Kentucky’s Curriculum Documents A driving force behind education in Kentucky.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
RIDE – Office of Special Populations
Advertisements

Understanding Depth of Knowledge
Elementary. The District Heard Your Concerns In teachers requested that the following three documents be merged into one. Instructional Focus.
KDE Resources KentuckyCurriculum, Instruction, and Assessment.
Aligning Depth of Knowledge with the TEKS and the STAAR
Understanding Depth 0f knowledge
Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Reviewing the Cognitive Rigor Matrix and DOK Tuesday September.
Teacher Librarians. Contact Information Mary Cameron Iowa Department of Education (515)
Science Break Out Session New Math and Science Teacher Dec 2008 Becky Smith.
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Tom Torlakson, State Superintendent of Public Instruction Common Core State Standards AB 250 and the Professional Learning.
Webb’s Depth of Knowledge USD 457. Objectives CO – Analyze and apply the four levels of Webb’s Depth of Knowledge. LO – Read for the purpose of understanding.
Teaching with Depth An Understanding of Webb’s Depth of Knowledge
INTRODUCTION AND IMPLICATIONS DELAWARE VALLEY SCHOOL DISTRICT PA Common Core Standards 1.
+ 21 st Century Skills and Academic Standards Kimberly Hetrick Berry Creek Middle School Eagle County School District.
Formulating objectives, general and specific
Science Standards of Learning: An Overview of Resources Eric M. Rhoades, Science Coordinator Barbara P. Young, Science Specialist.
MATHEMATICS KLA Years 1 to 10 Understanding the syllabus MATHEMATICS.
Developing School-Based Systems of Support: Ohio’s Integrated Systems Model Y.S.U. March 30, 2006.
Teaching with Depth An Understanding of Webb’s Depth of Knowledge
Categorizing Classroom Experiences
1 Oregon Content Standards Evaluation Project, Contract Amendment Phase: Preliminary Findings Dr. Stanley Rabinowitz WestEd November 6, 2007.
Combined Grades Making Them Work Fall 2007 Building Classes of Combined Grades “In successful schools, classrooms are organized to meet the learning.
Shifting to a Standards- Based Mindset Through Quality Assessments and Backwards Design LMS Department Everett High School October 10, 2014.
March16, To keep up with the current and future standards of high school graduates. To align with college and career readiness standards. To ensure.
Steve Williams DESE Fine Arts Consultant Presented at: Missouri Music Educators Association January 30,
Transition to PA Common Core Teaching Content Copyright ©2011 Commonwealth of Pennsylvania 2.
PSLA 39 TH ANNUAL CONFERENCE APRIL 14, Carolyn Van Etten Beth Sahd Vickie Saltzer – LibGuide Developer.
DOK Depth of Knowledge An Introduction.
Illinois MSP Program Goals  To increase the content expertise of mathematics and science teachers; 4 To increase teaching skills through access to the.
Webb’s Depth of Knowledge
Webb’s Depth of Knowledge (DOK) Aligning Assessment Questions to DOK Levels Assessing Higher-Order Thinking.
1 Introduction to Content Alignment. 2 Objectives 1.Summarize the relationship between the Iowa Core Curriculum and the Iowa Core Content Standards and.
1 Leadership Module 3: Introduction to Content Alignment.
CURRICULUM CONSTRUCTION II AMANDA SKELTON & GINA NAAS.
Modified from Depth of Knowledge presentation by Dr. Robin Smith at 2009 PRESA Leadership Conference… Adapted from Kentucky Department of Education, Mississippi.
Developing Assessments for and of Deeper Learning [Day 2b-afternoon session] Santa Clara County Office of Education June 25, 2014 Karin K. Hess, Ed.D.
TWS Aids for Student Teachers & Interns Overview of TWS.
Chapter 1 Defining Social Studies. Chapter 1: Defining Social Studies Thinking Ahead What do you associate with or think of when you hear the words social.
Depth of Knowledge Assessments (D.O.K.) Roseville City School District Leadership Team.
1 Draft Content Standards for K-12 Science First Reading Helen Maguire, Cheryl Kleckner Office of Educational Improvement and Innovation Oregon Department.
Salem School District What does proficient look like? Questions Salem High teachers were asking in the spring of 2002 regarding competency based assessment:
Depth of Knowledge (DOK)
Professional Development Opportunities for the New Math Standards.
Depth of Knowledge (DOK) SUN VALLEY HIGH SCHOOL. 2 Depth of Knowledge (DOK) Adapted from the model used by Norman Webb, University of Wisconsin, to align.
Units of Study for TAHOE Plus. Our Task Our task is to provide an education for the kinds of kids we have, not the kinds of kids we used to have, or want.
Today’s Learning Target I can explain how Webb’s Depth of Knowledge compliments Bloom’s Taxonomy to build rigor in the classroom.
SBAC Overview. SBAC Data SBAC Data Using ATLAS Protocol Step 1- GETTING STARTED 0 The educator providing the student work gives a very brief statement.
TEACHING WITH A FOCUS ON LEARNERS One model of Differentiation: Sousa and Tomlinson (2011) Differentiation and The Brain. Purpose: Understanding Text Complexity.
RtI Response to Instruction and Intervention Understanding RtI in Thomspon School District Understanding RtI in Thomspon School District.
Transition to ~ PA Common Core Standards ~ English Language Arts, Literacy across the Curriculum An Overview: Background, Expectation, & Exploration FCASD.
Teaching with Depth An Understanding of Webb’s Depth of Knowledge.
Common Core: Depth of Knowledge Rigor for Coaches.
Depth of Knowledge Civic Literacy Teacher Network Social Studies.
Colorado Standards Transforming teaching and learning in the 21 st Century.
New Hope-Solebury School District. Develop a shared understanding of the concept of cognitive rigor Begin the conversation about Webbs’ Depth of Knowledge.
Instructional Leadership Supporting Common Assessments.
Understanding Depth of Knowledge. Depth of Knowledge (DOK) Adapted from the model used by Norm Webb, University of Wisconsin, to align standards with.
Depth Of Knowledge Basics © 2010 Measured Progress. All rights reserved. He who learns but does not think is lost. He who thinks but does not learn is.
Teaching with Depth An Understanding of Webb’s Depth of Knowledge
Using Cognitive Science To Inform Instructional Design
Using the North Carolina Teacher Evaluation Rubric Proactively
Building Understanding of the North Carolina Professional Teaching Standards How to READ the North Carolina Teacher Evaluation Rubric Using language and.
Why DOK? The DOK level focuses on how deeply a student needs to understand the content.   Understanding the DOK level of the standard will help teachers.
Depth of Knowledge (DOK)
Preplanning Presentation
Common Core State Standards AB 250 and the Professional Learning Modules Phil Lafontaine, Director Professional Learning and Support Division.
HS Physical Science Spring 2017
Depth of Knowledge (DOK)
Norman L Webb.
Depth of Knowledge (DOK)
Presentation transcript:

