Page 1 IEEE 802.3 Ethernet Working Group - CSD Version 2.3 Items required by the IEEE 802 CSD are shown in Black text, supplementary items required by.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Doc.: IEEE /661r1 Submission November 2002 Ziv Belsky, WavionSlide 1 Proposal for the 5 criteria for the HT SG.
Advertisements

Doc.: IEEE /661r0 Submission November 2002 Ziv Belsky, WavionSlide 1 Proposal for the 5 criteria for the HT SG.
Doc.: IEEE /078 Submission May 2000 Matthew Shoemake, AlantroSlide 1 Information Regarding and Status of HRbSG Matthew B. Shoemake HRbSG Chairperson.
ECMP for 802.1Qxx Proposal for PAR and 5 Criteria Version 2 16 people from ECMP ad-hoc committee.
Doc.: IEEE /012r0 Submission January 2003 Jon Rosdahl, Micro LinearSlide 1 High Throughput Study Group WG Report and Meeting Slides Jon Rosdahl.
Doc.: IEEE /0085r2 Submission July 2011 Gerald Chouinard, CRCSlide Response to Comments received on the proposed a PAR and 5C Date:
Submission doc.: IEEE Comment #1 from WG Comment: In Section 5.2.b two examples of spectrum resource measurements are given: PER and.
Doc.: IEEE 802 EC-12/0008r1 Agenda March 2012 Jon Rosdahl, CSRSlide 1 More Proposed Changes to P&P and OM Date: Authors:
1 Force10 Networks, Inc. - Confidential and Proprietary, For Internal Use Only 1 Higher Speed Ethernet Update Greg Hankins APNIC IX SIG APRICOT /02/28.
CSD for P802.1AS-REV WG Wednesday, 05 November 2014.
IEEE 802.1ABrev Extension for Auto Attach Nigel Bragg Dan Romascanu Paul Unbehagen.
21-08-xxxx IEEE MEDIA INDEPENDENT HANDOVER DCN: mrpm Title: Comments on PAR/5C of MRPM SG Date Submitted: September 7, 2008.
IEEE Qbv DRAFT 5C’s for Time Aware Shaper enhancement to 802.1Q
Submission doc.: IEEE 11-10/0897r0 July 2014 Jon Rosdahl, CSRSlide PAR Review – July 2014 Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /252 Submission November M. Hoeben - No Wires Needed Load Balancing PAR Criteria Maarten Hoeben.
Submission doc.: IEEE 11-13/0333r1 March 2013 Jon Rosdahl, CSR Technology Inc.Slide Review of March 2013 Proposed Pars Date: Authors:
"Wearables" Standards Ad Hoc Committee Meeting January 14,15, 1998 FedEx, Memphis, TN.
Doc.: IEEE /0981r1 TGs Reference Architecture Considerations September 6, 2004 Tricci So & W. Steven Conner.Slide 1 TGs ESS Mesh System Reference.
PAR and CSD for P802.1Qxx WG January PAR (1) 1.1 Project Number: P802.1Qxx 1.2 Type of Document: Standard 1.3 Life Cycle: Full Use 2.1 Title:
Standardization of Mobile Wireless Small Cell Backhaul (SCB) Document Number: IEEE r Date Submitted: Source: Junhyeong.
Doc.: IEEE /0498r0 Submission April 2008 Eldad Perahia, Intel CorporationSlide 1 Modifications to the 60GHz PAR & 5 C’s Proposal Date:
CSD for P802.1Qcj WG January Project process requirements Managed objects – Describe the plan for developing a definition of managed objects.
Privecsg Privacy Recommendation PAR Proposal Date: [ ] Authors: NameAffiliationPhone Juan Carlos ZúñigaInterDigital
1 Recommendations Now that 40 GbE has been adopted as part of the 802.3ba Task Force, there is a need to consider inter-switch links applications at 40.
1 6/3/2003 IEEE Link Security Study Group, June 2003, Ottawa, Canada Secure Frame Format PAR: 5 Criteria.
Doc.: IEEE /1220r0 Submission November 2009 Jon Rosdahl, CSRSlide 1 WG11 Comments on PARs submitted Nov 2009 Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /0981r0 TGs Reference Architecture Considerations August 30, 2004 Tricci So.Slide 1 TGs ESS Mesh System Reference Architecture Considerations.
Privecsg Privacy Recommendation PAR Proposal Date: [ ] Authors: NameAffiliationPhone Juan Carlos ZúñigaInterDigital
Doc.: IEEE /0904r1 Submission July 2012 Jon Rosdahl (CSR)Slide Review of July 2012 Proposed Pars Date: Authors:
IEEE mban SubmissionSlide 1 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title:Resolution.
Privecsg Privacy Recommendation PAR Proposal Date: [ ] Authors: NameAffiliationPhone Juan Carlos ZúñigaInterDigital
1 IEEE interim, Orlando, Florida, March, 2008new-nfinn-fast-chains-rings-par5c-0308-v1 Fast Recovery for Chains and Rings Proposal for PAR and 5.
Doc.: IEEE sru Submission 11 November 2013 M Ariyoshi, S Kitazawa (ATR)Slide 1 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal.
Doc.: IEEE /0356r0 Submission March 2009 Jon Rosdahl, CSRSlide 1 New WG PARs that WG11 must consider in March 2009 Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /0860r0 Submission July 2010 Jon Rosdahl, CSRSlide 1 Comments for p New PAR – July 2010 Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /0236r0 Submission November 2009 Wendong Hu, STMSlide 1 Responses to Comments on PAR Modification IEEE P Wireless RANs.
Privecsg Privacy Recommendation PAR Proposal Date: [ ] Authors: NameAffiliationPhone Juan Carlos ZúñigaInterDigital
IEEE Std Proposed Revision Purpose, Scope & 5 Criteria.
Contents of this presentation ● PAR material (Title, Scope, Purpose) ● Material as developed at previous meetings ● Provision for new/revised material.
Contents of this presentation ● PAR material (Title, Scope, Purpose) ● Material as developed at previous meetings ● Provision for new/revised material.
IEEE P criteria responses
<month year> doc.: IEEE < e> November 2011
Comments on HT PAR & 5 Criteria
PAR Review - Meeting Agenda and Comment slides - Vancouver 2017
Nov 2010 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: Resolution of PAR and 5C Comments for MBAN Study.
doc.: IEEE <doc#>
P802.1CS Link-local Registration Protocol
Congestion Management Study Group
Review of March 2013 Proposed Pars
VHT SG PAR Feedback from Individuals
July 2017 Response to comments on 802.1ACct - Amendment: Support for IEEE Std  PAR and CSD July 2017 Thomas Kürner, Chair TG3d .
Jan Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [PAR and CSD document discussion] Date Submitted:
July 2017 Response to comments on 802.1ACct - Amendment: Support for IEEE Std  PAR and CSD July 2017 Thomas Kürner, Chair TG3d .
doc.: IEEE <492> <month year> November 2015
Submission Title: [Proposal on PAR and 5C draft for BAN]
<month year> Denver, March 2006
Privacy Recommendation PAR Proposal
Submission Title: [Proposal on PAR and 5C draft for BAN]
Jan Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [PAR and CSD document discussion] Date Submitted:
900 MHz ISM Band Date: Authors: January 2010 Month Year
<month year> Denver, March 2006
comments on Pending 802 PARs – July 2011
July doc.: IEEE /0997r0 July Response to Comments received on the proposed a PAR and 5C Date: Authors: Gerald.
Comments for p New PAR – July 2010
High Throughput Study Group WG Report and Meeting Slides
PAR Review - Agenda and Meeting slides - March 2016
March 15, 2015 Kunal Shah SG4v Chair
Submission Title: BAN closing report for San Diego, CA
Proposed text for Section 6.5 of 5 Criteria
Interest for HDR extension to a
Presentation transcript:

