1 Conceptual Design Review 4/17/07 Team 1 John Horst John Horst Jared Odle Jared Odle Keith Fay Keith Fay Boyce Dauby Boyce Dauby Andrew Kovach Andrew.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
AE 1350 Lecture Notes #10 TOPICS TO BE STUDIED Take-off and Landing Performance There is considerable variations due to –pilot technique –ground conditions.
Advertisements

College of Engineering and Computer Science Department of Mechanical and Materials Engineering Wright State University Regular Class Aircraft SAE Aero.
Extremely Maneuverable UCAV
ME 480 Introduction To Aerospace: Chapter 2 Prof. Doug Cairns.
Vertical Launch UAV Project Plan. ∞ Construct an unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) with a camera payload ∞ UAV must autonomously navigate with real-time video.
Range (nm) Payload (kg) Payload (lb) Endurance (hr) As a total system, Vigilante.
Guidelines Presentation. Aircraft Aim & Judging The aircraft needs to transport the mirror segments of the ESO European Extremely Large Telescope, being.
SAE AERO Chase Beatty (Team Leader) Brian Martinez (Organizer) Mohammed Ramadan (Financial Officer) Noe Caro (Historian) Brian Martinez.
Chase Beatty (Team Leader) Brian Martinez (Organizer) Mohammed Ramadan (Financial Officer) Noe Caro (Historian) SAE AERO Chase Beatty.
U5AEA15 AIRCRAFT STRUCTURES-II PREPARED BY Mr.S.Karthikeyan DEPARTMENT OF AERONAUTICALENGINEERING ASSISTANT PROFESSOR.
Predicting Performance
JLFANG-LDS Light Dynamic Strikefighter Dr. James Lang, Project Advisor Aircraft Design by Team Bling-Bling Marcus Artates Connor McCarthy Ryan McDonnell.
Preliminary Design Review
AME 441: Conceptual Design Presentation
D & C PDR #1 AAE451 – Team 3 November 4, 2003
Oculus Superne. 2 System Definition Review Mission Objectives Concept of Operations Aircraft Concept Selection Payload Constraint Analysis and Diagrams.
Critical Design Review AAE490 Project 1 March 2003 Nicholas Baker Brian Chernish Andrew Faust Doug Holden Mara Prentkowski Nicholas Setar.
Click to edit Master title style Click to edit Master text styles Second level Third level Fourth level Fifth level 1.
The Barn Owls Chris “Mo” Baughman Kate Brennan Christine Izuo Dan Masse Joe “Sal” Salerno Paul Slaboch Michelle Smith.
Oculus Superne 1 1.) Introduction 2.) Mission & Market 3.) Operations
Click to edit Master title style Click to edit Master text styles Second level Third level Fourth level Fifth level 1.
Group 3 Heavy Lift Cargo Plane
Patrick Dempsey Bridget Fitzpatrick Heather Garber Keith Hout Jong Soo Mok AAE451 Aircraft Design Professor Dominick Andrisani First Flight November 21,
March 1, Aerodynamics 3 QDR Michael Caldwell Jeff Haddin Asif Hossain James Kobyra John McKinnis Kathleen Mondino Andrew Rodenbeck Jason Tang Joe.
Team 5 Aerodynamics PDR Presented By: Christian Naylor Eamonn Needler Charles Reyzer.
Review Chapter 12. Fundamental Flight Maneuvers Straight and Level Turns Climbs Descents.
MAE 4261: AIR-BREATHING ENGINES
Overview of Chapter 6 Douglas S. Cairns Lysle A. Wood Distinguished Professor.
Modern Equipment General Aviation (MEGA) Aircraft Progress Report Flavio Poehlmann-Martins & Probal Mitra January 11, 2002 MAE 439 Prof. R. Stengel Prof.
AE 1350 Lecture #2 TOPICS ALREADY COVERED We reviewed the history of aeronautics and rocketry. We discussed the parts of the airplane. We discussed various.
