Making a Difference in 2010-11 Heidi A. Ramírez, PhD Chief Academic Officer Milwaukee Public Schools.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Teacher Work Sample
Advertisements

Chad Allison May 2013  1-2 Formal Classroom Evaluations  Drop-in Visits.
PORTFOLIO.
Charlotte Danielson’s The Four Domains of Teaching Responsibility
Teacher Evaluation New Teacher Orientation August 15, 2013.
Marshal Hurst LDC/MDC Coordinator Professional Development (501)
SEED MAT Mentor Training MAT Overview Roles and Responsibilities Internship Realities Internship Rotation Cycles Danielson Frameworks.
Explicit Instruction: when, where, and how?
Activity: Introducing Staff to Danielson’s Framework for Teaching
National Association for Sport and Physical Education (NASPE) PE Coordinator’s Mini-Conference Wednesday, March 14, 2012 Framework for Effective Teaching.
August 2014 The Oregon Matrix Model was submitted to USED on May 1, 2014 and is pending approval* as of 8/8/14 *Please note content may change Oregon’s.
Developing and Supporting Highly Effective Teachers in Every Classroom Leaders of Learning Implementation Norman Public Schools Date.
The Framework for Teaching An Overview of the Danielson Model.
Assessment Literacy & Student Growth within the Teacher Professional Growth and Effectiveness System (TPGES) The goal of this session is to make visible.
Evaluating Teacher Performance: Getting it Right CPRE Annual Conference November 21-23, 2002 Charlotte Danielson
Lesson Planning and Preparation
Matt Moxham EDUC 290. The Idaho Core Teacher Standards are ten standards set by the State of Idaho that teachers are expected to uphold. This is because.
Differentiated Supervision
The Framework for Teaching
Domain II Creating and Environment for Learning
Teacher Evaluation Ashley Greene 10/29/13.
Webcast October 11, Felicia Cumings Smith Associate Commissioner.
Meeting SB 290 District Evaluation Requirements
Welcome to... Doing Teacher Evaluation Right: 5 Critical Elements 9/9/2015PBevan, D.ED.
Research-Based Cutting Edge Professional Development Communicate, Connect, Collaborate, Conceptualize, Create For Results Oriented Learning Experiences.
CKEC ISLN January 2013 Math Network Update Debbie Waggoner CKEC Math Specialist debbiewaggoner-ckecmath.weebly.com.
Leadership: Connecting Vision With Action Presented by: Jan Stanley Spring 2010 Title I Directors’ Meeting.
An Effective Teacher Evaluation System – Our Journey to a Teaching Framework Corvallis School District.
Lesson Planning for Learning Best Practices ~ 2014.
Teacher Induction Program Why you are here The Allegheny Intermediate Unit offers this program for our staff and those in school districts,
Your Name Teaching Portfolio (Begin Year-End Year)
THE DANIELSON FRAMEWORK. LEARNING TARGET I will be be able to identify to others the value of the classroom teacher, the Domains of the Danielson framework.
The Delaware Performance Appraisal System II for Teachers Training Module 2 The Delaware Framework Review and Components 1-5 Training for Teachers.
The Danielson Framework Emmanuel Andre Owings Mills High School Fall 2013.
Using Teacher Evaluation as a Tool for Professional Growth and School Improvement Redmond School District
Standards Aligned System What is SAS? A collaborative product of research and good practice Six distinct elements Clear Standards Fair.
BACK TO SCHOOL Welcome Back! Evaluation Task Force Findings.
Teacher Effectiveness Who begins in ? Teaching Specialists Special Education Teachers English as a Second Language Teachers Gifted Teachers.
 Development of a model evaluation instrument based on professional performance standards (Danielson Framework for Teaching)  Develop multiple measures.
BY COURTNEY N. SPEER TECHNOLOGY AS A TOOL SPRING Professional Growth & Self- Reflection.
PGES: The Final 10% i21: Navigating the 21 st Century Highway to Top Ten.
The Framework for Teaching Charlotte Danielson Danielson’s Framework for Teaching Domain 3: Instruction Communicating Clearly and Accurately Using Questioning.
Boot Camp 2014 The 4 Cs in the Common Core. Marta Stirling School Library Coordinator, East River Joan Upell School Library Coordinator, West River.
A Framework for Teaching Charlotte Danielson’s Model SHS – Professional Development 14 November 2012 ( Brenda Baker/Marnie Malone)
DPASII Criterion Rubrics for Teachers. Component 1: Planning and Preparation Criterion 1a: Selecting Instructional Goals ELEMENT Value, sequence and alignment.
Assessing Teacher Effectiveness Charlotte Danielson
THE ART AND SCIENCE OF TEACHING BY ROBERT MARZANO PRESENTED BY: DEBBIE WINSKE.
Doing Teacher Evaluation Right: 5 Critical Elements: Evidence.
FOUR DOMAINS Domain 4: Domain 1: Professional Planning & Responsibilities Preparation Domain 3: Domain 2: Instruction Classroom Environment.
Curriculum and Instruction: Management of the Learning Environment
9 Common Characteristics of Successful Schools From: What we know about successful school leadership (2003). - American Education Research Association.
Educator Effectiveness: The Danielson Framework Collecting Evidence.
Teacher Evaluation University of New England - EDU 704 Dr. William Doughty Submitted By: Teri Gaston.
DANIELSON MODEL SAI 2016 Mentor Meeting. Danielson Model  Framework with rubrics  Define specific types of behaviors expected to be observed  A common.
Learning Goals & Scales EAGLE POINT ELEMENTARY SEPTEMBER 16, 2015 SCHOOL PRESENTATION.
Dr. Leslie David Burns, Associate Professor Department of Curriculum and Instruction UK College of Education
Supplemental Text Project Kenn Ward EDL 678 Dr. Pfennig June 2013.
Laura Maly Bernard Rahming Cynthia Cuellar Rodriguez Explore Explore Explore Math Teacher Leaders October 18, 2011.
FLORIDA EDUCATORS ACCOMPLISHED PRACTICES Newly revised.
NM Teacher Evaluation Planning & Preparation Creating an Environment of Learning Professionalism Teaching for Learning Evaluation.
Effective Supervision Supporting the Art and Science of Teaching An overview by Olivia L. Boucher Robert J. Marzano Tony Frontier David Livingston Robert.
Enhancing R. Emmanuel-Cooke, Principal March 14, 2016 PROFESSIONAL PRACTICE A Framework For Teaching.
Welcome Learning Targets for Today I will build schema for Danielson’s Framework for Teaching. I will connect Framework principles to powerful planning.
Standard One: Engaging & Supporting All Students in Learning
Update on Teaching, Learning and Leading
An Introduction to Teacher Evaluation
Iowa Teaching Standards & Criteria
Comprehensive Planning
Linking Evaluation to Coaching and Mentoring Models
District Mission & Vision Cluster Mission & Vision
Presentation transcript:

