:2 Evaluation of ATD Models Using National Emergency Support Function Information Requirements An Overview.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Museum Presentation Intermuseum Conservation Association.
Advertisements

Lesson 3 Responding to Emergency Events. For additional information or questions please contact Toledo-Lucas County Health Department APC:
Emergency Management Emergency Planning Emergency Preparedness Disaster Management Disaster Recovery Coordination Primary Functions.
Airport Emergency Plan - Overview
Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Organization w A Small Independent Federal Agency w Headquartered in Washington, D.C. w 10 Regions, Caribbean.
The Advantage of Geospatial Information in Disaster Management
NERT College Disaster Operations Disaster Operations - ICS Command Staff Workshop Refer to Field Operations Guide, Chapter 5.
DENR Disaster Response Center Purpose Purpose Activation Activation Operation and Responsibilities Operation and Responsibilities Phases of Response Phases.
A Brief Overview of Emergency Management Office of Emergency Management April 2006 Prepared By: The Spartanburg County Office of Emergency Management.
US&R Planning. US&R Planning Issues Establish authority and responsibility Assess vulnerability and hazards Identify resources Coordination of response.
Implementation of the Seveso II Directive 96/82/EC Institutional Strengthening of the Slovak Environmental Agency Emergency Response Principles and Practice.
Facilitating a Dialog between the NSDI and Utility Companies J. Peter Gomez Manager, Information Requirements, Xcel Energy.
Visual 3.1 Unified Command Unit 3: Unified Command.
Hurricane Sandy The Path to Recovery. Richard A. French Chief of Training and Exercise New York State OEM Office:
Alexander Brandl ERHS 561 Emergency Response Environmental and Radiological Health Sciences.
Emergency Evacuation.
Abstract Earthquakes are hazardous to people and the economy. Potential loss impacts include lives, homes, office buildings, manufacturing plants, schools,
All-hazards readiness in the United States Learning to communicate and build a culture of preparedness David Passey Senior Representative U.S. Federal.
PDLS © : Disaster Planning and Organization. Learning Objectives Steps of disaster planning Steps of disaster planning Concepts in management planning.
What is HAZUS-MH? HAZUS-MH is a planning tool that estimates
Roles and Responsibilities Local Agencies and Responders.
Session 131 Hazard Mapping and Modeling Supporting Emergency Response Operations using GIS and Modeling.
Application of HAZUS TM to the New Madrid Earthquake Project Prepared for: Federal Emergency Management Agency Central US Earthquake Consortium Prepared.
State Debris Management Plan California the “Disney Land of Disasters”
Moving Forward: NOAA & Earth Observation Systems Mr. Timothy R.E. Keeney Deputy Assistant Secretary of Commerce for Oceans and Atmosphere National Oceanographic.
Foster and sustain the environmental and economic well being of the coast by linking people, information, and technology. Center Mission Coastal Hazards.
Texas Department of Public Safety Division of Emergency Management Debris Management Overview.
US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® Consequence Assessment for Dam Failure Simulations Kurt Buchanan, CFM Economist Mapping, Modeling, and Consequences.
John Schulte USDA Forest Service, Fire & Aviation Management; Disaster & Emergency Operations and International Fire Support Your Logo Here.
Implementing HAZUS-MH in Pre-Disaster Mitigation
1. 2 Pets & Disasters Preparing an Action Plan State Agricultural Response Team 2.
Session 16: Distribution of Geospatial Data 1 Distribution of Geospatial Data in the Public Environment Hazard Mapping and Modeling.
AmeriCorps in Times of Disaster AmeriCorps Conference July 23,
Disasters know no geographic or seasonal limitations  Earthquakes  Wildfires  Floods  Tornadoes  Hurricanes  Pandemics  Terrorism  Bioterrorism.
Session 131 A community profile provides a base for overlay analysis and for discussing a hazard’s impacts on a community.
Presented to: 2012 Pacific Aviation Director’s Workshop, Guam By: Juan S.A. Reyes, A.C.E., ACSI Date: March 13-15, 2012 Federal Aviation Administration.
Lake Forest Emergency Plan Part II POST EVENT PROCEDURES.
National Response Plan and DOI Mission Management Briefing for DOI Annual Business Conference Laurence I. Broun Departmental Emergency Coordinator Office.
National Earthquake Program Managers Meeting 1 May 2013 Region X Cascadia Subduction Zone Planning Effort.
National Response Plan and DOI Mission Management Briefing for DOI Annual Business Conference Laurence I. Broun Departmental Emergency Coordinator Office.
IS-804: ESF #4 – Firefighting Firefighting
HAZUS-MH is a multi-hazard risk assessment and loss estimation software program developed by the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). (animate on.
Dr. Charles W. Beadling Central Asia Regional Health Security Conference April 2012 Garmisch-Partenkirchen, Germany.
1 The DNA of Emergency Management. 2 Approaches to Disaster Planning Two types of planning u Emergency 0perations Plan u Emergency Support Function.
FEMA Region III The National Flood Insurance Program Jon Janowicz – FEMA Region III June 8, 2010 Floodplain Mapping in West Virginia.
Unit 4: Functional Areas and Positions
California Emergency Management Agency State Emergency Plan Briefing Emergency Partnership Advisory Workgroup Meeting April 16, 2009.
Brevard County Office of Emergency Management Brevard County Emergency Management Robert Lay, Director Charlie Roberts, Sr EM Coordinator Founded 1513.
Richard Butgereit GIS Administrator
1Office of the Federal Coordinator for Meteorology OFCM OFCM Special Session: Challenges of Urban Test Beds Charge to the Joint Action Group for Joint.
1 Welcome North Dakota State University Emergency Management & Planning Donald Borgen ND Division of Emergency Services ND GIS Users Conference.
Visual 1.1 An Overview Multi-Hazard Emergency Planning For Schools UNIT 3.
1 DHS Emergency Management Presenter: Frank Billard Director, Office of Facilities & Support Services Date: October 21, 2015 Georgia Department of Human.
State Emergency Management
Comprehensive Plan Update. General, far-reaching vision to benefit the whole community Takes a long term view of issues Focuses on physical development.
McClain County Multi- Jurisdictional Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan Update Image from
1Office of the Federal Coordinator for Meteorology OFCM OFCM Special Session: Uncertainty in Atmospheric Transport and Diffusion (ATD) Models Setting the.
PROTECTIVE ACTIONS AND REENTRY. Protective Actions Promptly and effectively implemented or recommended for implementation to minimize the consequences.
Condition of Forests in San Diego County: Recent Conifer Tree Mortality and the Institutional Response Presented by California Department of Forestry Mark.
0 FEMA Region 6 Floods: The Response and the Costs Bob Bennett Response Division FEMA Region 6.
“Ag Related Water Emergencies” What can Extension do? Dr. Mike Martin Emergency Response and Preparedness Coordinator.
NH DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES NATIONAL RESPONSE FRAMEWORK EMERGENCY SUPPORT FUNCTIONS (ESF): – ESF #1 Transportation – ESF #2 Communications.
Harris County Case Study.  Aligning plans with emergency support functions (ESFs) can facilitate an efficient and effective response to emergencies.
OVERVIEW of the NATIONAL DISASTER MEDICAL SYSTEM.
Emergency Preparedness. Proposed Emergency Preparedness Rules NFR/LMC §19.326(a) deleted and moved to § for Emergency Preparedness Rules Places.
Recovery Operations.
Job Hazard Analysis (JHA) Training for Safety and Health Staff
Application of HAZUSTM to the New Madrid Earthquake Project
Hurricane Pam Exercise
Disaster Preparedness
Presentation transcript:

:2 Evaluation of ATD Models Using National Emergency Support Function Information Requirements An Overview

:3 Catastrophic Disaster Response Group Consists of the Assistant Secretaries of all Federal Response Plan signatory Departments and Agencies with emergency management responsibilities Acts as a Board of Directors for activities under the Federal Response Plan Directed the Emergency Support Function Leaders Group to establish emergency support information requirements

:4 EMERGENCY SUPPORT FUNCTIONS Transportation Communications Public Works and Engineering Firefighting Information and Planning Mass Care Resource Support Health and Medical Services Urban Search and Rescue Hazardous Materials Food Energy ESF Department of Transportation National Communications System Department of Defense Department of Agriculture Federal Emergency Management Agency American Red Cross General Services Administration Department of Health and Human Services Federal Emergency Management Agency Environmental Protection Agency Department of Agriculture Department of Energy Primary Agency

:5 Emergency Support Function Leaders Group Consists of the Emergency Managers responsible for each of the 12 Emergency Support functions under the Federal Response Plan Delegated the development of the Emergency Support Function information requirements to information and planning specialists - the Rapid Assessment Working Group

:6 Developed Proposed Information Collection Methodology, including remote sensing sources, and data collected prior to an emergency event as well as after an event Assigned who was responsible to collect the information The form and timing of the information product was described as Emergency Support Information Requirements (ESIR) Information Collection Plan

:7 Emergency Support Information Requirement Essential Elements of Information are required. The EEI’s relate to the Emergency Support Information Requirement, but they are separate.