System Definition Review - AAE Team 5 March 27, 2007 Slide 1 System Definition Review Robert Aungst Chris Chown Matthew Gray Adrian Mazzarella Brian.
Lesson 2-2a Principles of Flight
AE 1350 Lecture Notes #9.
1th UAS Team RQ-5A Hunter2008 Unmanned Air System 2008 Unmanned Aerial System Team RQ-5A/MQ-5B Hunter 1 st Team
PROPRIETARY James Bearman AJ Brinker Dean Bryson Brian Gershkoff Kuo Guo Joseph Henrich Aaron Smith Daedalus Aviation Conceptual Design Review: “The Daedalus.
AIAA Hybrid Airliner Competition 2013 The Transporters.
Team 5 Critical Design Review Trent Lobdell Ross May Maria Mullins Christian Naylor Eamonn Needler Charles Reyzer James Roesch Charles Stangle Nick White.
Real World Design Challenge
AEM 5333 UAV Search and Surveillance. Mission Description Overhead surveillance and tracking – Humans on foot – Moving vehicles Onboard GPS transceiver.
Final report and briefing
Conceptual Design Review - AAE Team 5 April 17, 2007 Slide 1 Conceptual Design Review Robert Aungst Chris Chown Matthew Gray Adrian Mazzarella Brian.
Propulsion PDR #2 AAE451 – Team 3 November 11, 2003 Brian Chesko Brian Hronchek Ted Light Doug Mousseau Brent Robbins Emil Tchilian.
Mensa XE (Extra Efficiency) High Efficiency Family Airplane
HALE UAV Preliminary Design AERSP 402B Spring 2014 Team: NSFW Nisherag GandhiThomas Gempp Doug RohrbaughGregory Snyder Steve StanekVictor Thomas SAURON.
Design Chapter 8 First Half. Design Requirements and Specifications Payload Range Cruising Speed Takeoff & Landing Distance Ceiling.
DESIGN OF THE 1903 WRIGHT FLYER REPLICA MADRAS INSTITUE OF TECHNOLOGY CHENNAI - 44.
1. Mission Statement Design Requirements Aircraft Concept Selection Advanced Technologies / Concepts Engine / Propulsion Modeling Constraint Analysis.
1 Lecture 4: Aerodynamics Eric Loth For AE 440 A/C Lecture Sept 2009.
AAE 451 Aircraft Design First Flight Boiler Xpress November 21, 2000
AAE 451 AERODYNAMICS PDR 2 TEAM 4 Jared Hutter, Andrew Faust, Matt Bagg, Tony Bradford, Arun Padmanabhan, Gerald Lo, Kelvin Seah November 18, 2003.
February 24, Dynamics & Controls 1 PDR Michael Caldwell Jeff Haddin Asif Hossain James Kobyra John McKinnis Kathleen Mondino Andrew Rodenbeck Jason.
Theory of Flight All are demonstrated by the flight of the bird!
Introduction to Aerospace – Historical Perspective Dr. Doug Cairns.
System Definition Review 3/27/07 Team 1
AE 2350 Lecture Notes #9 May 10, 1999 We have looked at.. Airfoil aerodynamics (Chapter 8) Sources of Drag (Chapter 8, 11 and 12) –Look at the figures.
AAE Team 1 - 2/20/07 System Requirements Review 2/20/07 Team 1 John Horst John Horst Jared Odle Jared Odle Keith Fay Keith Fay Boyce Dauby Boyce.
Zuliana-July Lecture 1: INTRODUCTION AIRCRAFT MASS (WEIGHT) & PERFORMANCE By: Zuliana Ismail, 2010.
12/11/12 Brandon Campbell & Ernesto Chairez. Purpose  Civil Transport  Large Volume  Efficient  Quiet  Long Range.
© 2009 Aviation Supplies & Academics, Inc. All Rights Reserved. The Pilot’s Manual – Ground School Aerodynamics Chapter 1 Forces Acting on an Airplane.
Vehicle Sizing AAE 451: Team 2 Michael Caldwell Jeff Haddin
VEHICLE SIZING PDR AAE 451 TEAM 4
DYNAMICS & CONTROL PDR 1 TEAM 4
Dynamics & Controls PDR 1
Team 5 Final Design Review
PROPULSION PDR 2 AAE 451 TEAM 4
Team 5 Final Design Review
Matching of Propulsion Systems for an Aircraft
stages control devices thrust arrangement
DYNAMICS & CONTROL QDR 1 TEAM 4
Aerodynamics PDR # 2 AAE451 – Team 3 November 18, 2003
Presentation transcript:

