Redesigning State & Private Forestry. Why Change? Forests are being threatened at a scale larger and faster than current programs can address. Pressures.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

USDA May 21, 2003 Sustainable Rangelands Roundtable.

Advertisements

2007 – 2008 Academic/Business Plan …a strategic initiative School District of Palm Beach County New Horizons for Student Success.

Redesigning State & Private Forestry. Why Change? Forests are being threatened at a scale larger and faster than current programs can address. Pressures.

IFAD’s regional communication strategy for Western and Central Africa.

Review of Maternal and Child Health Service

A Statewide Strategy for Restoring Arizona’s Forests A 20-YEAR ACTION PLAN.

Public Workshop Welcome -to the -. What is the ?

Northeastern Area U&CF Update  Billy Terry, Assistant Director, Cooperative Fire, Cooperative Forest Management  Phillip Rodbell, Area Specialist, Urban.

USDA Forest Service Southwestern Region. Overview  Why Landscapes?  Other Landscape Efforts  Strategic Action Plan Summary  Region-wide Landscape.

USDA Forest Service Research and Development Tribal Engagement Roadmap Consultation - January 10 to May 11, 2014 [DATE of PRSTN]

Decision Making Tools for Strategic Planning 2014 Nonprofit Capacity Conference Margo Bailey, PhD April 21, 2014 Clarify your strategic plan hierarchy.

Vision Strategic Aims DMT Priorities Care Group/Directorate Service Plans Team Delivery Plans Individual Performance Plans Performance and Budget Management.

Deputy Chief James E. Hubbard August 25, A Quick Refresher on the Farm Bill (Title VIII) Requirements Statewide assessment of forest resource conditions.

Family Resource Center Association January 2015 Quarterly Meeting.

“Pennsylvania Perspectives” Allegheny SAF Winter Meeting February 11, 2011 Dan Devlin, State Forester Conserving Penn’s Woods.

National Cohesive Wildland Fire Strategy 1. What is the Cohesive Strategy? A national, collaborative approach to addressing wildland fire across all lands.

1 Preparing Washington for a Changing Climate An Integrated Climate Change Response Strategy Department of Ecology Hedia Adelsman, Executive Policy Advisor.

Information Needs National Forest System Update 2011 FIA User Group Meeting – Sacramento, CA March 9, 2011 Greg Kujawa NFS, Washington Office.

Developing Biodiversity Indicators Measuring Conservation Impact at Global and Project Scales Valerie Kapos.

Challenge Questions How good is our operational management?

Australia’s new development policy and performance framework.

Office of Science & Technology Policy Executive Office of the President The National Climate Assessment Version 3.0 Kathy Jacobs Assistant Director for.

FOREST AND RANGELANDS ASSESSMENT STEERING COMMITTEE Meeting and Webinar November 7, 2013 Green Infrastructure, Open Spaces, Sustainable Recreation, and.

JOINT VENTURES Celebrating 25 Years of Bird Conservation.

IDP Conference 2004 “Developmental Governance in Action” SESSION 7: Integrated Governance: > Provincial-Municipal Engagement - A Provincial Perspective.

Burl Carraway. Purpose of Redesign Shape and influence use of forest land on a scale and in a way that optimizes public benefits from trees and forests.

Demystifying State Assessments Forest Service State & Private Forestry Redesign Version 2 December 10, 2008.

PRESENTATION TO THE MHSA PLANNING STAKEHOLDER STEERING COMMITTEE FEBRUARY 24, 2014 MHSA THREE-YEAR PROGRAM AND EXPENDITURE PLAN –

TEMPUS IV- THIRD CALL FOR PROPOSALS Recommendation on how to make a good proposal TEMPUS INFORMATION DAYS Podgorica, MONTENEGRO 18 th December 2009.

US FOREST SERVICE REGIONAL ROUNDTABLE Planning Rule Revision Photographer: Bill Lea.

Inventory, Monitoring, and Assessments A Strategy to Improve the IM&A System Update and Feedback Session with Employees and Partners December 5, 2011.

1 State & Private Forestry Redesign Assessment Tool.

Overview of Integrated Landscape Land Use Planning Mike Chaveas, US Forest Service International Programs CARPE Inception Workshop Yaoundé, Cameroon February.

Managing the Impacts of Wildfires on Communities and the Environment: A Report to the President in Response to the Wildfires of 2000.

Lower Mississippi Valley Joint Venture Management Board Meeting the Expectations and Challenges of Joint Venture Implementation Buras, Louisiana June.

Northeastern Area Overview. Our Mission Lead and help support sustainable forest management and use of forests across the landscape to provide benefits.

Accelerating Vegetative Treatments to Improve Condition Class (also known as our Fuels Strategy Meeting!!!)

Commissioning Self Analysis and Planning Exercise activity sheets.

Advancing Natural and Nature-Based Infrastructure Solutions through Policy and Partnerships Kim Penn, NOAA Office for Coastal Management.

New Currency of Conservation Conference May 20, 2005 The USDA Forest Service and Nature’s Services Keeping Forests in Forests Peter J. Roussopoulos, Acting.

Forestry in the 2008 Farm Bill and Associated Federal Acts Craig McKinley NREM, OSU-Stillwater.

The South Atlantic Landscape Conservation Cooperative’s Third Thursday Web Forum The SALCC Strategic Plan and What It Means Thursday, April 19, 2012.

1 NOAA Priorities for an Ecosystem Approach to Management A Presentation to the NOAA Science Advisory Board John H. Dunnigan NOAA Ecosystem Goal Team Lead.