:8 EEI # 1 EEI # 2... EEI # 26 ESIR #1 ESIR #2... ESIR #67 The Relationship of EEIs to ESIRs

:9 Four Information Collection Plans by Major Hazard Hurricane - approved Earthquake - approval Flood - awaiting approval Hazardous Materials - awaiting approval Emergency Support Information Requirement can serve more than one hazard

:10 ESIR - FEMA Emergency Support Info Requirements: 1 Geographical Extent of the Disaster (by coordinates, by zip, by county, by state, and by Congressional District) 2 Number of Casualties/Injuries/Fatalities 3 Number of Single Family Homes Damaged 4 Number of Multi-Family Homes Damaged 5 Number of Mobile Homes Damaged 6 Population Affected by Housing Type 7 Population Affected by Primary Language Spoken 8 Population Affected by Age 9 Population Affected by Limited Mobility 10 Population Affected by Income 11 Hospitals(Beds?) unaffected in area 12 Hospitals(Beds?) affected in area 13 Doctors Offices/Clinics (Beds) unaffected in area 14 Doctors Offices/Clinics (Beds) affected in area 15 Nursing Homes (Beds) unaffected in area 16 Nursing Homes (Beds) affected in area 17 Power Plants impacted (Nuclear/Conventional) 18 High Voltage Network 19 Residential Power Grid 20 Radio/TV Stations Available in area 21 Radio/TV Stations affected in area 22 Urban Search and Rescue High Density Zones 23 Petroleum Product Storage 24 Petrochemical Plants 25 Superfund Sites 26 Toxic Release Inventory Sites 27 Land Line Switches affected 28 Cellular Phone Antennas affected 29 Airports Fully operable in area 30 Airports without Radar in area 31 Airports without Terminals in area 32 Airports inoperable 33 Damage to Railroad Stock 34 Damage to Railroad Bridges 35 Damage to Railroad Roundhouses 36 Damage to Railbeds 37 Damage to Trucks/Buses 38 Damage to Subways 39 Damage to Police, Fire and Emergency Services 40 Damage to Highway Bridges and Other Road Closings 41 Damage to Sewage Treatment Plants and # of customers 42 Damage to Water Treatment Plants and # of customers 43 Damage to Private Water Wells and # of customers 44 Damage to Federal Food Warehouses 45 Damage to Private Food Warehouses 46 Damage to Ports and Harbors 47 Potential for Fires/Actual Fires 48 Potential Mobilization Center Sites and Risk 49 Feeding and Water Requirements 50 Shelter Requirements 51 Medical Requirements 52 Population Support Requirements 53 Business Loss 54 Housing Loss 55 Warning and evacuation information 56 Remote Sensing Targeting information 57 Post Application Assessment (ACE) priorities 58 Forward Assessment Team target areas 59 Disaster Assistance Center site location 60 Amount of Debris to be removed 61 Weather 62 Status of Key Personnel 63 Status of Declarations 64 Major Issues/Activities of ESF/OFAs 65 Resource Shortfalls 66 Donations 67 Historical Information

