I-69 Corridor: A Citizens’ Report on Transportation Needs Judy Hawley Chair I-69 Corridor Advisory Committee.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
March 2012 Ports and Cities Conference Newcastle Dorte Ekelund, Executive Director Major Cities Unit Department of Infrastructure and Transport
Advertisements

Keep Moving to Keep Ahead / INVESTING IN TRANSPORTATION FOR THE NEXT 20 YEARS Recommendations from the Minnesota Transportation Finance Advisory Committee.
Updating the Washington Transportation Plan February 4,
1 Port Freight Infrastructure Planning & Investment John N. Young Director of Freight & Surface Transportation Policies American Association of Port Authorities.
Presented to presented by East Central Florida Corridor Task Force Space Coast TPO 02/16/15 Huiwei Shen Systems Planning Florida Department of Transportation.
Returning to Our National Waterways Dabney Hegg U.S. Senate Committee on Commerce, Science and Transportation.
FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Florida Natural Gas Association June 18, 2014 | Boca Raton, FL.
Freight in the Southeast Conference Bob Romig State Transportation Development Administrator Florida Department of Transportation February 9, 2011 Florida’s.
FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION AASHTO Spring Meeting Transportation Economics and Logistics MAY 30, 2014 | LOUISVILLE KY.
I-95 Corridor Coalition December 14, 2001 I-95 Corridor Coalition Mid-Atlantic Rail Operations Study — An Integrated Strategy to Eliminate Choke Points.
Florida’s Future Transportation Corridors Florida’s Future Transportation Corridors Presented to: Florida Redevelopment Association Presented by: Bob Romig.
California Freight Advisory Committee May 14, 2014.
Western States Energy & Environment Symposium October 27, 2009.
Talking Freight Seminars November 19, 2008 Caroline A. Mays, AICP Atlanta Regional Commission Integrating Freight and Land Use in the Atlanta Region.
Dubai Government Policies for Enhancing the Competitiveness of Multimodal Transportation and Logistics Cluster June 2014.
Framework for Model Development General Model Design Highway Network/Traffic Analysis Zones (TAZs) Development of Synthetic Trip Tables Development of.
Burnet County Comprehensive Plan. What Is the Comprehensive Plan? This is a county strategic plan that will focus on the areas where the county government.
May 28, Vision Statement and Goals, Objectives and Performance Measures for the 2040 LRTP Status of these items: Draft Approved by LRTP Subcommittee.
Freight Bottleneck Study Update to the Intermodal, Freight, and Safety Subcommittee of the Regional Transportation Council September 12, 2002 North Central.
2010 Minnesota Comprehensive Statewide Freight and Passenger Rail Plan AASHTO Standing Committee on Rail 2010 Washington Meeting Freight in State Rail.
Freight Issues in the Report of the National Surface Transportation Policy and Revenue Study Commission Transportation for Tomorrow.
KEY PROVISIONS OF THE DRIVE* ACT H.R. 22, as passed by the Senate on July 30, 2015 *Developing a Reliable and Innovative Vision for the Economy Thomas.
Clean, Green, and on the Same Team! How Economic and Workforce Development are Partnering to Serve an Emerging Regional Industry.
NGA Center for Best Practices: Policy Academy on Land Use and Transportation Planning State of Illinois Team Lynne Padovan—Governor’s Office Randy Blankenhorn—IDOT.
Manage by Measure: Just Do It AASHTO SCOPM Annual Meeting October 23, 2009 Steve Simmons TxDOT Deputy Executive Director.
1 June 11, 2015 Raleigh, NC. PRESENTATION OBJECTIVE To give an overview on the newly adopted Strategic Transportation Corridors. 2.
U.S./Canada Transportation Border Working group April 9, 2014 Roger Petzold Office of Planning Federal Highway Administration.
MOVING AHEAD FOR PROGRESS IN THE 21 ST CENTURY MAP-21 Volusia TPO Board Presentation September 25, 2012.
Freight Council Webinar February 21, 2006 Anthony T. Furst Director, FHWA Office of Freight Management and Operations The Framework for National Freight.
ECIA A Regional Response to Local Needs CHANDRA RAVADA Director of Transportation Introducing Long Range Transportation Plan.
North Central Texas Council of Governments Transportation Department Summary Presentation January 2004 MOBILITY 2025: THE METROPOLITAN.
