United Nations Environment Programme Regional Cooperation and Coordination Experiences Marieta Sakalian Programme Management/Liaison Officer Biodiversity.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
WCDR Thematic Panel Governance: Institutional and Policy Frameworks for Risk Reduction Annotated Outline UNDP – UNV – ProVention Consortium – UN-Habitat.
Advertisements

Disaster Risk Reduction and Governance. Ron Cadribo.
Food crisis and the International Assessment of Agriculture knowledge, Science and Technology for Development (SSA) Dr Simplice Davo VODOUHE PAN International.
Roundtable on Sustainable Forests. Forests cover about 750 million acres -- more than a quarter of the entire United States -- and sustainable management.
UNEP World Conservation
Agrobiodiversity and Intellectual Property Rights: Selected Issues under the FAO International Treaty on Plant Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture.
Near East Plant Protection Network for Regional Cooperation & Knowledge Sharing Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations An Overview on.
Towards More Sustainable and Market-based Payment for Ecosystem Services A Pilot Project in Lijiang, China Lu Zhi.
European Clearing-House Mechanism Portal Toolkit Expert Group Meeting
AGRICULTURAL BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY CBD NEWS. SBSTTA 10 Recommendations Bangkok, February 2005 Elżbieta Martyniuk National Focal Point POLAND.
Country-Level Coordination & the GEF – an Overview.
Building the Community of Practice for Pro-poor Livestock Development Main Findings from the Need Assessment Silvia Sperandini Consultant, Knowledge Management.
Lobbying for Food Security: FAO advocacy interventions
World Bank Agriculture and Rural Development Program in Serbia And Synergies with Other IFIs and Government Institutions.
Summary Report of CSO Meeting GEF Expanded Constituency Workshop (ECW), Southern Africa 15 th July 2013 Livingstone, Zambia (
Trade and Environment Capacity-Building WTO Symposium on Trade and Sustainable Development October 2005 Division of Technology, Industry, and Economics.
OPTIONS AND REQUIREMENTS FOR ENGAGEMENT OF CIVIL SOCIETY IN GEF PROJECTS AND PROGRAMMES presented by Faizal Parish Regional/Central Focal Point GEF NGO.
Strengthening International Science for the Benefit of Society Celebrating 75 years:
STRENGTHENING the AFRICA ENVIRONMENT INFORMATION NETWORK An AMCEN initiative A framework to support development planning processes and increase access.
Environment and Energy Community of Practice meeting, Bratislava, 24 – 26 September, 2007 LAND DEGRADATION.
Europe & CIS Subregional Workshop: 7-8 March 2007, Istanbul, Turkey Enhancing National GEF Coordination, Communications and Outreach (Session 6): The Bulgarian.
Global Action Plan and its implementation in other regions Meeting for Discussion of the draft Plan for the Implementation of the Global Strategy to Improve.
Implementation of Global Action Plan for Peatlands and Ramsar CC GAP future Wise Use of Peatlands Schiphol February, 2009.
Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (BES) – Net Dialogue Workshop on Knowledge for the 21 st Century: connecting diverse knowledge systems April.
1 Towards a Strategic and Integrated Management of Plant Genetic Resources for Food Security and Sustainable Development Dr. Kakoli Ghosh, Agricultural.
GEF IN TAJIKISTAN Dr. Neimatullo SAFAROV CBD and CPB National Focal Point Republic of Tajikistan.
Roles of GEF National Focal Points & Experiences in GEF Coordination and Integration Sub-Regional Workshop for GEF Focal Points in the Pacific SIDS Auckland,
What is the NEPAD? It is a vision and strategic framework for Africa’s renewal. It has eight sectoral priorities, namely:  Infrastructure (ICTs, Energy,
Country Presentation- GEF Operational Focal Point, Sri Lanka GEF Sub-Regional Workshop 2-3 December 2007, Bali, Indonesia Anura Jayatilake Director, Environmental.
Enabling the rural poor to overcome poverty The Rural Poor Transforming livelihoods in the drylands.
Session 4: The Convention on Biological Diversity Making Access Decisions.
8 TH -11 TH NOVEMBER, 2010 UN Complex, Nairobi, Kenya MEETING OUTCOMES David Smith, Manager PEI Africa.
Promoting CARICOM/CARIFORUM Food Security (Project GTFS/RLA/141/ITA) (FAO Trust Fund for Food Security and Food Safety – Government of Italy Contribution)
