USGS Partnership Opportunities for 2008-2009 SLICE Proposal Richard L. Kiesling US Geological Survey MN Water Science Center 2280 Woodale Drive Mounds.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Lawyer Creek Steelhead Trout Habitat Improvement Project presented by: Lewis Soil Conservation District.
Advertisements

TMDL Development for the Floyds Fork Watershed Louisville, KY August 30, 2011.
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Welcome to the USGS Webinar: New Science and Online Management Tools to Help Guide Action on Nutrients.
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey The Use of Calculated Stream Metabolism in Understanding Nutrients and Algal Measures in Agricultural.
Developing Modeling Tools in Support of Nutrient Reduction Policies Randy Mentz Adam Freihoefer, Trip Hook, & Theresa Nelson Water Quality Modeling Technical.
SOURCES AND FLUX OF NUTRIENTS IN THE MISSISSIPPI RIVER BASIN: MONITORING, MODELING, & RESEARCH NEEDS Donald A. Goolsby, U.S. Geological Survey.
Methodology for Evaluating Hydrologic Model Parameters in an Urban Setting: Case Study Using Transferred HSPF Parameters in Midlothian and Tinley Creek.
Lake Status Indicator Selection and Use in SLICE David F. Staples.
Michael J. Brayton MD/DE/DC Water Science Center Hydrologic Controls on Nutrient and Pesticide Transport through a Small Agricultural Watershed, Morgan.
Land Use Change and Its Effect on Water Quality: A Watershed Level BASINS-SWAT Model in West Georgia Gandhi Raj Bhattarai Diane Hite Upton Hatch Prepared.
Lake Status Indicator Selection David F. Staples Ray Valley.
Adem.alabama.gov Incorporating NPS Intensive Surveys into ADEM’s Monitoring Strategy Southeastern Water Pollution Biologists’ Association Meeting Lake.
Chesapeake Bay Program Monitoring Activities and Monitoring Network Design Chesapeake Bay Program Monitoring Activities and Monitoring Network Design Stephen.
SPARROW Modeling in the Mississippi River Basin Iowa Science Assessment Davenport, IA Nov. 14, 2012 (608) By Dale M. Robertson*
TMDL Development for the Floyds Fork Watershed Watershed Hydrology and Water Quality Calibration and Water Quality Model Calibration Technical Advisory.
Getting the Big Picture How to Look at Your Watershed Indiana Watershed Planning Guide,
Surface Water Simulation Group. Comprehensive watershed scale model developed and supported by the USDA-ARS capable of simulating surface and groundwater.
Apalachicola/Chattahoochee/Flint Focus Area - USGS WaterSMART NIDIS SE Climate Forum Lake Lanier Islands, GA December 2, 2011.
Engineering Hydrology (ECIV 4323)
Brian Haggard Arkansas Water Resources Center UA Division of Agriculture Arkansas Water Resources Center.
Monitoring Design, Available Data, and Filling Data Gaps for Determining Whether Shale Gas Development Activities Contaminate Surface Water or Groundwater.
Water Quality Monitoring and Parameter Load Estimations in Lake Conway Point Remove Watershed and L’Anguille River Watershed Presented by: Dan DeVun, Equilibrium.
Water Quality Monitoring and Parameter Load Estimations in Lake Conway Point Remove Watershed, L’Anguille River Watershed, and Bayou Bartholomew Presented.
Impact of Climate Change on Flow in the Upper Mississippi River Basin
Ecosystems Climate and Land-Use Change Water Natural Hazards Core Science Systems Energy and Minerals, and Environmental Health U.S. Geological Survey.
EEOS 350: Quantitative hydrogeology Lecture 2 Water balance.
Regional Critical Mass SLICE can wait no longer!.
USGS Sentinel Lake Project with MN DNR Fisheries – Feb 2011 Richard L. Kiesling Emily Resseger
USGS Water Resource Monitoring and Assessment Activities Salinity and other topics presented to the Garfield County Energy Advisory Board Dec. 1, 2005.
Riga, 25 th April 2007 Expert meeting Twinning LV/2005-IB/EN/01 Water Quality.
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Alabama Water Science Center StreamStats: By Kernell Ries and J.
Introduction to Modeling Unit V, Module 21A. Developed by: Hagley Updated: May 30, 2004 U5-m21a-s2 Module 21 Introduction to Modeling  This module has.
USGS Global Change Science National Climate Change & Wildlife Science Center and SE Regional Hub Sonya Jones USGS Southeast Area NIDIS Planning Meeting.
