2014 Student Success Scorecard PaRC Presentation May 7, 2014 E. Kuo FH IR&P *Formerly known as the Accountability Reporting for Community Colleges (ARCC)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Peralta 2011 ARCC Report Mike Orkin, Ph.D. Office of Educational Services Peralta Community College District.
Advertisements

California Community Colleges Student Success 2014 Scorecard 2014 Scorecard College of the Desert Board of Trustee Presentation Dec. 19, 2014.
Scorecard: How to Improve your CDCP Outcomes Rate Association for Community and Continuing Education 2014 Annual Conference Beverly Heasley Mt. San Antonio.
Accountability Reporting for the Community Colleges 2010 Report: Moreno Valley College Calculation presented by presented by David Torres, Dean Institutional.
STUDENT EQUITY PLAN PROGRESS PRESENTATION TO BOARD FEBRUARY 28, 2012.
Environmental Scan: The First Pass Ed Master Plan (EMP) Steering Committee Planning and Resource Council (PaRC) April 29, 2015 E. Kuo FH IR&P.
 Student Success: What Is It, and How Can We Measure It? Kim Harrell, Folsom Lake College Carolyn Holcroft, Foothill College David Morse, ASCCC Executive.
SBVC Student Equity Plan A Update and Historical Overview James E. Smith, Ph.D. Dean, Research, Planning, and Institutional Effectiveness.
Academic Attainment in California Community Colleges: Racial And Ethnic Disparities in the ARCC 2.0/Scorecard Metrics Tom Leigh Alice van Ommeren.
ARCC /08 Reporting Period Prepared by: Office of Institutional Research & Planning February 2010.
November 13, 2013 Contra Costa Community College District Board Review Achievement Gap Report & College Scorecards.
Student Success Washington State Board for Community and Technical Colleges September 2011.
San Luis Obispo Community College District Cuesta College Institutional Effectiveness Outcomes/Student Success Scorecard Report SLOCCCD Board of Trustees.
ARCC Accountability Report for the Community Colleges Focus on Quality.
Accountability Reporting for the Community Colleges, 2012 Report Riverside Community College District Riverside Community College District Teaching & Learning.
Student Performance Profile Study: An Examination of Success and Equity Matt Wetstein, Interim Vice President of Instruction Office of Planning, Research,
SSTF Update: ARCC Score Card Phil Smith — ASCCC Leadership Development Committee Chair Craig Rutan — Santiago Canyon College.
The Student Success Scorecard Dr. Matt Wetstein Interim Vice President of Instruction April 16,
Board of Trustees Presentation 2014 Student Success Scorecard Report and District Strategic Plan Metrics Presented by Mallory Newell August 25,
Kathy Booth Gregory Stoup Terrence Willett Leading Conversations about Student Goals and Outcomes What Course-Taking Analysis Reveals Student Success Conference.
Accountability Reporting for Community Colleges (ARCC) 2007 Report for Cerritos College Bill Farmer and Nathan Durdella.
Cuesta College ARCC Data Report to the San Luis Obispo Community College District Board of Trustees May 5, 2010.
Accountability Reporting The “Scorecard” Presentation to Academic Senate November 1, 2012 Rosaleen Ryan.
REPORT TO THE SAN LUIS OBISPO COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT BOARD OF TRUSTEES MARCH 7, 2012 SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT INSTITUTIONAL.
Student Equity in California Community Colleges Dr. Craig Hayward, Director Lisa Nguyen, Senior Research and Planning Analyst Irvine Valley College.
Student Success Scorecard PaRC Presentation April 17, 2013 FOOTHILL COLLEGE E. Kuo FH IR&P *Formerly known as the Accountability Reporting for Community.
Key Components of the Planning Model at De Anza College: An Update to the Educational Master Plan Presented to Academic Senate May 23, 2011.
Student Success Scorecard Data from ARCC Year Ending in Prepared and Presented by: Dr. James Smith, Dean, Institutional Effectiveness,
Student Success Scorecard De Anza College 2015 Mallory Newell Office of Research and Planning.
2010 ARCC Overview Michael Orkin, Ph.D. Associate Vice Chancellor of Academic Affairs Peralta Community College District.
Student Equity Plan Tables Submitted 12/18/2015 in the SCC Student Equity Plan Katherine Zoloty SSSP & Student Equity Research Analyst.
Mallory Newell Office of Institutional Research and Planning
IS GCC MEETING ITS MISSION AND GOALS? MASTER PLANNING COMMITTEE (TEAM A) MAY 8, 2015.
Board of Trustees Retreat December 9, 2015 Edward Karpp Dean of Research, Planning & Grants Success Indicators and Key College Profile Data 2015.
Board of Trustees Retreat May 10, 2013 Dr. Edward Karpp Dean of Research, Planning & Grants.
Glendale Community College: Statewide Accountability Reporting Edward Karpp Associate Dean, Institutional Research & Planning January 24, 2008.
Los Angeles Valley College April 21, QUESTION 3: NEW GOALS & OBJECTIVES REFLECTING COLLEGE BASIC SKILLS INITIATIVE “ACTION PLANS”
Palomar College Presentation to Palomar College Board of Trustees March 11, 2008.
Glendale Community College: Statewide Accountability Reporting 2010 Data Edward Karpp Dean of Research, Planning, and Grants November 15, 2010.
1 A ccountability R eporting for the C ommunity C olleges (ARCC) 2008 Presentation to Peralta Community College Board of Trustees Merritt College Office.
Glendale Community College: Statewide Accountability Reporting 2009 Data Edward Karpp Associate Dean, Institutional Research & Planning December 21, 2009.
With Institutional and Program Level Data
SLOCCCD Board of Trustees Meeting November 2, 2016
Student Success Scorecard: 2016 Report
Student Success Scorecard and Institution-Set Standards 2014
Student Success Scorecard 2017
Student Success Scorecard Spring 2017
Edward Karpp Dean of Research, Planning, and Grants November 15, 2010
Student Success Scorecard Spring 2016
SLOCCCD Board of Trustees October 1, 2014
Edward Karpp Dean of Research, Planning, and Grants November 19, 2012
January 23, 2017 Academic Senate Meeting
2016 Taft College Student Success Scorecard
Contra Costa Community College District
2017 Taft College Student Success Scorecard
Board of Trustees Review
SOCCCD Board of Trustees’ Meeting
Student Success Scorecard & Other Institutional Effectiveness Metrics
Scorecard Future File Data
Dr. Brian Lofman, Dean April 18, 2017 Student Success Scorecard 2017:
Dr. Brian Lofman, Dean April 18, 2017 Student Success Scorecard 2017:
2008 ARCC Report Findings February 2, 2009
2009 ARCC Report Findings October 5, 2009
Environmental Scan Planning Retreat
Presentation to the Mt. San Jacinto College Board of Trustees
^ ^ >1% >1% ^ Small change
Student Success Scorecard
SLOCCCD Board of Trustees October 7, 2014
Disproportionate Impact Study
2010 ARCC Report Findings May 3, 2010
Presentation transcript:

