Chapter 5 1 Chapter 5. The Transportation- Planning Process 1.Explain how travel demand modeling fits into the transportation-planning process 2.Explain.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Interim Guidance on the Application of Travel and Land Use Forecasting in NEPA Statewide Travel Demand Modeling Committee October 14, 2010.
Advertisements

Wade E. Kline, AICP Community Development Planner.
Colorado Transportation Finance and Implementation Panel Overview Fort Morgan,Colorado September 13, 2007.
Florida’s Future Transportation Corridors Florida’s Future Transportation Corridors Presented to: Florida Redevelopment Association Presented by: Bob Romig.
Route 17 Corridor Study Public Workshop II – November 29, 2012 Orange / Sullivan County 1.
1 How to Succeed in Statewide and MPO Transportation Planning.
First home-interview survey (1944). Gravity model Where do the trips produced in TAZ 3 go? ? ? ? ?
Chapter 4 1 Chapter 4. Modeling Transportation Demand and Supply 1.List the four steps of transportation demand analysis 2.List the four steps of travel.
Transportation Planning Analysis UnitPNREC 2006 Transportation Modeling in Oregon: Overview of ODOT Statewide Integrated Model Pacific Northwest Regional.
PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS OVERVIEW Lecture 2. n Provide a historical perspective of the evolution of PMS over the last 20 years n Describe the basic.
Lec 2. Ch.1 UTP: Definition and Context Primary purpose of the planning effort 4 basic questions of UTP UTP as a process Importance of considering multimodal.
Lec 20, Ch.11: Transportation Planning Process (objectives)
Chapter 5 1 Chapter 5. The Transportation- Planning Process 1.Explain how travel demand modeling fits into the transportation-planning process 2.Explain.
Metropolitan Transportation Planning: Primer FHWA/FTA Transportation Planning Capacity Building Program.
1 Status Report on the Bus Systems in the National Capital Region Report of the Regional Bus Subcommittee to the Access for All Advisory Committee April.
Austin Strategic Mobility Plan Apr 19, 2010 Program Overview.
I n t e g r a t I n g C S S Practitioner Module 3 Module 3: CSS and Livability In Area Wide Planning.
1 SAFETEA: Transportation System Management, Operations and ITS Jeffrey F. Paniati Associate Administrator, Office of Operations Federal Highway Administration.
Program Update Baltimore MPO November 25, Internal Draft AGENDA  Program Overview  Alternatives Development  Stakeholder and Public Outreach.
Collaboration Collaboration Regional Transportation Plan (RTP) Regional Transportation Plan (RTP) Housing choices and opportunities Housing choices and.
U.S Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration Federal Transit Administration MAP-21 Moving Ahead with Progress in the 21 st Century Linking.
Center for Risk Management of Engineering Systems University of Virginia 1 Multimodal Maturity of Virginia’s Transportation Corridors April 19, 2006 presented.
Freight Bottleneck Study Update to the Intermodal, Freight, and Safety Subcommittee of the Regional Transportation Council September 12, 2002 North Central.
Ohio Transportation Planning Conference July 16, 2014.
Overview of SAFETEA-LU Sections 6001, 6002, 3005, and 3006 TRB January 13, 2008 Shari Schaftlein FHWA Project Development & Environmental Review Washington,
January Utah Statewide Household Travel Study Study overview and results.
MnDOT-ACEC Annual Conference March 5,  Capital planning and programming at MnDOT  Major considerations  A more transparent and collaborative.
BPAC. “Congestion management is the application of strategies to improve transportation system performance and reliability by reducing the adverse impacts.
Energy Law, Fall 2010 Natashia Holmes
Metropolitan Transportation Planning: Primer FHWA/FTA Transportation Planning Capacity Building Program.
Connectivity & Mobility