Making a Difference in Heidi A. Ramírez, PhD Chief Academic Officer Milwaukee Public Schools

Milwaukee Public Schools is significantly out- performed by other Wisconsin schools and nearly all other large, urban school districts In reading and math Across most domains/competencies Across grade levels Across student sub-groups

Reading 3

4

5 MPS is making little progress in improving literacy achievement across grades

In many areas, MPS student performance has been stagnant or regressing

Mathematics

In others areas, MPS non-disabled students perform at the same levels as students with disabilities nationally, including large cities African-American Students-MathStudents with Disabilities-Math

Significant achievement gaps persist

Many MPS Math Courses Lack Rigor

Too few MPS students are college- ready

How do we accelerate progress for all students? Focus on what happens inside of classrooms ▫Focus on standards/learning intentions ▫Clear framework/vision of effective instruction ▫Explicit, aligned support and materials ▫Improved access to rigorous coursework ▫Leverage expertise and capacity of Milwaukee Math Partnership and Math Teacher Leaders

Frameworks for Skillful Teaching Marzano Hunter Saphier Danielson CHPUC (Characteristics of High Performing Urban Classrooms)

Framework for Teaching Planning and Preparation Classroom Environment Instruction Professional Responsibilities (Danielson, 1996, 2007)

Planning and Preparation Selecting instructional goals Demonstrating knowledge of content and pedagogy Demonstrating knowledge of students Demonstrating knowledge of resources Designing coherent instruction Assessing student learning Overarching Objectives Objectives High Expectations based on Learning Targets High Expectations for All Learning Goals, Track Progress, Celebrate Success Planning Curriculum Design Lessons organized in a Cohesive Unit Strategic Instructional Choices Assessment Routine use of variety of Assessments Space, Time, Routines

Classroom Environment Creating an Environment of Respect and Rapport Establishing a Culture of Learning Managing Classroom Procedures Managing Student Behaviors Organizing Physical Space Class climate Personal relationship building Effective relationships w/ Students Active Engagement of Student Learners Engage Students Cultural Responsiveness Rules & Procedures Adherence to Rules & Procedures Routines Discipline Momentum, Attention Space, Time

Instruction Communicating clearly and accurately Using questioning and discussion techniques Engaging students in learning Providing feedback to students Demonstrating flexibility and responsiveness High Expectations based on Learning Targets Objectives ● Clarity Interact w/ New Knowledge Deepen Understanding of New Knowledge Test Hypotheses about New Knowledge Engage Students Principles of Learning Models of Teaching Strategic instructional Choices Active Engagement of Student Learners Cultural Responsiveness

Professional Responsibilities Reflecting on Teaching Maintaining Accurate Records Communicating with families Contributing to the school and district Growing and developing professionally Showing professionalism Impassioned, Engaged Adult Learners Partnerships w/ Families & Community Collaboration w/ Colleagues

What have we learned from these? Teaching is complex; can’t be reduced to a checklist of behaviors or strategies for every classroom, content area, grade, learning objective, student Effective teachers have rich repertoires of professional practice and are skilled at “making the match” ▫Effective teachers have more than one way to handle a given teaching situation ▫Matching depends on the situation, group, goal, and individual student Skillful teachers are made, not born A variety of district and school conditions and supports affect teacher development -- principals and other school leaders have both great potential and responsibility to help them develop

It can be easy to recognize: Well-organized teachers Effective classroom managers Engaging teachers Teachers who know their content Teachers who keep good records Teachers who use “research-based strategies” But skillful/effective teachers –those that “make the match” often take more time to recognize, support, and develop

What will you do this year to support skillful teaching?