1 Conceptual Design Review 4/17/07 Team 1 John Horst John Horst Jared Odle Jared Odle Keith Fay Keith Fay Boyce Dauby Boyce Dauby Andrew Kovach Andrew Kovach Akshay Raje Akshay Raje Manish Handa Manish Handa Introduction Mission Analysis Payload Sizing Aircraft Description Aerodynamics Performance Propulsion Structure Weights Stability & Control Cost Future Work

AAE Team 1 - 4/17/072 Mission Statement: Mission Statement: The objective is to provide a fixed-wing, semi- autonomous, long-endurance, continuous-area coverage unmanned aerial vehicle to relay communication of tactical importance for an extended period of time. The objective is to provide a fixed-wing, semi- autonomous, long-endurance, continuous-area coverage unmanned aerial vehicle to relay communication of tactical importance for an extended period of time. Department of Defense Department of Defense Front-line tactical communication relay to/from warfighter Front-line tactical communication relay to/from warfighter Relief Agencies/FEMA Relief Agencies/FEMA Front-line tactical communication relay to/from ground first responders Front-line tactical communication relay to/from ground first responders Commercial Customers Commercial Customers Damaged service locations, scouting of new telecommunication markets, and remote locations Damaged service locations, scouting of new telecommunication markets, and remote locations Introduction Mission Analysis Payload Sizing Aircraft Description Aerodynamics Performance Propulsion Structure Weights Stability & Control Cost Future Work

AAE Team 1 - 4/17/073 CONOPS Takeoff Takeoff Conventional runway takeoff (Autonomous or Remote Operation) Conventional runway takeoff (Autonomous or Remote Operation) Distance from Takeoff to Coverage Area Distance from Takeoff to Coverage Area Transmitting/Receiving Transmitting/Receiving Ground Forces  UAV  Command Station or other Ground Forces Ground Forces  UAV  Command Station or other Ground Forces Control Control Autonomous with manual backup/mission override Autonomous with manual backup/mission override Remote Operators Remote Operators Trained military UAV pilots controlling from Mission Command Center Trained military UAV pilots controlling from Mission Command Center Level of Threat Level of Threat Design for high threat environment Design for high threat environment Introduction Mission Analysis Payload Sizing Aircraft Description Aerodynamics Performance Propulsion Structure Weights Stability & Control Cost Future Work

AAE Team 1 - 4/17/074CONOPS Provide continuous area coverage for and extended time period Provide continuous area coverage for and extended time period Multiple UAVs in system Multiple UAVs in system Redundancy by overlapping coverage Redundancy by overlapping coverage Survivability via electronic countermeasures Survivability via electronic countermeasures Introduction Mission Analysis Payload Sizing Aircraft Description Aerodynamics Performance Propulsion Structure Weights Stability & Control Cost Future Work

AAE Team 1 - 4/17/075 Design Requirements TargetThreshold Endurance 24 hr 14 hr Range 200 nm 50 nm Ceiling 30,000 ft MSL 15,000 ft MSL Takeoff 500 ft 1,000 ft Landing 500 ft 1,000 ft Transportation Volume Fit inside C ’x10’x9’ Fit inside C-5 143’x19’x13.5’ Introduction Mission Analysis Payload Sizing Aircraft Description Aerodynamics Performance Propulsion Structure Weights Stability & Control Cost Future Work

AAE Team 1 - 4/17/076 Communications Payload AJCN - Adaptive Joint C4ISR Node AJCN - Adaptive Joint C4ISR Node by BAE Systems by BAE Systems Weight 200 – 270 lbs Power 2 hp Volume * 6 – 9 ft 3 Range (Air-to-Ground)** 55 – ,000 ft Range (Air-to-Air)** 60 15,000 ft *Volume approximated by avionic density: 0.02 – 0.03 ft 3 /lb **According to available data Introduction Mission Analysis Payload Sizing Aircraft Description Aerodynamics Performance Propulsion Structure Weights Stability & Control Cost Future Work

