April 22, 2003IOC - Report Overview & Recommendations1 Post-Tenure Review Institute Oversight Committee Report Overview & Recommendations to Georgia Tech.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Tenure is awarded when the candidate successfully demonstrates meritorious performance in teaching, research/scholarly/creative accomplishment and service.
Advertisements

Promotion and Tenure Faculty Senate May 8, To be voted on.
UNLV FACULTY SENATE TENURE & PROMOTION FORUM Oct. 2, 2012 Oct. 2, 2012 Thanks to the Past Chairs: Dr. John Filler Dr. Ceci Maldonado Dr. Nasser Daneshvary.
Special Faculty Meeting Faculty Handbook – Section 4 April 10, 2013.
Contract Faculty Evaluations. AGENDA Review of Information Packet Ground Rules Purpose of Evaluation Evaluation Procedures Evaluation Criteria Time Line.
Faculty Forum: March 5, 2008 Shall the Collected Rules and Regulations be revised to adopt the revised Pilot Faculty Grievance Procedure recommended by.
Biennial Review 1. Timeframe: August 1, 2011 – July 30, 2013.
Proposed Revisions to Section 5 (Review & Evaluation of Faculty Performance) of the Faculty Handbook Spring, T&P Oversight Committee Office.
Tenure and Promotion for Extension Faculty: Tips for the Evaluated and the Evaluators Larry Smith Executive Senior Vice Provost Utah State University Annual.
PEER REVIEW OF TEACHING WORKSHOP SUSAN S. WILLIAMS VICE DEAN ALAN KALISH DIRECTOR, UNIVERSITY CENTER FOR ADVANCEMENT OF TEACHING ASC CHAIRS — JAN. 30,
Faculty Senate Special Meeting June 12, Agenda I. Call to Order and Roll Call - Melanie Mormile, Secretary II.Bylaw Amendment III.Adjourn Pres.
Promotion and Tenure Planning Workshop Spring 2013 Susan S. Williams Vice Provost for Academic Policy and Faculty Resources.
Promotion and Tenure at Ohio University Martin Tuck PhD Associate Provost for Academic Affairs.
Institutional Effectiveness Operational Update Presentation made to the Indiana State University Board of Trustees October 5, 2001.
Update 11/9. Academic Senate University Appointments and Promotions Committee Policies and Procedures (approved ASLC 10/20/10)
Review of Appendix 16 FA Purpose –Review Appendix 16 for compliance with the Collective Bargaining Agreement Changes –Compliance –Removing.
The Pathway to Success Goal IV Strengthen and Leverage Programs of Strength and Promise.
Principal Investigator: Jean-Lou Chameau Co-Principal Investigators: Mary Frank Fox Mary Lynn Realff Sue V. Rosser ADVANCE Liaison Mary Hallisey Hunt Georgia.
Portfolio for Tenure & Promotion Grand Rapids Community College Faculty Evaluation System.
Promotion and Tenure Lois J. Geist, M.D. Associate Dean for Faculty Affairs and Development.
Portfolio for Tenure & Promotion
Materials presented are for general informational purposes only and do not constitute official University rules, policies or practices or interpretations.
September 17, 2002IOC - Report Overview & Recommendations1 Post-Tenure Review Institute Oversight Committee Report Overview & Recommendations to Georgia.
PROMOTION AND TENURE FOR CLINICAL ATTENDINGS Rhonda Dick, M.D. Tim Martin, M.D.
Recommendations on Professional Improvement Leave.
Call Changes APM c: “Each campus shall develop guidelines and checklists to instruct chairs about their duties and responsibilities in connection.
Promotion in the Clinical Track Lois J. Geist, M.D. Associate Dean for Faculty Affairs and Development.
