Southern Bridge Project Brown County Executive

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Beltline Highway ITS – Ramp Metering Project ODOT Planners Meeting April 25, 2012.
Advertisements

Project Description and Needs Lincoln Way Widening Addition of a center-turn lane and safety improvements to the grade and horizontal alignment. Needs.
Paula J. Trigg, County Engineer Public Works and Transportation Committee April 2, 2014 OVERVIEW | SOURCE OF PROJECTS PROPOSED HIGHWAY IMPROVEMENT.
CENTRAL CORRIDOR TRANSIT ACCESS STUDY Citizens for Modern Transit March 27, 2014.
City of Omak Central Avenue Bridge Replacement Project Prepared by Highlands Associates Photos by FlyBy Photos.
TRE ANNUAL MEETING Grant Levi, NDDOT Director November 26,
GIS at PSRC GIS data collection & travel demand modeling ESRM 250 February 4, 2010.
I-10 Exercise. Project Description Current and anticipated congestion due to rapid growth, one lane in each direction will be added to Interstate 10 from.
The Way Forward – A 21 st –Century Transportation Plan Frank DePaola, P.E. Administrator, Highway Division April 2013 Massachusetts Department of Transportation.
JANUARY 9, 2002 SCAJAQUADA CORRIDOR STUDY Grant Street to Parkside Avenue City of Buffalo Fisher Associates Joseph Passonneau & Partners In Association.
Corridor #5 Update United States Senate Briefing September 26, 2007.
May 14, st Street and 2 nd Street Couplet Traffic Modification Project.
Environmental Assessment Public Meeting
I-95 Corridor Coalition December 14, 2001 I-95 Corridor Coalition Mid-Atlantic Rail Operations Study — An Integrated Strategy to Eliminate Choke Points.
T.H. 23 / South Saratoga Street Reduced Conflict Intersection and Pedestrian Overpass Project Project hearing October 14, 2014 City Council Presenters.
Presentation to the AMP Leadership Team Moving forward. April 17, 2013.
Longmeadow Parkway Fox River Bridge Corridor
Freight Bottleneck Study Update to the Intermodal, Freight, and Safety Subcommittee of the Regional Transportation Council September 12, 2002 North Central.
Orange County Business Council Infrastructure Committee December 14, 2010 Draft Long-Range Transportation Plan Destination 2035.
Mississippi River Bridge An Analysis of Alternatives DRAFT Final Report Presentation January 31, 2007.
Sue Mulvihill, Deputy Commissioner & Chief Engineer Minnesota Department of Transportation.
CCJPA Sacramento to Roseville 3 rd Track Project Sacramento Stakeholder Advisory Committee (SAC) Meeting #1 HDR Office Tuesday, May 20, :00 - 9:00.
Alachua County Future Traffic Circulation Corridors Map Project July 10 th, 2007.
California’s Strategic Growth Plan Ken De Crescenzo Federal Liaison California Department of Transportation.
TRANSPORT The Cambridge Futures response to the Draft Structure Plan Dr Tony Hargreaves, Cambridge Futures.
1 Mississippi River Bridge An Analysis of Alternatives Expert Panel Review Sharon Greene & Associates.
1 Patriot’s Crossing  PROVIDES MOST REGIONAL CONGESTION RELIEF  UNIQUELY POSITIONED TO SUPPORT REGIONAL ECONOMIC GROWTH  IMPROVING TOTAL REGIONAL CONNECTIVITY.
Interstate 95 Corridor Improvement Program June 20, 2012.
WELCOME! July 31, 2012 ODOT District July 31, 2012 PURPOSE OF TONIGHT’S MEETING Introduce the project –Reconstruct I-75.
1 Item 12: Report on Draft Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan for the National Capital Region Michael Farrell TPB Staff Presentation to the Transportation Planning.
Portland North Small Starts Alternatives Analysis Coordination Meeting June 15, 2009.
Iowa in Motion  Iowa’s Plan Process  Phased Approach Part  -current conditions -issues -elements.
PROJECT UPDATE PUBLIC OPEN HOUSE #3 OCTOBER 17 4:30 PM – 6:30 PM Dakota County Northern Service Center.
PUBLIC MEETING November 19, 2003 Lower Manhattan Redevelopment D015183, PIN NYCD NYSDOT, REGION 11 Route 9A Project.
3000 Connecticut Avenue, N.W., Suite 208 Washington, DC
