New Bedford High School & Adjacent Properties Status of Off-Site Environmental Investigations - Public Meeting July 12, 2006.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Home with an Underground Heating Oil Tank (UST) Solutions for your Leaking Heating Oil Tank.
Advertisements

Summary of Conceptual Design Site 3 Causeway Landfill Culvert Stabilization Marine Corps Recruit Depot Parris Island (CTO JM38) 19 August 2014.
Land Use Program Septic System Overview Scott Weldon
2014 Vapor Intrusion Guidance Amendments Discussion Points Waste Site Cleanup Advisory Committee Meeting May 22, 2014.
Illinois Department of Nuclear Safety1 Radon Mitigation Overview So, you tell the homeowner that they have elevated radon. Now what do you tell them?
Radon in Your Home Presenter information here 4/2014.
Ground-Supported Slabs • Exterior Flatwork
Claremore Medical Office Building From Landfill to Medical Office Building A Brownfield Success Story THE GREEN SIDE OF BROWNFIELD REMEDIATION.
Building on a Landfill Celeste Manolas, Project Manager Santa Barbara County General Services Capital Projects.
ASPHALT & CONCRETE FOR INDOOR FACILITIES Presented by Tom DeRosa.
Permeable Heavy Use Area for Livestock Farms Presentation for Kitsap County DCD, September 28 th, 2006, Lab Test Findings and Calculated Storm Water Performance.
DATE: 1/20/14 REVISIONS Construction Services 170 Long Lane Middletown, CT WESLEYAN U N I V E R S I T Y A-1 MAJOR MAINTENANCE FY15 WEST ELEVATION.
PERMITS & INSPECTIONS DEPARTMENT 2003 INTERNATIONAL RESIDENTIAL CODE IRC.
US Highway 17 (Center Street) Sidewalk Feasibility Study Town of Pierson, Florida.
Environmental Investigation by Con Edison Former E115th Street Gas Works November 13, 2007.
Foundation Systems.
Condensation Piping and Installation Drain Pans
Chapter 8 Plot Plans.
Preparation before placing concrete Chapter 3. Chapter Topics Subgrade preparation Compaction around buried pipes and excavations Establishing grades.
 Embankment Construction – LOTs  What is the maximum length of a LOT? Mainline pavement lanes, turn lanes, ramps, parking lots, concrete box.
Asphalt Quality Assurance Program
Floor Systems and Foundation Support
Concrete Construction
CONSTRUCTING A FIVE CABIN LATRINE
2013 Section Engineer’s Meeting.  Correct Type, Gauge, and Coating (Standard Drawings)  Based on Pipe Diameter, Fill Height & Soil pH  Obtain copy.
For Stormwater Treatment and Flow Control Dan Cloak Environmental Consulting December 14, 2010 Contra Costa Clean Water Program.
Constructing Homes and Other Buildings
Radon Overview Reducing Radon in a Home. Learning Outcomes Upon completion of this module you will be able to:  Recall the most common method to reduce.
McCoy Field Proposed Keith Middle School Site EPA Proposes Approval of McCoy Field Cleanup Plan.
Wes Marshall, P.E. University of Connecticut March 2007
1 HVACR116 – Trade Skills Plan Views Elevations Plan Views Elevations.
Residential Construction Unit 2- Site Work and Concrete Mr. Todzia.
Reading Structural Drawings
Choose a category. You will be given the answer. You must give the correct question. Click to begin.
Chapter 32 Floor Systems and Foundation Support. 2 Links for Chapter 32 Slab Construction Reinforcing Concrete Crawl Spaces.
David Dippel, P.G. Frank Zeng, P.E. Waste Permits Division Municipal Solid Waste Permits Section 2015 TCEQ Environmental Trade Fair.
History and Cleanup at Chemical Commodities, Inc. Jeff Field US EPA Region 7 1.
Sampling and Testing Concrete Mixes MATERIAL TESTING LABORATORY
TRENTON Casing Filler Presentation
HVACR116 – Trade Skills Plan Views Elevations. Plan Views.
Brownfield Remediation Clean-up Part III. Urban agriculture Has potential to improve the quality of life in urban areas by increasing food security, providing.
Site Work.
1 BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES NSLS – II CFAC Review Conventional Facilities Geotechnical Conditions Tom Joos Civil/Structural Engineer BNL Plant Engineering.
Workshop on Permanent Closure of Single-Walled USTs and Funding Opportunities For Closure and Cleanup.
Concrete Field Sampling
Release Reporting. How Do I Know If I Have a Leak in My UST System? 1. Unusual operating conditions; such as, erratic behavior of the dispensing pump.
Marian Anderson Place Site Update City Commission Special Workshop December 14, 2015.
BUILDING CONSTRUCTION
Drafting 2 (Arch) Quiz Review #6 Quiz Review. 1.To anchor a stud wall to the subfloor, carpenters nail through the: Sole plate Header Jamb Joists Quiz.
Applicant:Derek and Erica Hokkanen Site Address: th Street Property #s: A Computer #s: Location:Section 33, T30N, R16W,
 Clean Water Act 404 permit  Ohio EPA Division of Surface Water 401 water quality certification  Ohio Revised Code 6111 – Placement of dredged materials.
The World of AUL Presentation by: Atul Pandey, P.E. PANDEY Environmental, LLC 2016 Ohio Brownfield Conference April 7, 2016.
Floor Systems and Foundation Support
Riprap Installation Construction Inspection for Field Office Activities Will use Riprap Gradation and Riprap Subgrade Problems from Class Problem Section.
Excavation & Trenching Awareness Plus
Footings & Foundation Prepared By: (Vanani Sanket) Department of Civil Engineering B.H.Gardi College of Engineering & Technology.
A REPORT ON PRACTICAL TRAINING CONDUCTED AT PUBLIC WORK DEPARTMENT(PWD),KOTA FROM 15/6/2011 TO 14/7/2011 Submitted to: Mr. Rajneesh Sharma HOD {Civil Dep.}
Leads Institute of Technology & Engineering
CAD-Architecture Inst: Mr. Johnston Logan High School
Alondra Villanueva ESS 315
Foundation – jay Desai.
Septic System Overview
Arch205 Materials and building construction 1 foundation
Chemical Metals Industries, Inc. (CMI)
Always Advancing Pervious
Arch205 building construction foundation
Connecticut Remediation Standard Regulations: Volatilization Criteria
TRENTON Casing Filler Presentation
Chemical Metals Industries, Inc. (CMI)
ACEC Designer Training
Presentation transcript:

New Bedford High School & Adjacent Properties Status of Off-Site Environmental Investigations - Public Meeting July 12, 2006

Purpose & Overview Special Project Designation Site – MCP  Complete delineation of release site required  Linked to RTN at Keith Junior High School Risk Based Cleanup  Assessment of soil at NBHS, Walsh and KJHS  Indoor air assessment at NBHS

Overview of Release Site

New Bedford High School Soil Sampling Plan E′E′ E

New Bedford High School Cross Section E to E′

New Bedford High School Soil Sampling Results: PCBs 259 Samples Analyzed* Range of Concentrations: Non-Detect to 40.0 parts per million Average Concentration: 2.7 parts per million MCP S-1 Soil Standard: 2.0 parts per million *A total of 69 samples exceeded the MCP S-1 Soil Standard of 2.0 parts per million

New Bedford High School RCRA Metals of Concern Lead, Barium, and Chromium Arsenic and Cadmium

New Bedford High School Indoor Air Sample Location Plan

New Bedford High School Indoor Air Quality Results: PCBs RBAC for PCBs in air RBAC (  g/m3) Action Level (1x10-6) 0.06 Maximum Acceptable Level (1x10-5) 0.3 Results from April 2006 Indoor Air Sampling: to  g/m3 Follow-up investigations scheduled later this month…

Walsh Field Soil Sampling Plan A′A′A B B′B′

Walsh Field Cross Sections A & B

Walsh Field Soil Sampling Results: PCBs 69 Samples Analyzed Range of Concentrations: Non-Detect to 0.66 parts per million Average Concentration: 0.18 parts per million MCP S-1 Soil Standard: 2.0 parts per million *No samples exceeded the MCP S-1 Soil Standard of 2.0 parts per million

Walsh Field RCRA Metals of Concern Lead Arsenic, Cadmium, and Chromium

Keith Junior High School Soil Sampling Plan

Keith Junior High School Soil Sampling Results: PCBs 11 Samples Analyzed* Range of Concentrations: Non-Detect to 0.9 parts per million Average Concentration: 0.08 parts per million MCP S-1 Soil Standard: 2.0 parts per million *No samples exceeded the MCP S-1 Soil Standard of 2.0 parts per million

Keith Junior High School RCRA Metals of Concern Lead Cadmium and Chromium

New Keith Middle School Indoor Air Quality – Vent Air Sampling Locations Plan

New Keith Middle School Vent Air Sampling Results  No PCBs or PAHs above Method Detection Levels  Detected VOCs are largely attributed to:  PVC joint cements and cleaners  Construction vehicle exhaust  Measured concentrations will decrease with time  No threat to human health, based upon current readings