M.D.G. Scholars Program -Capstone Presentation-.
Portfolio for Tenure & Promotion Grand Rapids Community College Faculty Evaluation System.
IOC - Report Overview1 Post-Tenure Review Institute Oversight Committee Report Overview July 19, 2002 Robert McMath Farrokh Mistree.
Key HOP Policies and Recent Guidelines Jesse T. Zapata & Gail Jensen September 2, 2015.
Changes in the Faculty Review Process for United Academics Faculty Presenter: Patricia Linton, College of Arts & Sciences.
Visioning 2 Committee 15,800 by 2018 JoyceArmstrongFamily Sciences 13 JessicaGullionSociology GovernorJacksonFinancial AidMarkHamnerInstitutional Research.
POST-TENURE REVIEW: Report and Recommendations. 2 OVERVIEW Tenure Field Test Findings Recommendations This is a progress report. Implementation, assessment,
>>>Faculty & Staff >>>Faculty Appointment & Review >>>Tenure Guidelines 2011 edition.
PROMOTION AND TENURE: THE LONG AND WINDING ROAD. WHAT ARE THE RANKS? WHAT DO THEY MEAN? ASSISTANT PROFESSOR ASSOCIATE PROFESSOR PROFESSOR –NOT THE “PHILOSOPAUSE”
Report to the Faculty Senate April 14, 2009 Bryan L. Spangelo, Chair.
Secretary Report Bylaws Amendments Shigeki SuganoSecretary Robin MurphyParliamentarian.
Report from the Ad Hoc Institute Review Committee (IRC) T. Russell Gentry, Ph.D., PE Associate Professor College of Architecture Architecture Program /
>>>Faculty & Staff >>>Faculty Appointment & Review >>>Tenure Guidelines 2008 edition.
Enterprise IT Decision Making Governance Amy Gee, Portfolio Manager, EITDM Office of the CIO.
ADVANCE Conference Georgia Tech NSF ADVANCE Institutional Transformation Program March 10, 2006.
TCNJ 2015 Promotion & Reappointment Document Faculty Information Forum November 12-13, 2015.
P&T Update: College of Medicine, Carol S. Weisman, PhD Associate Dean for Faculty Affairs Distinguished Professor of Public Health Sciences.
REAPPOINTMENT, PROMOTION AND TENURE AUGUST 26, 2016 SUE OTT ROWLANDS, PROVOST.
College of Arts & Sciences Lecturer Promotion Dossier assembly workshop fall 2016.
Faculty Senate Special Meeting June 12, 2014
Report from the Ad Hoc Institute Review Committee (IRC)
Academic Year UNC Asheville
REAPPOINTMENT, PROMOTION AND TENURE
Your Career at Queen’s: Merit Review and Renewal, Tenure, & Promotion New Faculty Orientation August 24, 2017 Teri Shearer Deputy Provost (Academic.
MUSC Faculty Senate October 18th, 2016.
2017 Workshop Tenure and Promotion Policy and Procedures Overview
Promotion in Extension Presented by: Ken Martin, Ph. D
College of Arts & Sciences Lecturer Promotion Dossier assembly workshop fall 2017.
The Tenure Process at Babson College: The Fourth-Year Review
Faculty Evaluation Plan
2016 Tenure and Promotion Workshop Policy and Procedures Overview
SCC Tenure Process November 9, 2016.
Promotion/Tenure Portfolio
Portfolio for Tenure & Promotion
REAPPOINTMENT, PROMOTION AND TENURE
Faculty Workshop on Promotion and Tenure
Your Career at Queen’s: Merit Review and Renewal, Tenure, & Promotion New Faculty Orientation August 23, 2018 Teri Shearer Deputy Provost (Academic.
Faculty Leadership Institute, June 17, 2017, Sacramento Sheraton
Tenure and Promotion: Article 6
UGANet Meeting January 7, 2004
Promotion Tenure and Reappointment
Faculty Meeting April 26, 2018.
UND’s Promotion & Tenure Process: Electronic Submission and Next Steps
Presentation transcript:

April 22, 2003IOC - Report Overview & Recommendations1 Post-Tenure Review Institute Oversight Committee Report Overview & Recommendations to Georgia Tech Faculty April 22, 2003 Robert McMath Farrokh Mistree

April 22, 2003IOC - Report Overview & Recommendations2 IOC – Committee 2002 Faculty Philip Auslander. LCC Meiyin Chou. Physics Cheol Eun. Management Steve French. Architecture Richard Fujimoto. CoC Gary May. ECE Administrators MGT. Terry Blum / Eugene Comisky. EGR. Narl Davidson / Don Giddens CoC. Jim Foley Arch. Tom Galloway IAC. Sue Rosser Sci. Gary Schuster Co-Chairs Bob McMath & Farrokh Mistree

April 22, 2003IOC - Report Overview & Recommendations3 IOC – Objectives of Reviews Post-Tenure Reviews are aimed at facilitating faculty development, and ensuring intellectual vitality and competent levels of performance by all faculty throughout their professional careers. In both regards, the goal is to maximize the talents of tenured faculty within the broad array needed for effective performance of the units and the Institute. Post-Tenure Reviews are both retrospective and prospective, inasmuch as they recognize past contributions and provide the means for continuous intellectual and professional growth.

April 22, 2003IOC - Report Overview & Recommendations4 IOC – Recommendations Adopted 9/17/02 Retain faculty-driven, peer evaluation process Retain provision that the decision of the faculty peer reviewers is final Focus on faculty development with 5/3 year recommendation to be part of the process Change name from Post-Tenure Review (PTR) to Periodic Peer Review (PPR) Replace Special Recognition feature with Program for Faculty Development for all Major review of PPR process every five years with monitoring between major reviews Responsibility instituting and maintaining Program for Faculty Development and monitoring process: –Dean of the Colleges of Architecture, Engineering, Ivan Allen, Sciences –VP Academic for Unitary Colleges of Computing and Management

April 22, 2003IOC - Report Overview & Recommendations5 IOC – Recommendations Adopted 9/17/02 A candidate has the right to select one faculty member (with full voting rights) for the PPR Committee; serve as advocate. Also has the option to remove one member of the PPR Committee. All candidates to provide a summary of his/her past activities and goals for the next five years. Up to 5 pages. Chair / Unit Head to provide an assessment of the goals of the candidate to the PPR. No comment on 3/5. PPR Committee to address letter to candidate, record vote in letter and all members of the PPR Committee to sign the letter. PPR Committee letter to include assessment of positives, constructive feedback after careful evaluation of performance and goals, and recommendations to Chair / Unit Head relevant to faculty development. PPR Committee to provide justification in case of a 3 year recommendation.

April 22, 2003IOC - Report Overview & Recommendations6 IOC – Tenured Faculty with Administrative Titles Policy Tenured faculty with administrative titles (other than unit chairs and above) are covered by Periodic Peer Review Process. Question Should tenured faculty with administrative titles be allowed to serve on Unit Level Committees? IOC Recommendations The faculty in each unit shall decide whether tenured faculty with administrative titles (other than unit heads) are eligible to serve on the unit-level Periodic Peer Review committee. This decision is to be reviewed by the faculty at least once every five years.

April 22, 2003IOC - Report Overview & Recommendations7 IOC – Appeals and Grievances Questions How can a faculty member get a Unit Level Committee’s recommendation reversed? How should a grievance against the PPR process be handled? IOC Recommendations On receipt of the review from the Dean / Vice Provost, a reviewee may appeal to the President to overturn a unit-level recommendation. Grievances related to the Periodic Peer Review process shall be handled by the Faculty Status and Grievance Committee under Section of the statutes of the Georgia Institute of Technology.

April 22, 2003IOC - Report Overview & Recommendations8 IOC - Motion The Georgia Tech Faculty on April 22, 2002 endorses the Recommendations of the 2002 Institute Oversight Committee (Post-Tenure Review) documented on Pages 6 and 7 of this presentation.