Addressing Cumulative Impacts of Pollution: A CEQA Perspective A Forum Presented by the Contra Costa County Hazardous Materials Commission December 4,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
November 8, California Environmental Quality Act California Environmental Quality Act SB 97 (Dutton) SB 97 (Dutton) Consistency Consistency Lead.
Advertisements

Lesson 3 ODOT Analysis & Assessment. Analysis & Assessment Learning Outcomes As part of a small group, apply the two- part analysis by generating exposure-
Presented to: 2010 Airports Conference By: Sue McDonald With slides by Tom Klin, CH2M HILL Date: March 3, 2010 Federal Aviation Administration Cumulative.
ICN Merger Working Group Work Product Merger Review Workshop March 10-11, 2009 Taipei.
Greenhouse Gas CEQA Significance Threshold Stakeholder Working Group #2 May 28, 2008 SCAQMD Diamond Bar, California.
Moving towards a more comprehensive planning SEA and indicators Per Christensen Aalborg University Denmark.
Deciding How To Apply NEPA Environmental Assessments Findings of No Significant Impact Environmental Impact Statements.
1 State Water Resources Control Board Environmental Review for State Bond Funded Grant Projects Presented by Lisa Lee, Environmental Review Unit.
Building EV Infrastructure Contra Costa County Climate Leaders Program (4CL) A Regional Perspective: Bay Area Goals and Objectives J UNE 2, 2015 Damian.
Lassen Lodge Hydroelectric Project Public Scoping Meetings November 5, 2014 (Sacramento and Red Bluff) State Water Resources Control Board Division of.
Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA): Overview
Health Risk Assessments & Land Use March 25, 2010.
1 Public Hearing to Consider Proposed Amendments to the Emission Inventory Criteria and Guidelines Regulation for the AB 2588 Air Toxics “Hot Spots” Program.
Chemicals Management Forum San Antonio, Texas May 15-16, 2012 Chemicals management indicators in the movement toward sustainable cities in Mexico Dr. Leonora.
1 Environmental Planning in the Army Corps of Engineers Ch 2 Mod 5 Relationship of the NEPA to Principles & Guidelines
1 Cumulative Impacts of Pollution Contra Costa County Hazardous Materials Commission Western States Petroleum Association Michaeleen Mason Western States.
Presented By: Lori D. Ballance Gatzke Dillon & Ballance LLP Prepared For:Assn. of California Airports 2013 Fall Conference.
Climate Action Plans and CEQA Charlotte Strem Assistant Director, Physical and Environmental Planning University of California Office of the President.
U N I T E D S T A T E S D E P A R T M E N T O F C O M M E R C E N A T I O N A L O C E A N I C A N D A T M O S P H E R I C A D M I N I S T R A T I O N State.
Contra Costa County Climate Leaders Reducing VMT and GHG Emissions: Tools & Resources Ian Peterson, Environmental Planner Bay Area Air Quality Management.
California Measure SB375: Linking Greenhouse Gas Emissions Reductions to Metropolitan Transportation Planning Presentation to the National Capital Region.
1 CEQA and CEQA-Plus Presented by Cookie Hirn, Lisa Lee, and Michelle Jones Regional Programs Unit July 2008.
Lecture(9) Instructor : Dr. Abed Al-Majed Nassar
CA Regional Water Quality Control Board San Diego Region CEQA SCOPING MEETING: TENTATIVE CLEANUP AND ABATMEMENT ORDER (CAO) NO. R January 21,
AB 32 and SB Implementation Process and Issues Presentation to Ventura County Civic Alliance Southern California Association of Governments October.
Summary of CAPCOA Significance Threshold Options April 30, 2008 SCAQMD Diamond Bar, California.
Work Zone Rule Virtual Workshop – Rule State of the Practice Overview.
Greenhouse Gas CEQA Significance Threshold Stakeholder Working Group April 30, 2008 SCAQMD Diamond Bar, California.
For 2014 Golden Empire AWMA Conference September 16, 2014 Leland Villalvazo, Supervising AQS San Joaquin Valley APCD.
The California Environmental Quality Act and Greenhouse Gas Emissions SB97 and the Proposed Amendments to the State CEQA Guidelines on Analyzing Greenhouse.
