SÄTEILYTURVAKESKUS STRÅLSÄKERHETSCENTRALEN RADIATION AND NUCLEAR SAFETY AUTHORITY Key outcomes of IRRS Mission in Finland 15.-26.10.2012 Kirsi Alm-Lytz.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Presented by: Muhammad Ayub Pakistan Nuclear Regulatory Authority Safety Enhancement at Nuclear Power Plants in Pakistan Prospects of Nuclear Energy in.
Advertisements

IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency. IAEA Outline Learning objectives Introduction Functions of Regulatory Body (RB) on EPR Appraisal guidance: Part.
Licensing of Nuclear Power Plants in Pakistan
School for drafting regulations Nuclear Safety Decommissioning Vienna, 2-7 December 2012 Tea Bilic Zabric.
INSAG DEVELOPMENT OF A DOCUMENT ON HIGH LEVEL SAFETY RECOMMENDATIONS FOR NUCLEAR POWER Milestone Issues: Group C. Nuclear Safety. A. Alonso (INSAG Member)
THE NUCLEAR WASTE DIRECTIVE: CONTENTS AND SOME REFLECTIONS ON ITS PEER-REVIEW MECHANISM Inter Jura Congress - INLA 21 st October 2014, Buenos Aires Nuria.
Regulatory Body MODIFIED Day 8 – Lecture 3.
SÄTEILYTURVAKESKUS STRÅLSÄKERHETSCENTRALEN RADIATION AND NUCLEAR SAFETY AUTHORITY Protection of the environment from ionising radiation - views of a regulator.
Technical Meeting on Evaluation Methodology for Nuclear Power Infrastructure Development December, 2008 Nuclear Safety in Infrastructure Building.
Postgraduate Educational Course in radiation protection and the Safety of Radiation sources PGEC Part IV The International System of Radiation Protection.
Gustavo Caruso Section Head Regulatory Activities Section
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency Overview of legal framework Regional Workshop - School for Drafting Regulations 3-14 November 2014 Abdelmadjid.
NEXT Lessons Learned from Integrated Regulatory Review Service (IRRS) 22 nd and 23 rd January 2014, Brussels Fernando Franco, Spanish Nuclear.
LEGAL FRAMEWORK & REGULATORY SYSTEM f or introduction of NPP into Vietnam Le Chi Dung (VARANS, Vietnam) Vienna, December 2008.
TEAM 1 NONAMECOUNTRY 1SU RUI (LEADER)CHINA 2TENG IYU LIN (PRESENTER)MALAYSIA 3MUHAMMAD TARIQ AZIZ (RAPPORTEUR)PAKISTAN 4NORAISHAH PUNGUTMALAYSIA 5MOHAMMAD.
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency Reviewing Management System and the Interface with Nuclear Security (IRRS Modules 4 and 12) BASIC IRRS TRAINING.
Swedish IRRS mission 6-17 Feb 2012 IRRS lessons learned workshop – Brussels 22 nd and 23 rd January Elisabeth Öhlén and Ingemar Lund.
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency. IAEA Outline Learning Objectives Responsibilities and functions of the government Framework for safety The Regulatory.
IAEA - Department of Nuclear Safety & Security
SÄTEILYTURVAKESKUS STRÅLSÄKERHETSCENTRALEN RADIATION AND NUCLEAR SAFETY AUTHORITY Example of a single national regulator responsible for both transport.
School for Drafting Regulations on Radiation Safety Vienna, November 2012 Rules and responsibilities of the regulatory body Jiří Veselý, SONS, Czech republic.
School for drafting regulations Nuclear Safety Operation Vienna, 26 November -7 December 2012 Tea Bilic Zabric.
RER/9/096 Regional Planning Meeting “Strengthening National Infrastructures for the Control of Radiation Sources” (TSA-1), (Phase II) Country: Bulgaria.
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency Reviewing Governmental and Regulatory Responsibilities (IRRS Modules 1, 2 and 3) BASIC IRRS TRAINING Lecture 9.
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency. IAEA Outline Learning objectives Introduction Authorization Inspection Enforcement 2 Basic IRRS Training - Reviewing.
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency. IAEA Outline Learning Objectives Introduction IRRS review of regulations and guides Relevant safety standards.
Organization and Implementation of a National Regulatory Program for the Control of Radiation Sources Regulatory Authority.
Maria J Moracho Ramirez Regulatory Activities Section
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency School of Drafting Regulations – November 2014 Government and Regulatory Body Functions and Responsibilities IAEA.
1 st Workshop on issues and trends arising from the European IRRS missions Findings and Conclusions A.Munuera Brussels, 22 nd and 23 rd January 2014.
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency. IAEA Photo: V. Friedrich Outline Learning Objectives General Safety Requirements Part 1 Other General Safety.
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency Governmental, Legal and Regulatory Framework for Safety and Regulatory Functions William Kennedy Research Reactor.
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency RER2006 RTC Establishing a Nuclear Safety Infrastructure for a National Nuclear Power Programme Wrap up, Where.
STRENGTHENING NATIONAL INFRASTRUCTURES FOR THE CONTROL OF RADIATION SOURCES RER/9/096 REGIONAL PLANNING MEETING ARMENIA ASHOT MNATSAKANYAN Head of Radiation.
4rd Meeting of the Steering Committee on Competence of Human Resources for Regulatory Bodies Vienna, 4-7 December 2012 Current Status of the Human Resources.
International Atomic Energy Agency School for Drafting Regulations on Radiation Safety RER/9/096 Vienna, 3 May, 2010 Adriana Nicic, Regulatory Activities.
23 January 2016 Gustavo C ARUSO Head, Regulatory Activities Section Division of Nuclear Installations Safety Department of Nuclear Safety and Security.
Swedish IRRS mission 6-17 Feb 2012 Ongoing work after the IRRS mission Elisabeth Öhlén, Ingemar Lund, Lars Skånberg.
Milestones for Nuclear Power Infrastructure Development Establishment of A Regulatory Framework Gustavo Caruso, Section Head, Regulatory Activities Section.
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency. IAEA Outline Learning objectives Introduction Authorization Inspection Enforcement 2 Basic IRRS Training - Reviewing.
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency. IAEA Outline Responsibilities and functions of the regulatory body Objectives of regulatory functions Organizational.
DEVELOPMENT OF THE NATIONAL INFRASTRUCTURE FOR NUCLEAR POWER IN VIETNAM DEVELOPMENT OF THE NATIONAL INFRASTRUCTURE FOR NUCLEAR POWER IN VIETNAM Vuong Huu.
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency. IAEA Photo: V. Friedrich Outline Learning Objectives Development and structure General Safety Requirements Part.
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency Arusha, Tanzania Uganda Dr. Akisophel Kisolo Project Counterpart 2 – 5 December 2013 RAF9038 Final Coordination.
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency Burkina Faso Delwendé NABAYAOGO RAF9038 Final Coordination Meeting Arusha, Tanzania 2 – 5 December 2013.
Organization and Implementation of a National Regulatory Program for the Control of Radiation Sources Program Performance Criteria.
Regulatory Control Training Workshop Regulatory Cooperation Forum
Nuclear and Treaty Law Section Office of Legal Affairs
Office of Legal Affairs
THAILAND Training and Tutoring Feedback
SESSION 3 Policy Framework
SESSION 3 Policy Framework
Radioactive waste repositories
MALAYSIA Training and Tutoring Feedback
AAEA Role in Improving EPR Coordination Interventions among Arab Countries Abdelmajid Mahjoub Arab Atomic Energy Agency
Nuclear and Treaty Law Section Office of Legal Affairs
Experts for experts Using the T&T international Projects to strengthen the professional development of NRA and TSO technical staff T&T second coordination.
IAEA Safety Guidance on Licensing and Oversight Activities
Armenia Training and Tutoring Feedback
Reviewing Governmental and Regulatory Responsibilities
Communication and Consultation with Interested Parties by the RB
RCF Plenary Session 21 September 2018
Regulatory Oversight of HOF in Finland
USNRC IRRS TRAINING Lecture 14
USNRC IRRS TRAINING Lecture18
Legal and Regulatory Framework for Nuclear Installations in IRAN
Reviewing Governmental and Regulatory Responsibilities
Preparation for the IRRS mission
IRRS Mission 2011 to Switzerland: Resulting Improvements to Regulatory Processes P. Flury.
Inspection Good practice (GP6):
Presentation transcript:

SÄTEILYTURVAKESKUS STRÅLSÄKERHETSCENTRALEN RADIATION AND NUCLEAR SAFETY AUTHORITY Key outcomes of IRRS Mission in Finland Kirsi Alm-Lytz & Kaisa-Leena Hutri January 22 nd, January, KlH 1

SÄTEILYTURVAKESKUS STRÅLSÄKERHETSCENTRALEN RADIATION AND NUCLEAR SAFETY AUTHORITY Scope of the IRRS mission Full-scope mission in 2012 (research reactor FiR 1 was excluded due to the decision to shut down the reactor) As regards modules 5-9, the following facilities/activities were included Nuclear power plants Radioactive sources Fuel cycle facilities Waste management facilities Decommissioning Following thematic areas were included –Transport –Control of medical exposure –Occupational radiation protection –Control of radioactive discharges and materials for clearance Fukushima Session was included 22 January, KlH 2

SÄTEILYTURVAKESKUS STRÅLSÄKERHETSCENTRALEN RADIATION AND NUCLEAR SAFETY AUTHORITY 8 recommendations 21 suggestions 10 good practices An Action Plan from the beginning of 2013 taking into account all suggestions & recommendations. General findings related to the results 3 22 January, KlH

SÄTEILYTURVAKESKUS STRÅLSÄKERHETSCENTRALEN RADIATION AND NUCLEAR SAFETY AUTHORITY Good practices Global Safety Regime active contribution of STUK to the global improvement of radiation and nuclear safety Political commitment for repository Long standing political commitment to plan and construct a geological repository for spent nuclear fuel Governmental Responsibilities and Global Nuclear Safety Regime (modules 1 and 2) 4 22 January, KlH