May 14, Our transportation system will provide a safe and accessible range of options that enhances existing urban areas communities while providing.
Statewide Strategies for Coordinating Regional Transportation and Land Use Planning Katie Benouar, Senior Transportation Planner Office of Regional and.
MARYLAND FREIGHT SUMMIT Freight in the Mid-Atlantic Region Jeffrey F. Paniati Associate Administrator for Operations Federal Highway Administration September.
Border Trade Advisory Committee Report Cary Karnstadt, TxDOT 2012 Border to Border Transportation Conference South Padre Island, TX November 14, 2012.
Ohio Department of Transportation Steering Committee Meeting #3 Steering Committee Meeting #1May 30, 2012 Steering Committee Meeting #1 WELCOME Steering.
Engaging State DOT’s Engaging State DOT’s 2008 ITS America State Chapters Council Annual Meeting and State Chapters Strengthening Workshop Bernie Arseneau,
MOBILITY 2030: THE METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION PLAN FOR THE DALLAS-FORT WORTH METROPOLITAN AREA North Central Texas Council of Governments Transportation.
Comprehensive Plan Update Kevin O’Neill Seattle Bicycle Advisory Board September 2, 2015.
Creating the 2040 Regional Transportation Plan. Today’s Presentation Now Developing the Next RTP  Very Early Stages of Development  Website: 2040Plan.org.
FREIGHTSUPPORTIVE LAND USE PLANNINGGUIDELINESFREIGHTSUPPORTIVE PLANNINGGUIDELINES FHWA Talking Freight Series May 18/05 Video Seminar on Context Sensitive.
S.H. 121 – Dallas, Texas Case Study Presentation National Summit on Future Transportation Funding and Finance Strategies April 11, 2007 Michael Morris,
Interstate 69 Update Briefing  Loyd Neal, Nueces County Judge Alliance for I-69 Texas Board Chair  Jeff Austin III, Transportation Commission Member.
Brownfields: Real Property, the expansion or redevelopment, or reuse of which may be complicated by the presence or potential presence of contamination.
Mn/DOT and Economic Development ACEC Annual Meeting March 2, 2010.
Environmental Justice: Context Sensitive Planning Grant Program California Department of Transportation Division of Transportation Planning Office of Community.
The Regional Transport Strategy Transport for Regional Growth Conference Edinburgh 5 November 2015 John Saunders SEStran.
Bicycle Advisory Board September 2, 2015 Freight Master Plan.
Think Globally, Act Locally August 19, Introduction Why freight is important to central Ohio Global implications and impacts Highway system challenges.
Washington Transportation Plan 2030 A comprehensive and balanced statewide transportation policy plan reflecting the multi-faceted needs of the state’s.
Meat processing cluster Selami Xhepa Albanian Center for International Trade (ACIT)
Regional Mobility Plan I. Introduction This process for creating a regional mobility plan is designed for geographic areas with a small to medium sized.
Community Redevelopment for Eastside Report on Advisory Committee Input and Request for Board Direction June 26, 2012.
2060 Florida Transportation Plan Florida Model Task Force Meeting November 10, 2009.
Neighborhood Planning Process Lacoochee/Trilby Neighborhoods.
Our Mission... “To facilitate collaboration and partnerships through a comprehensive master plan which promotes economic growth, community development.
1. Freight Transport System Facilities: Seaports Airports Rail yards Distribution centers Warehouses High traffic roads Border crossings 2 Modes:
Goals and ObjectivesFeb. 20, 2014 TEXAS FREIGHT MOBILITY PLAN: FACILITATING TEXAS’ ECONOMIC GROWTH AND GLOBAL COMPETIVENESS Regional Freight Advisory Council.
ADVANCED TRANSPORTATION AND CONGESTION MANAGEMENT TECHNOLOGIES DEPLOYMENT (ATCMTD) PROGRAM 1 Bob Arnold, Director Office of Transportation Management,
Rice University – Baker Institute
Oregon State Rail Plan Update
Transforming Communities in the 21st Century
Project Overview – Phase 1
SPECIAL COMMITTEE ON INTERMODAL TRANSPORTATION & ECONOMIC EXPANSION
“efficient movement of goods across the entire state of Oregon”
Transportation Task Force Mission and Vision
Transforming Communities in the 21st Century
Transforming Communities in the 21st Century
Transforming Communities in the 21st Century
Port of Muscatine Planning and Feasibility study
Presentation transcript:

I-69 Corridor: A Citizens’ Report on Transportation Needs Judy Hawley Chair I-69 Corridor Advisory Committee

Overview Committee Charge Committee Charge Recurring Themes Recurring Themes Committee Conclusions Committee Conclusions Current/Future Transportation NeedsCurrent/Future Transportation Needs Community Opportunities and ImpactsCommunity Opportunities and Impacts FundingFunding Next Steps Next Steps

Committee Charge Provide the Commission recommendations on I-69 Corridor planning, development and public involvement which consider: the current and future demand for the I-69 Corridorthe current and future demand for the I-69 Corridor economic, political, societal, environmental, demographic, financial, multimodal and community impact issueseconomic, political, societal, environmental, demographic, financial, multimodal and community impact issues enhancing collaboration among TxDOT and affected communities, governments and interested partiesenhancing collaboration among TxDOT and affected communities, governments and interested parties

Remove the moniker Trans-Texas Corridor from project name Remove the moniker Trans-Texas Corridor from project name Use existing right of way where possible Use existing right of way where possible Early in the planning process, engage stakeholders and incorporate their recommendations Early in the planning process, engage stakeholders and incorporate their recommendations Protect private property rights and compensate fairly Protect private property rights and compensate fairly Recurring Themes

Committee Conclusions I-69 is the vital artery needed to connect the ports of entry to each other, the rest of Texas and the nation I-69 is the vital artery needed to connect the ports of entry to each other, the rest of Texas and the nation I-69 addresses the current urgency for additional road, rail and port capacity to accommodate freight movements within and through Texas I-69 addresses the current urgency for additional road, rail and port capacity to accommodate freight movements within and through Texas I-69 will optimize Texas ports’ capacity and distribution efficiency – making Texas the hemisphere’s most competitive location for moving freight - by reducing logistics costs for Texas industries, retailers, importers/exporters, distribution centers, manufacturers... I-69 will optimize Texas ports’ capacity and distribution efficiency – making Texas the hemisphere’s most competitive location for moving freight - by reducing logistics costs for Texas industries, retailers, importers/exporters, distribution centers, manufacturers... I-69, primarily a freight corridor, will provide environmental and congestion relief for Texas I-69, primarily a freight corridor, will provide environmental and congestion relief for Texas

Committee Conclusions I-69 can be the template to incorporate innovative technologies such as the Universal Freight Shuttle I-69 can be the template to incorporate innovative technologies such as the Universal Freight Shuttle I-69 should be an interstate-type facility I-69 should be an interstate-type facility International coordination is essential in the planning and development of I-69 International coordination is essential in the planning and development of I-69 Improvements should be viewed as a systematic approach, yet be compatible with local and regional needs Improvements should be viewed as a systematic approach, yet be compatible with local and regional needs

Committee Conclusions Communities, through the segment committees and other stakeholders, should be fully engaged in planning and decision-making Communities, through the segment committees and other stakeholders, should be fully engaged in planning and decision-making Local connectors must be addressed in planning and funding discussions Local connectors must be addressed in planning and funding discussions Projects currently included in regional transportation plans should be prioritized and built quickly Projects currently included in regional transportation plans should be prioritized and built quickly Improvements must include projects on US 59, US 281, US 77 and SH 44 and other connecting highways to provide a contiguous facility Improvements must include projects on US 59, US 281, US 77 and SH 44 and other connecting highways to provide a contiguous facility

Committee Conclusions The rapid population growth stimulated by proximity to an interstate corridor brings challenges to: school districts, city planning and zoning, emergency service providers, utility providers, etc. The rapid population growth stimulated by proximity to an interstate corridor brings challenges to: school districts, city planning and zoning, emergency service providers, utility providers, etc. Proximity to an interstate corridor brings communities economic opportunities such as job creation, funding for more projects, increased economic development, increased tourism, more evacuation routes Proximity to an interstate corridor brings communities economic opportunities such as job creation, funding for more projects, increased economic development, increased tourism, more evacuation routes

Committee Conclusions The State Legislature and TxDOT must commit to: The State Legislature and TxDOT must commit to: Fund and build I-69Fund and build I-69 Provide the tools of innovative financing to maximize fundingProvide the tools of innovative financing to maximize funding Stop diversions from Fund 6Stop diversions from Fund 6 Develop additional sources of fundingDevelop additional sources of funding Weigh in on federal authorization in order to prioritize and fund Interstate 69Weigh in on federal authorization in order to prioritize and fund Interstate 69

Committee “next steps” Assess economic impact of I-69 on statewide manufacturers, industries, agricultural producers, retailers, truckers, taxing entities, etc. Assess economic impact of I-69 on statewide manufacturers, industries, agricultural producers, retailers, truckers, taxing entities, etc. “Quantify” projected environmental and congestion savings from building I-69 “Quantify” projected environmental and congestion savings from building I-69 Collaborate with newly formed segment committees and TxDOT Collaborate with newly formed segment committees and TxDOT Explore and assess funding options Explore and assess funding options Develop recommendations for facilitating community opportunity/impact planning Develop recommendations for facilitating community opportunity/impact planning Develop additional “citizen” recommendations for the Commission as needed and/or requested Develop additional “citizen” recommendations for the Commission as needed and/or requested ntEmpower state and federal decision makers with economic data linking Texas’ prosperity with the capacity of the state’s infrastructure to competitively accommodate commerce