Dimensions and parameters for the evaluation of e-learning Dr. Bernhard Ertl.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Designing and Developing Online Courses. Course Life Cycle Design Develop Implement Evaluate Revise.
Advertisements

E-Learning for Enterprise Managing online learners and learning e-Learning for Enterprise Clive Young & Wendy David.
Achieve Benefit from IT Projects. Aim This presentation is prepared to support and give a general overview of the ‘How to Achieve Benefits from IT Projects’
 will be able to write a learning outcome from the student perspective  will understand the difference between writing about an activity and learning.
An Introduction to Instructional Design Online Learning Institute Mary Ellen Bornak Instructional Designer Bucks County Community College.
The ADDIE Model By: Elva Juarez LEARNING THEORIES.
Michelle Gordon EDT/721 October 24, 2011 Dr. Sean Preston.
EDMOULD LLP/LDV/TOI/2009/SK/ PROJECT INTRODUCTION 1st meeting of the project partners Improvement of Vocational Education in Field of Injection.
Performance management guidance
EURIDICE project Evaluation of image database use in online learning environment 11/
Next Generation eLearning Can Technology Learn from the Learners: The case for Adaptive Learning Objects Vincent Wade Research Director, Knowledge & Data.
Leading, Teaching and Learning through SAMR Monique Simpson LWDT
Master Online Teacher Competencies eLearning Conference 2007 Virgil E. Varvel Jr.
Web-site Design Strategy.  For P5, learners need to draw up plans for the evaluation of the website design.  The plans should include consideration.
Questions to Consider What are the components of a comprehensive instructional design plan? What premises underline the instructional design process?
INTEL CONFIDENTIAL, FOR INTERNAL USE ONLY 1 Intel Teach Essentials Program Curriculum Roundtable – Oxford – July 2013.
Quality Management in Web-based Learning - A Finnish perspective Kristiina Karjalainen Lappeenranta University of Technology FVU Seminar 20 June 2005.
Instructional Design Aeman Alabuod. Instructional Design instructional Design (also called Instructional Systems Design (ISD)) is the practice of creating.
“Towards a Knowledge Society” April 7, 2006, Riga, Latvia 1 E-collaboration as a Way to Education and Society for Disabled Youth Jurijs Lavendels, Vjacheslav.
SOCRATES PROGRAMME OnLineMath&Sciences Project Results by 31 January 2007 and Planning October 2005 – September 2007.
Road Safety Practitioner Foundation Course - Overview and Experience Ian Edwards.
Scholarly Project Malignant Hyperthermia Learning Module
Recommendations for Best Practice. Best Practice This section will present an analysis of the literature in the following categories: Organization of.
LISA HOLMES INSTRUCTIONAL DESIGN. The process of creating an effective learning experience that takes into consideration: what needs to be learned what.
Instructional System Design
Student Learning Objectives 1 Phase 3 Regional Training April 2013.
Asynchronous Discussions and Assessment in Online Learning Vonderwell, S., Liang, X., & Alderman, K. (2007). Asynchronous Discussions and Assessment in.
Designing CLIL University of Goldsmith, April 24th 2014 Language Learning Matters.
Online Course Development and Constructivist Teaching Strategies Susan M. Zvacek, Ph.D
Project Summary Using to Create a Classroom Website By Eddie Mathews
Instructional/Program Design Produced by Dr. James J. Kirk Professor of HRD Western Carolina University.
A Model for EAP Training Development Zhiyun Zhang IDE 632 — Instructional Design & Development II Instructor : Dr. Gerald S. Edmonds.
Company LOGO Presenter: Hlengiwe Mfeka – 03 July 2013.
Curriculum development and curriculum assessment TEMPUS: Second consortium meeting, Koblanz Landau, Germany, March 2013 Dr. Roxana Reichman Working team.
Presented by: Tina Chargois. Online learning is becoming more and more prevalent, and offers a host of new opportunities for today’s students.
1Management Sciences for Health Principles of Curriculum Development.
RPPS Education Development Process Debbie Bender.
Asst. Prof. Thapanee Thammetar, Ph.D. Director of Thailand Cyber Univ. Quality Assurance, e-Learning content development and operation ASEAN-ROK Session.
Cleo Sgouropoulou * Educational Technology & Didactics of Informatics Educational Technology & Didactics of Informatics Instructional.
 Read through problems  Identify problems you think your team has the capacity and interest to solve  Prioritize the problems and indicate the.
CREATIT Project Meeting at H2020 Workshop, Belgrade, 9 Oct 2014 V-Alert Project Virtual World for Awareness and Learning on Information Security Divna.
By: Catherine Mendoza. Evaluate Implement Develop Analyze Design.
Summary of Local Seminars & Focus Groups 20/06/ Athens WP8 – TESTING II coordinated by IFI.
The Ferl Practitioners’ Programme Transforming Teaching and Learning with ILT O4.3 ILT Implementation.
Copyright © Intel Corporation. All rights reserved. Intel, the Intel logo, Intel Education Initiative, and Intel Teach Program are trademarks of.
Results of WP 4: Implementation, experimentation of teacher training actions Open University of Catalonia - From November 4th to December 19th.
IC&IC eLearning solutions Bucarest, 2 September 2010.
Designing and Planning for Technology-Enhanced Instruction
QTC Tel: : Yan Li QTC Tel: : Student-Centred Learning The Challenge of Change.
Considering the Roles of Research and Evaluation in DR K-12 Projects December 3, 2010.
UNGEI – GPE Partnership Questions for UNGEI GAC. UNGEI Resources What resources might be required at the global or country level to carry out the proposed.
Neuroblend Curriculum and Learning Paths. Introduction Project Description Professional neuroscience nursing ECP Curriculum Description Pedagogical background.
Work package 4 Evaluation, quality and report. Work package 4: Evaluation, quality and report Evaluation strategy: 1. Evaluation of the initial situation.
Instructional Design Course Evaluation Phase. Agenda The Evaluation Process Expert Review Small Group Review The Pilot Feedback and Revision Evaluation.
Aaron Panych eLearning & Instructional Designer Identify key elements of an well-designed online course Describe my process of developing an online course.
BSU E-Learning and PBL Project WP 2: Training of Trainers Mona Dahms, Henrik Bregnhøj Denmark.
Activities at a local level CEPer Siete Villas, Spain.
FLORIDA EDUCATORS ACCOMPLISHED PRACTICES Newly revised.
School practice Dragica Trivic. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS FROM TEMPUS MASTS CONFERENCE in Novi Sad Practice should be seen as an integral part of the.
4 th Biennial SAMEA Conference Meaningful Evaluation: Improving Use and Results Evaluation of Teacher-Directed ICT Initiatives Presenter Mokete Mokone.
, 15-18: E-Learning and Mobile Learning Kopp, Schulze, Mandl Design Principles in E-Learning Which Design Principles Influence Acceptance and.
Pedagogical aspects in assuring quality in virtual education environments University of Gothenburg, Sweden.
ENHANCING QUALITY IN ONLINE LEARNING Nadeosa Conference Durban University of Technology 8-9 July 2015 Dr Ephraim Mhlanga.
Setting up and Optimizing VLRCs
Unit 6 Research Project in HSC Unit 6 Research Project in Health and Social Care Aim This unit aims to develop learners’ skills of independent enquiry.
Instructional Design Gibran Carter.
Design of eLearning applications
Curriculum design.
Interdisciplinary learning (secondary version)
TITLE: MY REFLECTIONS ON SEMESTER 1 OF THE MSc CMCP COURSE AT THE UNIVERSITY OF MAURITIUS PRESENTED BY: UDHIN WAAIZA DATE: 7TH DECEMBER 2004.
Presentation transcript:

Dimensions and parameters for the evaluation of e-learning Dr. Bernhard Ertl

Why evaluation? To ensure the quality of the learning environment To ensure acceptance of the learning environment To learn about learners´ needs To prove the value and benefits of the environment to financers and participants

Results of an Evaluation Increased knowledge of learning processes Knowledge of the effectiveness of the learning environment  Target-group-specific improvements

Evaluation Forms Formative Evaluation –Takes place during the course Summative Evaluation –Takes place at the end of the course

Formative evaluation Analysis of the learning process: –Discovering problems –Optimisation of the learning environment

Summative Evaluation Analysis of the outcomes: –Knowledge gain –Acceptance

Evaluators Learners Teachers Experts –Internal –External

Dimensions of evaluation Cognitive dimension – do the learners have the necessary strategies to work in the learning environment? Epistemological dimension – the structure and implementation of the content Social dimension –available facilitation, tutoring and sociability Technical dimension – usability and technical support offered

Cognitive Dimension Learning prerequisites -Does the learning environment allow learners to activate existing knowledge? -Do the learners have required prior knowledge? Learning strategies -Which strategies are encouraged in the environment? -Are the learners supported in their use of strategies?

Epistemological Dimension Appropriateness of content -Who is the target group? -Is the content up-to-date? Didactical design -Based on a particular education theory? -Which concrete learning goals? Acceptance -Would participants recommend the course? -Did it meet their expectations?

Social Dimension Facilitation -To what extent do the users receive support in collaborative learning? -Do tutors and pupils have set roles and tasks? Sociability -Are the face-to-face and online elements well integrated? -Is there a positive social environment within the groups?

Technical Dimension Usability -Are the tools appropriate and adequate? -Usability and design of the environment? Support -Is the technical support offered to the users adequate?

Evaluation Model during Implementation Planning phaseImplementation Aims Appropriateness Didactical Design Learning prerequisites Learning strategies Appropriateness Didactical Design Learning prerequisites Learning results Fulfillment of aims Acceptance formative summative Pilot Learning processes Learning strategies Sociability Technical Support Learning prerequisites

Evaluation during productive Use Learners in learning environment formative: summative: learning process outcomes acceptance Analysis of test results Addition of necessary changes

Summary Evaluation is key to any e-learning project Evaluation may take place continuously throughout a project A number of parameters must be considered in order to evaluate a learning environment as a whole

Thank you for your attention