T.H. 23 / SOUTH SARATOGA STREET REDUCED CONFLICT INTERSECTION AND PEDESTRIAN OVERPASS PROJECT PROJECT HEARING June 10, 2014 City Council Presenters Glenn.
Forecasting and Evaluating Network Growth David Levinson Norah Montes de Oca Feng Xie.
PRESENTED BY PRISCILLA MARTINEZ-VELEZ CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION DIVISION OF TRANSPORTATION PLANNING SACRAMENTO, CA (916)
Palm Beach MPO Draft Complete Streets Policy Palm Beach MPO Draft Complete Streets Policy Advisory Committees September
I-95 Access Study Fredericksburg Area Project Status Update February 12, 2010.
8/7/02 Dane County Vandewalle & Associates Strand Associates William O’Connor Roadway Concept Select Link Traffic Modeling August 7, 2002.
The Fargo/Moorhead Area Interstate Operations Study Opportunities and Planned Activities Presentation for the Mn/DOT Travel Demand Modeling Coordinating.
Minnesota’s Urban Partnership Agreement UPA Timeline The UPA agreement with the US DOT requires that the project be operational by September 30, 2009,
INCORPORATING INCOME INTO TRAVEL DEMAND MODELING Brent Spence Bridge Case Study October 13, 2015.
September 14, 2015 Transportation Board of Directors John M. Terry Assistant Director- Engineering SR-160 from SR-159 to Mountain Springs Phase 2 Final.
Transportation Equity Act for the 21st Century TEA-21 Prepared by Iowa Department of Transportation September 1998.
Briefing for Transportation Finance Panel Nov 23, 2015 Economic Analysis Reports: 1.I-84 Viaduct in Hartford 2.I-84/Rt8 Mixmaster in Waterbury 3.New Haven.
Urban Bicycle Networks Throughout Virginia I. Introduction This multimodal investment network is the incorporation of four urban bicycle studies and plans.
Company LOGO Georgia Truck Lane Needs Identification Study Talking Freight Seminar March 19, 2008 Matthew Fowler, P.T.P Assistant State Planning Administrator.
Shaping our Future Transportation Transportation trends Influencing trends through land use decisions Alternative futures: Base Case and Scenario Complementary.
© 2014 HDR, Inc., all rights reserved. North Country Access Improvements Stakeholder Advisory Committee Meeting No. 6 October 6, 2015.
MED SR 18 Corridor Project MED PID October 13, 2015.
Solving the SR-520 Problem © 2005 Chaisy, Hurvitz, Jiang, Jun, ShinnersSlide 1 (of 37) Solving the SR-520 Problem prepared for UTRAN prepared by INSTEP.
I-35W/Highway 62 Crosstown Commons Reconstruction Nathan Aul, Bob Krussow, and Michael Martin.
Secondary & Cumulative Effects Analysis Training Program Module 1: How to Determine Which Resources Should be Considered in a SCEA How to identify what.
The Transportation Logistics Company Indiana Logistics Summit Infrastructure Needs and Opportunities September 26, 2007.
University Drive Road Diet September 8, Goals and Objectives A. Reduce vehicular speed in the corridor. B. Provide an attractive bicycle accommodation.
Solving the SR-520 Problem © 2005 Chaisy, Hurvitz, Jiang, Jun, ShinnersSlide 1 (of 31) Solving the SR-520 Problem prepared for UTRAN prepared by INSTEP.
Project Development and Environmental Study (PD&E) S.R. 30 (U.S.) 98 Gregory Street and Bayfront Parkway at 17 th Avenue Intersection Project Development.
City of New Braunfels Regional Transportation Planning Garry Ford, P.E., PTOE City Engineer June 13, 2017.
The I-465 West Leg Reconstruction Project
Downtown Valdosta Truck Traffic Mitigation Study
Progress Report Implementing the Interregional Transportation Strategic Plan May 22, 2003 in Sacramento Brian Smith, Deputy Director, Planning and.
PROJECT LOCATION Project begins at Garden Lane (East of I-4)
Highway 14 – Owatonna to Dodge Center District 6 Update
Technical and Public Advisory Committee Meeting #3
Draft Transportation Element September 6, 2017
Southern Bridge Project Brown County Executive
I-85 Corridor Light Rail Transit Feasibility Study
MPO Board Presentation
Presentation transcript:

Southern Bridge Project Brown County Executive Troy Streckenbach Brown County Executive

Project Background The 1996 Brown County Land Use and Transportation Plan recommended a two-phase strategy to handle existing and projected travel demand in the southern part of the metropolitan area. Phase 1: Replace the two-lane Claude Allouez Bridge with a four-lane bridge to improve bridge’s condition and reduce existing traffic congestion in downtown De Pere. This bridge was completed in 2008. (pic of CA bridge here?) Phase 2: Construct a new Fox River bridge south of downtown De Pere to handle traffic generated by development in southern De Pere, Ledgeview, Lawrence, Bellevue, Rockland, and other area communities.

Project Background Brown County is now working with the Wisconsin DOT, Federal Highway Administration, and southern metro area communities to complete the environmental and other studies required for the new Southern Bridge, connecting streets, and a new I-41 interchange.

Project Overview The Southern Bridge project will include: A new Fox River bridge and divided four-lane street between County Highways GV and X in Ledgeview and County Highways EB and F in Lawrence. A new full-access interchange at Interstate 41 (if justified by results of traffic and engineering studies). County Highway GV in Ledgeview Bicycle and pedestrian facilities.

Project Benefits Economic Development. The Southern Bridge project will: Significantly reduce shipping costs by providing another east-west link between business centers and major highways. Help attract and retain businesses and the talented people they employ by offering them many safe and convenient transportation options. Assist with efforts to develop De Pere’s Main Street Downtown by providing a convenient alternative route for large trucks and other vehicles.

Project Benefits Congestion Relief and Cost Avoidance. The plan for the Southern Bridge helped the state to rebuild the Claude Allouez Bridge (State Highway 32) as a four-lane structure instead of a more expensive six-lane structure in 2008. The Southern Bridge will also enable the state to avoid the high cost of expanding the Claude Allouez Bridge and Broadway south of this bridge by providing another Fox River crossing option as the area grows.

Project Benefits Safety. Traffic congestion forecasted for the Claude Allouez Bridge & nearby highways/streets will likely result in more congestion-related crashes on and near the bridge. The Southern Bridge will minimize congestion-related safety problems by allowing traffic to be distributed between two Fox River crossings instead of one.

Why is the Southern Bridge Project Needed Now? The communities in the southern metro area have grown significantly since 2000, and they are projected to grow much more by 2030. 2000 Population 2014 Population Estimate Increase (2000 to 2014) Percent Increase (2000 to 2014) Projected 2030 Population   De Pere 20,559 24,180 3,621 17.61% 29,550 Bellevue 11,828 14,760 2,932 24.79% 19,140 Rockland 1,522 1,753 231 15.18% 2,210 Lawrence 1,548 4,634 3,086 199.35% 6,900 Ledgeview 3,363 7,337 3,974 118.17% 10,810 Totals 38,820 52,664 13,844 35.66% 68,610 Sources: 2000 United States Census, Wisconsin Department of Administration Population Estimates.

Why is the Southern Bridge Project Needed Now? Development has progressed beyond the southernmost Southern Bridge corridor location alternative.

Why is the Southern Bridge Project Needed Now? Traffic volumes on the Claude Allouez Bridge and Broadway south of the bridge increased after the new bridge was completed in 2008. Claude Allouez Bridge Annual Average Daily Traffic Volumes 2006 Volumes = Before New Bridge 2009 & 2012 Volumes = After New Bridge *2015 Preliminary Volumes Not Available Broadway South of the Claude Allouez Bridge Annual Average Daily Traffic Volumes 2006 Volumes = Before New Bridge 2009 & 2012 Volumes = After New Bridge **2015 Preliminary Volumes Source: Wisconsin DOT.

Southern Bridge Coalition Current Project Schedule Environmental & interchange studies currently scheduled to be completed by 2018. Development activities for first project segment currently scheduled to begin in 2019. How do we guarantee that this project will remain on schedule? Southern Bridge Coalition

We Need Your Help to Achieve These Goals! Southern Bridge Coalition Goals Ensure the Southern Bridge project becomes and remains a priority to the Wisconsin DOT and Federal Highway Administration during the environmental and interchange studies. Identify and obtain state and federal funding to contribute to the development of the Southern Bridge, connecting streets, and I-41 interchange (if acceptable). We Need Your Help to Achieve These Goals!