Page 1 IEEE Ethernet Working Group - CSD Version 2.3 Items required by the IEEE 802 CSD are shown in Black text, supplementary items required by IEEE are shown in Blue text. It is expected that items shown in Red text will be proposed to be added to the IEEE Operating Rules. The IEEE 802 Criteria for Standards Development (CSD) are defined in Clause 14 of the IEEE 802 LAN/MAN Standards Committee (LMSC) Operations Manual. The criteria include project process requirements (“Managed Objects”) and 5 Criteria (5C) requirements. The 5C are supplemented by subclause 7.2 ‘Five Criteria’ of the ‘Operating Rules of IEEE Project 802 Working Group 802.3, CSMA/CD LANs’. IEEE Criteria for Standards Development (CSD) The following are the CSD Responses in relation to the IEEE P802.3xx PAR"

Page 2 IEEE Ethernet Working Group - CSD Version 2.3 Managed Objects Describe the plan for developing a definition of managed objects. The plan shall specify one of the following: a)The definitions will be part of this project. b)The definitions will be part of a different project and provide the plan for that project or anticipated future project. c)The definitions will not be developed and explain why such definitions are not needed.

Page 3 IEEE Ethernet Working Group - CSD Version 2.3 Broad Market Potential Each proposed IEEE 802 LMSC standard shall have broad market potential. At a minimum, address the following areas: a)Broad sets of applicability. b)Multiple vendors and numerous users. c)Balanced Costs (LAN versus attached stations) [Removed from IEEE Criteria Nov 2012]

Page 4 IEEE Ethernet Working Group - CSD Version 2.3 Compatibility Each proposed IEEE 802 LMSC standard should be in conformance with IEEE Std 802, IEEE 802.1AC, and IEEE 802.1Q. If any variances in conformance emerge, they shall be thoroughly disclosed and reviewed with IEEE WG prior to submitting a PAR to the Sponsor. a)Will the proposed standard comply with IEEE Std 802, IEEE Std 802.1AC and IEEE Std 802.1Q? b)If the answer to a) is “no”, supply the response from the IEEE WG. c)Compatibility with IEEE Std d)Conformance with the IEEE Std MAC e)Managed object definitions compatible with SNMP (see Managed Objects)

Page 5 IEEE Ethernet Working Group - CSD Version 2.3 Distinct Identity Each proposed IEEE 802 LMSC standard shall provide evidence of a distinct identity. Identify standards and standards projects with similar scopes and for each one describe why the proposed project is substantially different. Substantially different from other IEEE specifications / solutions.

Page 6 IEEE Ethernet Working Group - CSD Version 2.3 Technical Feasibility Each proposed IEEE 802 LMSC standard shall provide evidence that the project is technically feasible within the time frame of the project. At a minimum, address the following items to demonstrate technical feasibility: a)Demonstrated system feasibility. b)Proven similar technology via testing, modeling, simulation, etc. c)Confidence in reliability. [Removed from IEEE 802 CSD Nov 2013]

Page 7 IEEE Ethernet Working Group - CSD Version 2.3 Economic Feasibility Each proposed IEEE 802 LMSC standard shall provide evidence of economic feasibility. Demonstrate, as far as can reasonably be estimated, the economic feasibility of the proposed project for its intended applications. Among the areas that may be addressed in the cost for performance analysis are the following: a)Balanced costs (infrastructure versus attached stations). b)Known cost factors. c)Consideration of installation costs. d)Consideration of operational costs (e.g. energy consumption). e)Other areas, as appropriate.