Highlights from Auckland and Bangkok SOCCER Meetings Presented at SOCCER F2F Meeting Session 4 September 2014 Vienna, Austria 1

Auckland 2013 – Key Messages from Auckland SO IPGs have reviewed the Covenant of Partnership and continue to affirm it. SO IPGs continue to affirm the principles of O4 SOs IPGs strive to support O4 SO constraints around support expectation on O4 not currently fully recognized by Partnership – eg push towards pooled funding Issues are not irresolvable – we ask for genuine dialogue Working together – we can deliver added value for the WV ministry 2

Auckland – Key Resolutions All SOCCER members to: Keep own leadership informed of O4/LEAP 3 developments Document how SOs have aligned with O4 principles to date Analyse pros and cons of pooled funds (including discussing funding models with other NGOs in own countries) Analyse how donor funds received by SOs are spent (including percentage committed to field) Conduct ongoing evaluation meta-analyses and share results with DME unit and GPET Participate in end to end LEAP 3 trials (if possible) 3

Auckland – Key Topics and Agreements Agreed on wording of SO Field Facing Roles – was to have bee incorporated in to SO minimum Fiduciary Standards as appendix. Agreed to continue working on the SO Fiduciary Requirements (at the time referred to as “Minimum Fiduciary Standards”) – WG expected to have first draft out for SOCCER circulation and feedback in December (document also shared with Jaisankar and Dirk – feedback and collection of SO specific fiduciary related docs followed). The language of Minimum Fiduciary Standards will need to cover all the funding sources 4

Auckland – Key Topics and Agreements GC proposed minimum funding requirement of $650K per ADP per year: – Agreed to follow up with Sue Birchmore – SOCCER to document concerns and provide data to test current assumptions regarding “underfunded” ADPs. GC proposal for Shared ADPs: – SOCCER members will discuss issues associated with mixed SO funding with their Marketing Teams – Consult with Jaisankar Sarma and Camilla Symes as to whether it is perceived there is intrinsic good in sharing ADPs (done) – SOCCER to document SO experiences to date with shared ADPs 5

Auckland – Key Topics and Agreements On PSTs: – Kazu Takase will provide recommendations regarding possible Asian appointments to LACR PSTs – There should be bi-annual regional PSTs – All regions should carry out a PST effectiveness survey similar to the one conducted for Asia – James will discuss this with Jaisankar Sarma – The selection of SO staff to participate in PSTs will continue to be done through SOCCER 6

Bangkok SOCCER Steering Committee Meetings June, 2014 – Key Topics and Agreements SO Fiduciary Requirements GC Feedback on Draft SO Fiduciary Requirements documents will be responded to separately (not by reworking the actual Fiduciary doc) SO Field facing Document will not be appended to the final SO Fiduciary requirements document (SOFR) – (need to agree on the acronym…) Agreed to three revisions to the SOFR; Final document to be submitted to all SOCCER for ratification SOCCER TOR Revision Agreed on SOCCER TOR revision wordage. Revised SOCCER TOR circulated to all SOCCER members for feedback, sharing with their leaders – and prep for ratification at the September 2014 meeting 7

Bangkok SOCCER Steering Committee Meetings June, 2014 – Key Topics and Agreements PSTs and PCPR Agreed that WV USA and WV UK will share their respective “DME tests” and how they use them in context of PSTs Agreed to do a dedicated SOCCER organized WebEx with Darin Hamlin on WV USA Strategic DME Capacity Building approach. LEAP3 and Horizon3 Agreed that Joel and Ari will continue to interact with Camilla’s team – particularly on LEAP3 implementation guidance and tools for FY15 Agreed that LEAP3 and Horizon3 will need to be on the agenda for the SOCCER f2f meeting in September. 8

Bangkok SOCCER Steering Committee Meetings June, 2014 – Key Topics and Agreements CWBT FY14 Reports Agreed that SOCCER will raise concerns around two central O4 FY16 Desired State promises with eGOLT: – “SOs have access to timely, accurate and trustworthy information” and – “Contribution to CWB is reported at every level.” Sponsorship in programming (SIP) – Agreed that this needs to get on the GPET agenda. Ari/CJ to action 9