Danielius Pivoriunas Sr. Operations officer, Capacity Development, GEF SGP and Relations with countries of Eastern Europe and Central Asia GEF Familiarization.
“POLICY AND CHALLENGES ON ENVIRONMENT IN MONGOLIA – GEF COOPERATION” By J. Enkhsaikhan GEF Political Focal Point for Mongolia GEF Constituency Meeting.
Kyrgyzstan priorities in environment protection B. Tolongutov, Director, State Regulation Center on Environment Protection & Ecological Safety Sector State.
Financing sustainable forest management: A comprehensive approach to resource mobilization at country level Nadi, Fiji, 24 July 2012 Camilla Nordheim-Larsen.
NCSA AS A TOOL FOR INTEGRATED ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT (ARMENIA EXPERIENCE) Anahit Simonyan June, 2004 Bratislava UNDP ARMENIA.
Ministerul Mediului si Gospodaririi Apelor Session 6 - Enhancing National GEF Coordination, Communication and Outreach Developing the National Capacity.
The China Biodiversity Partnership And Framework for Action (CBPF) A Programmatic Approach for Biodiversity Conservation.
Pilot Projects on Strengthening Inventory Development and Risk Management-Decision Making for Mercury: A Contribution to the Global Mercury Partnership.
Stefano Padulosi Global Coordinator MS Swaminathan Research Foundation, Chennai, India, February 2015 Reinforcing the resilience of poor rural communities.
Assessing Vulnerability and Adaptation to Climate-related Risks A Flavour of SEI Activities Stockholm Environment Institute Frank Thomalla with contributions.
OPTIONS AND REQUIREMENTS FOR ENGAGEMENT OF CIVIL SOCIETY IN GEF PROJECTS presented by Ermath Harrington GEF Regional Focal Point.
CENTRAL ASIAN REGIONAL MIGRATION PROGRAM (CARM) Key words: Labour Migration Poverty Reduction Good Governance Human Rights.
Integrating GEF in Environment and Sustainable Development Plans and Policies - – Jamaica’s Experience GEF CSP Sub-regional Workshop for Caribbean Focal.
Kiev + 1 Conference 22 October Tbilisi, Georgia RECs Partnership Regional Environmental Centres: Central Asian REC REC Caucasus REC for Central.
GEF-Assisted Integrated Ecosystem Management Project In The Trans- Boundary Areas Between Nigeria and Niger Republic.
Session 10: Linking CBR+ with National REDD+ Programme in Cambodia Training of Trainer on REDD+ Concept for UNDP GEF SGP/CBR+ Grantees 7 October 2015.
LADA Assistance to the CACILM CMPF Support Project Sustainable Land Management Information System LADA Project Steering Committee Meeting and Technical.
Cooperation and synergies for better environment – efforts by CAREC EU-Central Asia high-level conference on environment and water 13/14 February 2013.
Waisea Vosa Climate Change Unit Division of Political and Treaties Ministry of Foreign Affairs and International Cooperation.
GEF Familiarization Seminar 2012 United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP)
Workshop and Steering Committee Meeting Globally-important Ingenious Agricultural Heritage Systems (GIAHS) Project Rome, 7-9 June 2004 Components and Processes.
Global Terrestrial Observing System National and regional dimensions Linking scientists and policy makers to collaborate on global and regional environmental.
Agroforestry – Implementation, Obstacles and Questions.
Biodiversity, Access & Benefit-sharing and the Sustainable Development Goals Tomme R. Young IRIS (International Research Institute for Sustainability)
Integrated Management of Biodiversity in the Central Zagros Ecosystems Riverine Biodiversity Conservation and Restoration Workshop February 2004,
Component Ecological Restoration and Biodiversity Conservation in Central Asia (ERCA) Bishkek Project is financed by the European Union.
and to Climate Action SDG 13 and Life on Land, SDG 15
Session 3: Advancing National Action and Capacity Development
Sendai Framework for Disaster Risk Reduction
Institutional Strengthening Support
GEF governance reforms to enhance effectiveness and civil society engagement Faizal Parish GEC, Central Focal Point , GEF NGO Network GEF-NGO Consultation.
German-Uzbek STI Cooperation
Decision analysis concept note plans
The Biodiversity and Protected Areas Management (BIOPAMA) Programme
Assessing the Economics of Land Degradation in Central Asia
Forest and Landscape Restoration (FLR)
Presentation transcript:

United Nations Environment Programme Regional Cooperation and Coordination Experiences Marieta Sakalian Programme Management/Liaison Officer Biodiversity UNEP/FAO/CGIAR UNEP Division of GEF Coordination

Objectives –Conservation of the unique high diversity of –wild and cultivated fruit species in CA –Enhancement of farmers’ production and livelihood –strategies Policy and legislation: Providing options to policy- makers for strengthening legal and policy frameworks; increase awareness on agrobiodiversity value Knowledge and methodologies: Assessing, documenting and managing local varieties of horticulture crops and wild fruit species in a in a sustainable way; Capacity building: across all relevant aspects meant to strengthen diversity conservation at local, national and regional levels. Collaboration and partnership: Promote broad stakeholder participation in agrobiodiversity management to ensure sustainability project activities In Situ/On farm Conservation of Agricultural Biodiversity in Central Asia ( Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan,Turkmenistan Uzbekistan)

The Region is one of the centres of origin and domestication for any globally important, vegetables, cereals, etc.) by N.I. Vavilov; Common threats to genetic diversity: - Overgrazing, Deforestation, Logging, industrialization in the wild, using of uniform high-yield varieties, chemical fertilizers and pesticides Shared environment degradation problems - Genetic erosion, loss of traditional diversity-based farming systems and loss of biodiversity, arable lands degradation, soil erosion pollution, deforestation Socioeconomic similarities Traditions in working in partnership Why Regional Multi-country Approach?

Keys for Success Global Environment benefits and development needs Multy stakeholder participation Country ownership Project development in respond to country needs Open, transparent and inclusive decision making process Builds on national and regional strategies for biodiversity conservation and strengthens the regional network “CATCN-PGR” Consistent with the GEF OPs and BD Focal areas SP Farmers EAs with national networks

Mechanisms for cooperation Regional Steering Committee, Multidisciplinary Site Committees in each pilot site; Participatory management methodologies Scientific and technical cooperation - Joint research and Exchange of information - Crops working groups - Promotes shared responsibilities among countries within the project and the CATCN-PGR); Regional training centres on pomegranate, walnut, molecular markers, marketing strategies and centres on priority fruit species in different countries; Training programes for Decision makers, farmers and local communities, protected areas managers, researchers and instructors; Genetic Resources Information System (GRIS)- Shared digital database on assessment of diversity distribution and level of genetic resources of targeted fruit species; Collaborative agreement on access and exchange of information on database between/among institutions involved in work on genetic resources of fruit crops at national and regional levels.

Cooperation and shared objectives within the region The project builds on the Regional Environmental Action Plan (REAP) – initiated by UNEP office in Asia and the Pacific and developed as a joint venture between UNEP, UNDP and ADB (in 2000); Facilitates the coordination between the National Strategies for PGR Conservation and supports implementation of the Regional Strategy on PGR Conservation; Strengthening of CATCN-PGR Promotes coordination and collaboration between Ministries of Environment and Agriculture in partner countries; Complements other GEF supported initiatives in the region.

Constrains Farmers have not historically been included in the process of documenting and decision-making for conserving genetic diversity; Traditional weak links within the scientific community – among natural scientists and between natural and social scientists and economists; Some differences in political and economic reforms.

Contribution to Biodiversity Conservation and Well-being in the Region Strengthened Policy

Increased Knowledge Contribution to Biodiversity Conservation and Well-being in the Region

Ecosystems Rehabilitation

Broad Participation and Strong Partnership Contribution to Biodiversity Conservation and Well-being in the Region

Increased Capacity

Thank you Questions?