Winery Ordinance Update Scoping Meeting for the Environmental Impact Report County of Santa Barbara July 16, 2014.
CALIFORNIA’S AIR TOXICS PROGRAM: IMPROVEMENTS TO ASSESS HEALTH RISK Update to the Air Resources Board July 24, 2014 California Environmental Protection.
Safeguarding California: Implementation Action Plans Listening Tour October 2015.
PM 2.5 Stakeholder Working Group Meeting #1 South Coast Air Quality Management District June 8, 2006.
Community Forum on Proposed Kraemer Homeless Shelter at 1000 North Kraemer Place August 5, 2015 Embassy Suites – Anaheim North RIGHT IDEA. RIGHT TIME.
Department of Transportation City Council August 31, 2015 Annual Self Certification Congestion Management Program for Los Angeles County.
1 Completing the CEQA Checklist Terry Rivasplata.
Public Workshop UCLA March 4, 2005 Draft Air Quality and Land Use Handbook: A Community and Health Perspective.
1 Findings and Board Resolution Steven Blum. 2 CEQA Findings in the Board Resolution  Resolution or separate appended document contains findings critical.
CEQA and Climate Change Evaluating & Addressing GHG Emissions from Projects Barbara Lee, CAPCOA.
Local Activities on Climate Change California Air Districts Step Up May 17, 2010 Barbara Lee, Northern Sonoma County APCD.
Notice: The views expressed here are those of the individual authors and may not necessarily reflect the views and policies of the United States Environmental.
Implications of the Newhall Ranch Decision for Climate Change Analyses
Tom Weeks, Archi Dela Cruz February 17, Overview Why and how is guidance changing? How will this affect me? District Implementation/Outreach.
Senate Bill 288- Limits Changes to Air Districts’ New Source Review Rules Beverly Werner, Manager Stationary Source Division California Air Resources Board.
1 Public Workshop to Discuss Amendments to the AB 2588 “Hot Spots” Emission Inventory Criteria and Guidelines Regulation California Air Resources Board.
Garry Kaufman Air Pollution Control Division.  Background on Oil and Gas Air Regulation in Colorado  Basis for Additional Air Quality Requirements for.
Role of Environmental Justice in Land Use Planning Shankar B. Prasad, M.B.B.S. Community Health Advisor California Air Resources Board May 11, 2001 Statewide.
Bay Area Air Quality Management District CEQA Air Quality Guidelines September 2, 2010 Bay Area Air Quality Management District CEQA Air Quality Guidelines.
CEQA 101  CA Legislature passed CEQA in 1970; signed by Governor Reagan  CEQA statutes are found in Public Resources Code sections et seq.  The.
Environmental Planning in the Army Corps of Engineers Relationship of the NEPA to Principles & Guidelines 1 Ch 2 Mod 5
1 1 The Project Description: Framing the CEQA Analysis Terry Rivasplata.
Welcome to the Public Comment Hearing on the Proposed Regulatory Update to the California Environmental Quality Act AB 52, Gatto (2014) Heather Baugh Assistant.
Environmental Management Division 1 NASA Headquarters Environmental Management System (EMS) Michael J. Green, PE NASA EMS Lead NASA Headquarters Washington,
The Plaza at Santa Monica Project PUBLIC SCOPING MEETING
1828 Ocean Ave & 1921 Ocean Front Walk PUBLIC SCOPING MEETING
Introduction to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA)
La Mesa Climate Action Plan Supplemental Environmental Impact Report Scoping Meeting May 31, 2017.
GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS INVENTORY
Infrastructure planning and management
Spare the air for a healthier future 1955 – 2005
Overview What is the CEQA environmental review process?
Addressing Disproportionate Adverse Impacts of Air Pollution
CEQA Guidelines & Thresholds Update
Strategic Appropriate Assessment of Spatial Plans
LAFCO AND CEQA LAFCO Role as A Responsible Agency
Effective Off-Site Air Quality Mitigation
Off Site Mitigation Measures under CEQA
Air Quality and Health Dr Liz Robin Director of Public Health
Presentation transcript:

Addressing Cumulative Impacts of Pollution: A CEQA Perspective A Forum Presented by the Contra Costa County Hazardous Materials Commission December 4, 2008 Greg Tholen, Principal Environmental Planner Bay Area Air Quality Management District

Cumulative Impacts of Pollution & CEQA2 Overview California Environmental Quality Act District CEQA Guidelines Update BAAQMD Risk Thresholds for CEQA CEQA & Thresholds of Significance CEQA & Cumulative Impacts Concepts for Developing Thresholds

Cumulative Impacts of Pollution & CEQA3 California Environmental Quality Act Identify significant adverse effects Identify alternatives to proposed project Avoid or mitigate significant effects Provide meaningful public disclosure Allow informed decisions Applies to public agency discretionary actions

Cumulative Impacts of Pollution & CEQA4 BAAQMD CEQA Guidelines Update BAAQMD CEQA Guidelines (1999) provide guidance to local agencies on air quality analysis in environmental documents Update efforts begin December 2008, scheduled completion mid-2009 Review existing thresholds, develop additional thresholds as needed Develop justification and supporting evidence

Cumulative Impacts of Pollution & CEQA5 BAAQMD Risk Thresholds for CEQA Cancer risk > 10 in one million Hazard Index > 1 Applies to new receptors locating near existing sources AND to new sources locating near existing receptors

Cumulative Impacts of Pollution & CEQA6 Thresholds of Significance Identifiable quantitative, qualitative or performance level of an effect Adopted by resolution, rule or regulation Developed through public review process Supported by substantial evidence

Cumulative Impacts of Pollution & CEQA7 Addressing Impacts Under CEQA Changes in existing physical conditions Significant effects caused by project to existing environment Significant effects caused by the existing environment to the project

Cumulative Impacts of Pollution & CEQA8 Cumulative Impacts When two or more individual effects, considered together, are considerable “Cumulatively considerable” – incremental effects are significant when viewed in connection with the effects of past, current and probable future projects Cumulative impacts can result from individually minor but collectively significant projects taking place over a period of time

Cumulative Impacts of Pollution & CEQA9 Mitigation Plans & Programs Not cumulatively considerable if project complies with plan or mitigation program Plan must provide requirements that will avoid or substantially lessen the cumulative problem in area project is located Plan must be law or adopted by agency with jurisdiction over resources Developed through public review process

Cumulative Impacts of Pollution & CEQA10 Concepts for Developing Thresholds Plan-based Based in science, plans sets regional path to sustainable, healthy environment Establishes “fair-share” reductions from all sectors Health/risk indicators Identify significant adverse change in effect Based on increased risk, health effects

Cumulative Impacts of Pollution & CEQA11 Example Risk Indicator Source: Air Quality and Land Use Handbook (CARB, 2005)

Cumulative Impacts of Pollution & CEQA12 Example Risk Indicator Source: Air Quality and Land Use Handbook (CARB, 2005)

Cumulative Impacts of Pollution & CEQA13 Levels of Impact Project alone – effect of single project causes significant adverse change Effect of project is cumulatively significant – incremental contribution Effect of multiple nearby existing uses cause significant adverse impact to new project – existing environment to project

Cumulative Impacts of Pollution & CEQA14 Where Should the Threshold be Set at Each Level? Impact LevelThreshold Project Alone? Incremental Contribution of Single Project? Existing Environment to Project?