2014 Student Success Scorecard PaRC Presentation May 7, 2014 E. Kuo FH IR&P *Formerly known as the Accountability Reporting for Community Colleges (ARCC)

Annual scorecard with specific metrics related to student progress and success Framework based on Student Success Taskforce (SSTF) recommendations Disaggregation of data Longitudinal data Overview

College Profile Over half of students are younger than 25 Compared to , increase of 6% among this group Asians, Hispanics and Whites make up 82% of students enrolled FT Faculty based on district figures New data element for 2014 Statewide: 719:1

College Indicators Scorecard focuses on cohort Tracking students over six years Data available for five cohorts – to Completion Outcomes – Degree/Transfer – Career Technical Education Momentum Points – Persistence – 30 Units – Remedial (Math, English, ESL)

Completion Foothill Overall State Overall Foothill Prepared State Prepared Foothill Unprepared State Unprepared Prepared/Unprepared determined by lowest attempted Math or English course Definition: Percentage of degree, certificate and/or transfer-seeking students starting first time in tracked for six years through who completed a degree, certificate or transfer-related outcomes. Overall Completion Rate by Ethnicity 40% African American (21/52) 62% Filipino (16/26) 38% Latino (57/149) Overall Completion Rate by Ethnicity 40% African American (21/52) 62% Filipino (16/26) 38% Latino (57/149) Compared to 85% Asian (223/263) 66% White (263/399) Compared to 85% Asian (223/263) 66% White (263/399)

Completion Peer Grouping Overall Completion Rates Peer group high: 64% Peer Group low: 49% Peer Group average: 56% Methodology: Using predictors BA/BS Index, weighted API, Pct Age 25+

Persistence State Overall State Unprepared State Prepared Foothill Overall Foothill Prepared Foothill Unprepared Foothill reports slightly lower persistence rates when compared to state figures Definition: Percentage of degree, certificate and/or transfer-seeking students starting first time in tracked for six years through who enrolled in the first four consecutive terms OR achieved degree/certificate/transfer outcome during same time period. Overall Persistence by Ethnicity 64% African American (33/52) 73% Filipino (19/26) 59% Latino (88/149) Overall Persistence by Ethnicity 64% African American (33/52) 73% Filipino (19/26) 59% Latino (88/149) Compared to 78% Asian (160/205) 69% White (275/399) Compared to 78% Asian (160/205) 69% White (275/399) Higher overall persistence rate by Latinos statewide (+10 percentage points)

