MICE Beam-line and Detectors Status Report 16 th October 2009 Chris Booth The University of Sheffield.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 MICE Beamline: Plans for initial commissioning. Kevin Tilley, 16 th November. - 75days until commissioning Target, detectors, particle production Upstream.
Advertisements

Progress in the construction of the MICE cooling channel and first measurements Adam Dobbs, EPS-HEP, 23 rd July 2011.
MICE MICE Target Mechanism Paul Smith University of Sheffield 8 th June 2010 (Based upon talk given by Chris Booth at CM26)
January 14, 2004 TJR - - UPDATED 1/25/04 1 MICE Beamline Analysis Using g4beamline Including Jan 25 Updates for Kevin’s JAN04 Beamline Design Tom Roberts.
Target Operations A summary of Target Operation to Date Paul Hodgson The University of Sheffield.
MTest Facility Low Energy Beam Erik Ramberg AEM 15 October, 2007.
MICE TARGET OPERATION C. Booth, P. Hodgson, R. Nicholson, P. J. Smith, Dept. of Physics & Astronomy University of Sheffield, England.
MICE Beam Loss vs Particle Rate Adam Dobbs, ISIS Meeting, 18 th December 2009.
MICE Beam-line and Detectors Status Report 16 th October 2009 Chris Booth The University of Sheffield.
MICE Particle Rate and ISIS Beam Loss Adam Dobbs, Target – ISIS Meeting, 17 th September 2010.
MICE Target Schedule Chris Booth Sheffield 12 th June 2006.
Linda R. Coney – 24th April 2009 MOM Update Linda R. Coney 21 September, 2009.
Linda R. Coney – 24th September 2009 MOM Update End of Sept Run Linda R. Coney 05 October, 2009.
TJR 10/30/031 MICE Beam rates Tom Roberts Illinois Institute of Technology 10/30/03.
Luminosity Monitor Commissioning MICE Collaboration Meeting March 2010 Paul Soler, David Forrest Danielle MacLennan.
M.apollonioMICE Funding Agency Committee Meeting - RAL 18/4/ M. Apollonio – MICE Operations Manager University of Oxford MICE beam line commissioning.
K.Walaron Fermilab, Batavia, Chicago 12/6/ Simulation and performance of beamline K.Walaron T.J. Roberts.
MICE: The International Muon Ionization Cooling Experiment Diagnostic Systems Tracker Cherenkov Detector Time of Flight Counters Calorimeter Terry Hart.
Linda R. Coney – 24th April 2009 MOM Update Linda R. Coney 14 September, 2009.
MOM Report Paul Soler MICE Operations Manager University of Glasgow MICO April 12, 2010.
Y. Karadzhov MICE Video Conference Thu April 9 Slide 1 Absolute Time Calibration Method General description of the TOF DAQ setup For the TOF Data Acquisition.
Luminosity Monitors MICE Video Conference 7 May 2009 Paul Soler.
MOM Report Paul Soler MICE Operations Manager University of Glasgow MICO April 26, 2010.
A Tale of Two Targets … 7 th September 2009 Chris Booth The University of Sheffield.
CMPB Alain Blondel 14 April STATUS OF MICE.
Linda R. Coney – 24th April 2009 MOM Update Linda R. Coney 7 September, 2009.
MICE Video meeting Alain Blondel 7 December MICE -- what running strategy? reflections on steps I and II.
INExT – Henry Nebrensky – 24 September 2010 slide 1 Goals and Status of MICE the international Muon Ionization Cooling Experiment Henry Nebrensky (Brunel.
Emittance measurement: ID muons with time-of-flight Measure x,y and t at TOF0, TOF1 Use momentum-dependent transfer matrices iteratively to determine trace.
Physics Program and Runs: Autumn 2011 & Step IV V. Blackmore MICE Project Board, 08/03/12.
24/11/2014MAUS Status, A. Dobbs, MPB Talk2 24/11/2014MAUS Status, A. Dobbs, MPB Talk3 CKOV – Threshold Cherenkov detectors (aerogel) TOF – Three Time.
Emittance measurement: ID muons with time-of-flight Measure x,y and t at TOF0, TOF1 Use momentum-dependent transfer matrices to map  path Assume straight.
Goals and Status of MICE The International Muon Ionization Cooling Experiment J.S. Graulich.
