A scale of cognitive demand.  Code with a ? to indicate that you have never heard of this,  Code with a + to indicate that you know something about.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Understanding Depth of Knowledge
Advertisements

Depths of Knowledge and Reading
Depth of Knowledge It’s NOT the VERB, It’s the ACTION! Portions of this presentation were taken from.
Webb’s Depth of Knowledge
Level 1 Recall Recall of a fact, information, or procedure. Level 2 Skill/Concept Use information or conceptual knowledge, two or more steps, etc. Level.
Depth of Knowledge and Rigor: Improving Instruction and Assessment
Aligning Depth of Knowledge with the TEKS and the STAAR
Depth of Knowledge. Why Depth of Knowledge? Mechanism to ensure that the intent of the standard and the level of student demonstration required by that.
Understanding Depth 0f knowledge
Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Reviewing the Cognitive Rigor Matrix and DOK Tuesday September.
Science Break Out Session New Math and Science Teacher Dec 2008 Becky Smith.
An Understanding of Webb’s Depth of Knowledge Tammy Seneca, Ph.D.
An Overview of Webb’s Depth of Knowledge
COABE 2014 Forging the Future Implementing Webb’s DOK in the Active Learning Classroom Sara Z. Gutting Education Consultant (317)
Teaching with Depth An Understanding of Webb’s Depth of Knowledge
Depth of Knowledge in Math K-5 Math Back to School Conference
DOK and GRASPS, an Introduction for new staff
Teaching with Depth An Understanding of Webb’s Depth of Knowledge
Categorizing Classroom Experiences
Depth of Knowledge (DOK)
Introduction to Depth of Knowledge
Sara Arizmendez Cassie Arquette Karl Spendlove. Team Effort ◦ Math teachers need to be aware of the content standards and how they will be tested ◦ Math.
Understanding Depth of Knowledge
PSLA 39 TH ANNUAL CONFERENCE APRIL 14, Carolyn Van Etten Beth Sahd Vickie Saltzer – LibGuide Developer.
DOK Depth of Knowledge An Introduction.
Webb’s Depth of Knowledge
Quick Glance At ACTASPIRE Math
Webb’s Depth of Knowledge (DOK) Aligning Assessment Questions to DOK Levels Assessing Higher-Order Thinking.
NEW REALITY STUDENTS MUST HAVE HIGHER-ORDER THINKING SKILLS 1.
Task Analysis Connecting Math and Science through class discussions.
Teaching with Depth An Understanding of Webb’s Depth of Knowledge.
Modified from Depth of Knowledge presentation by Dr. Robin Smith at 2009 PRESA Leadership Conference… Adapted from Kentucky Department of Education, Mississippi.
DEPTH OF KNOWLEDGE (DOK)
Developing Assessments for and of Deeper Learning [Day 2b-afternoon session] Santa Clara County Office of Education June 25, 2014 Karin K. Hess, Ed.D.
Teachers Helping Teachers with Rigor/Depth of Knowledge / Revised Bloom’s Taxonomy Presented by NHCS Gifted Education Specialists.
Depth of Knowledge Assessments (D.O.K.) Roseville City School District Leadership Team.
Depth of Knowledge (DOK) An Overview. 2 Depth of Knowledge (DOK) Adapted from the model used by Norman Webb, University of Wisconsin.
Vision: Every child in every district receives the instruction that they need and deserve…every day. Oregon Response to Intervention Vision: Every child.
Page 1 Teaching with Depth: An Understanding of Webb’s Depth of Knowledge by Karen Taylor
Depth of Knowledge (DOK)
Depth of Knowledge and the Cognitive Rigor Matrix 1.
PLANTING THE SEEDS OF RIGOR Region I Principals’ Meeting November 5, 2010.
By Benjamin Newman.  Define “Cognitive Rigor” or “Cognitive Demand”  Understand the role (DOK) Depth of Knowledge plays with regards to teaching with.
Depth of Knowledge (DOK) SUN VALLEY HIGH SCHOOL. 2 Depth of Knowledge (DOK) Adapted from the model used by Norman Webb, University of Wisconsin, to align.
Tuesday 08/12 Grab DOK handouts and put them in your “Units” tab. Warm-up: Look over the Academic Integrity Policy that you researched for homework. Respond.
Major Science Project Process A blueprint for experiment success.
From Infusing Rigor & Research into Instruction and Assessment presentation USOE, Salt Lake City, UT February 25-26, 2014 Karin K. Hess, Ed.D. Center for.
1. 10:00 – 10:05AmWelcome 10:05 -10: 10Starter 10: :30DOK and Blooms 10: :30DOK activity 11 :30AM Prayer Break 12: :15Pm Broad.
Getting to Know Webb’s. Webb’s Depth of Knowledge Level One (recall) requires simple recall of such information as fact, definition, term, or simple procedure.
Teaching with Depth An Understanding of Webb’s Depth of Knowledge.
Teaching with Depth An Understanding of Webb’s Depth of Knowledge.
What is RIGOR in the Math Classroom?. Presenter Introduction: Stephanie Darley East Valley RttT Math Coach Curriculum Coach at DHHS Been with TLG for.
Write your personal definition of “cognitive rigor” What do rigorous academic environments look and sound like?
New Hope-Solebury School District. Develop a shared understanding of the concept of cognitive rigor Begin the conversation about Webbs’ Depth of Knowledge.
Understanding Depth of Knowledge. Depth of Knowledge (DOK) Adapted from the model used by Norm Webb, University of Wisconsin, to align standards with.
1 Cognitive Demand in Problems  Cognitive demand is a measure of what the instructional question (a question posed during class) or test item requires.
Linking Curriculum, Instruction and Assessment in Mathematics March 10, 2016 CONNECTICUT STATE DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION.
Depth Of Knowledge Basics © 2010 Measured Progress. All rights reserved. He who learns but does not think is lost. He who thinks but does not learn is.
The Role of the School Librarian & Media Specialist In the Student Learning Objectives (SLO) Process South Carolina Department of Education Steve Driscoll,
Teaching with Depth An Understanding of Webb’s Depth of Knowledge
Definitions & Examples
Understanding Depth of Knowledge
Understanding Depth of Knowledge
Depth of Knowledge (DOK)
Preplanning Presentation
Understanding Depth of Knowledge
Depth of Knowledge (DOK)
Norman L Webb.
Depth of Knowledge (DOK)
Presentation transcript:

a scale of cognitive demand

 Code with a ? to indicate that you have never heard of this,  Code with a + to indicate that you know something about this,  Code with an ! to indicate that you know this so well that you could teach this!

 In 1997, Norman Webb, of the Wisconsin Center of Educational Research ; University of Wisconsin- Madison, developed a process and criteria for systematically analyzing the alignment between standards and standardized assessments.

 No Child Left Behind (NCLB) requires assessments to “measure the depth and breadth of the state academic content standards for a given grade level” ( U.S. Department of Education, 2003, p. 12 )  Mechanism to ensure that the intent of the standard and the level of student demonstration required by that standard matches the assessment items.

 Since then, the process and criteria have demonstrated application to reviewing curricular alignment as well. Webb’s Depth of Knowledge (DOK) model may be employed to analyze the cognitive expectation demanded by standards, curricular activities and assessment tasks (Webb, 1997).

 Basic recall of concepts, definitions, facts, and processes  Answering a Level 1 item can involve following a simple, well-known procedure or formula  Simple skills and abilities or recall characterize DOK 1

 Locate or recall facts found in text  Apply a well known formula  Use a dictionary to find the meaning of words  Represent math relationships in words, pictures, or symbols  Perform a simple science process or a set of procedures

 DOK 2 includes the engagement of some mental processing beyond recalling or reproducing a response.  Items require students to make some decisions as to how to approach the question or problem.  These actions imply more than one mental or cognitive process/step.

 Identify and summarize the major events, problem, solution, conflicts in literary text  Explain the cause-effect of historical events  Predict a logical outcome based on information in a reading selection  Retrieve information from a table, graph, or figure and use it to solve a problem requiring multiple steps.

 DOK 3 requires deep understanding as exhibited through planning, using evidence, and more demanding cognitive reasoning.  The cognitive demands at Level 3 are complex and abstract.  An assessment item that has more than one possible answer and requires students to justify the response they give would most likely be a Level 3.

 Justify a response when more than one answer is possible.  Analyze or evaluate the effectiveness of literary elements (e.g. characterization, setting, point of view, conflict and resolution, plot structures).  Solve a multiple-step problem and provide support with a mathematical explanation that justifies the answer.