Funding Programs in the New York Metropolitan Region 2007 Greenways Summit Gerry Bogacz New York Metropolitan Transportation Council May 29, 2007.
MOVING AHEAD FOR PROGRESS IN THE 21 ST CENTURY MAP-21 Volusia TPO Board Presentation September 25, 2012.
Transportation Policy. Issues Fuel Tax Evasion -Revenues from motor fuel and other highway use taxes to provide the primary source of funding for nation’s.
1 Context Sensitive Design CE 453 Highway Design Iowa State University Howard R. Green Company.
MARYLAND FREIGHT SUMMIT Freight in the Mid-Atlantic Region Jeffrey F. Paniati Associate Administrator for Operations Federal Highway Administration September.
November 30, 2012 Beverly Davis, AICP Ron Ratliff, AICP.
Managed Lanes CE 550: Advanced Highway Design Damion Pregitzer.
ITS Standards Program Strategic Plan Summary June 16, 2009 Blake Christie Principal Engineer, Noblis for Steve Sill Project Manager, ITS Standards Program.
Iowa in Motion  Iowa’s Plan Process  Phased Approach Part  -current conditions -issues -elements.
PROJECT UPDATE PUBLIC OPEN HOUSE #3 OCTOBER 17 4:30 PM – 6:30 PM Dakota County Northern Service Center.
Creating the 2040 Regional Transportation Plan. Today’s Presentation Now Developing the Next RTP  Very Early Stages of Development  Website: 2040Plan.org.
Transportation Funding Workshop Nova Southeastern University December 10, 2012.
U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration DOT Livability Initiative Smart Mobility Framework Workshop June 16, 2009 Presented by:
PRESENTED BY PRISCILLA MARTINEZ-VELEZ CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION DIVISION OF TRANSPORTATION PLANNING SACRAMENTO, CA (916)
Business Logistics 420 Public Transportation Lecture 17 Transportation Planning Overview.
Environmental Justice: Context Sensitive Planning Grant Program California Department of Transportation Division of Transportation Planning Office of Community.
1 Bringing Global Thinking to Local Sustainability Efforts: A Collaborative Project for the Boston Region James Goldstein Tellus Institute.
Submission Document went to cabinet … Planning for the Future Core Strategy and Urban Core Plan (the Plan) is a key planning document and sets out the.
1 Status Report on the Bus Systems in the National Capital Region Report of the Regional Bus Subcommittee to the National Capital Region Transportation.
© 2014 HDR, Inc., all rights reserved. North Country Access Improvements Stakeholder Advisory Committee Meeting No. 6 October 6, 2015.
Caltrans Transportation Planning Grant Programs: Partnership Planning & 5304 (formerly 5305) Transit Planning Presented by Priscilla Martinez-Velez California.
Freight Transportation Plan Savannah, GA AMPO Conference - October 23, 2014.
Unit 2 DEVELOPMENT OF THE LONG RANGE TRANSPORTATION PLAN (LRTP) LCTCC Educational Program.
Addressing Freight in the Planning and Programming Process presented by Jim Brogan Cambridge Systematics, Inc. July 11, 2001 FHWA Freight Planning Workshop.
2040 LONG RANGE PLAN UPDATE Congestion Management Process Plan (CMPP) Major Update February 24, 2016.
Unit 1 THE TRANSPORTATION PLANNING PROCESS AND THE ROLE OF THE MPO LCTCC Educational Program.
MPO 100 Presented by Erica Tait. What is an MPO?  MPO stands for Metropolitan Planning Organization  Mandated by the federal government for urbanized.
Oregon State Rail Plan Update
Chelan County Transportation Element Update
Effectiveness of Funding Mechanisms and
What is the Regional Transportation Plan?
Draft Transportation Element September 6, 2017
September 2011 Public Open Houses
Chapter 4. Modeling Transportation Demand and Supply
September 2011 Public Open Houses
Chapter 5. The Transportation-Planning Process
Transportation Task Force Mission and Vision
What is an MPO Anyway? (and why should I care?)
Ohio-Kentucky-Indiana Regional Council of Governments
Presentation transcript:

Chapter 5 1 Chapter 5. The Transportation- Planning Process 1.Explain how travel demand modeling fits into the transportation-planning process 2.Explain how the transportation-planning process is used to help make public investment decisions 3.List stakeholders who should be involved in the planning process Chapter objectives covered in CE361: By the end of this chapter the student will be able to: The majority of Chapter 4 and Chapter 5 will be covered in CEEn 565 Urban Transportation Planning taught by Dr. Schultz. (It will be offered in fall semester every year.) If you are planning to take CEEn 565, keep this textbook. Other topics in the chapter are: 5.2 Brief overview of engineering economics 5.3 Economic evaluation of alternatives 5.4 Ranking transportation alternatives

2Chapter 5 Scenario – SR361 Congestion Mitigation Alternatives Developers  A by-pass alternative Downtown merchants  Widen SR361 from a two- lane to four-lane highway Environmental groups  A BRT & improved bus routes Taxpayer watchdog groups  Do-nothing

3Chapter 5 “Think about it” in P.5.2: Alternatives are a Benefit or a Cost to these stakeholders? AlternativeDrivers: thru traffic Drivers: local traffic Residents along current road DevelopersDowntown merchants Environme ntal groups TaxpayersGovernme nt agencies A.By-pass B. Widening C. BRT D. Do nothing

4Chapter 5 Primary purpose of the planning effort - To generate information useful to decision makers for the specific types of decisions they are facing. Given that so many agencies and groups are involved with metropolitan-level transportation decision making, a regional perspective is needed on how these activities fit together. Utah, Wasatch, Summit Counties MAG’s 2040 Transportation Plan Demand Forecasting

5Chapter 5 It has become “institutionalized,” meaning federal guidelines, regulations, and requirements for local planning are often driving forces behind existing planning methods. Transportation planning in metropolitan areas is a collaborative process, led by the metropolitan planning organizations (MPO) and other key stakeholders in the regional transportation system. MPOs in our area include the Mountain Land of Governments and the Wasatch Front Regional Council.Mountain Land of Governments Wasatch Front Regional Council Or, non-profit organizations like Envision Utah encourage participation of businesses and residents. MPOs were set up by the ISTEA of 1991 (the Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act of 1991).Envision Utah 5.1 The transportation-planning process

6Chapter 5 It is intended to furnish unbiased information about the effects that the proposed transportation project will have on the community and on its expected users. It is intended to give the appropriate information to those who will be responsible for deciding whether the transportation project should go forward.

7Chapter 5 The Transportation Equity Act for the 21 st Century (TEA-21) requires consideration of seven broad areas: 1.Support the economic vitality of the metropolitan area 2.Increase the safety and security of the transportation system for motorized and non-motorized users 3.Increase the accessibility and mobility options available to people and for freight 4.Protect and enhance the environment, promote energy conservation, and improve quality of life 5.Enhance the integration and connectivity of the transportation system, across and between modes, for people and freight 6.Promote efficient system management and operation 7.Emphasize the preservation of the existing transportation system

8Chapter 5 MPO’s 5 core functions in the planning process Establish a setting (for fair and impartial decision making environment) Evaluate transportation alternatives Maintain a Long-Range Transportation Plan (LRTP): funding over the next 20 years. Develop a Transportation Improvement Program (TIP): To be funded over the next 1- to 3-year period. Involve the public in the above four core functions. Visit the MAG website.

9Chapter 5 A typical structure for the transportation planning process “Transportation planning in metropolitan areas is a collaborative process, led by the metropolitan planning organizations (MPO) and other key stakeholders in the regional transportation system.”

10Chapter Involving the public and others (Stakeholders) Transportation facilities affect a large number of people. And, obviously, the transportation-planning process is ultimately a public process. Many public hearings and meetings are held before certain alternatives are selected. An effective early planning strategy is to identify (and notify) all possible “stakeholders.” A stakeholder is a person, a group of persons, a company, or an organization that has a stake in the decisions being made. “Even where community consensus cannot be reached, a sufficient level of consent to a particular solution means that a satisfactory outcome has been obtained.” See Table 5.1. for sample stakeholders.

Table 5.1 Stakeholders for Example Chapter 5

Table 5.1 continued 12Chapter 5