Michael R. Walker Research Director IGCC Financing Project Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University PH: 720.842.5345, FX: 720.851.5784

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Energy in the U.S. - Why Wind? Financing Wind Power: The Future of Energy Institute for Professional and Executive Development Santa Fe, N.M. July 25,
Advertisements

Leaders in the design, implementation and operation of markets for electricity, gas and water. Portfolio Generation Investment Under Uncertainty Michael.
Grenada Sustainable Energy Plan Stakeholders Meeting April 5, 2002.
OHIO ENERGY POLICY PROGRESS & REVIEW UCEAO 6 th Annual Conference Securing Ohio’s Energy and Economic Future THE BEST OF TIMES, THE WORST OF TIMES: ADVANCED.
NARUC 2015 Winter Meeting February 16, 2015 Combined Heat and Power and the Clean Power Plan Bruce Hedman Institute for Industrial Productivity.
Tenth Annual Midwest Energy Conference March 7, 2007 How Best Satisfy Midwest Electric Load Growth? Thomas R. Casten Chairman Recycled Energy Development.
Coal Gasification : A PRB Overview Mark Davies – Kennecott Energy Outline Background – Our Interest History – Development of IGCC Current status – Commercial.
Energy Efficiency and Arizona’s Energy Future Jeff Schlegel Southwest Energy Efficiency Project (SWEEP) April
Darden School Social Responsibility and Entrepreneurship April 2, 2007 Recycling Energy: Profitably Mitigating Climate Change Tom Casten Chair, Recycled.
Brownfields: Emerging Issues in Redevelopment The Economics of Green Presented to: Rutgers, New Jersey Agricultural Experiment Station September 16, 2008.
Connecticut’s Energy Future Removing Barriers to Promote Energy Sustainability: Public Policy and Financing December 2, 2004 Legislative Office Building.
1. What Do We Know About Our Energy and Climate Policy? John W. Rowe Chairman and CEO, Exelon Corporation Grand Challenges of the 21 st Century Conference.
William G. Rosenberg 79 John F. Kennedy Street Center for Business & Government Belfer Center for Science & International Affairs Kennedy School of Government,
1 Jesse Jenkins (RNP) November 7th, 2006 Northwest Energy: A Look at the Past, Present and Future of Electricity Generation in the Pacific Northwest.
Prospero LLC December 2, 2004 Connecticut’s Energy Future Financing Sustainable Energy.
Slide 1 Policy Alternatives to Stimulate Private Sector Investment in Domestic Alternative Fuels Wally Tyner with assistance from Dileep Birur, Justin.
William G. Rosenberg 79 John F. Kennedy Street Center for Business & Government Belfer Center for Science & International Affairs Kennedy School of Government,
1 Colossal Mistake—Long-term Price Projections $3 $6 $9 $12 $ $/mmBtu Natural Gas Oil.
Wind Turbines: Power for a House or City *many slides from L. Sankar.
Katrina Pielli U.S. Environmental Protection Agency CHP Partnership
China’s Sustainable Energy Policy
Triennial Plan 2: Legal Framework. About Us  Efficiency Maine is an independent trust – Accounts and administrative responsibilities transferred from.
Arguments Against Nuclear Power Development in Iran May, 2003.
Challenges to the Development and Commercialization of CCS Cheyenne A. Alabanzas 2009 ASME Intern University of Alaska – Anchorage.
CHEAPER AND CLEANER: Using the Clean Air Act to Sharply Reduce Carbon Pollution from Existing Power Plants, Delivering Health, Environmental and Economic.
The Potential for Increased Cooperation on Offshore Wind among the Northeast States Warren Leon, Executive Director.
Page 1 3/13 – Lynchburg 4/23 – Fredericksburg 3/28 – Charlottesville 4/12 – Danville.
Energy Policy Levers. 2 State as a Taxing Authority Income tax credits or deductions Income tax credits or deductions Residential Alternative Energy Tax.
WORKSHOP ON TECHNOLOGY PATHWAYS FORWARD FOR CARBON CAPTURE & STORAGE ON NATURAL GAS POWER SYSTEMS April 22, 2014 Revis W. James Director, Generation R&D.
Dr. Fatih Birol Chief Economist Head, Economic Analysis Division International Energy Agency / OECD WORLD ENERGY INVESTMENT OUTLOOK.
Renewable Energy: Legal and Policy Issues Frank Prager Vice President, Environmental Policy Xcel Energy November 20, 2009 Frank Prager Vice President,
Terra-Gen Power, LLC California Renewables Portfolio Standards: Challenges and Opportunities CCPUC Annual Meeting October 5, 2009.
The Policy Voice for Energy Storage Bulk Energy Storage for the Nation’s Electricity Grid Jason Makansi, Executive Director President, Pearl Street Inc.
