Step Change in Safety Elected Safety Representative Network February 2nd 2011

Workforce representation Offshore Industry Advisory Committee [OIAC] Sub-committee – Workforce Involvement Group [WIG] Step Change Leadership Team [SCLT] Sub-committee – Workforce Engagement Group [WEG]

Inspection Template Heavily based on regulations 5 sections Safety Representatives (SR’s), constituencies & election process etc Functions and powers of SR’s Safety committees Duties of installation operators and owners, and employers Time off and training Room for comment and conclusion Space to collect examples of good practice Findings reported & coded using standard HSE ‘traffic light system’

Traffic Light System Action Taken Resulting From Intervention Activity Compliance Level Outcome Status ‘Traffic Light’ No findings or General compliance 1 Verbal advice 2 SPC/ENF/166 format letter issued identifying breaches and requiring action to be taken. No significant change made to intervention plan to follow-up issues (eg follow-up via future planned intervention activity) Partial Compliance 3 SPC/ENF/166 format letter issued identifying breaches and requiring action to be taken. Changes made to intervention plan to follow-up the issues (eg additional un-planned intervention activity) And/or Enforcement Notices considered but not served (eg EMM dutyholder factors modified initial enforcement expectation General non-compliance 4 Enforcement Notice Served Significant Non Compliance 5 Court proceedings recommended Sugnificant Non Compliancce 6

Scope and Coverage Each Duty Holder (DH) at least once Representative sample of installations – large / small / old / new / production / drilling / flotel / NUI etc. Inspections: May – October 2010 Conclusions: December 2010

The story so far… 38 inspections covering 25 DH’s 18 inspections resulted in formal letters addressing partial compliance 14 inspections resulted in verbal advice where minor improvements would secure full compliance No findings reported on 6 installations

TOPIC ASSESSMENT CONCLUSION Platform ID SECTION 1 SECTION 2 SECTION 3 SECTION 4 SECTION 5 Inspection Outcome 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24

TOPIC ASSESSMENT CONCLUSION (CONTINUED) Platform ID SECTION 1 SECTION 2 SECTION 3 SECTION 4 SECTION 5 Inspection Outcome 25 1 2 26 27 3 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38

RECOMMENDED FURTHER TRAINING FOR SAFETY REPRESENTATIVES WIG AGREED TRAINING APPROVED BY OIAC Reason Training Available/Duration Is there a Standard? Providers Risk Assessment Principles are covered in the SI971Course but it is recognized that further enhanced training in the operation of Risk Assessments is required by Safety Representatives YES One day NO Multiple Major Hazard Awareness (Generic) In order to increase understanding of MHA and its impact on the Revised Safety Case. 1 – 2 days. Development of Safety Inspection and Auditing Skills In order to improve and develop on the SI 971 Basic Training Combined Training;- Root Cause Analysis Accident and Incident Investigation Requirement has been identified in order ensure Safety Representatives are fully conversant with the principles when engaged in Investigations. 2 Days