07 October 2004 Hayet KEBBATI -1- Data Flow Reduction and Signal Sparsification in MAPS Hayet KEBBATI (GSI/IReS)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Kailua-Kona, Marcel Trimpl, Bonn University Readout Concept for Future Pixel Detectors based on Current Mode Signal Processing Marcel Trimpl.
Advertisements

Semiconductor Memory Design. Organization of Memory Systems Driven only from outside Data flow in and out A cell is accessed for reading by selecting.
The ATLAS Pixel Detector
M. Szelezniak1PXL Sensor and RDO review – 06/23/2010 STAR PXL Sensors Overview.
Design and Implementation a 8 bits Pipeline Analog to Digital Converter in The Technology 0.6 μm CMOS Process Eri Prasetyo.
Front-end electronics for Time Projection Chamber I.Konorov Outlook:  TPC requirements  TPC readout options  Options for TPC FE chips  Prototype TPC.
CHARGE COUPLING TRUE CDS PIXEL PROCESSING True CDS CMOS pixel noise data 2.8 e- CMOS photon transfer.
6 th International Conference on Position Sensitive Detectors, Leicester 11/09/2002 Yu.Gornushkin Outline: G. Claus, C.
L. Greiner1PXL Sensor and RDO review – 06/23/2010 STAR Heavy Flavor Tracker Overview With parameters pertinent to the PXL Sensor and RDO design.
14-5 January 2006 Luciano Musa / CERN – PH / ED General Purpose Charge Readout Chip Nikhef, 4-5 January 2006 Outline  Motivations and specifications 
STS Simulations Anna Kotynia 15 th CBM Collaboration Meeting April , 2010, GSI 1.
Final Year Project A CMOS imager with compact digital pixel sensor (BA1-08) Supervisor: Dr. Amine Bermak Group Members: Chang Kwok Hung
15-17 December 2003ACFA workshop, Mumbai - A.Besson R&D on CMOS sensors Development of large CMOS Sensors Characterization of the technology without epitaxy.
Development of Readout ASIC for FPCCD Vertex Detector 01 October 2009 Kennosuke.Itagaki Tohoku University.
Why silicon detectors? Main characteristics of silicon detectors: Small band gap (E g = 1.12 V)  good resolution in the deposited energy  3.6 eV of deposited.
Ultimate Design Review G. Bertolone, C. Colledani, A. Dorokhov, W. Dulinski, G. Dozière, A. Himmi, Ch. Hu-Guo, F. Morel, H. Pham, I. Valin, J. Wang, G.
DEPFET Electronics Ivan Peric, Mannheim University.
Monolithic Pixels R&D at LBNL Devis Contarato Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory International Linear Collider Workshop, LCWS 2007 DESY Hamburg, May.
MAPS readout Systems Christoph Schrader Dresden
Irfu saclay 3D-MAPS Design IPHC / IRFU collaboration Christine Hu-Guo (IPHC) Outline  3D-MAPS advantages  Why using high resistivity substrate  3 types.
1 Digital Active Pixel Array (DAPA) for Vertex and Tracking Silicon Systems PROJECT G.Bashindzhagyan 1, N.Korotkova 1, R.Roeder 2, Chr.Schmidt 3, N.Sinev.
VI th INTERNATIONAL MEETING ON FRONT END ELECTRONICS, Perugia, Italy A. Dorokhov, IPHC, Strasbourg, France 1 NMOS-based high gain amplifier for MAPS Andrei.
Fully depleted MAPS: Pegasus and MIMOSA 33 Maciej Kachel, Wojciech Duliński PICSEL group, IPHC Strasbourg 1 For low energy X-ray applications.
Development of an ASIC for reading out CCDS at the vertex detector of the International Linear Collider Presenter: Peter Murray ASIC Design Group Science.
LEPSI ir e s MIMOSA 13 Minimum Ionising particle Metal Oxyde Semi-conductor Active pixel sensor GSI Meeting, Darmstadt Sébastien HEINI 10/03/2005.
CEA DSM Irfu 20 th october 2008 EuDet Annual Meeting Marie GELIN on behalf of IRFU – Saclay and IPHC - Strasbourg Zero Suppressed Digital Chip sensor for.
1 Development of the input circuit for GOSSIP vertex detector in 0.13 μm CMOS technology. Vladimir Gromov, Ruud Kluit, Harry van der Graaf. NIKHEF, Amsterdam,
Recent developments on Monolithic Active Pixel Sensors (MAPS) for charged particle tracking. Outline The MAPS sensor (reminder) MIMOSA-22, a fast MAPS-sensor.
Summary STS working group Design optimization STS (Strip) layout R&D (MAPS) Working packages.
Strasbourg, France, 17 December, 2004, seminairGrzegorz DEPTUCH  MAPS technology decoupled charge sensing and signal transfer (improved radiation.
J. Crooks STFC Rutherford Appleton Laboratory