A Balanced Energy Plan for Alaska’s Railbelt Opportunities for End-Use Efficiency/Conservation and Renewable Energy Prepared for the Alaska Clean.
1 Rudolph/Libbe Solar. 2 Our Perspective on Solar in Ohio  Ohio has the foundation for rapid solar growth (distributed generation) – Existing electrical.
Financing New Nuclear: The Government’s Role in the Nuclear Renaissance John Hanson The Ohio State University American Nuclear Society, WISE Intern August.
Wind Energy Development In Illinois William S. Haas Energy Division Representative.
Biofuels - Systems Integrator Perspective Lockheed Martin Helping shape our energy future Stephen Klotz, PhDApril 21, 2011 Copyright © 2011 by Lockheed.
1 Are We Ready For The Future? 2005 NIPPC Annual Meeting September 8, 2005 Michael R. Niggli President, Sempra Generation.
Technology options under consideration for reducing GHG emissions SUSTAINABLE ENERGY ROUNDTABLE SERIES: Next Steps Post-Kyoto: U.S. Options January 13,
Financing the Capex Cycle: A Wall Street Perspective Maryland – District of Columbia Utilities Association 84 th Annual Fall Conference September 26, 2008.
LONG TERM ELECTRICAL SUPPLY PLAN STAFF RESPONSE TO QUESTIONS, ISSUES, AND RECOMMENDATIONS MADE IN NOVEMBER 2004 Presentation to the Gainesville City Commission.
Retro-fitting Commercial Buildings A Financing Perspective Date: April 2011 Prepared by: Carbon Solutions Group.
NARUC Joint Session, Committees on Electricity and Gas Ellen Lapson, CFA February 19, 2008.
Investing in America’s Electric Future Morry Markowitz Group Director, External Affairs New Mexico Utility Shareholders Alliance October 7, 2009.
Designing Utility Regulation to Promote Investment in Cost-Effective Energy Efficiency Dale S. Bryk Natural Resources Defense Council Pennsylvania.
1 Clean Line Energy National Association of State Utility Consumer Advocates Charleston SC Annual Meeting June 2012.
Combined Heat and Power Workshop Report and Next Steps Power Committee Briefing 7/15/03.
THE LONG-TERM ENERGY SUPPLY AND DEMAND OUTLOOK IN TAIWAN ENERGY COMMISSION MINISTRY OF ECONOMIC AFFAIRS AUGUST 2001 MOEA -15-
Weyerhaeuser CHP Project NWPPC CHP Roundtable June 24, 2003.
E8-GEF-UNDESA-UNESCAP Financing Sustainable Electrification HCB Initiative South-East Asia Dialogues, September 8-10, 2009, Bangkok, Thailand e8-GEF-UNDESA-UNESCAP.
Construction of Coal-Fired Generation: Evaluating the Utility Credit Implications Ellen Lapson, Managing Director Fitch Ratings, Utilities, Power & Gas.
1. Sustainable Development. International commitment. COORDINATION. A LONG-TERM VISSION. Policies Enhance the economic growth. Certainty and Economic.
Livable Delaware Energy Task Force - the Key to Energy and Environmental Co-Benefits.
Selected Geothermal Resource Topics from a Utility Perspective Geothermal Power Generation Workshop May 11, 2003 Ken Dragoon PacifiCorp
Wind Denmark Energy Annual Event 2015 Financing of companies within the wind industry from a bank perspective Torben André Petersen, Head of Branch Region.
Ayumi Konishi Director General, East Asia Department Asian Development Bank CCICED Annual General Meeting 2015 Forum G20 and Green Finance 11 November.
Environmental Benefits of Renewable Portfolio Standards in an Age of Coal Plant Retirements September 10 th, 2015 Energy Policy Research Conference Denver,
Generation Subcommittee, Day Two Arne Olson Energy & Environmental Economics, Inc. (E3) Presented to: Subcommittee on Generation Resources Boise, Idaho.
Residential Solar Investment Program Installer Discussion Solar Installer Meetings June 26-27, 2012.
Market Failures Chapter 7 Sections 2 and 3 Economic Solutions to Global Warming.
WGA TRANSPORTATION FUELS FOR THE FUTURE INITIATIVE Electricity Report Summary Bob Graham, Electric Team Lead Transportation Fuels for the Future Workshop.
The Case for IGCC Kay Pashos President, Duke Energy Indiana MARC 2006 Annual Meeting June 20, 2006.
Wind Project Ownership - An Investor Owned Utility Perspective John R
Energy Services Company Models: Opportunities for Transit
Wind Project Ownership - An Investor Owned Utility Perspective John R
Energy Services Company Models: Opportunities for Transit
Renewable Energy Project Investments
Wind Development & Policy Options
How Small Developers and EPC Contractors Can Add PPA Financing to their Arsenals John Langhus, VP Business Development Midwest Solar Expo 2019 New Energy.
Presentation transcript:

Michael R. Walker Research Director IGCC Financing Project Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University PH: , FX: Financing IGCC for Near-Term Deployment September 2004 Report available at:

Financing IGCC 2 Kennedy School IGCC Financing Project Sponsors:  DOE (NETL)  EPA (Clean Air Markets)  National Commission on Energy Policy  Packard Foundation June 03’—began study to develop financing program to stimulate IGCC deployment Feb. 04’—draft working paper & IGCC financing symposium at Harvard July 04’—final report: Deploying IGCC in this Decade with 3Party Covenant Financing Fall 04’—follow-up IGCC symposium, ongoing dialogue, issue papers, implementing legislation

Financing IGCC 3 IGCC financing project objectives Access to capital Share advanced technology risks Produce competitively priced energy Minimize federal costs  Deploy half-dozen IGCC plants in this decade

Financing IGCC 4 IGCC deployment rationale Abundant domestic coal resource  Energy & national security  Energy independence Low cost electricity for economic growth Relieve natural gas price pressure Lower air pollutant emissions Less water consumption and waste Technical pathway for carbon control Foundation technology for hydrogen economy Reconcile coal use and environmental protection

Financing IGCC 5 50, , , , , , 's1960's1970's1980's1990's'00-'02 Fuel Type MW Historic U.S. capacity additions

Financing IGCC 6 Natural gas price volatility Average Delivered Fuel Prices to U.S. Electric Generators

Financing IGCC 7 IGCC deployment obstacles Economics  Higher capital cost (~20% higher than PC)  Higher kWh energy cost  Public, not private benefits Perceived Technology Risks  Construction overruns (EPC wrap?)  Reliable performance (limited track record) Access to Capital  Wall Street skepticism  S&P utility credit rating from A to BBB (just above junk status) Environmentalist skepticism  Renewable & conservation priority  “Anti-coal” opposition

Financing IGCC 8 3-Party Covenant PUC Approved Revenue Stream Owner 20% Equity Investment Federal 80% Debt Guarantee IGCC Deployment

Financing IGCC 9 Federal loan guarantees Access to low-cost financing with favorable terms  Lower cost debt  Higher debt/equity ratio IGCC economic competitiveness  38% lower cost of capital  25% lower cost of energy Foundation for risk sharing  Federal government  State PUC/ ratepayers  EPC contractor/technology vendors  Owner

Financing IGCC 10 Traditional Utility Financing 80% Federal Loan Guarantee 45% Equity (18.6%) 80% Debt (5.5%) 20% Equity (18.6%) Pre-tax weighted cost of capital: 11.9% Pre-tax weighted cost of capital: 8.1% Cost of capital with 80% federal loan guarantee 55% Debt (6.5%)

Financing IGCC 11 IGCC cost of energy with guarantee

Financing IGCC 12 PC vs. IGCC cost of energy with guarantee

Financing IGCC 13 Loan guarantee risk mitigation—3Party Covenant Prohibitive risk and cost without protection  Budget scoring based on risk of default  Without risk mitigation scoring could be as high as 100% Assured revenue stream to reduce federal risk  Upfront & ongoing determinations of prudence  Approval of timely pass-through  Project cost or power purchase agreement  IOU, Muni, Coop Alternative credit enhancement  Insurance  Corporate credit  Other

Financing IGCC 14 Federal budget cost Budget Cost of 1 cent/kWh equivalent incentive (3,500 MW of IGCC)

Financing IGCC 15 State PUC participation Benefits  Low cost base load power  Low air emissions  Hedge against future CO 2  Promote long-term sustainable coal use  Local coal and jobs Ratepayer protections  Transparent PUC process  10% construction and operating reserve fund  15% line of credit  EPC performance guarantees  Gasifier redundancy

Financing IGCC 16 NGCC refueling opportunity Convert to base load plant  Establish need for base load power net of new PC  Long-term power purchase agreement  Inclusion by PUC in rates New valuation  Base load vs. cycling  80% vs. 20% operations  Potentially par value Financing  80% federally guaranteed debt  Existing plant becomes equity contribution  Equity that remains in earns regulated 11.5 after tax return  Surplus equity withdrawn