New Bedford High School & Adjacent Properties Questions & Answers

New Keith Middle School Backfilling in Exterior Areas Backfilling in exterior areas (outside the building footprint) was completed to provide a minimum cap thickness of two feet of clean material in all paved and sidewalk areas and a minimum of three feet of clean material in all other areas (landscaping and grass areas). To accomplish this goal, contaminated soil was stripped to the appropriate pre-grading elevation and removed from the site by WES Construction. After removal of soil to the appropriate elevation, a separation layer of geotextile fabric was placed over the soil to remain. Approximately four hundred (400) spot elevations were obtained by a licensed land surveyor and submitted as an as-built drawing. A layer of clean backfill (approximately one foot) was installed above the geotextile fabric in all locations. An orange warning barrier was then placed over the initial clean backfill to provide a visual indicator for any unauthorized excavation in the landscaped areas. Following installation of the warning barrier, clean fill was placed to an intermediate elevation by WES Construction. In areas to be paved, Agostini (Building Contractor) placed additional clean backfill and a pavement binder coarse (approximately two inches) to achieve a minimum 2-foot cap. The pre- and post-paving elevations were surveyed to make sure the final cap thickness was achieved, in accordance with EPA’s conditional approval of the Risk Based Cleanup Plan. The same procedure will be followed to verify that final grades in landscaped areas achieve a minimum cap thickness of three feet, also in accordance with the EPA conditional approval. Photo showing layered backfill. Clean backfill placed above contaminated fill and geotextile fabric, followed by warning barrier, then additional clean backfill. Placement and compaction of clean backfill was performed in lifts. First lift was prior to placement of warning barrier. Second lift was after placement of warning barrier.

New Keith Middle School Backfilling within Building Footprint Backfilling around pile caps and grade beams within the building footprint was performed as follows. After installation of the foundation piles was complete, contaminated soil was excavated around the piles to a depth of one foot below the base of the proposed pile caps. A separation layer of permeable geotextile fabric was placed over the soil to remain. A one-foot thick bed of gravel fill was then placed to the elevation of the base of the pile cap excavation. The concrete pile caps were then formed by concrete foundation work crews. Following curing of the pile caps, the forms were stripped and the area around the individual pile caps was backfilled with contaminated material, to an elevation six inches below the top of the pile cap (approximately 2.5-foot thick layer). A layer of separation fabric was then placed over the contaminated backfill, followed by a six-inch layer of clean granular fill. Once backfilling was complete to the top of the pile caps, concrete grade beams were formed over the pile caps. Upon completion of the grade beams, a second layer of contaminated fill was used as backfill to an elevation of two feet below the top of the grade beams (approximately one foot). A layer of separation fabric was then placed over the contaminated backfill. An approximate one-foot layer of clean granular backfill was placed over the separation fabric, to match grade with the tops of the grade beams. View of several “lower” pile cap excavations backfilled with contaminated fill. (April 2005) View of clean fill along interior wall. (April 2005)

New Keith Middle School Installation of the Vapor Barrier Membrane Installation A vapor barrier membrane was installed beneath the concrete slab on the first floor to prevent the potential migration of any toxic vapors that may accumulate under the building. The construction of the vapor barrier included placing rigid insulation board on top of clean backfill material. A 1-foot wide space was left, as appropriate, to allow for installation of the Geovent furnished by Liquid Boot. Geotextile fabric was installed over the insulation board and secured to the foam board with plastic screws spaced at approximately 12 inches. The Geovents were installed and covered with a 1-inch thick rigid insulation board to provide a smooth and level surface. The Liquid Boot vapor membrane barrier was then spray-applied to the geotextile fabric. Smoke Testing Following a 24+/-hour curing period, smoke tests were conducted at isolated areas of the vapor barrier to inspect for any leaks. This was accomplished by pushing a fogging agent under the membrane in all directions. If smoke was observed, additional liquid vapor barrier was applied. Once no smoke was observed, the testing was complete. Thickness tests were also conducted periodically to determine if the Liquid Boot was installed to the manufacturer's correct specified thickness (60-mil minimum). Digital calipers were used to test the thickness of the barrier. If the thickness was insufficient, the area was re-sprayed. Vent Piping Four-inch diameter PVC piping was installed from each of the individual vent systems through the building roofs. A total of sixteen vent pipes were installed. The vent stacks were placed away from air handling units and up to approximately three feet above the roofs. Rigid insulation board installed above clean, compacted backfill. The foam board was cut to allow for geovent installation. Geovents were installed between sections of insulation board to allow the ground beneath the vapor barrier to “breath”. Venting is channeled to vertical PVC pipe risers and discharged outside through the roof.