Do you have to hit “rock bottom” to recover? An analysis of motivation to recover through the lens of the Vigo County Drug Court experience.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Javier Leung and Kassy Tyler University of West Florida Educational Statistics III Dr. Carla Thompson.
Advertisements

Oklahoma Department of Corrections DUI Offender Profile
Gender Differences in Health Status Among Opiate Users in a 25-Year Follow-up Study Christine Grella & Luz Rodriguez UCLA Integrated Substance Abuse Programs.
Effectiveness of a Cognitive Therapy for Repeat Drinking and Driving Offenders Kathleen A. Moore, PhD Melissa L. Harrison, MS M. Scott Young, PhD Department.
Predictors of Disciplinary Problems within a Juvenile Correctional Facility Michelle Painter Hanover College.
Predictors of Change in HIV Risk Factors for Adolescents Admitted to Substance Abuse Treatment Passetti, L. L., Garner, B. R., Funk, R., Godley, S. H.,
Background: The low retention rates among African Americans in substance abuse treatment (Milligan et al., 2004) combined with the limited number of treatments.
Differences in Characteristics of Heroin Inhalers and Injectors at Admission to Treatment J. C. Maxwell, R. T. Spence, & T. M. Bohman UT Center for Social.
NOW is the time for Transformation of our Criminal Justice System NOW is the time for 11X15 “The time is always right to do what is right” - MLK.
Conducting Research in Challenging Times: California Parolee Reentry Court Evaluation Association of Criminal Justice Research, California March
S.T.A.R.T. Cuyahoga County Department of Children and Family Services Sobriety Treatment and Recovery Teams.
Drug Offender Sentencing Alternative (DOSA): Treatment and Supervision
Re-Entry and Recidivism
The Implementation and Impact of Drug Courts Drug Courts and the New Technology of Offender Change Nov. 10, 2010 Lecture James M. Byrne, Professor.
SMART JUSTICE SYMPOSIUM Lt. Joanne Lake Spokane County Sheriff’s Office Detention Services Assistant Facility Commander-Geiger.
Taking Charge of Your Health Chapter 1. 2 Chapter 1 4 Wellness 4 Aspects of Health 4 Six Dimensions of Wellness.
1 Behavioral Health/Juvenile Justice (BH/JJ) Part 2 Presented by Jeff Kretschmar, Ph.D. Project Director: Institute for the Study and Prevention of Violence.
Vermilion County Action Team Laurie Krolikowski & Susan Werner.
1 Behavioral Health/Juvenile Justice (BH/JJ) Evaluation Report ( ) Presented by Jeff Kretschmar, Ph.D. Project Director: Institute for the Study.
Copyright Alcohol Medical Scholars Program1 Substance Use Disorders in African Americans Jean-Joel Villier, M.D. Howard University College of Medicine.
Shared Family Care: An Innovative Model for Supporting & Restoring Families through Community Partnerships Amy Price, Associate Director National Abandoned.
Substance Abuse Treatment and Corrections
Jenelle R. Shanley Larissa N. Niec Central Michigan University
Does Case Management Improve Linkage to Substance Abuse Treatment? By Erin.
CSWE Child Welfare Symposium Child Welfare Workforce Retention Research in New York State New York State Social Work Education Consortium.
ISU Phase 4 – Primary Research Proposal. The Primary Research Proposal Phase will be handed in (along with Phase 3) as part of your final research paper.
According to The National Center on Addiction and Substance Abuse at Columbia University.
Juvenile Crime Prevention Evaluation Phase 2 Interim Report Findings in Brief Juvenile Crime Prevention Evaluation Phase 2 Interim Report Findings in Brief.
PowerPoint Template ©2009 Texas Christian University, Center for Instructional Services. For Educational Use Only. Content is the property of the presenter.
UCLA’s Statewide Evaluation of Proposition 36 Darren Urada, Ph.D. UCLA Integrated Substance Abuse Programs Association for Criminal Justice Research (California)
EVALUATING THE IMPACT OF ADDING THE RECLAIMING FUTURES APPROACH TO JUVENILE TREATMENT DRUG COURTS: RECLAIMING FUTURES/JUVENILE DRUG COURT EVALUATION Josephine.
EXTENDING THE THERAPEUTIC JUSTICE MODEL TO PROBLEM GAMBLERS Mark G. Farrell, JD; Jessica Aungst Weitzel, MPH; Thomas H. Nochajski, PhD, Buffalo Center.
Introduction Smoking and Social Networks Joseph R. Pruis, Student Research Collaborator, Rosemary A. Jadack, PhD, RN, Professor Department Of Nursing,
North Carolina TASC NC TASC Bridging Systems for Effective Offender Care Management.
Preparing for an Expanded Medicaid Population under the ACA: Undiagnosed and Untreated Health Needs Sandra Decker, Deliana Kostova, Genevieve Kenney and.
Harold I Perl, PhD National Institute on Drug Abuse APA 120 th Annual Convention August 3, 2012.
A Profile of Women in Treatment in California Data from the California Outcome Measurement System January – December 2006.
The Adult Drug Courts of New Hampshire, Vermont, and Maine: An Analysis of Effectiveness and Barriers to Expansion Prepared by: Jaya Batra ‘13 Austin Goldberg.
UCLA Integrated Substance Abuse Programs Amity In-Prison Therapeutic Community: Five-Year Outcomes Association of Criminal Justice Research (CA) Sacramento,
Introduction Results Treatment Needs and Treatment Completion as Predictors of Return-to-Prison Following Community Treatment for Substance-Abusing Female.
Substance Use among Older Adults (Age 50+): Current Prevalence and Future Expectations Presented by Joe Gfroerer U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES.
Ready (or not) to graduate: Mental and physical health characteristics associated with completing public housing-based, substance abuse treatment in Key.
Predictors of study retention in addiction treatment trials KORTE JE 1, MAGRUDER KM 1,2, KILLEEN TK 1, SONNE SC 1, SAMPSON RR 1 and BRADY KT 1,2 1. Medical.
Kathryn P. Jett Director California Department of Alcohol and Drug Programs.
 The word of “CITIZENSHIP” means being a member of a country  As a member of a country every individual has positive or negative attitudes towards to.
What is Recovery Kentucky? Initiative to help Kentuckians recover from substance abuse that often leads to chronic homelessness. Studies indicate that.
MODELS FOR SUCCESS: AN INTEGRATED APPROACH FOR JUVENILE DRUG COURT Reclaiming Futures/Juvenile Drug Court Evaluation Southwest Institute for Research on.
Drug Treatment Court Funding Program CCJA Conference Halifax, Nova Scotia October 30, 2009.
First Steps System of Care Family Systems Collaborations Systems to Systems Nancy Gottlieb, MFT.
Efficacy of Combination First Line Agents for Smoking Cessation Sneha Baxi, Pharm.D. Pharmacy Practice Resident University of Illinois at Chicago.
Method Introduction Results Discussion Mean Negative Cigarette Systoli Previous research has reported that across the nation 29% of college students engage.
Improving Access to Mental Health Services: A Community Systems Approach Leslie Mahlmeister, MBA PhD Student Department of Political Science Wayne State.
Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration Impact of Screening and Brief Intervention Grants in Seven States: Substance Use, Criminal Justice,
Avoiding (Un)Intentional Discrimination When Recruiting via Social Media Stephanie R. Thomas, Ph.D. Thomas Econometrics
1 CLEAN COURT OUTCOME STUDY January, 2005 Charlene Rhyne, PhD.
Recidivism Rates for DCJ Offenders Exiting Residential Treatment June 2007 Kim Pascual Research & Evaluation.
Stress and Coping in a Mother-Child Residential Drug Treatment Program.
Problem Solving Courts Bench Bar Conference Double Tree Hotel April 20, rd Judicial District Court of Common Pleas – Berks County.
Results of the 2015 National Collegiate Recovery Programs Profiles Study JEFF A. JONES, PH.D., EMILY EISENHART, M.S.S.C., BRIANNA CHARLES, B.S., & NATHAN.
Performance Evaluation of Drug Courts Douglas B. Marlowe, J.D., Ph.D. Treatment Research Institute at the University of Pennsylvania TRI science addiction.
Levels of Care Continuum of Care ASAM Patient Placement Criteria (PPC)
Criminal Justice Association of Georgia Annual Conference
Recidivism Rates for DCJ Offenders Exiting Residential A&D Treatment
Eighth Judicial District Court Mental Health Court Program
Beyond the referral Presented by:
1 Panel 2, Position 5 Jack D. Ripper.
Recidivism Among DWI Offenders in New Mexico (Preliminary Results)
Coconino County Recovery Court
DRUG COURTS IN ILLINOIS
Presentation transcript:

Do you have to hit “rock bottom” to recover? An analysis of motivation to recover through the lens of the Vigo County Drug Court experience

About this research project Origins of this research project – Brainchild of Professor Butwin, Indiana State University Political Science – Funded by the ISU Center for Student Research and Creativity Undergraduate Researchers: Website for more information about this project and a copy of this paper

Hypothesis If external characteristics exist to identify those who are “ready for recovery” drug courts should utilize those characteristic in selecting drug court participants to make programs more effective and efficient.

Who is most ready to recover from addiction? Stages of Change Model of willingness to recover - Prochaska and DiClemente (1992) – Precontemplation, contemplation, action, maintenance – This study will focus on the first two stages Precontemplation phase = less likely to benefit from drug court program (action) Contemplation phase = more likely to be successful in a drug court program and beyond (maintenance)

What are the characteristics of those in the “contemplation” phase of change? A number of theories exist – X – x “Rock Bottom” theories of readiness for change – X – x

How are participants for drug court participation currently selected? National statistics / best practices model

How are participants for drug court participation currently selected? Vigo County Drug Court – VCDC Policy and Procedures Manual Section 1.4 Eligibility Criteria according to VCDC manual Target population according to VCDC manual Referral from lawyers is not specifically placed in the manual, however, this is a common practice in order to divert prosecution for crimes committed Cite Evan’s article

Methodology January 1, 2008 thru December 31, 2010 Active, Successful & Terminated Participants Successful: Completing all requirements & no recidivism post completion of program Graduated: Completing all requirements &recidivism post completion of program Data Gathered: – Socio-economic – Self-Reported – Drug History – Criminal History

General Characteristics Income: – $0-$4,999: 50.2% Martial Status: – Single: 55.5% Drug of Choice: – Alcohol: 69.5% – Methamephatime: 13.7% – Marijuana: 8.4% – Prescription Drugs: 6.1% – Cocaine: 2.3% Average Number of Days in VCDC Program: days Gender: – 188 Males, 70 Females Age: years Ethnicity: – Caucasian: 89.5& – African American: 8.9% – Hispanic: 1.2% – Other: 0.40%

Factors that Contribute to “Hitting Rock Bottom” Prior attempt at treatment Employment status Criminal history/Number of charges Age of onset for drug or alcohol abuse

Findings: Prior Attempt at Treatment

Findings: Employment

Findings: Criminal History Graduated: Mean number of charges: charges 52.1% reported having 10 charges or less Successful: Mean number of charges: charges 53.1% reported having 5 charges or less

Findings: Age of Onset Successful: Mean age: years old Range: years of age 54.2% reported being under the age of 17 Graduated: Mean age: years of age Range: 1-22 years of age 54.1% reported being under 16

All factors combined: More successful or more likely to fail?