TLC FINAL REPORT METHODOLOGY Presentation by Dr. Edith Natukunda - Togboa.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Project Cycle Management
Advertisements

Guide to statistics in European Commission Development Co-operation
The Range of Qualitative Methods Module number 4 ESRC workshops for qualitative research in management.
Intelligence Step 5 - Capacity Analysis Capacity Analysis Without capacity, the most innovative and brilliant interventions will not be implemented, wont.
Research Capacity Strengthening
School Improvement Through Capacity Building The PLC Process.
Develop an Information Strategy Plan
Assessing student learning from Public Engagement David Owen National Co-ordinating Centre for Public Engagement Funded by the UK Funding Councils, Research.
Professional Standards and Professional Values in HE Christine Smith, University of Salford.
Constructing the Foundations of Capacity Building An Activity Theory Analysis of the English in Action Baseline Studies Jan Rae and Adrian Kirkwood.
Higher Attainment Through Cross-Border Hubs CERTIFICATE IN SMALL BUSINESS FINANCE DELIVERED BY: South West College LOCATION: Cavan Innovation & Technology.
ACCOUNTING INFORMATION SYSTEMS
Montse Moharra; Antoni Parada on behalf of WP8 of the EUnetHTA project Catalan Agency for Health Technology Assessment and Research EUnetHTA HANDBOOK ON.
Literacy Assessment and Monitoring Programme (LAMP) UNESCO Institute for Statistics.
SAFER CITIES MODEL. SAFER CITIES TOOLS SAFER CITIES TRAINING MANUAL AND TOOLKIT Overall development objective is to facilitate effective strategy development.
CEFPI is a Registered Provider with The American Institute of Architects Continuing Education Systems (AIA/CES). Credit(s) earned on completion of this.
Educational Outcomes: The Role of Competencies and The Importance of Assessment.
HOW INNOVATIVE IS YOUR ORGANISATION? Dr. Sandra M. Dingli The Edward de Bono Institute UNIVERSITY OF MALTA.
Learning while sharing experience in the BOLDIC network: methodological principles and practical implementation Audronė Valiuškevičiūtė (Vytautas Magnus.
WHITE ROSE CENTRE FOR EXCELLENCE IN THE TEACHING AND LEARNING OF ENTERPRISE.
Association for the Education of Adults EAEA European AE Research – Look towards the future ERDI General Assembly, 2004.
Copyright ©2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Project Risk Management EECS811: IT Project Management Presenter: Gavaskar Ramanathan.
More than Knowing At Mercy College Karin Gilbert & Michelle Cotter.
Purpose Program The purpose of this presentation is to clarify the process for conducting Student Learning Outcomes Assessment at the Program Level. At.
Prospects for Development of Bulgarian Model for R&D Management in Support of Defence Industry Presented by Assoc. Prof. Dr Tsvetan Tsvetkov UNWE-DNRS.
Strasbourg 05/06/07 Strasbourg 31/07/07 EUROPEAID Non-State Actors and Local Authorities in Development WTD: WORKING TOGETHER FOR DEVELOPMENT.
Formula student as part of a mechanical engineering curriculum Dr Huw Davies – ENGIN.
1 ©Copyright Dr G Sieff | IC Growth Group | | ph Strategy Mastery Programmes October 2012.
Professional Certificate – Managing Public Accounts Committees Ian “Ren” Rennie.
An Online Knowledge Base for Sustainable Military Facilities & Infrastructure Dr. Annie R. Pearce, Branch Head Sustainable Facilities & Infrastructure.
Copyright ©2015 Pearson Education, Inc.
1 WERT: WP 5 RG EVANS ASSOCIATES November 2010 Aim To pilot and evaluate the content and context of the course material with target groups To help women.
1 Women Entrepreneurs in Rural Tourism Evaluation Indicators Bristol, November 2010 RG EVANS ASSOCIATES November 2010.
Fostering Sustainable and Autonomous Higher Education Systems in the Eastern Neighbouring Area - ATHENA project -
March 26-28, 2013 SINGAPORE CDIO Asian Regional Meeting and Workshop on Engineering Education and Policies for Regional Leaders Programme Evaluation (CDIO.
© 2011 Partners Harvard Medical International Strategic Plan for Teaching, Learning and Assessment Program Teaching, Learning, and Assessment Center Strategic.
The Brain Project – Building Research Background Part of JISC Virtual Research Environments (Phase 3) Programme Based at Coventry University with Leeds.
1 Designing Effective Programs: –Introduction to Program Design Steps –Organizational Strategic Planning –Approaches and Models –Evaluation, scheduling,
Case study of a successful proposal Rob Davies. Parts of a proposal Part A - Proposal Administrative Overview - forms Part B- Description of objectives.
Regional Training/Consultations on Capacity Development for Sustainable Growth and Human Development in Europe and CIS Application of Capacity Development.
European Commission Joint Evaluation Unit common to EuropeAid, Relex and Development Methodology for Evaluation of Budget support operations at Country.
School Improvement Partnership Programme: Summary of interim findings March 2014.
EU Projects – FP7 Workshop 6: EU Funding –What’s Next? Carolina Fernandes Innovation & Funding Manager GLE Group.
Creating Value Learning resources for managers to deliver efficiencies whilst improving effectiveness Patrick Kennedy, Director of Strategic Planning and.
Developing your Research Plan for FemNorthNet Community Case Studies 1.
The PHEA Educational Technology Initiative. Project Partners PHEA Foundations – Ford, Carnegie, Kresge, MacArthur South African Institute for Distance.
Marv Adams Chief Information Officer November 29, 2001.
Working Technologically Early Stage 1 – Stage 3. Students evaluate by: recounting the steps taken to reach a final solution discussing their likes and.
Development of a harmonised quality assurance and accreditation system at institutional level, national, regional and Pan-African continental level EU.
FOR URAFRC RETREAT 21 ST -23 RD OCTOBER, 2010 BY DR. EDITH NATUKUNDA TLC PROGRESS REPORT ARE YOU READY FOR CHANGE??
Grant Application Form (Annex A) Grant Application Form (Annex A) 2nd Call for Proposals.
ROMANIAN AGENCY OF QUALITY ASSURANCE IN HIGHER EDUCATION – ARACIS Consolidating and Developing the Human Capital for Sustainable knowledge-based Societies.
FAO Turkey Partnership Programme (FTPP) FAO Final Evaluation of the FTPP Summary for FTPP Programming Meeting, 14 December
EVALUATION OF THE SEE SARMa Project. Content Project management structure Internal evaluation External evaluation Evaluation report.
School Improvement Partnership Programme: From principles to practice Chris Chapman.
©2012 RAY SVENSON CONSULTING, INC. 1 PHASE 2: DATA COLLECTION Why do data collection? Three categories of data collection:  Business Requirements —Business.
School practice Dragica Trivic. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS FROM TEMPUS MASTS CONFERENCE in Novi Sad Practice should be seen as an integral part of the.
> 1 ACP S&T Grant Contract N° FED/2009/ Introducing WP6 Monitoring & Quality control Objectives, actions, procedures Dr Sarah Bracking.
Educational contributions to cohesion and well-being in European social and institutional life.
Monitoring and Evaluation Systems for NARS organizations in Papua New Guinea Day 4. Session 10. Evaluation.
Ellinogermaniki Agogi Research and Development Department DigiSkills Network DigiSkills: Network for the enhancement of Digital competence skills.
TEMPUS INFORMATION DAY NEDAL JAYOUSI/Ph.d. NTO PALESITNE TEMPUS IV- FIFTH CALL FOR PROPOSALS.
Knowledge Transfer Partnership Project Nottingham Trent University and Nottinghamshire County Council Dr Adam Barnard Rachel Clark Catherine Goodall 19/4/16.
A Framework of Factors for Learning Environment Evaluation
Quality Assurance and Enhancement at The University of Edinburgh
Poster 1. Leadership Development Programme : Leading Cultures of Research and Innovation in Clinical Teams Background The NHS Constitution is explicit.
Makerere University, College of Humanities and Social Sciences and UNISA, College of Human Sciences January 2018 Title slide – option 2.
Plan your journey.
CEng progression through the IOM3
Presentation transcript:

TLC FINAL REPORT METHODOLOGY Presentation by Dr. Edith Natukunda - Togboa

Introduction Universities, like any other organisation, operate in a dynamic environment – both internal, operational and external competitive, evolve with time. In response, management processes must also change over time so that the institution can remain efficient and sustainable through the changing situation. Reengineering and reorganising institutional products, processes and structures is a critical endeavour as management seeks to improve its success rates and optimise university programme cycle time.

Conceptual framework A conceptual framework of Reforms at Makerere University was first developed so as to identify the major constructs/ blocks of processes that would go into effecting Research, Admin. & Financial Reforms. This framework was largely based on reform programmes effected in other universities in the region – Univ. of Dar es Salaam, Univ. of Addis Ababa, Univ. of Nairobi.

Conceptual Framework Cont. The Conceptual framework of Reforms at Makerere was a performance model that identifies the present processes and measures them against hypothesised more successful ones as a positive drive in search of a better performance, using a cross functional team – the Reform Committee.

Mapping of Processes in T &L Identifying of core processes Segement them into sub-processes Multi-valuing of sub-process : where initiated, duration, preconditions, if any. Mapping sub-processes from space A, through other spaces B, C, to …….Z in order to sequence & explore documentation of basic process properties Different documentation features used to distinguish these basic properties e.g design features. Critical examination of current process.

Critical Examination of processes A critical appraisal of how we handle core processes of Teaching and Learning at Makere Univ. Based on impirical data on the sequencing of operations at various levels Critiqued redundancies, disconnections, efficiency, effectiveness and relevance of “as is ” operation. With each “no value added” activity identified problematic area though an evaluative phase. Proposed a possible solution including adjustment & omission of components of sub-process for the ideal “to be” operation. (Organisational factors such as context, capacity, structures within sub-units were taken into account).

Benchmarking Visits Visits conducted to compare with best practices with the eventual aim of innovative adaptation. To rate our present performance against the continent’s best. To identify critical success factors in T &L prog. devpt. To look at other institutions’ settings, practices, methods and link them to their good performance. Factors like programme synergy, market attractiveness, student screening, market study & priotization criteria were taken note of in ordrer to envision more focused and proficient T &L.

Sensitisation and Consultation Public platforms were organised to make others aware and responsive to ideas, events & situations arising fromthe Reform process. Some addressed homogenious groups e.g MPs,, Management, others were crossfunctional (student/ Staff interface) to take care of the diversisty and interdependance of T & L processes ans stgructures.

Review of existing literature ; thematically analysed to collect impirical data on Teaching, Learning and College Structures in universities. Collecting such data was aiming at developing an authoritative and factual stance to the process. Documentary Review

Focus Group Discussions Group interviews that captilised on communication between reform process participants. This method was useful because it explored people’s knowledge and experiences. Through it we examined not only what people were thinking but also how and why they were thinking that way. FGDs were especially helpful in tapping into a variety of views on College formation.

References Denscombe Martyn : The Good Research Guide, Maidenhead Open UniversityPress, 3 rd Edition, Jackson N. & Lund H. (Eds) : Benchmarking for Higher Education,Taylor & Francis Inc., U.K, 2000.