SÄTEILYTURVAKESKUS STRÅLSÄKERHETSCENTRALEN RADIATION AND NUCLEAR SAFETY AUTHORITY Improvements Although STUK operates in practice as an independent regulatory body, the government should strengthen the legislative framework by embedding in law the regulatory body separate from entities having responsibilities or interests that could unduly influence its decisions –STUK’s position in the governmental system –Mandatory technical regulations –License conditions -> Nuclear Energy Act will be changed and these initiatives have been proposed Governmental Responsibilities and Global Nuclear Safety Regime (modules 1 and 2) 5 22 January, KlH

SÄTEILYTURVAKESKUS STRÅLSÄKERHETSCENTRALEN RADIATION AND NUCLEAR SAFETY AUTHORITY Improvements cont. Written arrangements are needed for cooperation with ministries and other governmental authorities -> Preparatory work has been started National comprehensive policy and strategy for radioactive waste management is needed (nuclear waste strategy is available) -> Documents in “bit and pieces” will be compiled, also a requirement of 2011/70/Euratom to submit national programme including policy and strategy in 2015 Governmental Responsibilities and Global Nuclear Safety Regime (modules 1 and 2) 6 22 January, KlH

SÄTEILYTURVAKESKUS STRÅLSÄKERHETSCENTRALEN RADIATION AND NUCLEAR SAFETY AUTHORITY Improvements Review of roles, functions and reporting lines of the Advisory Commissions of STUK is needed  Procedures have been reviewed and updated Responsibilities and functions of the regulatory body (module 3) 7 22 January, KlH

SÄTEILYTURVAKESKUS STRÅLSÄKERHETSCENTRALEN RADIATION AND NUCLEAR SAFETY AUTHORITY Improvements Safety culture should be further elaborated in STUK’s Management System -> Safety culture workshops carried out, results will be elaborated in the Management System STUK’s Management System should be further improved –Coverage of relevant requirements –Consistency, duplications –Processes and their sub-processes, interdependency - > A plan for overall revision of the Management System Systematic programme is needed for internal audits and self assessments -> A plan for 4 year period for audits under preparation Management system of the regulatory body (module 4) 8 22 January, KlH

SÄTEILYTURVAKESKUS STRÅLSÄKERHETSCENTRALEN RADIATION AND NUCLEAR SAFETY AUTHORITY Good practise Effective safety assessment of new nuclear power plants Improvements The Finnish legislative framework should be further developed to cover authorization for facility decommissioning and the waste repository shutdowns -> has been proposed to be included in renewal of legislation Authorization and Review and Assessment (modules 5 and 6) 9 22 January, KlH

SÄTEILYTURVAKESKUS STRÅLSÄKERHETSCENTRALEN RADIATION AND NUCLEAR SAFETY AUTHORITY Improvements enhance the effectiveness of STUK inspection activities unannounced and reactive inspections, use of the graded approach for planning and conducting inspections formal qualification programme for inspectors -> Inspection procedures will be updated and procedure for formal qualification process for inspectors is under development STUK should consider the development and implementation of a more systematic method to collect indications of and assess the licensee’s safety culture. -> A pilot system for collecting safety culture findings of NPP under construction and SF disposal facility project will be extended for existing NPPs Inspection and Enforcement (modules 7 and 8) January, KlH

SÄTEILYTURVAKESKUS STRÅLSÄKERHETSCENTRALEN RADIATION AND NUCLEAR SAFETY AUTHORITY Improvement STUK should complete its comprehensive programme for the renewal of its nuclear safety regulatory guides (YVL) in accordance with its approved implementation plan. -> STUK has finalized renewal of the YVL guides –Take into account WENRA safety reference levels for reactors (2008), waste management and decommissioning as well as WENRA safety objectives for new reactors (2013) –Lessons learned from Fukushima Regulations and Guides (9) January, KlH

SÄTEILYTURVAKESKUS STRÅLSÄKERHETSCENTRALEN RADIATION AND NUCLEAR SAFETY AUTHORITY Good Practice The organization and conduct of emergency exercises by STUK, outstanding tools and programs of the STUK emergency center, coordination with other key players Emergency Preparedness and Response (module 10) January, KlH

SÄTEILYTURVAKESKUS STRÅLSÄKERHETSCENTRALEN RADIATION AND NUCLEAR SAFETY AUTHORITY Regulatory Framework –Sound regulatory framework for safety STUK Responsibilities and functions –STUK operates as an independent regulatory body –STUK conducts its regulatory processes in a well-organized, open and transparent manner –Committed, technically competent and well-motivated staff –Several areas of excellence Recommendations and suggestions are very helpful and relevant for the improvement of the Finnish regulatory control framework. However, most of them were based on STUK’s own self assessment findings Background and personal interest of the reviewers were reflected in the interviews in some modules. These were however mostly avoided in the final report Conclusions January, KlH