Groundwater Flux to the Upper Mississippi River – Approach and application to nutrient understanding.
Lake Tahoe TMDL Science Objectives l What are sources and relative contributions of “contaminants” causing clarity decline? l How much of a reduction is.
Sentinel Lakes Program: Water quality monitoring and assessment Steve Heiskary, Research Scientist III Environmental Analysis and Outcomes Division Minnesota.
Assessing Alternative Policies for the Control of Nutrients in the Upper Mississippi River Basin Catherine L. Kling, Silvia Secchi, Hongli Feng, Philip.
LAKE ECOLOGY Unit 1: Module 2/3 Part 1- Introduction January 2004.
Hydrologic Related Activities within the Joint Institute for Caribbean Climate Studies Eric Harmsen, Ph.D., P.E. Dept. of Agricultural and Biosystems Engineering.
Gulf of Mexico Hypoxia and Mississippi River Basin Nutrient Losses Herb Buxton, USGSRob Magnien, NOAA Co-Chairs, Monitoring, Modeling, and Research Workgroup,
Twinning water quality modelling in Latvia Helene Ejhed
Assessment of Runoff, Sediment Yield and Nutrient Load on Watershed Using Watershed Modeling Mohammad Sholichin Mohammad Sholichin 1) Faridah Othman 2)
SLICE Advisory Team Meeting January 26 th -27 th 2011.
Timeline Impaired for turbidity on Minnesota’s list of impaired waters (2004) MPCA must complete a study to determine the total maximum daily load (TMDL)
Engineering Hydrology (ECIV 4323)
Delaware River Basin SPARROW Model Mary Chepiga, , Susan Colarullo, , Jeff Fischer, ,
Vision for the National Geospatial Framework for Surface Water Robert M. Hirsch Associate Director for Water U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological.
Effects of Climate Change on Ecosystems and Natural Resources of the Yukon River Basin.
Gulf of Mexico Hypoxia and Nutrient Management in the Mississippi River Basin Herb Buxton, U.S. Geological Survey.
St. Johns River Water Management District Hydrologic Modeling in Orange Creek Basin Hydrologic Modeling in Orange Creek Basin Dale Smith, P.E. Bureau of.
Southern Sierra Critical Zone Observatory Integrating measurements for advances in hydrology & geochemistry A research platform for studying Earth surface.
Lake Independence Phosphorus TMDL Critique Stephanie Koerner & Zach Tauer BBE 4535 Fall 2011.
Relating Surface Water Nutrients in the Pacific Northwest to Watershed Attributes Using the USGS SPARROW Model Daniel Wise, Hydrologist US Geological Survey.
Opportunities for Collaboration on Water- Quality Issues in the Mississippi River Basin Herb Buxton, Office of Water Quality.
Modeling Stream Flow of Clear Creek Watershed-Emory River Basin Modeling Stream Flow of Clear Creek Watershed-Emory River Basin Presented by Divya Sharon.
Nutrient Criteria Development for Lakes: Minnesota’s Approach & Timeline Steve Heiskary, Research Scientist III Minnesota Pollution Control Agency Environmental.
Sustaining Lakes in a Changing Environment - SLICE.
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Scenario generation for long-term water budget.
The National Monitoring Network: Monitoring & Management of Alabama Rivers Fred Leslie Alabama Dept of Environmental Management National Monitoring Conference.
Water Census Progress: DRB Focus Area Perspective Bob Tudor Deputy Director Delaware River Basin Commission.
Impact of Land use on water resources on Mt Elgon, Uganda Nakileza B.R., Bamutaze Y. Mukwaya Paul, Palesjo P.
Dr. Patrick Doran, The Nature Conservancy in Michigan. Climate Change: Challenges to Biodiversity Conservation. Chris Hoving, Michigan Department of Natural.
USGS- Water Discipline WV Water Science Center, Charleston, WV Current GIS projects include: FEMA DFIRM projects Berkeley County drainage area gains and.
Yahara River Watershed RCPP
Project Description Nutrient loading to the western basin of Lake Erie has been recognized as a pivotal component in the re-occurrence of harmful and nuisance.
Term Project Presentation CEE6440 GIS in Water Resources Seungbin Hong
Susceptibility Assessment for Public Water Supply sources
Engineering Hydrology (ECIV 4323)
Engineering Hydrology (ECIV 4323)
Moving Towards A Smart Socio-Ecological City
Presentation transcript:

USGS Partnership Opportunities for SLICE Proposal Richard L. Kiesling US Geological Survey MN Water Science Center 2280 Woodale Drive Mounds View, MN 55112

