TUITION & FEE PROCESS GUIDELINE Draft Policy Review Draft Policy Review Financial Area Representatives April 21, 2008 Draft Policy Review Draft Policy.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Trustees Academy August 30, 2010 Indiana Commission for Higher Education HIGHER EDUCATION FUNDING IN INDIANA: THE ROLE OF THE INDIANA COMMISSION FOR HIGHER.
Advertisements

3   What is the role of the Committee?   Review details of the tuition and fee proposal resulting in a recommendation to the President and Board.
Facilities & Administrative (F&A) Cost Recovery Report April 22, 2009 Carol Hollingsworth, Director, Grants & Contracts Financial Services & Janet Parker,
TUITION & FEE PROPOSAL (Revised) Recommendation to The University of Texas Board of Regents (Revised) Recommendation to The University of Texas.
Town Hall Meeting Budget Update and Planning April 11, 2007.
STATUS UPDATE 3/12/2010 Proposed Changes to RCM. Goals Align RCM incentives with institutional goals Identify source of central strategic funds Simplify.
BUDGET 2015 AND LEGISLATIVE APPROPRIATIONS REQUEST MARY SIMON, SR. DIRECTOR BUDGET PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT MAY 6, 2014.
1 FY 2014 Merit Presentation July 2, AGENDA – MERIT PROCESS  Merit Policy Overview and Timeline  Templates and Instructions, Forms Signature.
Open Budget Meeting 1. 2 State Appropriations Tuition & Fees Auxiliary Enterprises Major Repair & Renovation (MRR) Salaries and Wages Utilities Supplies.
2 Biennial process for setting deregulated tuition and mandatory fees initiated by the Board of Regents Rates are set for a two year period covering Academic.
BUDGET UPDATE: MID-YEAR REVIEW AND BUDGET CALENDAR MARY SIMON, SR. DIRECTOR BUDGET PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT FEBRUARY 18, 2015.
1 Tuition Policy Advisory Committee September 16, 2004.
Overview of UTSA’s Discretionary Budget Presented by: Mary Simon Sr. Director Budget and Planning Development.
Tuition & Fee Proposal and FY 2009 Budget Tuition & Fee Proposal and FY 2009 Budget Presentation to UTSA Staff Council June 26, 2008 Janet Parker, Associate.
David Proulx, Assistant Vice President for Financial Planning and Budgeting Budget Office Website:
Georgia State University An Overview of the Budget Process.
An Educational Computer Based Training Program CBTCBT.
MARICOPA COMMUNITY COLLEGES Financial Planning Update Fall 2010.
Planning, Budget and Forecast Presented to Financial Area Reps by Mary Simon, Sr. Director Budget and Planning April 25, 2013 Presented to Financial Area.
Overview of UTSA’s Discretionary Budget
Tuition-Designated Fees University of Texas at San Antonio.
Budget Update Presented to Financial Area Representatives by Mary Simon, Sr. Director Budget and Planning January 18,2012 Presented to Financial Area Representatives.
University Strategic Resource Planning Council Budget.
BUDGET UPDATE: MID-YEAR REVIEW AND BUDGET CALENDAR MARY SIMON, SR. DIRECTOR BUDGET PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT MARCH 4, 2014.
AR 3110 – Basic Aid Allocation Board of Trustees Presentation February 27, 2012.
Campus Budget Update December 7, State Appropriations Operating Recommendations: 6.1% ($1,623,145) Performance Incentives.
Reviewing Internal Sales Activity / Rates Reviewing Internal Sales Activity / Rates Internal / External Sales Office.
Budget Transfer Guidelines. Budget Transfers Two types of budget transfers:Two types of budget transfers: –Intrafund Within the same fund group as allowedWithin.
2 UTSA has developed a process to systematically review all fees to: 1. 1.Analyze expenditures and transfers to ensure appropriate use consistent with.
University of Minnesota Office of Internal / External Sales Fiscal Year-End Actions for Internal/External Sales Organizations.
Budget Update Budget Update Elva Martinez, Assistant Director Budget Planning and Development February 19, 2013 Elva Martinez, Assistant Director Budget.
University of Minnesota Internal/External Sales “Annual Requirements and Certification” How to Annually Account for Internal Sales Activity.
Budget Process February 24, 2009 Budget Planning and Development.
1 November 20 th - Agenda Review Agenda, Explanation of Fee Types, Fee Reviews & Process, Review of Proposed Fee Changes - Janet Parker Mandatory Fee Presentations:
2   Lab fees must be collected as E&G revenue per Texas Education Code.   Lab fee accounts must be reconciled for each semester’s activity to adjust.
The University of Texas at San Antonio, One UTSA Circle, San Antonio, TX /11/111 UTSA Tuition & Fee Proposal.
Budget Workshop: Fiscal Policies, Process, and Budget Guidelines Board of Governors April 21, 2005.
3   What is the role of the Committee?   Review details of the tuition and fee proposal resulting in a recommendation to the President and Board.
Merit Program  Overview – General Information  Employee Eligibility  Merit Allocation Pools & Funding  Merit Awards, Process, Rules  Draft.
Budget Transfer Guidelines. Budget Transfers Two types of budget transfers:Two types of budget transfers: –Intrafund Within the same fund group as allowedWithin.
Update on 5% Reduction Plans On February 12 th UT System advised that the proposal to mitigate the 5% reduction with TRB appropriations (debt savings)
Prepared by the Office of Grants and Contracts1 INDIRECTS vs. REDIRECTS.
Budget Update FY 12 Mid Year Revenue Analysis and FY 13 Budget Planning Janet Parker, Associate Vice President, Financial Affairs Mary Simon, Senior Director,
Planning and Budget Committee January 16, Agenda Current Financial Position Revenue and Expenditure Comparisons FY08 to FY14 Simplified Budget Process.
Budget Update Presented To: University of Louisiana at Monroe Faculty, Staff and Students August 2002.
Operating Budget Funding Sources State Appropriations - General Revenue Formula Funding, Special Items, Benefit Cost Sharing THECB Transfers TX Grant,
1 Service Center FY2006 Billing Rate Proposal Preparation.
Budget Process Overview Mary Simon Budget Planning and Development.
1 Budget Overview Budget Information Committee February 26, 2007.
Budget Status Fiscal Year 2011 & 2012 May 11, 2011 Draft.
1 Tuition Policy Advisory Committee September 23, 2004.
LAPSE GUIDELINES FOR FISCAL YEAR-END BALANCES. Lapse Guidelines – Educational & General Funds (14 – Accounts)   Special Items & Research Development.
Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board November 4, 2011 Ben Ferrell, Jr., Executive Vice President, Finance & Administration Austin Community College.
THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS OF THE PERMIAN BASIN Presenter Mark McGurk, VPBA Funding & Finance Informational May 17, 2016.
Budget Calendar and Mid-Year review Mary Simon, Senior Budget Director March 23, 2016.
Research Service Center Business Plan September 2013.
University Budget Process Stability of revenue sources compared to most businesses Role of financial statement- financial accounting at one point Operational.
BUDGET UPDATE FY14 and BUDGET PLANNING FY15. BUDGET Basic Principles for Budget Planning and Development (not Prioritized) Meets Core Values/Goals College.
Office of Financial Affairs
Agenda Faculty Fringe Summer Reallocation Salary Encumbrances
Proposed Budget Budget Hearing August 15, 2016.
FY2017 Mid-Year Review FY2018 Budget Planning
Tuition and Fee Structure
LAPSE GUIDELINES FOR FISCAL YEAR-END BALANCES
Fiscal Management.
Campus Wide Open Forum Budget Update.
FY 2018 Hyperion Operating Budget Timeline
FY13 Budget Planning Janet Parker, Associate Vice President, Financial Affairs PRESENTATION TO THE UNIVERSITY STRATEGIC RESOURCE PLANNING COUNCIL March.
Internal/External Sales Activity related to:
Budgeting and Financial Management
Presentation transcript:

TUITION & FEE PROCESS GUIDELINE Draft Policy Review Draft Policy Review Financial Area Representatives April 21, 2008 Draft Policy Review Draft Policy Review Financial Area Representatives April 21, 2008

Audit Recommendations   Assign overall responsibility for the annual tuition and fees update process, and prepare process documentation to include roles, timelines, and deliverables.   Establish criteria for excessive year end unexpended balances and request documentation supporting the justification for the accumulation.   Assign overall responsibility for the annual tuition and fees update process, and prepare process documentation to include roles, timelines, and deliverables.   Establish criteria for excessive year end unexpended balances and request documentation supporting the justification for the accumulation.

Tuition & Fee Process Guideline Scope   Designated tuition and mandatory, college/course, laboratory or other incidental fee rates and/or changes.   Communication of fee information to students and university constituents.   Requirements for fee revenue Reserves.   Authority for annual revenue budgets, expenditures and year-end balances (retained earnings).   Authority for rate (cost) reviews.   Designated tuition and mandatory, college/course, laboratory or other incidental fee rates and/or changes.   Communication of fee information to students and university constituents.   Requirements for fee revenue Reserves.   Authority for annual revenue budgets, expenditures and year-end balances (retained earnings).   Authority for rate (cost) reviews.

Process Guidelines and Responsibilities Establishing Designated Tuition and Mandatory Fee Rates:   Board of Regents approve tuition & mandatory fee rates for two year periods.   Spring following legislative year   Associate VP – Financial Affairs coordinates the T&F Process in accordance with The UT System guidelines.   Tuition & Fee Committee & public hearings are required. Establishing Designated Tuition and Mandatory Fee Rates:   Board of Regents approve tuition & mandatory fee rates for two year periods.   Spring following legislative year   Associate VP – Financial Affairs coordinates the T&F Process in accordance with The UT System guidelines.   Tuition & Fee Committee & public hearings are required.