 DOK 4 requires high cognitive demand and is very complex.  An investigation or application that requires time to research, think or process multiple conditions of the problem.  Students are expected to make non-routine manipulations or connections across disciplines/content areas/multiple sources.  Due to the complexity of cognitive demand, DOK 4 requires an extended period of time.

 Analyze and synthesize information from multiple sources.  Design and conduct experiments and projects.  Conduct a study that requires taking into consideration a number of variables.

It’s not just the verbs:  DOK 1- Describe three characteristics of metamorphic rocks. (Requires simple recall)  DOK 2- Describe the difference between metamorphic and igneous rocks. (Requires cognitive processing to determine the differences in the two rock types)  DOK 3- Describe a model that you might use to represent the relationships that exist within the rock cycle. (Requires deep understanding of the rock cycle and a determination of how best to represent it)

It’s not the difficulty of the task, it’s the complexity.  What is the definition of exaggerate? DOK 1— recall (NOT difficult!)  What is the definition of glabella? DOK 1— recall (DIFFICULT!)

 If there is only one correct answer, it is probably level DOK 1 or DOK 2  DOK 1: you either know it (can recall it, locate it, do it) or you don’t  DOK 2 (conceptual): apply one concept, then make a decision before going on applying a second concept

 If there is more than one solution/approach, requiring evidence, it is DOK 3 or 4  DOK 3: Must provide supporting evidence and reasoning (not just HOW solved, but WHY – explain reasoning)  DOK 4: all of “3” + use of multiple sources or texts

 Turn and talk to your neighbor. Discuss how looking at DOK levels of activities in your lessons might increase rigor in your classroom.  In 3 minutes we will share.  New York City Department of Education DOK Video New York City Department of Education DOK Video

Level 3. “An activity that has more than one possible answer and requires students to justify the response they give would most likely be a Level 3.” Since there are multiple possible approaches to this problem, the student must make strategic decisions about how to proceed, which is more cognitively complex than simply applying a set procedure or skill. Grade 4 Assessment : Think carefully about the following question. Write a complete answer. You may use drawings, words, and numbers to explain your answer. Be sure to show all of your work. Laura wanted to enter the number 8375 into her calculator. By mistake, she entered the number without clearing the calculator, how could she correct her mistake? Without clearing the calculator, how could she correct her mistake another way?

Level 1. Students only need to be able to recognize even numbers.

Look at the drawing Level 3. This item can be approached through a number of viable strategies: pattern recognition, guess-and-check, algebra, etc. This freedom means that the student must make choices and assumptions. Furthermore, no matter what strategy she employs, she must keep track of a complex logical chain. The multiple choices provided do not make this task any less complex. Grade 8 Assessment Look at the drawing. The numbers alongside each column and row are the total of the values of the symbols within each column and row. What should replace the question mark?

Level 3. This item gives the student a new definition and asks her to use it as a basis for reasoning. In order to ascertain whether the student really understands the asymptotic behavior that makes a 6% effective rate impossible, this item must be open-ended. This is why most Level 3 items are open-response items, because the complexity of thinking they require the students to display could not be displayed using the multiple choice option. Grade 11 Assessment

Level 2. This item is not Level 1 because it is not routine, nor does it focus on a memorized definition or procedure. In fact, it involves numerous steps, because it requires students to compare several different pairs of shapes before arriving at the correct answer. For these reasons, many spatial reasoning items are Level 2. Note that this may be a coded as a source-of- challenge item, because choice C seems to be drawn in a misleading way.

 Karin Hess, from the The National Center for the Improvement of Educational Assessment, Inc. has done extensive research regarding rigor in the classroom and she applies Webb’s DOK to Bloom’s Cognitive Process Dimensions.

Hess’ Cognitive Rigor Matrix and Curricular Examples Applying Webb’s Depth-of-Knowledge Levels to Bloom’s Cognitive Process Dimensions – Math/Science

 Look at your current lessons and code activities.  Enhance lessons to increase opportunities for rigor.  Collaborate!  DOK objectives in specific subject areas are available, just ask:  Math  Language Arts  Science  Social Studies

 Differentiation  I/E times  Opportunities for:  Research  Deeper understanding  Self-selection  Long-term projects  More complex problems  Integrating subjects

 This work WON’T be finished today.  You have choices!  You know your students better than anyone.  Collaboration among colleagues will greatly help your efforts.  There are resources for level 3 and 4 activities!  This work will change the way your classroom looks.  Your students’ expectations and outcomes will increase.