HALL HIGH SCHOOL Academic Indicators 1999- 2009. Students meeting or exceeding the Illinois Learning Standards (reading, math, science) 2002………………………………..43%2003………………………………..58%2004………………………………..42%2005………………………………..45%2006………………………………..48%2007…………………………

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Charles Johns, Ph.D., Principal, Rolling Meadows High School
Advertisements

Strategic Interventions for English Learners Long Beach Unified School District Chris Dominguez, Deputy Superintendent Pamela Seki, Director, Program Assistance.
Response to Intervention (RtI): A Realistic Approach Presented By: Lisa Harrod Lisa Harrod.
Data Driven Plans to Improve Student Performance Individual Student Success Plans Classroom Data Walls Targeted Interventions: During School Hours.
Response to Intervention: What is it?. RtI is… A process for achieving higher levels of academic and behavioral success for all students through: High.
Research tells us that 74% of children who are poor readers in third grade remain poor readers in ninth grade. (Francis et al. 1996) After age 12 rate.
Response to Intervention (RtI) A Brief Introduction to NH ’ s RtI Framework for the State Advisory Committee on the Education of Students with Disabilities.
Mike W. Olson RTI. RTI is… 2 the practice of providing high-quality instruction/intervention matched to student needs and using learning rate over time.
Introduction to Response to Intervention: A comprehensive School Support Perspective Gary L. Cates Illinois State University.
Response to Intervention (RtI) A Basic Overview. Illinois IDEA 2004 Part Rules Requires: use of a process that determines how the child responds.
+ The RtI Journey in the Secondary English Classroom By: Christy Cheek and Amy Limerick Student needs are the #1 priority. Instructional Leaders Teachers.
RtI: Response to Intervention and the Problem Solving Model Presented by Alison Boutcher Director Mid-State Special Education
Today’s Presenter Mark R. Shinn, Ph.D. Big Ideas in RTI Success.
1 Good Morning! Christopher Kaufman, Ph.D. (207) web: kaufmanpsychological.org.
Blending School-wide PBS & Literacy Initiatives Chris Borgmeier, PhD & Amanda Sanford, PhD Portland State University
Response to Intervention A quick review to guide the work of NH’s RtI Task Force Sandy Plocharczyk Raina Chick Co Chairs, NH RtI Task Force October 24,
Administrators’ Back to School INSTITUTE August 2013 RESPONSE TO INTERVENTION (RTI ) Brownsville Independent School District Curriculum & Instruction Department.
Preparing for End & Beginning SWPBS Year: Evaluation & Action Planning George Sugai OSEP Center on PBIS Center for Behavioral Education & Research University.
Roseburg High School Comprehensive School Improvement Team: CSI Team.
Oregon’s Initiatives & Grants  Roadmap  Action  Responsibility Nancy Latini, Ph.D. Oregon Department of Education 2008.
Discipline Systems that Work Florida’s Second Annual Bully Prevention Conference Orlando, Florida April 17, 2007 Dr. George M. Batsche Co-Director Institute.
CENTENNIAL PUBLIC SCHOOL RtI 101 Slides adapted from the NE RtI Consortium.
Counselor’s Meeting August 11, 2014 Michelle Coconate, RtI Facilitator Academic & Behavioral Response to Intervention (RtI)
An Introduction to - PBIS in Roseburg Public Schools: RTI, Professional Learning Communities and How to Respond When Kids Don’t Learn.
Maine’s Response to Intervention Implementation: Moving Forward Presented by: Barbara Moody Title II Coordinator Maine Department of Education.
Response to Intervention
Response to Instruction & Intervention (RtI 2 ) Using Differentiation to Provide Equity and Access for All Students.
RTI: Reasons, Practices, Systems, & Considerations George Sugai OSEP Center on PBIS University of Connecticut December 6,
Access through BlackBoard Phone: Office hours- by appointment, After Class.
RTI and NH RESPONDS Professional Development for Excellence in Education November 5,
MAINE RESPONSE TO INTERVENTION IMPLEMENTATION FUNDING AND RESOURCES "Education is the most powerful weapon which you can use to change the world." (Nelson.
FloridaRtI.usf.edu A collaborative project between the Florida Department of Education and the University of South Florida Intervention Mapping.
The ABCs of RTI: Background and the Basics. Questions we will cover about RTI 1.What is RTI anyway? 2.Why do it? 3.What’s so wrong with the way we’re.
Response to Intervention in KPS Linda Campbell
PBIS Secondary Team.  The team that targets the Yellow: 5-10% of those students who are still struggling despite Universal Level training.  Supporters.
Positive Behavior Intervention Supports PBIS Cambrian School District April 2011.
Responsiveness-to-Intervention: What is It? George Sugai OSEP Center on PBIS Center for Behavioral Education and Research University of Connecticut October.
Problem Solving and RtI ASCA Conference Denver, 2007 Rich Downs School Counseling Consultant Student Support Services Project Florida Department of Education.
Victoria White, PhD Ann George, EdD Associate Professor Assistant Professor Director of KC Metro Center SSLS.
PBS Systems Overview Lisa P. Hammel Effective Educational Practices.
Brief Overview of Response to Intervention within Glenbrook South Andy Piper & Lindsay Schrand NSSED Problem-Solving Coaches.
Earobics Closing the Literacy Gap Through Intervention Pre K - 3.
(“Response to Intervention: Basic Information”, 2011).
Response to Intervention: Many Parts, One Purpose Problem Solving Universal Screening Progress Monitoring Written Plan Data.
Effective Behavior & Instructional Support. Implementing RTI through Effective Behavior & Instructional Support.
SW-PBS & RtI: Lessons Being Learned George Sugai & Rob Horner OSEP Center on PBIS University of Connecticut & Oregon November 16,
Sustaining Change: RtI & SWPBS George Sugai OSEP Center on PBIS Center for Behavioral Education and Research University of Connecticut May 9,
ISOA MARCH 2, 2011 Sustaining Response to Intervention 1.
Theoretical Frameworks Pairing Science w/ Values Science tells us how we can change things, but values tell us what is worth changing – Carr et al (2002,
1 Response to Intervention Background and Laws Gaynard Brown Paul Bunyan Special Education Co-op Director.
By Tracey Parks and Angela Riffle How Teams Can Talk to Parents… and Get Results How Teams Can Talk to Parents… and Get Results.
Response to Intervention: Using Data to Enhance Outcomes for all Students Amanda VanDerHeyden Education Research and Consulting, Inc.
What IS RtI?. National RtI Model “Response to Intervention” –Born out of Reauthorization of Special Ed Law (IDEA 2004) Two Models of RtI: –Problem-Solving.
Introduction to PBS. A school for all children?  If you were going to design a school and curriclum for all children that would prevent behavior problems.
HALL HIGH SCHOOL Academic Indicators Students meeting or exceeding the Illinois Learning Standards (reading, math, science) 2002………………………………..43%2003………………………………..58%2004………………………………..42%2005………………………………..45%2006………………………………..48%2007…………………………
Introduction to School-wide Positive Behavior Support.
Lessons Learned in SWPBS Implementation: Sustainability & Scaling Up George Sugai OSEP Center on PBIS Connecticut January 15,
RTI: Linking Academic and Behavior Support Wesley Temple Dawn Davis.
Positive Behavior Interventions and Supports (PBIS) Rachel Saladis Wisconsin PBIS Network
1 1.0 Review DIBELS Next ® Data Interpretation & Tier I Reading Systems.
Laurel School District
Response to Intervention
Documented District Support Needs
1 1.
EDSP 5311 Dr. Charlotte Fontenot
Redwood Area Schools Reede Gray Elementary
Response to Intervention Implementation
Response to Intervention (RTI)
EDSP 5311 Dr. Charlotte Fontenot
Presentation transcript:

