This project is financed by the European Union 1 The project is implemented by a European Profiles S.A. led consortium Evaluation of Training By Senior.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Writing Effective Learning Outcomes Department for the Enhancement of Learning, Teaching and Assessment RGU:DELTA.
Advertisements

Curriculum Development and Course Design
Training Evaluation Presentation by Ranjith Menon.
Writing Objectives: Instructional Targets to Aim For! Anitra E. Butler Associate Professor Dept. of Teacher Education.
Reasons for Evaluating Training Companies are investing millions of dollars in training programs to help gain a competitive advantage. To justify the costs.
This project is financed by the European Union 1 The project is implemented by a European Profiles S.A. led consortium TNA METHODOLOGIES By Senior Sort.
Chapter 6 Training Evaluation
Measuring Learning Outcomes Evaluation
Designing Competency Based Training with Bloom’s Taxonomy Michele B. Medved Learning in the News
This project is financed by the European Union 1 The project is implemented by a European Profiles S.A. led consortium Counselling methods techniques &
This project is financed by the European Union 1 The project is implemented by a European Profiles S.A. led consortium Training / Counselling selling By.
Presented By Muhammad Asif Nadeem (M.Phil) Lecturer Department of Education The Islamia University of Bahawalpur Bloom’s Taxonomy Illustrated.
Learning Objectives. Objectives Objectives: By the conclusion to this session each participant should be able to… Differentiate between a goal and objectives.
Taxonomies of Learning Foundational Knowledge: Understanding and remembering information and ideas. Application: Skills Critical, creative, and practical.
Chapter 6 Training and Development in Sport Organizations.
Bloom’s Cognitive and Affective Taxonomies Cognitive and Affective Taxonomies.
Sina Keshavaarz M.D Public Health &Preventive Medicine Measuring level of performance & sustaining improvement.
Evaluation methods and tools (Focus on delivery mechanism) Jela Tvrdonova, 2014.
This project is financed by the European Union 1 The project is implemented by a European Profiles S.A. led consortium TRAINER’s STYLE AND TECHNIQUES (2)
Training Evaluation. Evaluation of Training Since huge sums of money are spent on training and development, how far the programme has been useful must.
All images © Mat Wright Ensuring quality – what can be learnt from the UK and the rest of Europe? Santiago June 2014 Geoff Fieldsend.
Assessing Student Learning Lynn Merklin Assistant Provost Office of Institutional Effectiveness August, 2014.
Needs Assessment EDTC General Definition The process of comparing a desired goal state with existing conditions Data is fundamental to all decision.
The Impact of Health Coaching
Prodotto da Elena Turchi 4^H Scienze Sociali. ESkills Kit.
Award, Certificate and Diploma in Strategic Management Certificate and Diploma in Executive Leadership ILM Level 7.
EDU 385 CLASSROOM ASSESSMENT Week 1 Introduction and Syllabus.
Writing Student-Centered Learning Objectives Please see Reference Document for references used in this presentation.
This project is financed by the European Union 1 The project is implemented by a European Profiles S.A. led consortium The assignments By Senior Sort Term.
D1.HRD.CL9.06 D1.HHR.CL8.07 D2.TRD.CL8.09 Slide 1.
Program Evaluation.
LEARNING DOMAINS & OBJECTIVES Southern Illinois University Carbondale Instructor Workshop.
What Do Students Need?  Each student needs to be like all others and at the same time, different from all others.  Students need unconditional acceptance.
Introduction to: Motor Skills and Abilities.  1. A task with a specific goal to achieve  Fundamental  Sport related  Music applications 2. An indicator.
Chapter 6 Training Evaluation
“A Truthful Evaluation Of Yourself Gives Feedback For Growth and Success” Brenda Johnson Padgett Brenda Johnson Padgett.
BSBIMN501A QUEENSLAND INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS ACADEMY.
Tier III Implementation. Define the Problem  In general - Identify initial concern General description of problem Prioritize and select target behavior.
Kirkpatrick’s Four-Level Model of Evaluation
Developing a Project Proposal
1 The project is financed from the European Union funds within the framework of Erasmus+, Key Action 2: Cooperation for innovation and the exchange of.
This project is financed by the European Union 1 The project is implemented by a European Profiles S.A. led consortium Evaluation of Training By Senior.
Bloom’s Taxonomy Benjamin Samuel Bloom He was one of the greatest minds to influence the field of education. He was born on February 21, 1913 in Lansford,
Training Evaluation Chapter 6 6 th Edition Raymond A. Noe Copyright © 2013 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.McGraw-Hill/Irwin.
Output of Development Phase Training Title: Training Duration: Trainer: Seating: Target Population: Overall Training Objectives: After having attended.
Objectives of Curriculum Qulb e Abbas. Taxonomy of educational objectives In which three domains are identified: (i) the cognitive; (ii) the affective.
So You Think You’ve Made a Change? Developing Indicators and Selecting Measurement Tools Chad Higgins, Ph.D. Allison Nichols, Ed.D.
Evaluating Training The Kirkpatrick Model.
SIUC Instructor Workshop Learning Domains and Objectives.
Training Trainers and Educators Unit 6 – Developing Aims and Learning Outcomes and Planning a Learning Session Aim To provide participants with the knowledge.
Training Trainers and Educators Unit 8 – How to Evaluate
Innovative measures in teaching
EDU704 – Assessment and Evaluation
Chapter Six Training Evaluation.
Training Trainers and Educators Unit 8 – How to Evaluate
SPIRIT OF HR.in TRAINING EVALUATION.
GETTING ‘EVEN’ BETTER: FIVE LEVELS FOR PD EVALUATION
Introduction to CPD Quality Assurance
Orientation and Training
Creating Meaningful Student Learning Outcomes
Training Trainers and Educators Unit 6 – Developing Aims and Learning Outcomes and Planning a Learning Session Aim To provide participants with the knowledge.
Lesson Planning (2) (A.E.T. Wk 11).
Assessments and the Kirkpatrick Model
Analyzing Learners & Context
Training Evaluation Chapter 6
Orientation and Training
Systematic Approach to Training
OD Interventions Unit-3.
6 Chapter Training Evaluation.
TLQAA STANDARDS & TOOLS
Presentation transcript:

This project is financed by the European Union 1 The project is implemented by a European Profiles S.A. led consortium Evaluation of Training By Senior Sort Term International Expert: Kyriakos DIMITRIOU Place: UCCI Tashkent Training Centre Ташкент - July 9, 2014 Training of Trainers

This project is financed by the European Union 2 The project is implemented by a European Profiles S.A. led consortium Evaluation Generally speaking, evaluation is used to determine the degree to which program objectives are met through the procedures used. If we want to define “evaluation in training” as a term, we could say that is a systematic procedure to give a “value” qualitative and quantitative in a training session, using concrete criteria and methodology.

This project is financed by the European Union 3 The project is implemented by a European Profiles S.A. led consortium The procedure What When (by) Whom 3 W How H

This project is financed by the European Union 4 The project is implemented by a European Profiles S.A. led consortium Evaluation; “What” Curriculum (content) Way of delivery (methods, techniques) Training facilitation Duration Material Usefulness Impact Trainer Learners (self- evaluation) External factors (facilities etc) General satisfaction

This project is financed by the European Union 5 The project is implemented by a European Profiles S.A. led consortium Evaluation; “When” When the evaluation is taking place? The answer in this question is: During all phases of the training program  Before (ex ante)  During (on going) or interim (in the middle)  After (ex post)

This project is financed by the European Union 6 The project is implemented by a European Profiles S.A. led consortium Ex ante Ex-ante evaluation enables analysis of the anticipated impacts of the planned programme. It’s a quite demanding process in comparison with on going and ex post evaluation. o Structure of the activity o Sequence of priorities o Internal coherence and o External coherence

This project is financed by the European Union 7 The project is implemented by a European Profiles S.A. led consortium Ex-ante assesses Ex-ante evaluation assesses whether the objectives are clear, coherent and adjusted to the situation, helps the realistic numeric quantification of these and defines indicators enabling the monitoring of implementation, as well as reporting on results achieved. Indicators relate to financial resources, physical attributes, results and impact.

