Information & Library Science Library Z711.25.C65 L53 2009.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Performance Assessment

Advertisements

Critical Listening and Feedback ECE 3940 Megan OByrne – CLEAR 17 September 09.

Case Studies M.Sc. in Applied Statistics Dr. Órlaith Burke Michaelmas Term 2012.

The Tuning Protocol.

WHO Antenatal Course Preparing the new WHO eProfessors.

Speakers: Denise Chilton, Sandra Smele, Christine Wong May 1, 2013

Preparing a lecture from your research. Aims of the session To reflect on the challenges and opportunities presented by the lecture format; To consider.

Experiential Learning Model. Experience: Just Do It Individual or group experience Involves doing May be unfamiliar Pushes learner to a new level.

7 Strategies of Assessment for Learning

Tuning Protocol as a Learning Design Summer Learning Designs Institute June 19-20, 2008 Karyn Scarcella

Examining Instruction, Part I Nov. 7, Plan for Today 4:10-4:15 Welcome and Overview 4:15-5:00 Tuning Protocol on Data Overviews 5:00-5:50 Observing.

1 Name Aliki (Alice) Bougioukou Costeas-Geitonas SchoolWhich of the four face-to-face institute or Elluminate session topics did you select to report on.

DR.MOHAMMED AL NAAMI, FRCSC, FACS, M Ed. INTRODUCTION  Small group teaching implies active participation of all its members  A common error that many.

Customer Focus Module Preview

Designing Academic Response Frames

Session 7: Using the Tuning Protocol to Adapt Modules

Designing Academic Response Frames Supporting Language Acquisition and Global Competencies.

Looking at Student work to Improve Learning

Public Narrative Christina Krause July 24, How do we create change at scale? Source: Marshall Ganz Shared understanding leads to Action Narrative.

Is the Flipped Classroom Appropriate at the University Level? Thomas J Francl, MBA, CMA National University April 10, 2014.

EngageNY.org Overview of the 3-8 ELA Curriculum Modules Session 1A, November 2013 NTI.

Introduction to Blogs and Blogging And educational uses for this application.

Interstate New Teacher Assessment and Support Consortium (INTASC)

This presentation contains the poll(s) you downloaded SlideContents 2Suggested verbal notes for presenters 3Instructions slide to educate audiences on.

WELCOME! 1. PLEASE GET A DOT – AND PLACE IT ON THE KNOWLEDGE OF ELP STANDARDS CONTINUUM 2. HAVE A SEAT AT THE APPROPRIATE TABLE GROUP 1 GROUP 2 3. TURN.

Facilitating Reflective Feedback as a Complementary Evaluator “It is when you lose sight of yourself, that you lose your way. To keep your truth in sight.

Why did I get a 5 out of 10? Connecting standards, assessment, and instruction: the power of rubrics. Peace Corps Erin Bohler, Msg. TEFL Teacher Trainer.

Ensuring that Professional Development Leads to Improved Mathematics Teaching & Learning Kristen Malzahn Horizon Research, Inc. TDG Leadership Seminar.

1 Building Mathematics Leadership Across Oregon Mark Freed Office of Educational Improvement and Innovation Oregon Department of Education.

Looking at Student Work Tuning Protocol Kathy Arminio Kathy Hoppe Monroe 2-Orleans BOCES.

PBL for the 21 st century. Begin with the end in mind Knowledge of science, history, literature, languages, etc. Time management Strong work ethic Respectful.

Professionally Speaking : Qualitative Research and the Professions. Using action research to gauge the quality of feedback given to student teachers while.

Leading Innovation 2011: Sanding the Edges - Tuning a Lesson STRUCTURED LESSON REVIEW BEGIN.

Part TWO The Process of Software Documentation Chapter 5: Analyzing Your Users Chapter 6: Planning and writing your Doc. Chapter 7: Getting Useful reviews.

Enrich a Unit of Study of Egypt: Then and Now with Technology Introduction to the 6th Grade Unit of Study Social Studies Session 1 of 8.

Presentation 1 Roles for Discussing Student Work There are four roles for discussing student work: Presenting Teacher Participant Recorder Facilitator.

Peer Evaluation and the College of Business Effective 3/15/93.

Presentation Assignment. Short Group Facilitation of a Reading With a small group (3 to 4 colleagues), facilitate an assigned reading for the rest of.

Facilitate Group Learning

Academic Use of Cell Phone Technology at Montclair State University Patricia Kahn, Ph.D., Director, Technology Training, & Integration Office of Information.

Back-to-School Night G-8-ors Team Science Jessica Geissler.

Customer Focus Module Preview This PowerPoint provides a sample of the Strategic Planning Module PowerPoint. The actual Strategic Planning PowerPoint is.

Examining Student Work in Science Jacque Melin – GVSU

How do students respond to assessment for learning?