AAE Team 1 - 4/17/077 Additional Payload Missile Warning/Countermeasures - BAE Systems Missile Warning/Countermeasures - BAE Systems AN/ALQ-156(V) Warning System AN/ALQ-156(V) Warning System 425 Watts of Power 425 Watts of Power 50 pounds 50 pounds 20.4 × 10.2 × 7.6 in 20.4 × 10.2 × 7.6 in AN/ALE-47 Dispensing System AN/ALE-47 Dispensing System Automatic Response Automatic Response Protects Against: Protects Against: Air Interceptor (AI), Anti-Aircraft Artillery (AAA), and Surface-to-Air Missiles (SAMs) 20 pounds 20 pounds Fielded on 1,307 Aircraft Fielded on 1,307 Aircraft 43.7 x 39.5 x 26.8 in 43.7 x 39.5 x 26.8 in Introduction Mission Analysis Payload Sizing Aircraft Description Aerodynamics Performance Propulsion Structure Weights Stability & Control Cost Future Work

AAE Team 1 - 4/17/078 Payload Summary Introduction Mission Analysis Payload Sizing Aircraft Description Aerodynamics Performance Propulsion Structure Weights Stability & Control Cost Future Work MicroPilot - Dayview/Nightview

AAE Team 1 - 4/17/079 Sizing Introduction Mission Analysis Payload Sizing Aircraft Description Aerodynamics Performance Propulsion Structure Weights Stability & Control Cost Future Work Custom written sizing code. Attempts are being made with FLOPs and ACS—results may be available in the report. Using General Aviation component weight predictions from Raymer.

AAE Team 1 - 4/17/0710 Sizing Various parameters were held constant during trade studies and carpet plot generation Various parameters were held constant during trade studies and carpet plot generation L/D12 Propeller Efficiency 0.8 Specific Fuel Consumption (c bhp ) 0.4 lb/hp-hr (cruise) 0.5 lb/hp-hr (loiter) Loiter Velocity 80 kts w e /w 0 (from UAV database) Aspect Ratio 10 Λ0 C Lmax 1.8 (Takeoff) 1.6 (Landing) Introduction Mission Analysis Payload Sizing Aircraft Description Aerodynamics Performance Propulsion Structure Weights Stability & Control Cost Future Work

AAE Team 1 - 4/17/0711 Trade-offs Using sizing code, it was determined that increasing the design combat range from 100 to 200 nm resulted in an increase in gross weight of 100 lbs. Using sizing code, it was determined that increasing the design combat range from 100 to 200 nm resulted in an increase in gross weight of 100 lbs. Decreasing endurance from 24 hours to 20 hours saved 500 lbs. Decreasing endurance from 24 hours to 20 hours saved 500 lbs. Introduction Mission Analysis Payload Sizing Aircraft Description Aerodynamics Performance Propulsion Structure Weights Stability & Control Cost Future Work

AAE Team 1 - 4/17/0712 Carpet Plot Introduction Mission Analysis Payload Sizing Aircraft Description Aerodynamics Performance Propulsion Structure Weights Stability & Control Cost Future Work

AAE Team 1 - 4/17/0713 Aircraft Description *All dimensions in feet

AAE Team 1 - 4/17/0714 Aircraft Description Camera Rotax 914 AJCN Fuel Tanks Rear Landing Gear Main Landing Gear Missile Defense System Avionics

AAE Team 1 - 4/17/ Camera 2. AJCN 3. Engine Nacelles 4. Missile Defense 5. Fuel Tanks 6. Avionics *All dimensions in feet Introduction Mission Analysis Payload Sizing Aircraft Description Aerodynamics Performance Propulsion Structure Weights Stability & Control Cost Future Work