Sentinel watersheds and lakes as focal points of long-term monitoring and research USGS Objectives – Monitoring super-sentinel lakes 1.Continuous monitoring of physical and chemical parameters 1.Characterize habitat and populate bio-physical models of lake metabolism 1.Test prediction of published temperature/habitat models 2.Calibrate carbon-based lake metabolism model 3.Estimate important flux rates 2.Methods – mobile data platforms; in-lake rate est. 1.Instrument rafts and thermistor buoys 2.Sediment core incubations 3.Algal bioassays

USGS Lake Monitoring Program Continuous water quality monitoring raft

Continuous temperature data collection using temperature-logger chains at fixed locations

Sentinel watersheds and lakes as focal points of long-term monitoring and research USGS Objectives – Monitoring super-sentinel lakes 2. Continuous monitoring of meteorological / physical parameters to populate bio-physical models of lake hydrology and physics

Sentinel watersheds as focal points of long-term monitoring and research USGS Objectives – Monitoring watershed 1.Monitoring of physical and chemical parameters to characterize inflow and outflow from lakes 1.Monitor water level to characterize water mass balance 2.Monitor discharge at tributaries and outlets 3.Calculate loads and residence times for nutrients 2.Estimate ground-water contributions to water balance – thermal surveys, isotope studies, water balance calculation 3.Estimate landcover and landuse for tributary sub- watersheds and ungaged contributing zones using existing data

Linked watershed-lake biophysical models to forecast future habitat and water quality Objectives: Comparison of statistical models of load / lake productivity models with dynamic, mechanistic models of productivity and habitat (bio-hydrology) Watershed models to estimate external loading –SWAT, HSPF, or ARC-HYDRO watershed model Lake models to estimate productivity, habitat and water quality (e.g., OECD; CE-QUAL-W2 or WASP) 3D lake modeling to estimate fine-scale habitat and trophic dynamics (carbon cycling; stoichiometry) –realistic food-web component for algal dynamics and zooplankton grazing –Output adaptable for bio-energetics models

Project Objectives – Outcomes Meeting Project Objectives – Coordinated monitoring of three super-sentinel lakes (plus 1) –joint data-collection efforts by multiple partners –Multiple-year datasets –Strong inference into complex processes and functions Example: Shingobee lake, MN Data sets to test habitat model predictions; Model system response to external forcing –Calibrate and test bio-physical models for scenario modeling scenarios on landuse, climate and trophic dynamics / productivity bio-hydrology

Preliminary Super-sentinel Lakes

Elk Lake County: Clearwater Data Steward Org: MPCA Lake ID: Lat/Long: / HUC: Period of Record: 1985 through 2008 Ecoregion: Northern Lakes and Forest Basin: Upper Mississippi Surface Area: (acres) Littoral Area: 73 (acres); 25% Maximum depth: 97 (feet) Maximum fetch: 1.1 miles

Source: MPCA

1 mile

Trout Lake County: Cook Data Steward Org: MPCA Lake ID: Lat/Long: / HUC: Period of Record: 1980 through 2008 Ecoregion: Northern Lakes and Forest Basin: Lake Superior Surface Area: (acres) Littoral Area: 59 (acres); 27% Maximum depth: 69 (feet) Maximum fetch: 1 mile

1 mile

Lake Carlos County: Douglas Data Steward Org: MPCA Station ID: Lat/Lon: / HUC: Period of Record: 1973 through 2008 Ecoregion: North Central Hardwood Forest Basin: Upper Mississippi Surface Area: 2611 (acres) Littoral Area: 910 (acres); 35% Maximum depth: 164 (feet) Maximum fetch: 5 miles

1 mile

Source: Todd County Soil and Water Cons. District Lake Carlos Landuse Agricultural landuse: 43% Open water and wetland : 17% Urban and rural development: 4%

Contact Information Dr. Richard Kiesling US Geological Survey 2280 Woodale Drive Mounds View, MN (763) office (612) cell

Lake Carlos Watershed Sites Station IDStation NameOrganizationStation TypeCounty MNG SD-1CARLOS WWTP:PERMITTEEDISCHARGEDouglas LAKE CARLOSMPCALAKEDouglas 27B901LAKE CARLOSUSEPALAKEDouglas 27B902LAKE CARLOSUSEPALAKEDouglas 27B903LAKE CARLOSUSEPALAKEDouglas S LONG PRAIRIE R, 1/2 MI N OF CARLOS, T129/R37W/S12 MPCASTREAMDouglas S UNN INLET TO LK LEHOMME DIEU, 3 MI SW OF CARLOS MPCASTREAMDouglas

Lake Travis Sediment Flux Oct 2006

Sediment Flux Measurements