Kentucky’s Curriculum Documents A driving force behind education in Kentucky

Agenda:General Overview The Big Picture Curriculum, Instruction, Assessment Reasons for Recent Changes The Critical Documents and Their Relationships The Impact of the Documents on Schools and KDE

Guiding Questions What do I know about the state curriculum documents? What do I know about recent revisions and refinements in the documents? How do the documents impact schools? How do the documents impact my work with pre-service teachers?

Overall Outcome A general understanding of the state curriculum documents, their role in Kentucky education, and how they impact schools, education providers, and KDE.

Part I: Historical Perspective In the beginning there was…………

Name the 6 Learning Goals of KERA 1.Basic communication and math skills 2.Ability to apply core concepts 3.Ability to become self-sufficient 4.Ability to become responsible members of family, work group, community 5.Ability to think and solve problems 6.Ability to connect and integrate experiences and knowledge

Learning Goals National Standards Academic Expectations Program of Studies Core Content District and School Curriculum Curriculum Hierarchy Combined Documents

Part II: Why Revise the CCA and POS? To assure alignment with emerging national and international standards and research in all areas The Kentucky Board of Education determined that the Program of Studies should be reviewed and revised accordingly

Part II: Why The Revisions? (cont.) To better organize, clarify and focus the Core Content Assessment standards to guide instruction and assessment To draft the Blueprint for the 2007 assessment and beyond (new NCLB requirements)

Part III: A Closer Look Program of Studies Core Content for Assessment Relationships Depth of Knowledge

Learning Goals National Standards Academic Expectations Program of Studies Core Content District and School Curriculum How are the documents organized? Combined Documents

What’s The Big Idea? Why is the Program of Studies organized around big ideas?

