Submission doc.: IEEE 802.11-14/1179r0 September 2014 Gwangzeen Ko, ETRISlide 1 Considerations for Partial Band Interference between WLAN Systems Date:

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Doc.: IEEE /1464r0 Submission November 2011 Yasuhiko Inoue (NTT), et. al.Slide 1 The better spectrum utilization for the future WLAN standardization.
Advertisements

Doc.: IEEE /0871r0 Submission Jul 2013 Timo Koskela, Renesas Mobile CorporationSlide 1 Discussion on Potential Techniques for HEW Date:
Doc.: IEEE /1157r3 SubmissionYunzhou Li, Tsinghua Univ.Slide 1 Feasibility of Coordinated Transmission for HEW Date: Authors: September.
Submission doc.: IEEE /1225r1 Considerations on CCA for OBSS Opearation in ax Date: Slide 1Huawei Authors:
Submission doc.: IEEE 11-14/1148r1 Consideration of asynchronous interference in OBSS environment Date: Authors: September 2014 Slide 1Koichi.
Doc.: IEEE /1207r1 Submission Imad Jamil (Orange)Slide 1 OBSS reuse mechanism which preserves fairness Date: Authors: September 2014.
Submission doc.: IEEE /0085r1 Jan 2015 John Son, WILUS InstituteSlide 1 Legacy Fairness Issues of Enhanced CCA Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /1167r2 Sept 2014 SubmissionYonggang Fang et. al. (ZTE) TGax Functional Requirement Discussion Date: Slide 1 Authors: NameAffiliationAddress .
Submission doc.: IEEE /0353r1 March 2015 Jinsoo Ahn, Yonsei UniversitySlide 1 OFDMA Non-contiguous Channel Utilization Date: Authors:
Discussion on OFDMA in IEEE ax
Submission doc.: IEEE /1208r1 September 2014 Jinsoo Ahn, Yonsei UniversitySlide 1 MAC considerations on ax OFDMA Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /1303r5 Submission November 2010 Jarkko Kneckt (Nokia)Slide 1 Overlapping BSS Co-Existence Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /1126r0 Submission September 2012 Krishna Sayana, SamsungSlide 1 Wi-Fi for Hotspot Deployments and Cellular Offload Date:
Submission doc.: IEEE /1063r0 September 2012 Yasuhiko Inoue (NTT)Slide 1 Requirements on WLAN Cellular Offload Date: Authors:
Submission doc.: IEEE /870r2 July 2015 Guido R. Hiertz et al., EricssonSlide ax in 2.4 GHz Date: Authors:
Submission doc.: IEEE 11-14/0026r1 January 2014 Yong Liu, et al.Slide 1 Thoughts on HEW PAR Date: Authors:
September 2013 doc.: IEEE 11-13/1105r0 Submission Meng Yang (CATR) Discussion on Access Mechanism for HEW Date: Authors: NameAffiliationsAddressPhone .
Doc.: IEEE /1153r0 Submission September 2013 Laurent Cariou (Orange)Slide 1 Simulation scenario proposal Date: Authors:
Submission doc.: IEEE /0065r0 July 2015 Alaa Mourad, BMW GroupSlide 1 Coexistence Management in the 2.4GHz ISM Band in the automotive enviroment.
Submission doc.: IEEE /0801r1 Akira Kishida, NTT Issues of Low-Rate Transmission Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /0648r0 Submission May 2014 Chinghwa Yu et. al., MediaTekSlide 1 Performance Observation of a Dense Campus Network Date:
Doc.:IEEE /0536r0 Submission May 11th, 2009 Slide 1 OBSS issue in ac Authors: Date:
Doc.: IEEE /0065r0 Submission January 2014 William Carney, SONYSlide 1 Comments on Draft HEW PAR Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /1207r0 Submission Imad Jamil (Orange)Slide 1 OBSS reuse mechanism which preserves fairness Date: Authors: September 2014.
Submission doc.: IEEE 11-13/1395r2 Simultaneous Transmission Technologies for HEW Date: November 2013 Koichi Ishihara, NTTSlide 1.