This project is financed by the European Union 8 The project is implemented by a European Profiles S.A. led consortium On going / Ex post evaluation a) determine what the participants have learned b) give the learners time to reflect on their learning c) gather useful feedback in an organized manner, to help with future training planning d) ensure learners’ follow-up (their training with relevant actions to apply, improve, develop and reinforce learning attained).

This project is financed by the European Union 9 The project is implemented by a European Profiles S.A. led consortium Evaluation; “By whom” Who is responsible to evaluate? Everyone has the right to evaluate any actor (participant). Usually: Learners Trainer and External evaluator (usually on behalf of beneficiaries, stakeholders) INTERNAL

This project is financed by the European Union 10 The project is implemented by a European Profiles S.A. led consortium Evaluation; “How” Quite a lot of ways is the answer and by various means (techniques):  Each “actor” evaluates others  Self evaluation Means: Questionnaires Interviews (personal, group) Round tables, focus groups etc

This project is financed by the European Union 11 The project is implemented by a European Profiles S.A. led consortium Bloom's Taxonomy in evaluation Benjamin S Bloom ( ) -USA Taxonomy means “a set of classification principles”, or “a structure”. Bloom's Taxonomy model is in three parts, or “overlapping domains”. Bloom used rather academic language, but the meanings are simple to understand: Cognitive domain (intellectual capability, ie., knowledge, or “think”) Affective domain (feelings, emotions and behavior, ie., attitude, or “feel”) Psychomotor domain (manual and physical skills, ie., skills, or “do”)

This project is financed by the European Union 12 The project is implemented by a European Profiles S.A. led consortium Simplification /1 Cognitive (knowledge) 1.Recall data 2.Understand 3.Apply (use) 4.Analyse (structure/elements) 5.Synthesize (create/build) 6.Evaluate (assess, judge in relational terms)

This project is financed by the European Union 13 The project is implemented by a European Profiles S.A. led consortium Simplification /2 Affective (attitude) 1.Receive (awareness) 2.Respond (react) 3.Value (understand and act) 4.Organise personal value system 5.Internalize value system (adopt behavior)

This project is financed by the European Union 14 The project is implemented by a European Profiles S.A. led consortium Simplification /3 Psychomotor (skills) 1.Imitation (copy) 2.Manipulation (follow instructions) 3.Develop Precision 4.Articulation (combine, integrate related skills) 5.Naturalization (automate, become expert)

This project is financed by the European Union 15 The project is implemented by a European Profiles S.A. led consortium Evaluating Training Programs: Kirkpatrick's 4 Levels The most widely used and popular model for the evaluation of training programs is known as "The Four Levels of Learning Evaluation" The model was created by Donald L. Kirkpatrick in a series of articles that appeared in the US Training and Development Journal. Kirkpatrick redefined the evaluation model with his 1998 book "Evaluating Training Programs: The Four Levels."

This project is financed by the European Union 16 The project is implemented by a European Profiles S.A. led consortium Level 1: Reaction Kirkpatrick refers to Level one as a measure of customer (learner) satisfaction. Most of the forms that people fill out at the end of a training or a similar (coaching, mentoring) activity are instruments for measuring Level 1.

This project is financed by the European Union 17 The project is implemented by a European Profiles S.A. led consortium Level 2: Learning Kirkpatrick defines learning as the extent to which participants change attitudes, increase knowledge, and/or increase skill as a result of attending a program. Level 3: Behaviour Level three can be defined as the extent to which a change in behaviour has occurred because someone attended a training program

This project is financed by the European Union 18 The project is implemented by a European Profiles S.A. led consortium Level 4: Results This involves measuring the final results that occurred because a person attended a training session. This can include increased production, improved work quality, reduced turnover, etc. Level four can be difficult because you must determine what final results occurred because of attendance and participation in a training program

This project is financed by the European Union 19 The project is implemented by a European Profiles S.A. led consortium Evaluation has a meaning when  Is a procedure to collect valid, reliable and useful information and data  Extend in explaining of the results  Is combined with feedback  Is not only quantitative  Its results are used by appropriate persons in terms of improvement