Some examples of quality standards and their use for self assessment and planning CINDA Workshop for TEIs Ramallah, May 2007.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The PRR: Linking Assessment, Planning & Budgeting PRR Workshop – April 4, 2013 Barbara Samuel Loftus, Ph.D. Misericordia University.
Advertisements

Chemawawin Cree Nation. Community Planning Change, Expectations and Performance Some Observations Chief Clarence Easter Chemawawin Cree Nation Aboriginal.
Setting internal Quality Assurance systems
Introduction to Assessment – Support Services Andrea Brown Director of Program Assessment and Institutional Research Dr. Debra Bryant Accreditation Liaison.
Subchapter M-Indian Self- Determination and Education Assistance Act Program Part 273-Education Contracts under Johnson-OMalley Act.
Standards Definition of standards Types of standards Purposes of standards Characteristics of standards How to write a standard Alexandria University Faculty.
Low-Cost Private Schools Knowledge Framework Research methodology template.
Using the New CAS Standards to Assess Your Transfer Student Programs and Services Janet Marling, Executive Director National Institute for the Study of.
STRATEGIC PLAN Community Unit School District 300 7/29/
ORGANIZATION. 2 Problem scenario  Develop an organizational chart for your laboratory showing lines of authority from the head of the organization to.
ASSESSMENT AND EVALUATION Assessment, data analysis and evaluation of findings as essential components of the self study for determining if objectives.
The Nuts and Bolts to Administrative Unit Outcomes (AUOs) Franklin P. Ow, Ph.D East Los Angeles College Assistant Professor, Chemistry Learning Assessment.
Introduction to Research Methodology
1 GETTING STARTED WITH ASSESSMENT Barbara Pennipede Associate Director of Assessment Office of Planning, Assessment and Research Office of Planning, Assessment.
MED  Problem of the Day: SEND +MORE MONEY.
Laboratory Personnel Dr/Ehsan Moahmen Rizk.
INDUSTRIAL & SYSTEMS ENGINEERING
1 GETTING STARTED WITH ASSESSMENT Barbara Pennipede Associate Director of Assessment Office of Planning, Assessment and Research Office of Planning, Assessment.
Graduate Program Review Prof. Emad Ali. Major Review Steps Self-study Report External evaluation Apply actions for improvement.
HELPFUL TIPS FOR UNIT PLANNING Office of Institutional Effectiveness.
Standards and Guidelines for Quality Assurance in the European
Huzairy Hassan School of Bioprocess Engineering UniMAP.
The Accreditation: The Policies on Distance Learning.
Mia Alexander-Snow, PhD Director, Office for Planning and Institutional Effectiveness Program Review Orientation 1.
MALAYSIAN QUALIFICATIONS AGENCY
August 3,  Review “Guiding Principles for SLO Assessment” (ASCCC, 2010)  Review Assessment Pulse Roundtable results  Discuss and formulate our.
Association for Biblical Higher Education February 13, 2013 Lori Jo Stanfield Evaluator Team Training for Business Officers.
Prof. György BAZSA, former president Hungarian Accreditation Committee (HAC) CUBRIK Workshop IV Beograd, 13 March, 2012 European Standards and Guidelines.
Highlights from Dr. Robin Dasher-Alston To Periodic Review Report Committee November 24, 2003.
Unit 1 – Preparation for Assessment LO 1.1&1.2&1.3.
JAZAN UNIVERSITY COLLEGE OF NURSING & ALLIED HEALTH SCIENCES
Basic Workshop For Reviewers NQAAC Recognize the developmental engagements Ensure that they operate smoothly and effectively” Ensure that all team members.
 This prepares educators to work in P-12 schools (1)  It provides direction (1)  It is knowledge-based, articulated, shared, coherent, consistent with.