Monolithic Active Pixel Sensors (MAPS) News from the MIMOSA serie Pierre Lutz (Saclay)
Valerio Re, Massimo Manghisoni Università di Bergamo and INFN, Pavia, Italy Jim Hoff, Abderrezak Mekkaoui, Raymond Yarema Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory.
Technology Overview or Challenges of Future High Energy Particle Detection Tomasz Hemperek
UK Activities on pixels. Adrian Bevan 1, Jamie Crooks 2, Andrew Lintern 2, Andy Nichols 2, Marcel Stanitzki 2, Renato Turchetta 2, Fergus Wilson 2. 1 Queen.
Thanushan Kugathasan, CERN Plans on ALPIDE development 02/12/2014, CERN.
BTeV Hybrid Pixels David Christian Fermilab July 10, 2006.
Irfu saclay Development of fast and high precision CMOS pixel sensors for an ILC vertex detector Christine Hu-Guo (IPHC) on behalf of IPHC (Strasbourg)
LCFI meeting 19 th August 2008 TESTING OF CPR2A Mirek Havranek, Peter Murray, Konstantin Stefanov, Stephen Thomas.
The development of the readout ASIC for the pair-monitor with SOI technology ~irradiation test~ Yutaro Sato Tohoku Univ. 29 th Mar  Introduction.
A Fast Monolithic Active Pixel Sensor with in Pixel level Reset Noise Suppression and Binary Outputs for Charged Particle Detection Y.Degerli 1 (Member,
Vertex 2008 July 28–August 1, 2008, Utö Island, Sweden CMOS pixel vertex detector at STAR Michal Szelezniak on behalf of: LBNL: E. Anderssen, L. Greiner,
M. Deveaux, CBM-Collaboration-Meeting, 25 – 28. Feb 2008, GSI-Darmstadt Considerations on the material budget of the CBM Micro Vertex Detector. Outline:
Prague, Marcel Trimpl, Bonn University DEPFET-Readout Concept for TESLA based on Current Mode Signal Processing Markus Schumacher on behalf.
Rutherford Appleton Laboratory Particle Physics Department G. Villani CALICE MAPS Siena October th Topical Seminar on Innovative Particle and.
COMETH*: a CMOS pixel sensor for a highly miniaturized high-flux radiation monitor Yang ZHOU, Jérôme Baudot, Christine Hu-Guo, Yann Hu, Kimmo Jaaskelainen,
BeamCal Electronics Status FCAL Collaboration Meeting LAL-Orsay, October 5 th, 2007 Gunther Haller, Dietrich Freytag, Martin Breidenbach and Angel Abusleme.
LHCb Vertex Detector and Beetle Chip
A. Dorokhov, IPHC, Strasbourg, France 1 Description of pixel designs in Mimosa22 Andrei Dorokhov Institut Pluridisciplinaire Hubert Curien (IPHC) Strasbourg,
-1-CERN (11/24/2010)P. Valerio Noise performances of MAPS and Hybrid Detector technology Pierpaolo Valerio.
MIMO  3 Preliminary Test Results. MIMOSTAR 2 16/05/2007 MimoStar3 Status Evaluation of MimoStar2 chip  Test in Laboratory.
Progress with GaAs Pixel Detectors K.M.Smith University of Glasgow Acknowledgements: RD8 & RD19 (CERN Detector R.&D. collaboration) XIMAGE (Aixtron, I.M.C.,
Eleuterio SpiritiILC Vertex Workshop, April On pixel sparsification architecture in 130nm STM technology ILC Vertex Workshop April 2008 Villa.
M. TWEPP071 MAPS read-out electronics for Vertex Detectors (ILC) A low power and low signal 4 bit 50 MS/s double sampling pipelined ADC M.
ASIC Development for Vertex Detector ’07 6/14 Y. Takubo (Tohoku university)
Fast Full Scale Sensors Development IPHC - IRFU collaboration MIMOSA-26, EUDET beam telescope Ultimate, STAR PIXEL detector Journées VLSI 2010 Isabelle.
Irfu saclay CMOS Pixel Sensor Development: A Fast Readout Architecture with Integrated Zero Suppression Christine HU-GUO on behalf of the IRFU and IPHC.
Pixel Sensors for the Mu3e Detector Dirk Wiedner on behalf of Mu3e February Dirk Wiedner PSI 2/15.
Andrei Nomerotski 1 Andrei Nomerotski, University of Oxford for LCFI collaboration LCWS2008, 17 November 2008 Column Parallel CCD and Raw Charge Storage.
Progress with GaAs Pixel Detectors
Nonvolatile memories:
3D CMOS monolithic 3-bit resolution pixel sensor with fast digital pipelined readout Olav Torheim, Yunan Fu, Christine Hu-Guo, Yann Hu, Marc Winter.
DCH FEE 28 chs DCH prototype FEE &
First Testbeam results
HV-MAPS Designs and Results I
HVCMOS Detectors – Overview
TCAD Simulation and test setup For CMOS Pixel Sensor based on a 0
Beam Test Results for the CMS Forward Pixel Detector
R&D of CMOS pixel Shandong University
Why silicon detectors? Main characteristics of silicon detectors:
Presentation transcript:

07 October 2004 Hayet KEBBATI -1- Data Flow Reduction and Signal Sparsification in MAPS Hayet KEBBATI (GSI/IReS)

07 October 2004 Hayet KEBBATI -2- Pixel Sensors applied to vertex detector  Hybrid Pixel Detectors  Fast readout and radiation hardness device,  Sizeable pixel pitch due to readout circuitry surface,  High material budget.  Charge Coupled Devices -CCD-  High density due to reduced pitch size,  Poor radiation hardness and long readout time.  Benefits from constant decrease of technology size  higher pitch density,  Can be thinned down to the thickness wanted => less material budget compared to hybrid devices,  Fast readout and radiation tolerant compared to CCD,  But radiation hardness always far behind hybrid devices,  Cost-effective and easily available CMOS Process.  Monolitic Active Pixel Sensors -MAPS-

07 October 2004 Hayet KEBBATI -3- System on a Chip (SoC) Signal Processing Part Sensor Digital Part Analog part Interface Part (ADC)  At the first Silicon tracking Station (5cm), particle densities have values up to 2 hits/mm².event,  Fast readout (100ns/event)  Huge data flow 1.6 Tera bits/sec (output size=1 bit),  Hit Extraction and data sparsification  Data flow of 8 Giga bits/sec  Implementation of on-chip processing forming a System on Chip  Parallel readout  40 transmission lines per reticle (20mmx20mm), Freq=200 MHz (output size=1 bits) CMOS Sensor -MAPS- : Data Flow Reduction