AAE Team 1 - 4/17/0716 Aerodynamics NACA NACA Thick profile allows easier structural layout Thick profile allows easier structural layout Wide drag high lift coefficients Wide drag high lift coefficients Center at 0.4 Center at 0.4 Extends to 0.9 Extends to 0.9 Aircraft travels entire range as fuel is burned and aircraft lightens Aircraft travels entire range as fuel is burned and aircraft lightens Introduction Mission Analysis Payload Sizing Aircraft Description Aerodynamics Performance Propulsion Structure Weights Stability & Control Cost Future Work

AAE Team 1 - 4/17/0717 Aerodynamics Trailing edge flaps on main wings. Trailing edge flaps on main wings. Fowler Flaps Fowler Flaps 33% chord ratio 33% chord ratio 50% of wing area is covered 50% of wing area is covered Basic drag component buildup using techniques described in Raymer Basic drag component buildup using techniques described in Raymer Introduction Mission Analysis Payload Sizing Aircraft Description Aerodynamics Performance Propulsion Structure Weights Stability & Control Cost Future Work

AAE Team 1 - 4/17/0718 Aerodynamics Introduction Mission Analysis Payload Sizing Aircraft Description Aerodynamics Performance Propulsion Structure Weights Stability & Control Cost Future Work

AAE Team 1 - 4/17/0719 Performance Introduction Mission Analysis Payload Sizing Aircraft Description Aerodynamics Performance Propulsion Structure Weights Stability & Control Cost Future Work

AAE Team 1 - 4/17/0720 TargetThresholdCurrent Endurance 24 hr 14 hr 20 hr Combat Radius 200 nm 50 nm 200 nm Ceiling 30,000 ft MSL 15,000 ft MSL 41,000 ft MSL Takeoff Ground Roll 500 ft 1,000 ft 750 ft Landing Ground Roll 500 ft 1,000 ft 490 ft Loiter Altitude 15,000 ft AGL Current Gross Weight 3,450 lbs Stall Speed 49 kts Maximum Speed 150 kts Compliance Matrix Introduction Mission Analysis Payload Sizing Aircraft Description Aerodynamics Performance Propulsion Structure Weights Stability & Control Cost Future Work

AAE Team 1 - 4/17/0721 Propulsion System Variable pitch propeller Variable pitch propeller In-flight adjustable In-flight adjustable Diameter : 7 ft Diameter : 7 ft Number of blades : 3 Number of blades : 3 Advance ratio (J) : Advance ratio (J) : Activity Factor (AF) : 100 Activity Factor (AF) : 100 Integrated design lift coefficient (Cl i ) : 0.3 Integrated design lift coefficient (Cl i ) : 0.3 Maximum working RPM : 2400 Maximum working RPM : 2400 Introduction Mission Analysis Payload Sizing Aircraft Description Aerodynamics Performance Propulsion Structure Weights Stability & Control Cost Future Work

AAE Team 1 - 4/17/0722 Propulsion System Propulsion System *Cruise velocity: 80 knots *Cruise velocity: 80 knots *Propeller Efficiency: 0.81 *Propeller Efficiency: 0.81 Introduction Mission Analysis Payload Sizing Aircraft Description Aerodynamics Performance Propulsion Structure Weights Stability & Control Cost Future Work

AAE Team 1 - 4/17/0723 Engine Description Engine Description Rotax 914 UL Aircraft Engine Rotax 914 UL Aircraft Engine 100 HP, with maximum 115 HP for 5 minutes 100 HP, with maximum 115 HP for 5 minutes 4-stroke, 4-cylinder, with turbo charger 4-stroke, 4-cylinder, with turbo charger Max RPM 5800 Max RPM 5800 Integrated reduction gear i = 2.4 Integrated reduction gear i = 2.4 Shaft RPM 2400 Shaft RPM 2400 Electric starter Electric starter Electric dual ignition system Electric dual ignition system Introduction Mission Analysis Payload Sizing Aircraft Description Aerodynamics Performance Propulsion Structure Weights Stability & Control Cost Future Work

AAE Team 1 - 4/17/0724 Material Comparison Introduction Mission Analysis Payload Sizing Aircraft Description Aerodynamics Performance Propulsion Structure Weights Stability & Control Cost Future Work