Attain 30 Units Foothill Overall FH Unprepared Foothill Prepared State Overall State Prepared State Unprepared Foothill’s cohorts tend to attain 30 units at a higher rate when compared to state figures Foothill’s cohorts tend to attain 30 units at a higher rate when compared to state figures Definition: Percentage of degree, certificate and/or transfer-seeking students starting first time in tracked for six years through who achieved at least 30 units. Overall Attain 30 Units by Ethnicity 71% African American (37/52) 77% Filipino (20/26) 59% Latino (88/149) Overall Attain 30 Units by Ethnicity 71% African American (37/52) 77% Filipino (20/26) 59% Latino (88/149) Compared to 79% Asian (208/263) 74% White (295/399) Compared to 79% Asian (208/263) 74% White (295/399) Higher overall attain 30 units rate by Latinos statewide (+4 percentage points) Higher overall attain 30 units rate by Foothill African Americans (+15 percentage points)

Completion, Persistence and Attain 30 Units cohort: – First-time new students (w/valid SSN) – 6 units minimum earned (pass course) within first three years – Attempt any Math or English in first three years Foothill cohort: 1,016 students – 455 Female (45%) – 857 Under age 20 (85%) – 399 Whites (39%) – 263 Asian (26%) – 149 Latino/a (15%) – 52 African Americans (5%) Who’s being counted? Foothill had 1,541 new first-time students in academic year Outcomes Definitions

Basic Skills Education Progress Who’s in the cohort? – Attempt a credit course below transfer level in What’s the cohort outcome? – Math: pass a college-level Math course within 6 years (includes degree and transfer applicable) – English: pass a college-level English course within 6 years – ESL: pass the ESL sequence or a college-level English within 6 years

Math FH African American 47 African Americans 42 Asians 20 Filipinos 148 Latino/as 237 Whites Foothill FH Filipino What’s being counted in ? Primarily Math 101 and Math My Way (230, 231, 235) State FH Asian FH White FH Latino Total 564 Cohort size decreased from a high of 918 students in Who’s being counted at FH in ? African American rates increased by 4-percentage points from previous year cohort

English FH White FH Asian State Foothill FH Latino FH African American FH Filipino 60 African Americans 80 Asians 25 Filipinos 177 Latino/as 28 Pacific Islanders 248 Whites What’s being counted at FH in ? Primarily ENGL 100 and ENGL 110 Total 696 Cohort size was decreasing from 940 in but increased by 8% from Who’s being counted at FH in ?

ESLL FH Asian Foothill FH Latino/a State Who’s being counted at FH in ? <10 African American 135 Asian 114 Latino/a 59 White 0 Filipino & <10 PI What’s being counted at FH in ? Seems like about half in F07 are enrolled in ESL 166/167, 155/156, 136/137 Total 336 ESL cohort size continues to decrease from a high of 507 in

Career Technical Education Who’s being counted at FH in ? 61 African Americans 563 Asians 63 Filipinos 253 Latino/as 12 Pacific Islanders 835 Whites Total 1,981 State Foothill Definition: Percentage of students tracked for six years through who started first time in and completed more than eight units in courses classified as career technical education (or vocational) in a single discipline and completed a degree, certificate or transferred or achieved “transferred prepared” status. Cohort size fairly consistent since (~2000) CTE Cohort Definition

What’s the message? System-level: – Emphasis on defining completion as degree/certificate and transfer attainment – Different outcomes among Prepared and Unprepared students Institution-level: – Cohort size fluctuate but increased between to – Disaggregating data can lead to small groups of students – Changes in courses (number and curriculum) affects what is included in the cohort – How are we serving our students? – Focusing on trends over time

FOOTHILL COLLEGE What’s the next step? How is this information useful to us? – Institutional goals, objectives, metrics – Focus on trends to promote outcomes among current students What should be the institutional priorities in planning and resource allocation process

FOOTHILL COLLEGE Check it out! Student Success Scorecard

What outcomes are counted? Completion cohort outcomes definition: – Earned AA/AS – Earned Certificate – Transfer to four-year institution – At least 60 transferrable CSU/UC units with minimum 2.0 GPA – Within 6 years Need Updates?

What outcomes are counted? Persistence cohort outcomes definition: – Enroll in four consecutive quarters – Within the first year of enrollment – OR Earned AA/AS, Earned Certificate, Transfer to four-year institution within four consecutive quarters Attain 30 Units cohort outcomes definition: – Earned at least 30 units – Within 6 years Need Updates? Basic Skills “Remediation” Cohort

Who’s in the CTE cohort? First-time CTE course completers who also complete 8+ units in the subsequent 3 years in a single vocational discipline What’s the cohort outcome? Earned AA/AS Earned Certificate Transfer to a 4-yr institution At least 60 transferrable CSU/UC units with minimum 2.0 GPA Within 6 years Need update? < Scorecard Summary