:11 TRACE Hardware Software Personnel Facilities Support Data Base Communications Information System Element Categories D1. NRT GeoSpatial D2. Monitoring Data D3. Ad Hoc Data D4. Initial Analysis D5. Action Updates D6. Res. Updates D7. GeoSpatial Aids D8. Statistics E1. Resource Info E2. Hazard Info E3. GeoSpatial Data E4. Statistics E5. GeoSpatial Aids E6. Action Guidelins. E7. Monit. Directions E8. Resource Allocat F1. Hazard Info F2. GeoSpatial Data F3. Monitoring Data F4. Ad Hoc Data F5. Thematic GIS F6.ResourceStaging F7. Final Prep. Aids F8. Ad Hoc Aids G1. NRT GeoSpatial G2. Monitoring Data G3. Ad Hoc Data G4. Initial Analysis G5. Action Updates G6. Res. Updates G7. GeoSpatial Aids G8. Statistics K1. Mapping Requir. K2. Local GIS Status K3. Hazard ESIR K4. Staff POC K5. GIS Data Plan K6.RS Requirements K7. Budget Needs K8. ResourseAllocat. L1. Structures L2. DEM L3. RS Products L4. Soil & LandUse L5. Hazard Maps L6.ActionRecomend. L7. GIS & Images A8.ActionDataSuport Tech Notes and Reports D EFGKL ASAP AFTER h. AFTER h. AFTER h. AFTER wk. AFTER 1 month AFTER Requirements Event Related Applied to Multi-Hazard Risk Modeling Assessment Key Inputs: Key Outputs: Key Inputs Key Outputs Multi-Hazard Risk Modeling Assessment for ATD

:12 Issues & Considerations in Assessment Spatial Accuracy Currency TimelinessCost Completeness Availability Options Usage Guidelines Trade-Off Understanding Tools Multi-Hazard Risk Modeling Assessment for ATD

:13 Other Earthquake Flood ATD Hurricane TRACE Chart 1 System Description Technical Notes TRACE Automated Flow Input Processing Matrix All Inputs Data Handling Processes Derived System Element Requirements Matrix Information System Characteristics Data Handling Processes FEMA ESIRs and RAWG EIIs Event-Oriented Matrix ESIRsTime- Oriented Outputs A-Q 1.1 Pre-Event & Post-Event Output Matrix Pre- Event Data A-Q ESIRs Outputs A-Q Post- Event Data A-Q 1.1.A- 1.1.Q Pre-Event Input Characteristics Matrix Pre- Event Data A-Q Pre- Event Input Characte ristic A-Q 1.2.A- 1.2.Q Post-Event Input Characteristics Matrix Post- Event Data A-Q Post- Event Input Characte ristic A-Q 1.3.A- 1.3.Q 1.4.A- 1.4.N 1.5.A- 1.5.N Multi-Hazard Risk Modeling Assessment for ATD

:14 ATD Models ATD Models Classification Matrix Multi-Hazard Risk Modeling Assessment for ATD

:15 Information Sources: A. Atmospheric Dispersion Modeling Resources, DOE, March B. Directory of Atmospheric Transport and Diffusion Models, Equipment and Projects, DOC, April C. General Specifications for OFCM Directory from Carl Mazzola, August D. Directory of Atmospheric Transport and Diffusion Consequence Assessment Models, DOC, March 1999 ATD Models Classification Matrix Multi-Hazard Risk Modeling Assessment for ATD

:16 Information Considered: 1. Character 2. Terms 3. Type 4. Range 5. Validation Operational Research Global Special Short Terms Long Terms Radiological Biological Chemical Smoke/Dust Less than 100 km More than 100 km ATD Models Classification Matrix Multi-Hazard Risk Modeling Assessment for ATD

:17 6. Inputs 7. Outputs Wind Temperature Humidity Rain Terrain Ground Cover Other Air Concentration, Ground Deposition, Dosage, Health Consequences Information Considered: ATD Models Classification Matrix Multi-Hazard Risk Modeling Assessment for ATD

:18 ATD Models Classification Matrix Multi-Hazard Risk Modeling Assessment for ATD

:19 ATD Models Operational Verified Meteorological Parameters Use Terrain Data Use Immediate Response Models Supporting ESIRs ATD Models Classification Matrix Multi-Hazard Risk Modeling Assessment for ATD

:20 Built by Model Data Professional GIS Support to Decision Making Current Measurements Data Prepared GIS Data Multi-Hazard Risk Modeling Assessment for ATD

: models evaluated  64 models were Verified and Validated  36 models are operational  3 include terrain (Topography & Ground Cover)  2 meet at least one Emergency Support Requirement ATD Models Classification Matrix Multi-Hazard Risk Modeling Assessment for ATD Modeling Assessment

:22 Recommendations Develop standardized Verification and Validation and Acceptances procedures. Select best models and begin adding capabilities to meet Emergency Support Requirements. Web-enable the final models. ATD Models Classification Matrix Multi-Hazard Risk Modeling Assessment for ATD