Update on Magnet Schools Dr. Kim Morrison-Director for Federal Programs and Strategic Planning- October 18, 2011.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 Gifted and Talented Task Force Presentation to the Howell Township Board of Education March 29, 2006.
Advertisements

Lessons Learned on CCSS
Common Core Standards and the Edmonds School District November 4, 2013.
 Reading School Committee January 23,
STAR 3 : An Overview Teacher Incentive Fund (TIF) Grant Project for the WS/FCS.
Measures of Student Achievement Appoquinimink School District November 2007.
Common Core Implementation Plan Whittier City School District Board of Education Meeting April 7, 2014.
Two Generations of Success Family Engagement in Full Service Community Schools Coalition for Community Schools April, 2010.
Evaluation of Math-Science Partnership Projects (or how to find out if you’re really getting your money’s worth)
PPS Department Update Denise Doolittle, Director Paul Pattavina, Supervisor Lori Secchiaroli, Supervisor December 15, 2014.
What is Title 1? It is a federal formula grant. It is the largest federal grant the Fayette County Public Schools receives.
DISTRICT IMPROVEMENT PLAN Student Achievement Annual Progress Report Lakewood School District # 306.
WEST HEMPSTEAD UNION FREE SCHOOL DISTRICT Final Strategic Plan Update Board of Education Meeting—June 21, 2011.
Leveraging Educator Evaluation to Support Improvement Planning Reading Public Schools Craig Martin
Eighth Street Elementary School September 25 th, 2014 Mr. John McCollum Title I Annual Parent Meeting.
Curriculum Update January What are the big projects? Fall 2013 – Math Common Core Implementation Fall 2014 – English/Language Arts Common Core Implementation.
Jackson Public School District Holistic Accountability in Action.
(High/Middle School) HSTW/MMGW Site Presentation ( Month Date, 2006) Promising Practices Next Steps Major Challenges Technical Review Visit (TRV)
Council of Great City Schools Conference October 28,
1 STUDENT PROGRESS AND ACCOUNTABILITY REPORT 2013 September 10, 2013 HUNTINGTON BEACH CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT.
FewSomeAll. Multi-Tiered System of Supports A Comprehensive Framework for Implementing the California Common Core State Standards Professional Learning.
WBCSD District Strategic Goals Update August 10, 2015.
An Update on Charter Schools Presentation to the New Jersey State Board of Education November 3, 2010.
WW Why Evaluation?. Evaluation formalizes the shared responsibility of state and LEAs to improve student achievement and close the achievement gap in.
Theme: Teaching and Learning Goal: Provide quality curriculum and instruction that engages and meets the needs of all students in a diverse learning community.
Governing Board Meeting September 29, 2011 Annual State of the School Address Mr. R. Hackler, Principal.
STAR3 Project for WS/FCS. STAR3 All students deserve and thrive under a great teacher that cares for their well being. Our responsibility is to provide.
JANUARY 12, Subject Change from previous year English89%85%89%+5% Math74%76%88%+12% History83%86%69%-17% Science74%
Putting It All Together Diane Gross USD 261 8/11/06.
School Year 2 Updates and Overview Thursday, August 20, 2015.
Hastings Public Schools PLC Staff Development Planning & Reporting Guide.
Berkshire Local School District Strategic Plan Update Fourth Update, 10/14/09.
Sol C. Johnson High School Wednesday September 23, 2015 (11:00am and 5:30pm) Auditorium.
Reform Model for Change Board of Education presentation by Superintendent: Dr. Kimberly Tooley.
Why 21st Century Skills & STEM? Research indicates students across all grade-levels lack competencies in math and science. New demands have been placed.
Career Academic Technical Institute (CATI) Division of Career-Technical Education TN State Department of Education 25th NACTEI New Orleans, 2005.
CURRICULUM RENEWAL EDD 7913 CRN BY JAMIE LEEDER, GENEVIEVE LEYDIG, KEITH MABE NOVA SOUTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY APRIL 4, 2013.
What is Title I and How Can I be Involved? Annual Parent Meeting Pierce Elementary
NOVA Evaluation Report Presented by: Dr. Dennis Sunal.
Revision the Future Strengthening our Magnet Programs October 20, 2015.
Northwest ISD Target Improvement Plan Seven Hills Elementary
Vae View Elementary School Improvement Plan
Presented By WVDE Title I Staff June 10, Fiscal Issues Maintain an updated inventory list, including the following information: description of.
Preparing to Use This Power Point with Staff: This power point can be used to: This is a power point called 90 – 90 – 90 Research and can be downloaded.
Principal – Adriene Stephenson. Enrollment – 371 General Education – 83% SPED – 17% LEP – Less than 1% African American – 75% White – 22% Asian, Hispanic,
Teachers of Teachers of Mathematics (TOTOM) Bend, OR September 6, 2013 Mark Freed, ODE Mathematics Education Specialist ODE Update.
SCEP Evaluation Albany Elementary School.
School Governance Council Meeting February 18, 2016 River Eves Elementary School NEIL PINNOCK, PRINCIPAL MATTHEW DONAHOE, ASSISTANT PRINCIPAL.
Walters Middle School Conversion STEAM Magnet Proposal
The Big Bang (Theory): A Framework for maximizing a STEM program
GA Department of Education STEM Visit Thursday, December 1, 2016
¡Bienvenidos! Carthage Dual Language Academy MSBA Annual Conference
School Governance Council Meeting February 9, 2016
Title I Annual Parent Meeting
School Governance Council Meeting February 18, 2016
Otis J. Brock, III Elementary School
Title 1 Annual parent Meeting
Title I Annual Parent Meeting
Title I Annual Parent Meeting
Title I Annual Meeting
Title I Annual Parent Meeting
Otis J. Brock, III Elementary School
Title I Annual Parent Meeting
DRAFT Cascade School Strategic Plan (Mays Cluster) DRAFT
DRAFT Cascade School Strategic Plan (Mays Cluster) DRAFT
State of the School Title I Meeting Folwell School, Performing Arts Magnet October 9, /8/2019.
NC Mathematics and Science Partnership Program
EDN Fall 2002.
District Mission & Vision Cluster Mission & Vision
S.T.E.A.M. Focused Instruction:
Presentation transcript:

Update on Magnet Schools Dr. Kim Morrison-Director for Federal Programs and Strategic Planning- October 18, 2011

Phase 3 Magnet Schools Phase 3 has completed their last year of implementation as of September 30th( )  Hanes Magnet School  Philo Magnet Academy  RJ Reynolds High School

Phase 3 Magnet Schools  The magnet schools in this cycle have met or made significant progress on all of their federal targets.  Philo, Hanes and Reynolds have made academic gains and attracted a large number of applicants.  A big thank you goes out to these schools for a tremendous amount of work that resulted in great opportunities for students.

Phase 3 Magnet Schools Budget Expenditures- $298,742 Personnel/Technology $181,625 Staff Development/Supplies $225,472 Contractual Total Spent: $ 705,839 Project Budget Total:$4.7 Million *Overall applications have increased from 500 in 2001 to over 2000 in 2011 (all magnets)

Rigorous Evaluation This report was obtained over a 3-year rigorous evaluation of the MSAP schools. SERVE Center at the University of North Carolina at Greensboro conducted the study. This study used magnet schools compared to non-magnet within the district.

Rigorous Evaluation  Academic growth was observed based on whether magnet dosage had any effect on outcomes Overall magnet effects were significant in  Philo-Grade 6-8 Math  Hanes-Grade 6 and Grade 8 Math  Reynolds-English I and Algebra I

Rigorous Evaluation  Magnet effects were significantly positive for minority students in the following areas: Philo Hispanic Students-Grade 7 and 8 Math Philo African American Students-Grade 6 and 7 Math

Rigorous Evaluation  Magnet effects were significantly positive for minority students in the following areas: Hanes African American Students-Grade 8 Math Reynolds Hispanic Students- Algebra I Reynolds African American Students- Geometry

Rigorous Evaluation  In the area of climate, magnet students compared to students attending traditional middle and high schools, have high perceptions of climate at each of the three magnet schools.

Rigorous Evaluation  Magnet students show significant positive perceptions of the following areas: Respectful classroom behaviors Student high expectations Student-student trust Student-teacher trust

Rigorous Evaluation Conclusions  The results suggest that magnet programs produce detectable effects on student achievement.  In addition to achievement effects, the school climate at each magnet school appears to have high student perceptions of climate.

Rigorous Evaluation Conclusions  Lastly, these three magnet schools were evidence that a well implemented program, carefully monitored, can show effectiveness even after only three years. Again, a big thank you to the administration, staff and especially students of Philo Magnet Academy, Hanes Magnet School, and Reynolds High School

Phase 4 Magnet Schools

 Konnoak Elementary School Mandarin Chinese Global Infusion Technology  Brunson Elementary School Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics Engineering is Elementary Design Process

Phase 4  John F. Kennedy High School Pro-Start Restaurant Management Construction and Design Health Sciences Creative Enterprises

Konnoak Elementary School  Theme using technology to connect globally  International connections throughout units of study

Konnoak Elementary School  Part of the North Carolina Global Schools Network  Chinese Immersion at Kindergarten with two certified Chinese teachers-Confucius Classroom  Four International Teachers Added to the Staff  Highlighted by the Governor

Brunson Elementary School  Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics  Engineering is Elementary through hands-on modules  Creativity, problem-solving, and design

Brunson Elementary School  Staff has been trained in Engineering is Elementary.  The school has purchased engineering kits to be used with each grade level  A STEM coordinator was hired to support STEM implementation two days a week.  District in South Carolina visited to explore STEM themes for their elementary schools

Service

John F. Kennedy High School  Over 100 students in the High School academies  Focus and training on entrepreneurship and cooperative learning.  Training on Renzulli Learning  Integrated Units with entrepreneurship embedded in learning

Phase 4 Phase 4 schools have written detailed implementation plans aligned with their School Improvement Plans with targets and benchmarks in the following areas: 1. Minority isolation/marketing 2. Parental involvement 3. Professional Development 4. Innovative Practices 5. Sustainability

Phase 4 Phase 4 schools have already participated in multiple hours of staff development and recruited over 170 students in the first class of magnet students. Thank you for your support to begin these unique magnets and to provide three more options for parental choice.

Winston- Salem/Forsyth Magnet Schools 18 District-Wide Magnet Schools

Name of SchoolComposite Composite Growth 2007 Growth 2011 Ashley Elementary Not MetHigh Growth Diggs Elementary Not MetExpected Downtown Elementary High Growth Moore Elementary Expected Mineral Springs Elementary Not MetExpected Konnoak Elementary Less/Exp Elementary Magnet Schools

Middle Magnet Schools Name of SchoolComposite Composite Growth 2007 Growth 2011 Hanes Middle High Growth Hill Middle Not MetExpected Mineral Springs Middle Not MetExpected Paisley Middle GrowthExpected Philo Middle Not MetHigh Growth

High School Magnet Schools Parkland High Not Met Low Performing High Growth Reynolds High GrowthExpected Atkins-Comp Tech Not Met Low Performing Expected Atkins-Bio- Tech Not Met Low Performing Less/Exp Atkins-Pre- Engineering Not Met Low Performing Less/Exp WSPA Not Met Low Performing Less /Exp Name of School Composite Composite Growth 2007 Growth 2011

WS/FCS Magnet Schools Questions???