AAE Team 1 - 4/17/0725 Selected Materials Internal Structure (wing/tail/body) Internal Structure (wing/tail/body) Aluminum 2024-T3 Aluminum 2024-T3 Landing Gear Landing Gear Aluminum 7075-T6 Aluminum 7075-T6 Aircraft Skin Aircraft Skin Aluminum 7075-T6 Aluminum 7075-T6 Introduction Mission Analysis Payload Sizing Aircraft Description Aerodynamics Performance Propulsion Structure Weights Stability & Control Cost Future Work

AAE Team 1 - 4/17/0726 Internal Structure Introduction Mission Analysis Payload Sizing Aircraft Description Aerodynamics Performance Propulsion Structure Weights Stability & Control Cost Future Work

AAE Team 1 - 4/17/0727 Weight Breakdown 1. W Camera 1. W Camera 2. W AJCN 2. W AJCN 3. W Engine 3. W Engine 4. W Missile Defense 4. W Missile Defense 5. W MainGear 5. W MainGear 6. W Wing 6. W Wing 7. W Fuselage 7. W Fuselage 8. W Fuel 8. W Fuel 9. W Avionics 9. W Avionics 10. W VertTail 10. W VertTail 11. W HorizTail 11. W HorizTail 12. W RearGear 12. W RearGear Introduction Mission Analysis Payload Sizing Aircraft Description Aerodynamics Performance Propulsion Structure Weights Stability & Control Cost Future Work

AAE Team 1 - 4/17/0728 Weight Breakdown *Moment and location measured from tip of the nose

AAE Team 1 - 4/17/0729 Stability & Control Introduction Mission Analysis Payload Sizing Aircraft Description Aerodynamics Performance Propulsion Structure Weights Stability & Control Cost Future Work

AAE Team 1 - 4/17/0730 Stability & Control Introduction Mission Analysis Payload Sizing Aircraft Description Aerodynamics Performance Propulsion Structure Weights Stability & Control Cost Future Work

AAE Team 1 - 4/17/0731 Stability & Control Introduction Mission Analysis Payload Sizing Aircraft Description Aerodynamics Performance Propulsion Structure Weights Stability & Control Cost Future Work

AAE Team 1 - 4/17/0732 Control Surface Sizing Tail Volume Coefficient Method Tail Volume Coefficient Method Vertical tail – 60 ft 2 Vertical tail – 60 ft 2 Horizontal tail – 68 ft 2 Horizontal tail – 68 ft 2 Statistical Approximation Statistical Approximation Elevator – 22 ft 2 Elevator – 22 ft 2 Rudder – 25 ft 2 Rudder – 25 ft 2 Aileron – 31 ft 2 Aileron – 31 ft 2 Introduction Mission Analysis Payload Sizing Aircraft Description Aerodynamics Performance Propulsion Structure Weights Stability & Control Cost Future Work

AAE Team 1 - 4/17/0733 Cost Very hard to estimate per aircraft Very hard to estimate per aircraft DoD Endurance-Payload model DoD Endurance-Payload model  $1.8 million DoD $1500 / lb empty weight DoD $1500 / lb empty weight  $3.2 million DoD $8000 / lb payload DoD $8000 / lb payload  $2.2 million DAPCA IV model, DAPCA IV model,  $2.7 million (50 aircraft produced) Average is $2.5 million Average is $2.5 million Introduction Mission Analysis Payload Sizing Aircraft Description Aerodynamics Performance Propulsion Structure Weights Stability & Control Cost Future Work

AAE Team 1 - 4/17/0734 Future Work Sizing Sizing Update Carpet Plots Update Carpet Plots More Accurate Results from ACS and FLOPS More Accurate Results from ACS and FLOPS Structures Structures More detailed layout and analysis More detailed layout and analysis Better cost estimate Better cost estimate Stability and Control Stability and Control Lateral Stability Lateral Stability Control surface sizing Control surface sizing Dynamics Dynamics Flight control computer definition Flight control computer definition More detailed Aerodynamic work More detailed Aerodynamic work Potential flow analysis Potential flow analysis CFD analysis CFD analysis Introduction Mission Analysis Payload Sizing Aircraft Description Aerodynamics Performance Propulsion Structure Weights Stability & Control Cost Future Work