice.  Is the CDT a timed assessment?  No.

Scoring Students’ scores are converted into scale scores rather than points correct or raw scores Scale scores are transformed raw scores that allow for valid comparisons across students, grades, and administrations, but only within the same subject Scales scores take into consideration the fact that some questions on the test are more difficult than others CDT Minimum scale score of 400 CDT Maximum scale score of 2000 Note: Item Response Theory (IRT), specifically the Rasch model, is used to determine the student’s raw score.

Research  Information about students is crucial to a teacher’s ability to calibrate tasks and lessons to students’ current understandings and skills (Adding It UP, National Research Council, Kilpatrick, Swafford, 2001, 349).

Classroom Diagnostic Tools

Best Practices: English Department  Teachers individually reviewed their own class data for the assessment and shared the data with their students.  Teachers then discussed ways to address the areas of weakness with one another and then the data served as the springboard for instructional modifications.  For instance, some courses are using more USATest Prep practice questions, more close reading lessons with think-alouds are being utilized, and vocabulary instruction is being geared to the Keystone glossary.  Additionally, along with reviewing the data from the 1st 9 weeks common assessments with the Social Studies grade-level cohorts, the CDT data will be shared/reviewed with the Social Studies cohorts this coming Thursday. Again, the goal is for Social Studies to help us reinforce these skills.

The Framework for Teaching Domain 1: Planning and Preparation Demonstrating Knowledge of Content and Pedagogy Demonstrating Knowledge of Students Setting Instructional Outcomes Demonstrating Knowledge of Resources Designing Coherent Instruction Designing Student Assessments Domain 2: The Classroom Environment Creating an Environment of Respect and Rapport Establishing a Culture for Learning Managing Classroom Procedures Managing Student Behavior Organizing Physical Space Domain 4: Professional Responsibilities Reflecting on Teaching Maintaining Accurate Records Communicating with Families Participating in a Professional Community Growing and Developing Professionally Demonstrating Professionalism Domain 3: Instruction Communicating with Students Using Questioning and Discussion Techniques Engaging Students in Learning Using Assessment in Instruction Demonstrating Flexibility and Responsiveness

CDT Student Data Analysis  One ‐ to ‐ One Conferencing with Your Students One ‐ to ‐ One Conferencing with Your Students  See BHS Weebly PD Site for resources  Guide for 1-1 Conferencing with students  Metacognition guide for students  bhspd.weebly.com

Research “As teachers derive feedback information from assessments that they give their students, there can, then, be important adjustments to how they teach, how they consider what success looks like, how they recognize students’ strengths and gaps and how they regard their own effects on students. The essence of such formative interpretations is providing teachers with feedback from assessments about how they need to modify their teaching, and providing students with feedback so they can learn how to self ‐ regulate and be motivated to engage in further learning” (Visible Learning for Teachers, Routledge, Hattie, 2012, 125 ‐ 126).

Testing Windows  CDT: September 9-20, 2013  Keystone Exams:  December 4 & 5, 2013 (Algebra I)  December 10 & 11, 2013 (Literature)  January 8 & 9, 2014 (Biology)  CDT: February 10-21, 2014  CDT: April 1-11, 2014  Keystone Exams  May 12-23, 2014 (Window)

CDT for Grades 3-5  CDT -BWSD is not field testing  CDT is operational  Reading, math, science, and writing  Based on PA anchors and eligible content