ECE 001: Team Awesome Patel, Hetal Odobasic, Stephen Rajeevan, Sushmitha Noel, Kelli Patel, Hetal Odobasic, Stephen Rajeevan, Sushmitha Noel, Kelli.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Introduction to LEGO RCX robotics and Robot Sumo
Advertisements

Robot Project Group Seven Zac Lovato David Thompson Doug Yarholar Shang-Chih, Tsai Daryn, Wu.
Intro to Engineering Fall 2004 ROBOLAB Project By Team Eight Chris Kiser, Candace Penry, Tobias Portillo, Amin Parnian, John Mitchem, Hafiz Rashid.
Go speed racer! Challenge #2: Design the most energy efficient car
IRobot, Prosthetic Arm, and Rescue Robot Group 4 Adrian Burke Darren Draper Collin Palmer Max Reinisch Viyat Jhaveri Can Gurkan.
VEX Drive Systems Presented by Chani Martin Lauren Froschauer Michelle Gonzalez Presented by Chani Martin Lauren Froschauer Michelle Gonzalez.
AARON HEO PERIOD 6. Which combination will allow a car to travel faster around a track?
Group Four Catherine Fahey, Steven Falzerano, Nicollette Fernandez, Eliot M. Fine and Stefan Toubia.
One of the most common types of drivetrain is known as a skid steer drivetrain, which may also be referred to as a tank drive. A skid steer drivetrain.
READY, GO! Hare and Snail Challenges. 1. What are some design considerations to make a fast robot? 2. What are some design considerations to make a slow.
Group 6 Taylor Gould, Olivia Graffis, Taylor Guidon and Bdho Gdeh.
 Project 1: To build and program a robot that will follow a solid black line, make a U-turn, and follow the line back to the start.  Project 2: To understand.
Tug of War Battle Bots A tug of war game designed to demonstrate engineering and physics concepts in grades 6-12.
Analysis vs. Design When you take a test in your math or physics course, there is one and only one answer! When you do a goal-driven design there may be:
Team A.C.M.E. ECE 361 Final Project. Team Members A my Sibilia C hris Waters M att Fike E ric Benz.
Justin Harger | Adi Kapoor | John Kolodick | Captain Morgan Rebels.
Two-Gear Gear Trains Driving gear is attached to motor Driven gear is attached to wheel Gears spurs (teeth) mesh together Gears rotate in opposite directions.
Final Presentation EE 296 – Micromouse Spring 2007 Friday, May 4, 2007 POST 214.
Guide to Reports and Presentations Your team’s Project Report is the most important means to document design ideas, procedures, and implementations. While.
Elevator Project Description Dr. S. Ahmadi ECE 002.
SPH4C – UNIT #2 MACHINES FRICTION AND TECHNOLOGY.
Somerset Berkley Regional High School Robotics Engineering with LabView.
VEX Drive Systems Presented by Chani Martin Lauren Froschauer Michelle Presented by Chani Martin Lauren Froschauer Michelle.
BRIDGE AND ROV GROUP 4. Alex Paige Collin Palmer Sifat Syed Marc Hermann.
Shawnee Mission School District Science Fair. Speed.
Why do robots need to move?
The George Washington University Electrical & Computer Engineering Department ECE 002 Dr. S. Ahmadi Class 2.
Voiture Swapnil Agrawal Tauseef Ahmed Kanwal Gill Syed Jafri Varun Kalia.
Lego Robot Construction Project. Adam, Roger, Lu, Riana, Paul.
Members (from left to right): Rachel Bevill, Brae Bower, Samantha Cherbonneau, Professor Ahmadi, Anthony Contreras.
The George Washington University Department of ECE ECE Intro: Electrical & Computer Engineering Dr. S. Ahmadi Class 3.
The Batmobile and Centrifuge November 11, Members (from left to right): Rachel Bevill, Brae Bower, Samantha Cherbonneau, Professor Ahmadi, Anthony.
A-Tech Technical Training. Robotic Design - Basket Grey pieces act like funnel Black rubberband keeps basket closed.
Team 4 Shane Sunada – Project Leader Malcolm Menor – Project Manager Nathan Umeda – Technical Supervisor Joseph Longhi – Documentation Final Presentation.
ECE 001 Final Presentation: Escape from Maze and Biomedical Centrifuge Experiment Scott Trocchia The George Washington University Computer Engineering.
Gears and Speed/Power.
Lego Mindstorms Robot Tracey Zhang. LEGO MINDSTORMS STATMENT The design challenge my group experimented with is the Lego Mindstorms robot. Our goal is.
Erin Halseth, Will Gottschalk, Briana Warschun, and Michaella Gaines
NXT Drag Racer Deanna Margo, Darrah Margo, Melissa Kinsman.
Somerset Berkley Regional High School Robotics Engineering with LabView.
ECE 002 Robots and Sensors Group 14. Objectives Research sensors and their usefulness to analyze data Research sensors and their usefulness to analyze.
Group 7 Project 1 Presentation Robert Moe John Zumwalt Mark Woehrer Celi Sun.
An Autonomous Self-Parking Vehicle William Whitney (Mentor: Dr. Jeff Gray) Background: NXT and Robot C The vehicle was constructed using the Lego Mindstorms.
Designing Robots How to make a stable robot! Much of the information in this power point is from Winning Design! By James J. Trobaugh.
UNIT 6 VEHICLE HANDLING THE EFFECT OF CONDITIONS
Science 801 Robotics The Final Project. Task Your team will create a robot that will complete a number of challenges as it moves through a series of tasks.
Somerset Berkley Regional High School Robotics Engineering with LabView Lauren Marques, Miranda Chace, and Ashley Frank.
Deriving Consistency from LEGOs What we have learned in 6 years of FLL by Austin and Travis Schuh © 2005 Austin and Travis Schuh, all rights reserved.
1 The George Washington University Electrical & Computer Engineering Department ECE 1010 Intro To Electrical and Computer Engineering Dr. S. Ahmadi Class.
Casne.ncl.ac.uk Taking care of the CrumbleBot Please do NOT stress the robot's motors 1.Do NOT push the robot 2.Do NOT hold the.
RoverBot Assembly The following pages show assembly plans for the RoverBot using the Consumer MindStorms or School Team Challenge Lego kit. Assemble the.
The entire system was tested in a small swimming pool. The fully constructed submarine is shown in Fig. 14. The only hardware that was not on the submarine.
Introduction to Robotics using Lego Mindstorms EV3 Shreya Reddy & Kiran Raja RoboAvatars Robotics.
Somerset Berkley Regional High School Robotics Engineering with LabView.
SEI Robotics Lego Mindstorm Competition
Deriving Consistency from LEGOs
8/30/2004 RoverBot Assembly The following pages show assembly plans for the RoverBot using the Consumer MindStorms or School Team Challenge Lego kit. Assemble.
CSU-1 Project Updates Mechanical:
CSU-Pueblo Team: Paul Rael, Shae Anderson, Atilla Turkoz, Yudhi Paudel
Mounting Servos and Black Gear Motors in Botball Robots
Team 6 Presents Bender: Milestone One.
Intelligent Traction Control Smart Robot
G2’s Drive System Primer – Acceleration and Gear Ratios
Cole Perrault Spring 2015 ET 493 Wesley Deneke
Follow The Guidelines Light Sensor
Limited Slip Differential
Somerset Berkley Regional High School
Hare and Snail Challenges
Lego MINDSTORMS EV3.
Presentation transcript:

ECE 001: Team Awesome Patel, Hetal Odobasic, Stephen Rajeevan, Sushmitha Noel, Kelli Patel, Hetal Odobasic, Stephen Rajeevan, Sushmitha Noel, Kelli

Mr. Awesome

Objectives Build robot and write program to operate robot Move robot from start to finish on dark line Have robot complete a U-turn Make robot return to the start point by following the black line Build robot and write program to operate robot Move robot from start to finish on dark line Have robot complete a U-turn Make robot return to the start point by following the black line

Resources  Parts:  Two motors  One handiboard  Two analog sensors  Lots and lots of Lego blocks  Four tires-2 with rubber treads and 2 without  Parts:  Two motors  One handiboard  Two analog sensors  Lots and lots of Lego blocks  Four tires-2 with rubber treads and 2 without

Source Code  Overall while loop  State dependent cycle  Complete one state and then move on to the next  Used for U-turn  Analog sensors  Threshold of 200  Overall while loop  State dependent cycle  Complete one state and then move on to the next  Used for U-turn  Analog sensors  Threshold of 200

Procedure  Wheels used instead of treads for better navigation  Rubber wheels in back for better traction allowing better use of power  Front wheels without rubber to allow for smoother turning  Speed was set below full power to allow better control  Wheels used instead of treads for better navigation  Rubber wheels in back for better traction allowing better use of power  Front wheels without rubber to allow for smoother turning  Speed was set below full power to allow better control

Order of Development 1.Source code and construction of robot prototype done simultaneously 2.Trial and error resulted in modifications to both code and robot 3.Final code written and final robot constructed 1.Source code and construction of robot prototype done simultaneously 2.Trial and error resulted in modifications to both code and robot 3.Final code written and final robot constructed

Challenges  Robot malfunctions  First prototype was built with wheels  issue with gear ratio  Second prototype was built with treads  Friction and weight of robot led to dilemmas  Final design  Went back to wheels with a lower gear ratio that worked less efficiently but provided better overall results  Front wheels without rubber treads to minimize friction and add control  Robot built with more fortification to sustain it under stress  Robot malfunctions  First prototype was built with wheels  issue with gear ratio  Second prototype was built with treads  Friction and weight of robot led to dilemmas  Final design  Went back to wheels with a lower gear ratio that worked less efficiently but provided better overall results  Front wheels without rubber treads to minimize friction and add control  Robot built with more fortification to sustain it under stress

First Prototype Second Prototype Final Robot: Mr. Awesome

Programming Errors  Turns  Modified through trial and error until we concluded that one motor must have its speed reduced  U-turn  Initial program resulted in the robot turning in circles  Second attempt relied on imprecise time estimates  We concluded that the program should be written into two elements  Turns  Modified through trial and error until we concluded that one motor must have its speed reduced  U-turn  Initial program resulted in the robot turning in circles  Second attempt relied on imprecise time estimates  We concluded that the program should be written into two elements

Biomedical Experiment  A centrifuge is a device that separates liquids based on their density  Centrifuges can separate liquids faster by the “centrifugal” force than gravitational force  A centrifuge is a device that separates liquids based on their density  Centrifuges can separate liquids faster by the “centrifugal” force than gravitational force

Trial #Sensor reading (before separation) Sensor Reading (after separation) Oil Sensor Reading (after separation) Water Time to Separate (seconds) Motor Speed