OPERATIONAL PROGRAMME SLOVENIA-HUNGARY 2007-2013 Analysis Szentgotthard, September 2012 Aleš Mrkela Managing Authority Ministry of econom ic development.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Roma education: the role of the Structural Funds Policy Framework.
Advertisements

Structural and cohesion funds and the European Semester process –experiences from the past, lessons for the future for the European Structural and Investment.
Coast2capital.org.uk European Structural and Investment Funds Coast to Capital Shadow ESIF Committee 1 st Meeting, December 5 th 2014.
New opportunities for regional development through cross-border cooperation Ministry of Environmental Protection and Regional Development November 16,
Cyprus Project Management Society
Towards the Romania of PRINCIPLES OF PROGRAMMING The social and macroeconomic policy of Europe is the policy of Romania EU projects represent a.
2014 to 2020 European Structural and Investment Funds Growth Programme.
Helping to shape the EU Structural Funds The role of Social Enterprises 24th June ’13.
Entrepreneurship youth
The Interreg CENTRAL EUROPE Programme
1 MINISTRY OF REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT AND PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTORATE GENERAL PROGRAMMING OF REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT Operational Programme Regional Development.
Community Initiative Programme Interreg III A Greece – Italy February 2006.
Cross-border co-operation programme under the European Territorial Co-operation objective.
Adam Tyson, European Commission DG HE, Dublin, 22 April 2013
How the European Social Fund can contribute to social enterprises? Workshop 7: Structural funds (ESF, ERDF) for social enterprises Strasbourg, 16 January.
LV-RU programme and Europe territorial cooperation future perspectives in Latvia Ināra Buda Project “Cross-Border E-archive” Closing Conference, Riga,
Estonia - Latvia Programme Anu Roomere Managing Authority Budapest,
Common Strategic Framework Commission proposal Dominique Bé 3-4 May 2012, Bratislava.
The cohesion policy of the European Union Pelle Anita University of Szeged Faculty of Economics and Business Administration.
Prague, Operational Programmes aimed at innovation in the new EU Member States, and the implementation of Lisbon Agenda Dr. Csaba Novák Director.
The Territorial Dimension in the legislative proposals for cohesion policy Zsolt SZOKOLAI Policy Analyst, Urban development and territorial cohesion.
Regional Policy EU Cohesion Policy 2014 – Regional Policy Why change? Cohesion Policy has been changing already for a long time! ✦ EU has been changing:
EU funds for South East Europe: IPA II Cross-border Cooperation Programme BULGARIA-SERBIA Sofia, 2015.
Baltic Sea Region Programme EU:s strategi för Östersjöregionen, hur nära relation? -Större vikt, mer medel? -Ryssland, Vitryssland -Större roll,
Presentation WG 2 Managing EU Funds on the Regional Level Republic of Albania Ministry of European Integration (MEI) Regional Conference EU Perspectives.
Regional Policy ESI Funds' Policy in European Trade Unions Confederation Brussels – 13 March 2014 Diego Villalba de Miguel – DG Regional and.
EU Cohesion Policy 2014 – 2020 Measures, tools, methods for supporting cross-border cooperation prepared used for adoption and implementation of joint.
Post 2013 European Funding. EU Cohesion Policy Investment strategy aligned to deliver the Europe 2020 objectives of smart,
European Social Fund Cohesion Policy EU cohesion policy & social economy Dominique Bé, European Commission Worker ownership: the synthesis between.
The Future of Structural Funds Tony McGale and Susan Tamburrini European Structural Funds Division.
Regional Policy Major Projects in Cohesion Policy Major Projects Team, Unit G.1 Smart and Sustainable Growth Competence Centre, DG Regional and Urban Policy.
Cohesion policy – opportunities for low-carbon economy Photo credit: Kheng Guan Toh Dr. Gergana Miladinova European Commission - DG REGIO Team.
│ 1│ 1 What are we talking about?… Culture: Visual Arts, Performing Arts, Heritage Literature Cultural Industries: Film and Video, Television and radio,