National Commission for Academic Accreditation & Assessment Developmental Reviews at King Saud University and King Faisal University.
University of Idaho Successful External Program Review Archie George, Director Institutional Research and Assessment Jane Baillargeon, Assistant Director.
Important informations
Mia Alexander-Snow, PhD Director, Office for Planning and Institutional Effectiveness Program Review Orientation 1.
Georgia Institute of Technology CS 4320 Fall 2003.
Management in relation to learning processes Proposal Sources: ANECA, CHEA, DETC.
Standard Five - Library and Information Resources Committee Members Chris Brown, College of Education, Co-Chair Scott Smith, University Libraries, Co-Chair.
Student Support Services Standard II B & C. II.B. The institution recruits and admits diverse students who are able to benefit from its programs, consistent.
The University of Kentucky Program Review Process for Administrative Units April 18 & 20, 2006 JoLynn Noe, Assistant Director Office of Assessment
SESSION 4 EVALUATING FOR FULL ACCREDITATION USING COPPA EVALUATION INSTRUMENT 1.
Personnel record and report is a statement describing an event, situation and happening in a clear manner. It provide both qualitative and quantitative.
ANNOOR ISLAMIC SCHOOL AdvancEd Survey PURPOSE AND DIRECTION.
Peer Reviewer - Basic Workshop 2 Prof Hala Salah Consultant in NQAAP Prof Hussein El-Maghraby Member, NQAAP.
Response due: March 15,  Directions state that the report must “focus on the institution’s resolution of the recommendations and Commission concerns.”
Distance Learning and Accreditation Heather G. Hartman, Ph.D. Brenau University Online Studies and SACS Liaison.
External Review Team: Roles and Responsibilities A Very Brief Training! conducted by JoLynn Noe Office of Assessment.
ABET ACCRIDITATION STATUS AND TASKS AHEAD By Dr. Abdul Azeem.
Criterion 1 – Program Mission, Objectives and Outcomes Weight = 0.05 Factors Score 1 Does the program have documented measurable objectives that support.
Management in relation to learning processes Proposal Sources: ANECA, CHEA, DETC.
Criterion 1 Mission A. The institution's mission is broadly understood within the institution and guides its operations. B. The mission is articulated.
Revision N° 11ICAO Safety Management Systems (SMS) Course01/01/08 Module N° 9 – SMS operation.
HLC Criterion Five Primer Thursday, Nov. 5, :40 – 11:40 a.m. Event Center.
SZABIST INSTITUTIONAL RESEARCH DEPARTMENT QUALITY ENHANCEMENT CELL.
Evaluator Training Workshop March 1, 2012 Jeff Jordan Vice President for Student Life Seattle Pacific University.
QA in HEIs: ZIMCHE’s Perspectives Workshop on trends in HE for BUSE Administrators 8-9 April 2016 Evelyn Garwe, Deputy CEO.
Note: In 2009, this survey replaced the NCA/Baldrige Quality Standards Assessment that was administered from Also, 2010 was the first time.
Model of an Effective Program Review October 2008 Accrediting Commission for Community and Junior Colleges.
HLC Criterion Four Primer Thursday, Oct. 15, :40 – 11:40 a.m. Event Center.
1 Institutional Quality and Accreditation: A Workshop on the Basics.
Administration, Finances, and Resources
Self Assessment for Pastoral Care
Department of Political Science & Sociology North South University
DRAFT Standards for the Accreditation of e-Learning Programs
Clinical Engineering Lecture (3).
CLINICAL INFORMATION SYSTEM
Organization Definitions:
HR AUDIT (An Early Evaluation System) (An Early Evaluation System) S.Jayaprakash., M.Sc (IT), PGD.HRM, DLL & AL.
Presentation transcript:

Some examples of quality standards and their use for self assessment and planning CINDA Workshop for TEIs Ramallah, May 2007

May, 2007 CINDA2 General standards for an institution or programme The programme or institution must : Have clearly stated mission, goals, and objectives appropriate to the institution’s resources and the needs of its constituents Generally achieve these intentions at a level appropriate for its type of programme (or institution) or have clearly stated, realistic plans to remedy the situation Have good leadership and have appropriate and effective decision making, evaluation, planning and budgetary processes and organizational structure Have an adequate, well qualified, academic staff (Cont.)

May, 2007 CINDA3 General standards for an institution or programme (2) The programme or institution must : Have students appropriately selected and qualified to pursue the instructional programmes, who fulfil the requirements of the degree at appropriate levels Have adequate library and other academic resources Have adequate, appropriate student services Have adequate physical facilities Have sufficient financial resources to support the programmes, services and facilities Have reasonably well functioning administrative services (financial records, maintenance, personnel) which enhance the functioning of the education and research programmes

May, 2007 CINDA4 Have good leadership and have appropriate and effective decision making, evaluation, planning and budgetary processes and organizational structure  Aspects that should be taken into account:  Formal governance structure considering both individual and collegiate authorities  Governance and administration system and its features  Information system for institutional variables  Mechanisms for the assessment of governance and administrative effectiveness  Financial planning and management mechanisms  Management mechanisms: allocation and distribution of human and physical resources (Cont.)

May, 2007 CINDA5 Sources of information: Personal data and qualifications of institutional authorities Job description for main positions Description of actual operation of individual and collegiate mechanisms Availability of physical and financial resources allocated to institutional and departmental authorities for the fulfillment of their goals Decision making mechanisms, academic participation, institutional records Faculty satisfaction (Cont.) Have good leadership and have appropriate and effective decision making, evaluation, planning and budgetary processes and organizational structure

May, 2007 CINDA6 Have good leadership and have appropriate and effective decision making, evaluation, planning and budgetary processes and organizational structure Some questions that must be answered: Are there adequate institutional mechanisms to support decision making in terms of contrasting stated goals with actual institutional performance, available options, the environment, resources, etc.? Are qualifications of academic and administrative authorities adequate to institutional needs? Does the existing governance system allow for timely and appropriate decision making? Are authorities and faculty members happy with present governance and administrative arrangements? Which are the main institutional strengths/weaknesses in this area? Is there an action plan to deal with strengths and weaknesses?

May, 2007 CINDA7 Have adequate library and other academic resources Aspects that should be taken into account:  Teaching and learning resources, quantity and quality of libraries, maps, scientific equipment, audiovisual aids, computer stations, software, etc.  Staff associated with the management and usage of teaching and learning resources  Mechanisms for identifying needs in this area  Mechanisms for buying, maintaining and updating resources  Reports on the usage of available resources  Financial resources allocated to ensure appropriate availability and quality of teaching and learning resources  Student and faculty satisfaction with the availability, actualization and condition of resources. (Cont.).

May, 2007 CINDA8 Have adequate library and other academic resources Sources of information:  Description of main teaching and learning resources (laboratories, libraries, computer stations, etc.) in terms of actual available resources, staffing, financial support, etc.  Description of the procedures used to identify the need for procurement, maintenance and updating of resources.  Statistics on actual usage of teaching and learning resources.  Student and faculty satisfaction surveys (Cont.).

May, 2007 CINDA9 Have adequate library and other academic resources Questions that should be answered:  Are there appropriate institutional mechanisms to define, procure, maintain, review, update, teaching and learning resources? Are these mechanisms used and assessed?  Does the institution have the human resources it needs to ensure effective and timely use of resources?  Are there mechanisms to assess the degree and effectiveness of the use of resources  Which are the main strengths of the institution in this area? And its main weaknesses?  Is there a plan to deal with identified strengths and weaknesses

May, 2007 CINDA10  Begin by analyzing data that are readily available in institutional data bases – student data, staff data, financial data Standard production reports (enrollment by major, gender, full/part time status, socioeconomic status, grade distribution analysis, persistence/attrition rates, staff profile) Institutional ‘Facts and Figures’ Non standard data (Student Satisfaction, Withdrawing/Non- Returning Students, Alumni, Comparative Benchmarking Data)  Develop Your Own Data Collection Instrument…  Buy a Commercially Prepared Instrument… Sources of information

May, 2007 CINDA11 Institutional research is the sum total of all activities directed at describing the full spectrum of functions (educational, administrative, support) occurring at a college or university. Institutional research activities examine those functions in their broadest definitions, and embrace data collection and analytical strategies in support of decision making and policy formulation at the institution. The objective is to provide the richest possible array of information that will assist the institution in fully realizing its mission. Institutional Research

May, 2007 CINDA12 Institutional Research Is not haphazard or strictly reactive to circumstances within a college or university, or its external environment Is proactive, systematically gathering both quantitative and qualitative information in order to better understand both the institution and the external environment Is organized around a conceptual framework of the institution’s choosing, that enables a systematic and thorough approach to information gathering