07 October 2004 Hayet KEBBATI -4- Control and address Electronics Fast signal processing and data sparsification  Signal digitalisation Storage threshold values needed during data sparsification Surface ratio (B 2 /B 1 ) must be as small as possible Matrix of Pixel Control ELN Sparcifi cation Memori- sation Smart Detector Reticle Band Height of non- sensitive part B2B2 Sensitive part Control and processing part ADC Band Height of sensitive part B1B1

07 October 2004 Hayet KEBBATI -5- Charge Sensitive Element : CDS with clamping capacitor architecture o nwell/p-epi diode biased by a bias forward diode to convert particle charge to voltage, o Noise sources : shot noise, FPN, flicker noise and thermal => CDS technique o On pixel CDS and amplification => good signal to noise ratio and T readout =100ns. VA Vclamp vdd gnd SF sample read clamp Cac Cclamp Csample Vx 2 diodes’s Self reverse bias charge sensitive element SF Vout

07 October 2004 Hayet KEBBATI -6- Signal Sparsification Method Hit 2 3 Steps : 1) Scanning clusters of 3x3 pixels 2) Compare pixels and clusters with seed threshold and cluster threshold value 3) Extract valid clusters seed_thre=7 mv cluster_thre=20 mv

07 October 2004 Hayet KEBBATI -7- Hit output = W pix. 5 + W adr (cluster 5) W pix R occ Flow Reduction RatioData Flow/Reticle 3 bits4%67%200 Giga bits/sec 8%33% 10%17% 4 bits4%70%240 Giga bits/sec 8%40% 10%25% Hit output = W pix. 2 + W adr (heavy center, processing part surface>>) W pix R occ Flow Reduction RatioData Flow/Reticle 3 bits4%79%128 Giga bits/sec 8%57% 10%47% 4 bits4%82%144 Giga bits/sec 8%64% 10%55% Data Flow with On-chip Processing R occ is the hit occupancy rate = number of hits / total number of pixels W adr is the binary length of the address of the pixel position W pix is the binary length of the signal corresponding to the pixel voltage

07 October 2004 Hayet KEBBATI rows 1000 columns bits ADC Seed pixel and cluster Comparisons Cluster Extraction Threshold values Memorisation Sub-bloc Detector Structure Pitch = 20 µm  Pixel Readout time = 100ns => Readout time = 10 µs => occupancy rate up to 8% at station 1 closest to the beam  Column parallel readout,  Digitalization of the output data of each column (3 bits ADC). (2 mm) (20 mm) Sensitive part Control and processing part

07 October 2004 Hayet KEBBATI OR Gates Tree FSM FIFO 8 ADC counter OR Gates Tree FSM FIFO 8 ADC 200 MHz 50 MHz 10 MHz  Surface = 20mm 2  Processing surface to sensitive surface ratio=1/2 Data Sparsification Implementation results (0.35 µm)

07 October 2004 Hayet KEBBATI -10- row decoder column decoder column mux, write buffers, sense amplifiers, DRAM cell write bit line gnd read bit line 3 T DRAM 3.5 x 5.5  m = 2.5 x 3.92 SDRAM Memory Strucure adr write data pre read adr data valid data Write Cycle Read Cycle

07 October 2004 Hayet KEBBATI -11- Memory of 512x26 bits in 0.25µm technology Regular layout with silicon surface saving Test data maintain time in DRAM cells Test of circuit behavior under radiation : number and type of errors  detection and correction bits Surface : 320µmx930µm Access delay : 2.5 ns Power dissipation: 7 mW SDRAM Implementation Results

07 October 2004 Hayet KEBBATI -12- Summary  Real-time data processing  Readout time = 10µs => hit occupancy rate up to 8% in worst case  Processing surface to sensitive surface ratio = ½  To improve the ratio : 1.Increase the pitch  hit occupancy rate rise 2.Parallel readout by 2 rows  High power dissipation  SDRAM design in 0.25 µm technology  Surface = 320µmx930µm  Access time = 2.5 ns Options to reduce hit occupancy:  Optimize STS geometry to avoid hot spots ? Use hybrid pixels in the hottest area