CALIFORNIA'S STATE WILDLIFE ACTION PLAN 2015 UPDATE A Conservation Legacy for Californians Armand Gonzales, Project Lead.

A Capacity Building Program of the Virginia Department of Education Division Support for Substantial School Improvement 1.

Establishing an Urban Research Agenda for Decision Ready Science: Priorities and Opportunities: From the Forest Perspective Sarah Low, Philadelphia Field.

Country Partnership Strategy FY12-16 Consultations with Civil Society The World Bank Group June 2, 2011.

Shaping the future Consultation on the Heritage Lottery Fund’s Strategy January – 26 April 2011.

DEVELOPMENTS IN REGULATORY DELIVERY – OUTCOMES, OPPORTUNITIES AND RISKS 3 March 2011 Rob Powell, Director.

LEADERS 2006 MOBILISATION OF EMERGENCY RESOURCES Judy R. Thomas Disaster Management Specialists.

Don’t make them come to you!.…forest research steps out of the Ivory Tower Southern Research Station.

12-CRS-0106 REVISED 8 FEB 2013 APO (Align, Plan and Organise)

Request for Proposals Q&A Webcast – February/March

The United States Foreign Assistance Reforms: An Overview.

Measuring Conservation Outcomes for Biodiversity: Name Date Location An overview on monitoring the status of biodiversity and the Outcome Monitoring Program.

Community Wildfire Protection Planning: HFRA and Beyond.

1 Formulate Alternatives Planning Step 5. 2 Social Science Activities in Land Use Planning Planning Steps Social Science Activities Steps 1 & 2: Identify.

National Coordinating Center for the Regional Genetic Service Collaboratives ( HRSA – ) Joan A. Scott, MS CGC, Chief, Genetics Services Branch Division.

Las Cienegas National Conservation Area An opportunity for cooperative conservation with the National Landscape Conservation System.

For over 20 years, the Government Accountability Office, Office of Management and Budgets, Congress, a variety of stakeholders and various administrations.

National Association of Conservation Districts Annual Meeting, Orlando, FL February 2, 2010 The Next Generation of The Next Generation of Conservation.

Using GAO’s Fraud Risk Management Framework

Bill Hubbard Southern Regional Extension Forester taking the urban forest to the next level.

Exploitation means to use and benefit from something. For Erasmus+ this means maximising the potential of the funded activities, so that the results are.

Maintenance BC - NZTA assessment in TIO

Community Wildfire Protection Plan

The Urban Forest Management Plan

North Shore Streamkeepers February 23, 2019

Colorado’s Forest Action Plan Mike Lester, State Forester and Director

Pacific Week of agriculture side event Forestry technical meeting

Presentation transcript:

Redesigning State & Private Forestry

Why Change? Forests are being threatened at a scale larger and faster than current programs can address. Pressures on forests and local economies are increasing. State and national budgets are tight.

S&PF Redesign Board of Directors: State Foresters Bill Crapser (WY) Paul DeLong (WI) Carl Garrison (VA) Jim Grace (PE) Jim Hull (TX) Larry Kotchman (ND) Mike Long (FL) Leah MacSwords (KY)

S&PF Redesign Board of Directors: Forest Service Ken Arney (Southern Region Deputy RF) Marsha Butterfield (Tribal Relations) Harv Forsgren (Regional Forester, R3) Jim Hubbard (Deputy Chief, S&PF) Larry Payne (USFS, Cooperative Forestry) Mike Prouty (Northeastern Area) Paul Ries (S&PF Director, R4)

Purpose Statement The purpose of a redesigned State & Private Forestry is to shape and influence forest land use on a scale and in a way that optimizes public benefits from trees and forests for both current and future generations.

Redesign Approach: Focus–Priority–Outcome Focus on national issues and sustaining diverse public benefits. Prioritize using the best available information to assess conditions & identify opportunities. Outcomes are achieved through collaboration, partnerships and working at appropriate scales.

Components of Change National Themes National Assessment State Assessments State Response Plans Competitive Resource Allocation Programs & Staffing Demonstrating & Communicating Results Integrated Program Delivery

National Themes Sustainable Forestry Conserve Working Forest Landscapes Conserve Working Forest Landscapes Enhance Benefits From Trees and Forests Protect Forests from Harm

National Assessment Geospatial assessment of conditions, trends & opportunities across ownerships. Key elements: wildland fire risk; insect & disease impacts; threat of conversion. Will be used to: –Guide planning, prioritization and resource allocation at the national and regional levels. –Monitor, demonstrate and communicate results. Will eventually include partner-accessible, web-based data base.

State Assessments Geospatially-based Resource Assessments Describe forest conditions (cross-jurisdictional) Identify forest related benefits and services Highlight trends/issues of concern Delineate high-priority landscapes Outline strategies for addressing priorities Development Timeline:

State Response Plans State proposal for investment of competitive federal dollars Collaboratively developed Respond to national priorities as well as those in State Assessments

Competitive Allocation: Process 1.National direction and priorities will guide the competitive process. 2.Initial allocation will go to the three geographic regions (NE,W,S). 3.State and federal partners in each geographic region will design a competitive process for allocation of funds.

Programs and Staffing: Ensure we have the right mix of skills, resources and tools to be successful. Improve program integration. Organize to support the three national themes. Prepare to address issues and opportunities in National Assessment & State Response Plans.

Demonstrating & Communicating Results Develop reporting system tied to National Assessment. Draft performance indicators for each national theme (“Annual Report Card”). Visual display of progress.

Questions? Comments? For more information, or to share input on the proposed S&PF Redesign, please contact: Paige LewisMelissa Zaksek Redesign Project LeadRedesign Communications (303) (505)