Process Guidelines and Responsibilities Establishing the Designated Tuition Rate   Lowest amount possible to cover incremental changes in mandatory & fixed costs   Conservative estimates of growth   Cap may be imposed by UT System In FY09, our rate goes from $101/SCH to $110/SCH (+8.9%) Establishing the Designated Tuition Rate   Lowest amount possible to cover incremental changes in mandatory & fixed costs   Conservative estimates of growth   Cap may be imposed by UT System In FY09, our rate goes from $101/SCH to $110/SCH (+8.9%)

Process Guidelines and Responsibilities In FY09, Designated Tuition is the only new discretionary source of income for UTSA E&G budgets to fund:   $1.176M in required Financial Aid   $2M New Faculty Recruitments   $2.77M in Merit Salary increases   $0.290M for Bad Debt Allowance & Texas Tomorrow Other budget increments are reallocations of previously recovered revenue (except for BoR approved mandatory fee increases.) In FY09, Designated Tuition is the only new discretionary source of income for UTSA E&G budgets to fund:   $1.176M in required Financial Aid   $2M New Faculty Recruitments   $2.77M in Merit Salary increases   $0.290M for Bad Debt Allowance & Texas Tomorrow Other budget increments are reallocations of previously recovered revenue (except for BoR approved mandatory fee increases.)

Establishing / Changing Fee Rates or Justifications Use Fee Request Form   Zero based budget approach   For existing fees, requires re-validation of the rate charged to students based on budgeted semester credit hour projections and expenditures.  Allows for cost analysis of current situation versus the requirements when the fee was originally established.   Changes must be endorsed by VP/Provost and vetted through fee committees/student organizations as appropriate. Use Fee Request Form   Zero based budget approach   For existing fees, requires re-validation of the rate charged to students based on budgeted semester credit hour projections and expenditures.  Allows for cost analysis of current situation versus the requirements when the fee was originally established.   Changes must be endorsed by VP/Provost and vetted through fee committees/student organizations as appropriate.

Establishing / Changing Fee Rates or Justifications Authority of the President   Upon prior review and approval of the Executive Vice Chancellor for Academic Affairs, the President can approve new or changes to:   Laboratory or course fees   College fees   (other) Incidental fees Can be done ‘off cycle’ if necessary for exceptional circumstances. Authority of the President   Upon prior review and approval of the Executive Vice Chancellor for Academic Affairs, the President can approve new or changes to:   Laboratory or course fees   College fees   (other) Incidental fees Can be done ‘off cycle’ if necessary for exceptional circumstances.

Communication of Fee Rates and Changes   Committees   Banner Student Information System   Websites   Academic Publications / Information Bulletin   Other   Committees   Banner Student Information System   Websites   Academic Publications / Information Bulletin   Other

Retained Earnings Retained Earnings Retained earnings (carryforward balances and reserves) are appropriate for:   Working Capital – when expenditures precede revenue   Current Operations – if projected expenses can not be covered by projected income   Capital Replacement – offset economic effects of depreciation   Planned Future Operations Requirements are documented each year for the AVP- Financial Affairs to review and make recommendations. Retained earnings (carryforward balances and reserves) are appropriate for:   Working Capital – when expenditures precede revenue   Current Operations – if projected expenses can not be covered by projected income   Capital Replacement – offset economic effects of depreciation   Planned Future Operations Requirements are documented each year for the AVP- Financial Affairs to review and make recommendations.

Revenue Financial Assessment   Sr. Director of Budget – establishes revenue targets based on CY revenue & projected enrollment or other changes.   Deviations are mutually agreed upon.   Expenditures monitored by fee administrators.   In accordance with justification   Stakeholder appropriateness test   Retained earnings exceeding 15% must be approved by VPBA or designee.   Sr. Director of Budget – establishes revenue targets based on CY revenue & projected enrollment or other changes.   Deviations are mutually agreed upon.   Expenditures monitored by fee administrators.   In accordance with justification   Stakeholder appropriateness test   Retained earnings exceeding 15% must be approved by VPBA or designee.

Periodic Review of Approved Rates   AVP-Financial Affairs Authority   Focus – Cost Recovery of Expenditures   Are students being appropriately charged?   Are Reserves being expended for the intended purpose?   Is UTSA subsidizing costs and is the level of subsidy appropriate?   AVP-Financial Affairs Authority   Focus – Cost Recovery of Expenditures   Are students being appropriately charged?   Are Reserves being expended for the intended purpose?   Is UTSA subsidizing costs and is the level of subsidy appropriate?

Periodic Review of Approved Rates   Recommendation to UTSA Administration about rate appropriateness.   Appropriateness of expenditures within the approved justification remains the responsibility of each VP and is not the focus of this activity.   Internal & External Auditors may examine that aspect (as well as the rate appropriateness.)   Recommendation to UTSA Administration about rate appropriateness.   Appropriateness of expenditures within the approved justification remains the responsibility of each VP and is not the focus of this activity.   Internal & External Auditors may examine that aspect (as well as the rate appropriateness.)