HALL HIGH SCHOOL Academic Indicators

Students meeting or exceeding the Illinois Learning Standards (reading, math, science) 2002………………………………..43%2003………………………………..58%2004………………………………..42%2005………………………………..45%2006………………………………..48%2007………………………………..46% 2008………………………………..51%

ACT Scores Class of English Reading Math Science Comp Class of English Reading Math Science Comp * *---- first year all students were tested

Graduation Rate 1999……………..89% 2006……………92% 2000……………..88% 2007……………95% 2001……………..84% 2008……………82% 2002……………..91% cut score (75%) 2003……………..79% 2009…………… 2004……………..88% 2005……………..82% 10 Year Average= 87%

Attendance Rate 1999……………..94% 2006……………95% 2000……………..95% 2007……………97% 2001……………..96% 2008……………99% 2002……………..97% 2009…………… 2003……………..96% 2010…………… 2004……………..94% 2005……………..96% 9 Year Average= 96%

Students meeting or exceeding the Illinois Learning Standards- Reading 2001………………………………..58%2002………………………………..46%2003………………………………..58%2004………………………………..49%2005………………………………..51%2006………………………………..50%2007………………………………..43% 2008……………………………...53% (62.5%) 2009………………………………55% (70%)

Students EXCEEDING the Illinois Learning Standards- Reading 2001………………………………..4%2002………………………………..8%2003………………………………..6%2004………………………………..6%2005………………………………..11%2006………………………………..11%2007…………………………………5%2008…………………………….10%

Students meeting or exceeding the Illinois Learning Standards- Mathematics 2001………………………………..54%2002………………………………..33%2003………………………………..56%2004………………………………..39%2005………………………………..40%2006………………………………..44%2007………………………………..48% 2008…………………………50% (62.5%) 2009…………………………45% (70%)

Students EXCEEDING the Illinois Learning Standards- Mathematics 2001………………………………..2%2002………………………………..3%2003………………………………..4%2004………………………………..1%2005………………………………..1%2006………………………………..3%2007………………………………..6%2008……………………………4.5%

Students meeting or exceeding the Illinois Learning Standards- Science 2001………………………………..50%2002………………………………..35%2003………………………………..51%2004………………………………..39%2005………………………………..45%2006………………………………..46%2007………………………………..47%2008……………………………48%

Students EXCEEDING the Illinois Learning Standards- Science 2001………………………………..7%2002………………………………..6%2003………………………………..7%2004………………………………..5%2005………………………………..10%2006………………………………..5%2007………………………………..6%2008……………………………….6%

ACADEMIC SYSTEMSBEHAVIORAL SYSTEMS Tier 1 Core Instructional Interventions All students Preventive, proactive 80% Tier 2 Targeted Group Interventions Some students (at-risk) High efficiency Rapid response 15% Tier 3 Intensive, Individual Interventions Individual Students Assessment - based High intensity Of longer duration 5% T 80% Tier 1 Core Instructional Interventions All settings, All students Preventive, proactive Tier 3 Intensive, Individual Interventions Individual Students Assessment - based Intense, durable procedures 5% Tier 2 Targeted Group Interventions Some students (at-risk) High efficiency Rapid response 15% What Does RtI Look Like? Batsche, G. M., Elliott, J., Graden, J., Grimes, J., Kovaleski, J. F., Prasse, D., et al. (2005). Response to intervention: Policy considerations and implementation. Alexandria, VA: National Association of State Directors of Special Education, Inc.