1 Module: Developing Professional Learning Communities The ideas, graphics and material presented have been prepared with the guidance of Ann Delehant.

PBL for the 21 st century. Begin with the end in mind Knowledge of science, history, literature, languages, etc. Time management Strong work ethic Respectful.

Experience Protocols Tools that provide framework for discussions By Claire Dean.

Book Study 2010Book Study 2010 E-learning and the Science of Instruction| Ruth C. Clark & Richard E. Mayer.

Writing Workshop Feedback Protocol Let’s improve our writing!

DYNAMIC DUO Reference and Instruction Are Better Together! Amanda Folk, Anna Mary Williford, Kelly Bradish, & Amanda Miller Millstein Library University.

Examining Student Work (using the Tuning Protocol) Jacque Melin – GVSU

Stage 1 Integrated learning Coffee Shop. LEARNING REQUIREMENTS The learning requirements summarise the knowledge, skills, and understanding that students.

1 Los Angeles New Administrators Leadership Program Unit of Study 9 Conversations with Educators March 17, 2016.

Graded Discussions To be awesome. What does a graded discussion feel like? It is led by you all. The teacher serves as the moderator and makes sure everyone.

Chase Young, Ph.D. Teaching with the Brain in Mind.

Assessment Considerations A Student Scenario. Assessment Plan Embedded Assessment (Short Cycle) Informs practice Dynamic, moment by moment Participatory.

FULL DAY SCHEDULE TimeActivity Notes 8:00 – 8:20Opening Session Commons Area 8:20 – 8:30BREAK & Move to Classrooms 8:30 – 9:35Team Introductions & Tuning.

Core Math Instruction RtI Innovations in Education Conference, Milwaukee, WI October 12-13, 2017.

Critical Reflective Practice

Preparing to Teach and Overview of Teaching Assignments

Guest WIFI Password: Back to school!

Welcome Introduction to Poll Everywhere

The Tuning Protocol.

Tuning Protocol Critique Groups.

Ricarda Braukmann (DANS)

Bridging the Common Core Standards and Gifted Education: Instructional Resources Project NAGC - November 2013 Presenters Caroline C. Eidson and Sneha.

“You don’t know diddly-squat

Fishbowl Discussion Directions:

Session 1, Program Introduction and Overview

Preparing to Teach and Overview of Teaching Assignments

Presentation transcript:

Information & Library Science Library Z C65 L

QualtricsLauraTues Nov 12 CamtasiaNicole Mooc’sMeredith WixBarbara Concept MappingJessica ManyEyesRobert PollEverywhereRachael Jonathan

Follow-up on Jonathan’s class on teaching…

challenges Need to install program to create a poll Must use MS PPT Depends on connection speed…

Opportunities Participants may respond anonymously Different types of polls (T/F, Multiple choice, free- text) Poll is embedded within PPT presentation and updates in real time A free text poll allows participants to send free- form text responses or short answers instead of pre-defined choices Can display your audience's answers in real time on a projector for everyone to see, or just on a laptop in front of the presenter

Tuning Protocol The Tuning Protocol is a structured process that allows for reflection and meaningful feedback about a project, a text, a performance, or any work in progress. The Tuning Protocol assumes that the presenter or presenters want to improve the work in question and that the participants will deliver thoughtful, substantive feedback. It is like tuning up a car or an orchestra—it assumes that attention to improvement matters.

how can I tune-up this instruction session?

1Facilitator Reviews the process at the outset, even if everyone is familiar with it. Sets time limits and keeps time carefully. Participates in discussions but is on the lookout for others who want to get in conversations. 2 Presenter or presenter team Prepares an issue for consultancy. Is clear about the specific questions that should be addressed. Presents the issue to participants – participants are silent during this period. Unlike most discussions of this nature, the presenter does not participate in the group discussion. Sits outside the group and does not maintain eye contact during the discussion but rather takes notes and gauges what is helpful and what is not. Later, is specific about the feedback that was helpful. 3 Participants to Presenter Probing or clarifying questions brief 4Participants Address the issue brought by the presenter and give feedback that is both warm (positive) and cool (critical). The feedback should be given in a supportive tone and discussants should provide practical suggestions. 5Presenter Presenter response to group feedback 6Facilitator + allDebrief: Facilitator leads discussion, critiquing the process

After asking clarifying questions, participants offer three levels of feedback: 1. warm respondents describe what they see working or what they like in a work. 2. cool respondents consider aspects of the work that might be improved or clarified by framing their response in the form of a question: "I wonder if…?" or "Have you thought about…?" 3. hard respondents ask deeper questions that get at larger, structural aspects of the work.

Image credit: Introduction to Monstering from WorldIslandInfo less about training

Image credit: First grade class from WoodleyWonderWorks more about facilitating