Particle Production in the MICE Beam Line Particle Accelerator Conference, May 2009, Vancouver, Canada Particle Production in the MICE Beam Line Jean-Sebastien.
MICE Beamline Commissioning Linda R. Coney NFMCC Meeting 16 January 2010.
Results from Step I of MICE D Adey 2013 International Workshop on Neutrino Factories, Super-beams and Beta- beams Working Group 3 – Accelerator Topics.
MICE Step 1: First Emittance Results with Particle Physics Detectors Linda R. Coney EuCARD Meeting – 10 May 2011.
M. apollonio MICE Beamline summary. - Beamline parallel session (June 1 st ): - envisaged goals (Alain) - assess readiness of the line magnet status (Ken)
ICHEP 2012 Melbourne, 7 July 2012 Paul Soler on behalf of the MICE Collaboration The MICE Beam Line Instrumentation (Trackers and PID) for precise Emittance.
Plans (& ideas) for beamline commissioning The beamline Magnet field tests Source characterisation Optics (& model) commissioning K. Tilley CM18, 14/06/07.
Luminosity Monitor UKNF Meeting 7 June 2010 Paul Soler, David Forrest Danielle MacLennan.
Particle Production in the MICE Beamline IPAC10 Linda Coney, UC Riverside, Adam Dobbs, Imperial College London, Yordan Karadzhov, Sofia University The.
Linda R. Coney – 24th September 2009 MOM Update Linda R. Coney 24 September, 2009.
MICE TARGET OPERATION C. Booth, P. Hodgson, P. J. Smith, Dept. of Physics & Astronomy University of Sheffield, England. 1 – The MICE Experiment2 - The.
Alain Blondel MICE VC 12 March 2009 Brief MICE news 1. Decay solenoid: operations will restart in early July. Criteria for acceptance have been specified.
KEK beam test in May 2005 Makoto Yoshida Osaka Univ. MICE Frascati June 27 th, 2005.
MICE Run Plan Sept/Oct 2009 m. apollonio – IC MACHINE PHYSICS USERs RUN NO SHIFT A B C D E.
March 18, 2008 TJRMICE Beamline Status1 MICE Beamline Status (March 18, 2008) Tom Roberts Muons, Inc. Illinois Institute of Technology.
Target tests 1 st – 2 nd Nov. Chris Booth Sheffield 7 th December 2006.
Instrumentation and Simulations for Target Test MICE Collaboration Meeting 22 October Bill Murray 1, Paul Soler 1,2, Kenny Walaron 1,2 1 Rutherford.
KEK Test Beam Phase I (May 2005) Makoto Yoshida Osaka Univ. MICE-FT Daresbury Aug 30th, 2005.
Running plan Step I.1 Basic radiation levels. I.1.1 ISIS running with beam elements on, target off, beam stop shut. Establish permanent MICE monitoring.
Progress in the construction of the MICE cooling channel and first measurements Adam Dobbs, EPS-HEP, 23 rd July 2011.
- MICE - The Muon Ionization Cooling Experiment Jean-Sebastien Graulich, Univ. Genève o Introduction: Aims And Concept o Design o Infrastructure: Hall,
Luminosity Monitor Design MICE Collaboration Meeting 31 May 2009 Paul Soler.
T2K Status Report. The Accelerator Complex a Beamline Performance 3 First T2K run completed January to June x protons accumulated.
M. Bonesini - CM 22 RAL October 081 TOF0 status M. Bonesini Sezione INFN Milano Bicocca.
NUMI NUMI/MINOS Status J. Musser for the MINOS Collatoration 2002 FNAL Users Meeting.
1 Updated Run Plans. K.Tilley, MICO, 07/02/08 - pre-commissioning - Target, - beamline functionality - detectors, particle production - decay solenoid.
M. apollonio 7/7/2010CM27 - RAL11 Beam-Line Analysis …
K. Long, 28 June, 2016 Introduction to MICE — and the role of the Hydrogen Delivery System.
MICE. Outline Experimental methods and goals Beam line Diagnostics – In HEP parlance – the detectors Magnet system 2MICE Optics Review January 14, 2016.
MICE Beamline Status m. apollonio 17 December 2009 MICE VC
MICE The International Muon Ionisation Cooling Experiment
MICE Operations Scenario Run 1
The Beam Test at Fermilab:
Luminosity Monitor Status
MICE Collaboration Meeting
MOM Report + RUN PLAN m. apollonio – Imperial College
Particle ID Diagnostics in the MICE Beamline
Presentation transcript:

MICE Beam-line and Detectors Status Report 16 th October 2009 Chris Booth The University of Sheffield

Outline Overview of MICE beam-line Target –Operation –Stability Beam-line optimisation –Quadrupoles –Decay Solenoid Time of Flight counters – , p and  beams Other detectors –Cherenkov –e/  identifier –Sci Fi trackers 2Chris Booth – 16 th October 2009

3

Target Target drive installed in August shutdown Timing & depth scans during ISIS start-up to explore edge of beam Operation in ISIS MD (50 Hz/32) and User Run modes Studies of different accelerations (drive voltages) Runs at increasing target depth, producing ISIS beam-loss 0.1, 0.2, 0.3, 0.4, 0.5, 1 and 2 V –(Last year’s maximum for prolonged running was 50 mV) Target stability checked over long runs and between runs 62,250 pulses to date (inspections after 12, 22 & 42 k pulses) Routinely providing particles for beam-line and detector studies 4Chris Booth – 16 th October 2009

5 Normal beam loss monitor (BLM) display with MICE target inactive Target is in sector 7 Target operating at 2 V beam- loss Note losses in sectors 7 to 9 (and elsewhere)

Chris Booth – 16 th October “BCD” = Beam Centre Distance Exploring the beam edge Increased depth = increased beam-loss Stable operation 0.2 mm (c.f. strike of 38 mm) > 13 hours

Beam-loss variation Beam-loss (in Sector 7) for the 13 hour run at 1V Apparently two distinct peaks (although only fitted a single Gaussian). Double structure due to ISIS beam wandering in cyclic pattern Not due to variation in target depth! Activation Study Survey of target area after long 1V run Slight activation (max. 500 µSieverts/hour) in 1 or 2 spots near target ISIS suggests repeat at 5V beam- loss 7Chris Booth – 16 th October 2009

Upstream Beam-line 8 Target ISIS synchrotron Quads Q1 - 3 Dipole D1

Chris Booth – 16 th October 2009 Optimisation of Upstream Beam-line Scan of upstream quadrupoles Simulation – triangles Data – circles Behaviour qualitatively as expected; more work needed to understand details 9 Counts in GVA1 Preliminary!

Chris Booth – 16 th October 2009 Beam-line and detectors 10

Time of Flight Counters TOF0 and TOF1 installed Horizontal and vertical bars – hodoscope as well as timing Have proved invaluable in beam-line commissioning 11Chris Booth – 16 th October 2009

333 MeV/c pion beam 12Chris Booth – 16 th October 2009 TOF1 TOF0 Single-channel ToF spectra  p

333 MeV/c proton beam 13Chris Booth – 16 th October 2009 TOF0 back front Protons range out  p

444 Mev/c pi + to mu + 14Chris Booth – 16 th October 2009 Proton contamination ranges out muons!

444 Mev/c pi – to mu – 15Chris Booth – 16 th October 2009 Excess in TOF0 largely eliminated! muons!

Preliminary muon rate survey 16Chris Booth – 16 th October MeV/c  – to  – beam Varied target depth to study muon rate as function of beam loss VERY preliminary! Very preliminary!

Chris Booth – 16 th October 2009 Decay Solenoid Operation of Decay Solenoid is now routine Provides gain of ~5 in pion flux – much more for muons Without DSWith DS 17

Chris Booth – 16 th October 2009 Decay Solenoid Optimisation 330 MeV/c pion beam DS nominal setting 550 A (3.1 T) Vary ± 10%, study profile in TOF0 TOF0 → TOF 1 → 18 Preliminary! Run 1121 DS lower 0.30T  Run 1123 Nominal DS  Run 1125 DS up 0.30T

Chris Booth – 16 th October 2009 TOF Calibration Many TOF bars to cross-calibrate Needs lots of data! MeV/c (peaks overlap) MeV/c increased statistics e   TOF2 under construction (Milan) to be delivered at end of this year.

Cherenkovs Two aerogel Cherenkov counters Installed after Q6 and TOF1 To separate e/  MeV/c e/  calibration data taken Sample electron data below 20Chris Booth – 16 th October 2009

e/  Identifier KL lead/scintillating fibre calorimeter module –Installed on temporary support in September –Calibration in progress Will be followed by Electron Muon Ranger (EMR) –See next slide 21Chris Booth – 16 th October 2009 KL KL behind TOF1

Electron-Muon Ranger (EMR) 50 1m 2 planes, 1.7 cm thick. Triangular scintillator bars + wavelength-shifter fibre readout. to be installed July next year. 22Chris Booth – 16 th October 2009

Scintillating Fibre Tracker 2 nd tracker completed Feb. Exposed to cosmics Mar- Aug. Performs according to spec. Final calibration in progress Both trackers ready for installation 23Chris Booth – 16 th October 2009

Summary A huge amount of effort and progress during September! Target reliably producing beam losses up to 2 V. TOF providing valuable beam diagnostics. Decay solenoid operating without problems. Beam-line optimisations (DS, Qn,...) performed. Proton, pion, muon & electron beams, of various momenta, used for detector calibrations. Data acquisition synchronisation problems fixed, limit on particles/spill raised from 40 to 250. Data in use for off-line calibrations of TOF, Cherenkovs, KL. We look forward to more data in November!! 24Chris Booth – 16 th October 2009