Test 1 Learn these numbers

Types of Memory Short term memory 5 to 20 seconds Working memory Varies but temporary/chunking Long Term Memory Can be retrieved indefinitely/large relevant concepts (big ideas)

Test 2 Learn these letters DV DN BCT VF BIU SA

Big Ideas Current brain research suggests a key factor that distinguishes expert learners from novice learners is one’s ability to organize thinking by big ideas (National Research Council 2000)

Big Ideas Big ideas bring relevance to the classroom and “have enduring value beyond the classroom” (Wiggins and McTighe) Big ideas help promote transfer of learning from year to year.

What do I know about the Program of Studies Revised 2006 and Core Content for Assessment, Version 4.1? Test Your Knowledge!

The Program of Studies ….. It’s the LAW!!

Purpose of the POS The Program of Studies defines the minimum standards for all students in Kentucky

POS Organization Big Ideas Related Academic Expectations Enduring Understandings Skills and Concepts

The Core Content for Assessment ….. It’s the TEST!!

Purpose: Core Content for Assessment 4.1 Represents Kentucky’s Academic Expectations and is a subset of the content standards in the Program of Studies Is not a comprehensive curriculum or course of study

Purpose: CCA 4.1 Identifies content for inclusion on state assessment and provided focus for 2007 item development Provides parameters for KY teachers and assessment contractors to design the state assessment items

CCA Organization Domains (e.g., SC = Science) Grade Span and Level (Elementary, Middle, High and Primary-EP, 04, 05, 06, 07, 08, High School - HS) Subdomains (e.g., Physical Science) Organizers (e.g., Motion and Forces) Specific numbered assessment standards Depth of Knowledge ceiling for state assessment

Organized by Levels End of primary, fourth, fifth, sixth, seventh, eighth, high school Ensures continuity and conceptual development in a content area across levels

Organized using Bold and Italicized Statements Bold = state assessed Italicized = supporting content

Organized using Parentheses If there is a list inside parentheses with an e.g., preceding it, that means the examples included are meant to be just that, examples. (e.g., car, airplane, train)

Organized using Parentheses If the list is NOT preceded by an e.g., the list is to be considered exhaustive and only those items will be assessed. (car, airplane, train)

Addition of Verbs for each content area Represents how students will be expected to demonstrate their knowledge, concepts and skills on the state assessment Contributes to understanding the depth of knowledge and cognitive complexity expected for the state assessment

Sample CCA Standard AH Students will analyze or explain the use of elements of music in a variety of music. DOK 3 Under this standard are listed the elements of music (rhythm, tempo, melody, harmony, form, timbre, dynamics) and specifically what will be tested regarding each element.

Combined Documents… Completing the structure Look at the example combined documents. Share what you find with others at your table.

Depth of Knowledge (DOK) is… Deep understanding.

Norman Webb Senior Scientist Norman L. Webb is a senior research scientist with the Wisconsin Center for Education Research and the National Institute for Science Education. Webb is a mathematics educator and evaluator who leads the Institute's work on strategies for evaluating reform and rethinking how we evaluate mathematics and science education, while focusing on the NSF's Mathematics and Science Partnerships. His own research has focused on assessment of students' knowledge of mathematics and the alignment of standards and assessments. Webb also directs evaluations of curriculum and professional development projects. Contact Information Phone: (608) Office: 783 Ed Sciences Mail Drop: 78 Website:

Depth of Knowledge (DOK) Indicates the cognitive demand limits for the state assessment Defines the “ceiling” or highest DOK level for each Core Content for Assessment Standard for the state assessment Guides item development for the state assessment, classification of test items, and alignment to Kentucky standards

DOK (cont.) No Child Left Behind (NCLB) requires assessments to “measure the depth and breadth of the state academic content standards for a given grade level” (U.S. Department of Education, 2003, p. 12)

Remember: Depth of Knowledge… Is descriptive, not a taxonomy Focuses on how deeply a student has to know the content in order to respond Is not the same as difficulty

Depth of Knowledge Assigning depth-of-knowledge to content standards and assessment items is an essential requirement of alignment analysis Four levels of depth of knowledge were used for assessment analysis and alignment: Recall and Reproduction – Level 1 Skills & Concepts – Level 2 Strategic thinking- Level 3 Extended thinking – Level 4

Depth of Knowledge Activity Look at the DOK Support Materials. In groups, use the Support Materials to sort the sample assessment items into DOK levels.

Final Exam! Questions?