European Cities in the World City Network, 2010 Peter Taylor

Background Globalization as space of flows World/global cities as nodes Interlocking network model Indirect measurement Service values matrix Network connectivities Network structure

Intensive globalization strategy COMMAND CITIES: New York Chicago 1.9 – London Pittsburgh Los Angeles 1.3 – Toronto 1.1 – Boston 0.8 – Philadelphia 0.7 – Miami 0.7 – Washington 0.6 – Columbus 0.6 – Detroit 0.5 – Baltimore 0.5 – San Francisco 0.4 – Seattle 0.4 – Charlotte 0.4 – Seoul Dallas

Extensive globalization strategy COMMAND CITIES: 8.2 – New York 3.3 – London 1.9 – Chicago 1.1 – Paris Brussels

Pacific Asian strategy COMMAND CITIES: 5.3 – Tokyo 1.9 – Beijing 1.2 – Seoul 0.9 – London 0.7 – Singapore 0.5 – Paris 0.5 – Melbourne Toronto

Americas strategy COMMAND CITIES: 4.7 – New York 1.0 – Toronto 0.6 – Chicago 0.6 – Dublin 0.5 – Atlanta 0.5 – Charlotte 0.5 – Brussels 0.5 – Zurich 0.5 – Boston 0.4 – Baltimore 0.4 – London Dallas

European Strategy COMMAND CITIES: 3.1 – London Milan 1.0 – Boston 1.0 – Madrid 0.7 – Munich 0.5 – Trieste 0.5 – Frankfurt 0.5 – Turin 0.5 – Paris 0.5 – Istanbul 0.4 – Chicago Florence

Australian/Commonwealth strategy COMMAND CITIES: 1.5 – Sydney 1.3 – Melbourne 0.6 – Munich 0.5 – Johannesburg London

Latin American strategy COMMAND CITIES: 1.3 – Sao Paulo 0.9 – Madrid Brasilia

Canada/Commonwealth strategy COMMAND CITIES: 1.6 – Toronto 0.6 – Boston Mumbai

Scandinavian strategy COMMAND CITIES: 1.3 – Stockholm Oslo

China strategy COMMAND CITIES: 0.7 – Shenzhen 0.7 – Shanghai 0.5 – Beijing 0.4 – Florence Singapore