Submission doc.: IEEE 11-13/1398r0 Nov 2013 Akira Yamada, NTT DOCOMO, Inc.Slide 1 Requirements for HEW Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE / Submission September 2010 James Wang, MediatekSlide 1 Wide Band OBSS Friendly PSMP Date: 2010, September 13 Authors:
Submission doc.: IEEE /1081r3 September, 2015 Jing Ma, NICTSlide 1 Further consideration on receive behavior based on the cascading structure.
Doc.: IEEE /0383r0 Submission Considerations on evaluation methodology for candidate HEW PHY&MAC techniques Date: March 2014 Le Liu, et.
Doc.: IEEE /0542r0 SubmissionSimone Merlin, QualcommSlide 1 HEW Scenarios and Goals Date: Authors: May 2013.
Submission doc.: IEEE /1288r1 November 2015 K. Yunoki, KDDI R&D Labs.Slide 1 An issue of wider bandwidth operation at real denser environment.
Discussion on ax functional requirements
Doc.: IEEE /0877r0 Submission July 2013 James Wang (MediaTek)Slide 1 HEW Beamforming Enhancements Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /1259r0 SubmissionYunlu Liu (China Mobile)Slide 1 Measurement Reporting in WLAN Date: Authors: Nov 2012.
Submission doc.: IEEE 11-13/1073r0 September 2013 Katsuo Yunoki, KDDI R&D LaboratoriesSlide 1 Access Control Enhancement Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /0098r0 Submission November 2015 Hyunduk Kang et al, ETRISlide 1 Consideration on Neighbor Discovery Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /1149r0 Submission September 2010 Jarkko Kneckt, Nokia CorporationSlide 1 Operation rules for > 40MHz Bandwidth Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /1086r0 SubmissionSlide 1 Date: Authors: Improved Virtual Carrier Sensing Mechanism for 45GHz Sep ZTE Corp.
Doc.: IEEE /0212r3 Submission Feb 2016 TG ax Enterprise Scenario, Color and DSC Date: Authors: Graham Smith, SR TechnologiesSlide 1.
Submission doc.: IEEE /0108r0 January 11 Slide 1 Evaluation of neighbors impact on channel allocation for dense environment and Video use cases.
Doc.: IEEE /0098r0 Submission May 2016 Hyunduk Kang et al, ETRISlide 1 A Coexistence Discovery Mechanism Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /0161r1 Submission doc.: IEEE /1032r0 Slide 1 Simulation Scenario for OBSS in Home Network Date: Authors: September.
Submission doc.: IEEE /1064r0 September 2015 Jarkko Kneckt, NokiaSlide 1 Long Range, Low Power Design Criteria Date: Authors:
DL-OFDMA Procedure in IEEE ax
802.11ax in 2.4 GHz Date: Authors: July 2015
Month Year doc.: IEEE yy/xxxxr0 May 2010
Consideration on Interference Management in OBSS
TGax Functional Requirement Discussion
TGax Functional Requirement Discussion
Raising the PAR Date: Authors: January 2014 January 2014
Consideration on Interference Management in OBSS
Month Year doc.: IEEE yy/xxxxr0 May 2010
Consideration on Interference Management in OBSS
Month Year doc.: IEEE yy/xxxxr0 May 2010
Overlapping coverage issues with n BSSs
Raising the PAR Date: Authors: January 2014 January 2014
Efficient Frequency Spectrum Utilization
Interference and Co-existence Issues of EUHT network
RTS&CTS Exchange in wideband transmission
Centralized Clustering Resolution to CID 127
Considerations on CCA for OBSS Opearation in ax
Interference and Co-existence Issues of EUHT network
April 2009 doc.: IEEE /xxxxr0 July 2010
Management Enhancement for WLAN
Channelization for China’s Spectrum
Month Year doc.: IEEE yy/xxxxr0 November 2013
OBSS Requirements Date: Authors: July 2008 July 2008
HEW Beamforming Enhancements
OBSS Requirements Date: Authors: July 2008 July 2008
Proposed basis for PAR discussion
Presentation transcript:

Submission doc.: IEEE /1179r0 September 2014 Gwangzeen Ko, ETRISlide 1 Considerations for Partial Band Interference between WLAN Systems Date: Authors:

Submission doc.: IEEE /1179r0 September 2014 Gwangzeen Ko, ETRISlide 2 Abstract In the OBSS area, WLAN throughput decrease depending on number of overlapped BSS due to the time sharing policy between WLAN systems. There are two types of interferers between overlapped BSSs. One is full band interference from neighbor BSSs. Another is partial band interference. In this presentation, we will discuss both partial band interference problems and possible solution.

Submission doc.: IEEE /1179r0September 2014 Gwangzeen Ko, ETRISlide 3 Introduction Full band interference When two or more devices’ operation band are fully overlapped. This type of interference is called by Full band interference each others Both center frequency and bandwidth are exactly same Partial band interference When two or more devices’ operation band are partially overlapped. This type of interference is called by Partial band interference each others Both center frequency and bandwidth are NOT exactly same

Submission doc.: IEEE /1179r0September 2014 Gwangzeen Ko, ETRISlide 4 Introduction Full band vs Partial band interference example in 2.4GHz band

Submission doc.: IEEE /1179r0 Slide 5Gwangzeen Ko, ETRI September 2014 Bandwidth Overlap Problems Because of time sharing policy for coexistence between BSSs called CSMA/CA, bandwidth overlap yields performance degradation. This performance degradation is an expected problem since WLAN was born. However, this simple coexistence protocol is a good solution for bandwidth overlap between BSSs. Solution of this problem will be supported by Functional Requirement of IEEE ax(TGax R7)[1] The ax amendment shall provide a mechanism to facilitate frequency reuse and manage interference between neighboring overlapping BSS (OBSS) in dense deployment scenarios with a high density of STAs per BSS or a high density of both STAs and BSSs

Submission doc.: IEEE /1179r0 Slide 6Gwangzeen Ko, ETRI September 2014 Difference between Full and Partial Bandwidth Overlap In full bandwidth overlap case, time division solution is available. Whereas, in partial bandwidth overlap case, there are some clean frequency bands additionally. These clean parts of bandwidth are a hiding resource of current WLAN networks. So, if we can use those clean part of bandwidth, WLAN performance can be improved.

Submission doc.: IEEE /1179r0 Slide 7Gwangzeen Ko, ETRI September 2014 Characteristics of Fully and Partially Overlapped Bandwidth Fully overlapped bandwidth Possible : both physical layer detection and NAV information Partially overlapped bandwidth Possible : physical layer detection and expected low signal strength Hard to decode NAV information To detect partial overlap bandwidth accurately, we need modification of existing CCA procedure based on signal characteristics of partial overlap cases.

Submission doc.: IEEE /1179r0 What about 5GHz? Similar situation in 5GHz band! Slide 8Gwangzeen Ko, ETRI September 2014

Submission doc.: IEEE /1179r0 Possible Solution for Bandwidth Overlap Problem Slide 9Gwangzeen Ko, ETRI September 2014 Non Overlap approach(Level 1) Higher Layer or User Management Government Guide Line for band selection Powerful for 2.4GHz and enterprise devices Providing intelligence initial bandwidth selection and updating mechanism How often? Automatically or User setting? Overlap approach(Level 2) Full band overlap case Time Division Access Partial band overlap case Time and Frequency Division Access  OFDMA

Submission doc.: IEEE /1179r0 Summary IEEE ax will support various performance enhancement techniques There are unused resource in the frequency domain which is some clean bandwidth under partially overlapped OBSS situation Usage of these unused bands provides higher performance in IEEE ax standard Slide 10Gwangzeen Ko, ETRI September 2014

Submission doc.: IEEE /1179r0 September 2014 Gwangzeen Ko, ETRISlide 11 References [1]Lei Wang et. al., ax-proposed-tgax- functional-requirements