1 Ministry of Regional Development. 2 Technical Assistance Operational Programme Information on implementation of technical assistance projects.
Partnership Agreement of the SR for years
Institutional structures for Structural Funds assistance Ministry of Finance September 10, 2003.
Budapest, June 2014 Hermina Golob Head od Development Policies Division SLOVENIA Partnership agreement and Operational programme
Regional Policy EU Cohesion Policy 2014 – 2020 Proposals from the European Commission.
EU European Territorial Cooperation Legal Package - State of play Vicente RODRIGUEZ SAEZ, DG Regional Policy, European Commission Deputy Head.
Future cohesion policy and RIS³ Jadranka Vukovic Johnsson Programme manager DG Regional Policy Cohesion Policy.
The European Structural and Investment Funds & the defence sector Paul Anciaux, Helsinki, 25 March 2014.
Hungary-Croatia IPA CBC Programme Overview of the Programme and planning for
March 2007, Smolyan Angelos SANOPOULOS, Euroconsultants SA CROSS BORDER COOPERATION Bulgaria-Greece Experiences, Framework and New Operational.
Employment and Skills Partnership Board David Fletcher Executive Director 15 th June Degrees Limited – Registered in England and Wales – Registration.
Structural Funds Managing Authority – Ministry of Finance 1 Technical Assistance Ilze Aleksandroviča Head of Control and Development Division EU Funds.
European Structural and Investment Funds Breakfast Briefing 4 th February 2015 Simon Nokes – Deputy Chief Executive, New Economy.
Conference with European multipliers of information 21 st of September 2010, Calarasi “Common borders. Common solutions” Common solutions” 21/09/2010.
Danube Transnational Programme – opportunities for cooperation Bucharest
1 EUROPEAN FUNDS IN HALF-TIME NEW CHALLENGES Jack Engwegen Head of the Czech Unit European Commission, Directorate General for Regional Policy Prague,
EU A new configuration of European Territorial Cooperation Vicente RODRIGUEZ SAEZ, DG Regional Policy, European Commission Deputy Head of Unit.
HUMAN RESOURCES DEVELOPMENT OPERATIONAL PROGRAMME 2007 – 2013.
EU Cohesion Policy : A new configuration of European Territorial Cooperation 16 September 2014| Milano.
Iruma Kravale Ministry of Environmental Protection and Regional Development Head of Development Instruments Department 28 November 2013, Riga.
URBACT IMPLEMENTATION NETWORKS. URBACT in a nutshell  European Territorial Cooperation programme (ETC) co- financed by ERDF  All 28 Member States as.
Towards the RIS3CAT Ricard Esparza Masana, PhD Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona Chisinau (Moldova), February 19th 2016.
EUROPEAN NEIGHBOURHOOD AND PARTNERSHIP INSTRUMENT - ENPI CROSS-BORDER COOPERATION PROGRAMMES.
PRESENTATION OF EUROPEAN TERRITORIAL COOPERATION OBJECTIVE PROGRAMMES FOR – POTENTIAL FOR COOPERATION Gediminas ČESONIS Deputy Director of Regional.
Freeware application found on Google play – download and install Could be used on Android, iPad, iPhone and Mac.
Regional Policy Future of Cohesion Policy and Investments in Health Christopher Todd, Head of Unit, Slovakia European Commission, Directorate General for.
Open Days 2015 “Interreg Europe: how can Investment for Growth and Jobs programmes benefit? October 15 th, 2015 / Brussels Managing Authority testimony:
Strategic Environmental Assessment for the Operative Programmes Anita Gulam Ana Kovačević Ministry of Environmental and Nature Protection, Republic of.
Ministry of Finance Contribution of the Operational Programmes to the implementation of the NSRF objectives Boriana Pencheva Director Management.
Overview of the Programme Achievements of previous period
ESF - State of the Art in Romania
– potential relevant financial allocations
Interreg IPA CBC Programme "Greece - Albania "
Future of Cohesion Policy
Dr. Katja Šnuderl, Contract manager
Biodiversity, Natura 2000 & Green Infrastructure in the Regional Policy Mathieu Fichter European Commission, DG Regio Team leader "sustainable.
Environment in Cohesion Policy framework for
Presentation transcript:

OPERATIONAL PROGRAMME SLOVENIA-HUNGARY Analysis Szentgotthard, September 2012 Aleš Mrkela Managing Authority Ministry of econom ic development and technology

ABOUT FUNDS IN CURRENT PROGRAMMING PERIOD

FINANCIAL TABLE PRIORITYERDFPUBLIC CO- FINANCING TOTAL INCREASE THE ATTRACTIVENESS OF THE COOPERATION AREA , , ,00 SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT , , ,00 TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE , ,00 TOTAL , , ,00 Available for projects: ,00 EUR Allocated to projects: ,13 EUR Average project size: ,51 EUR

CONTRACTED ERDF FUNDS BY REGIONS

RECEIVED ERDF FUNDS BY REGIONS

FORMED CONNECTIONS BETWEEN PARTNERS

Decommitment (N+2/N+3 rule) OP SI-HU Year ERDF funds available (N) Target amount of claimed ERDF for each year Total ERDF that must be spent by 31 December each year (target amount)- including advance payment Planned use of ERDF according to the approved operations/signed contracts - without TA Actual use of ERDF funds in all projects including the TA , , , , , , ,31 (up to ) , , ,13 Total Advance payment: ,97 Technical Assistance: ,00 Remaining amount: ,69

AREAS OF INTEREST IN CURRENT PROGRAMMING PERIOD

INCREASE THE ATTRACTIVENESS OF THE COOPERATION AREA % SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT % Development of Joint Tourist Destination 13,64Regional Development Cooperation 6,06 Preservation and Development of Culture 48,48Preventative Health Care 7,58 Improvement of Cross border Traffic Connections 4,55Environment Protection and Management 10,61 Efficient Energy Use 9,09 EXPRESSED INTEREST IN COOPERATION 1st Call: 54 Applications received 2nd Call: 69 Applications received 43 Applications supported

WHICH ORGANIZATIONS ARE INTERESTED IN TERRITORIAL COOPERATION IN OP SI-HU? Types of organizations Regional or local authority23% Public institution29% Chamber6% Private law company with non-profit character29% Association10% Private law company with for-profit character3%

WHERE DO YOU GET INFORMATIONS ABOUT TERRITORIAL COOPERATION OP SI-HU? Information source% Programme web page ( Other web pages10% Newspapers0% Radio3% TV0% Other project partners61%

WHAT WAS THE MOST DIFFICULT TASK TO APPLY OP SI-HU? What was the most difficult task to apply% Searching for public call information0% Project idea19% Search of proper partners19% Electronic application form29% Fullfillment of conditions10% Gathering necessary information23%

WHAT ARE YOUR INTERESTS IN OP SI-HU? Type of interest Monitor state of the programme55% Proper reporting of project partners97% Proper reporting of lead partners58% Eligible expenditures87% State Aid61% Information and publicity81%

WHY DO YOU ATTEND WORKSHOPS OF OP SI-HU? Reason I attend workshops with partners50% I rarely visit workshops43% I come from company that deals with application processes14% I come to workshops to search for potential partners3% Other4%

ARE YOU PREPARING PROJECTS JUST TO GET ERDF FUNDING? Level of agreement I totally agree3% I agree10% Neutral19% I don't agree55% I totally don't agree13%

Lack of prefinancing Own contributin Administrative burden Complicated application procedures Long reimbursement time Lead-partner principle State aid requirements Eligibility of expenditures Public procurement Project ideas connected to selection procedures and different needs of regions Bilingual application forms WHAT ARE THE BIGGEST OBSTACLES FOR APPLYING TO OP SI-HU ?

HOW WOULD YOU LIKE TO BE INFORMED IN FUTURE ABOUT TERRITORIAL COOPERATION? Medium 94% Web site45% Letter messages13% Newspaper6% Radio3% TV6%

AREAS OF INTEREST IN FUTURE PROGRAMMING PERIOD

ARE YOU FAMILIAR WITH FOLLOWING PROGRAMMING PERIOD CBC ? Are you familiar with following programming period?% Yes4% No67% Partly29%

Research & innovation Information and communication technologies (ICT) Competitiveness of Small and Medium-sized Enterprises (SMEs) Shift towards a low-carbon economy Climate change adaptation & risk prevention and management Environmental protection & resource efficiency Sustainable transport & removing bottlenecks in key network infrastructures Employment & supporting labour mobility Social inclusion & combating poverty Education, skills & lifelong learning Institutional capacity building & efficient public administrations PROPOSED THEMATIC OBJECTIVES FOR PROGRAMMING PERIOD ?

Transfer of successfull educational systems to our environment Companies environmental protection and efficient use of energy Programmes for children and youth (youth tourism) Sport cooperation Recycling Health-care projects Projects in the field of entrepreneurship and early involvement Virtual study companies with the possibility of funding real companies Cultural heritage of programme area Innovations and international connectivity of companies Cycling Eduaction of teachers in Internet communication technologies WHAT TOPICS WOULD INTEREST YOU IN THE FUTURE PROGRAMMING PERIOD OF CBC SI-HU ?

HOW COULD THE COOPERATION IN CBC SI-HU BE INCREASED? One language application process Prefinancing Having proper personnel (experience) Additional points for good partnerships from the past Easier procedures for public procurement (common public procurement) Shared costs and lump sum grants Real lead-partner principle

THANK YOU FOR YOUR ATTENTION QUESTIONS?