Highway Location Study CE 453 Lecture 4 See also lab 2 and lab 4 instructions, and EIS lecture notes See also 04 DOT development process.doc Refs:

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
County of Fairfax, Virginia Department of Transportation Review and Discussion of Draft Scope of Work for Study of Issues Associated with Increasing Transportation.
Advertisements

Great Western Corridor Feasibility Study
NORTH HOUSTON HIGHWAY IMPROVEMENT PROJECT Environmental Impact Statement and Preliminary Engineering Public Scoping Meeting Tuesday, November 15, 2011,
Environmental Scoping Guidance Jerry Vogt Region Environmental Coordinator ODOT – Region 3.
080820_v1DP TRAVEL MANAGEMENT - PROCESS ON THE GILA NATIONAL FOREST.
A Highway Corridor Planning Process for NEPA Compliance Using Quantm Goose Creek Canyon Bypass Case Study A Unique Approach to Corridor Planning.
Farmlands Office Of Environmental Services Managing the Environmental and Project Development Process Presented by the Ohio Department of Transportation.
Gateway National Recreation Area Jamaica Bay Transportation Studies at Floyd Bennett Field, Jacob Riis Park, Riis Landing, and the Former Pennsylvania.
NEPA and Property Acquisition May 19, 2014 Elizabeth Patel Environmental Protection Specialist FTA Office of Planning and Environment.
Friends of the Fox River November 9, 2014 Longmeadow Parkway Fox River Bridge Corridor.
New I-65 Interchange at Worthsville Road Welcome!.
From KY 89 at the northern city limits of McKee to the recently improved section of US 421 just north of the Jackson-Rockcastle County line. Six-Year Highway.
Environmental Assessment Public Meeting
Route 28 South of I-66 Corridor Safety and Operations Study Technical Committee Meeting #2 June 25,
U.S. 31 at CR 400 South Roundabout Information Meeting December 18, 2013 Clifty Creek Elementary Columbus, Indiana.
Urban transportation planning process. Urban Transportation Planning Vital to an area ’ s economic and social health by moving people and goods (sometimes.
Longmeadow Parkway Fox River Bridge Corridor
Lec 20, Ch.11: Transportation Planning Process (objectives)
© 2003 TranSystems Corporation Advisory Committee Meeting January 19, 2010.
Introduction Transportation System Objectives : Military; Knit together the inhabitants of a territory by providing mutual access and communication; Economic.
 Life in communities has changed over the years.  One of those changes is in transportation. Transportation is a way of moving people or things from.
Texas Department of Transportation Corpus Christi District Harbor Bridge Project U.S. 181 (Harbor Bridge)/SH 286 (Crosstown Expressway) Agency Scoping.
Other Environmental Issues U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Noise Endangered and Threatened Species Explosive/Flammable Hazards and Underground.
Barrington Road at Jane Addams Memorial Tollway (Interstate 90) Interchange Improvement Study Hoffman Estates Village Hall June 27, 2012.
Lecture Six Radu ANDREI, PhD, P.E., Professor of Civil Engineering
Meeting Agenda Stakeholder Participation Panel July 14, 2003 Welcome/Introductions Study Overview Tasks/Products/Schedule Traffic Patterns Break Key Project.
Planning for Travel and Transportation Management National Training Center Course # Unit Two Planning Processes.
Presented by: The Ohio Department of Transportation 1 Land Use Managing the Environmental & Project Development Process.
Pipeline Route Selection. Safety Minute What is a Typical Pipeline Project? There is no typical pipeline project since each pipeline project takes on.
1 Context Sensitive Design CE 453 Highway Design Iowa State University Howard R. Green Company.
Highway Route Surveys And Location
1 C E T A S Purpose and Need Presentation Date Project Name Project location (city, county) ODOT Key Number:
1 C E T A S Triage Presentation, Date Project Name Project location (city, county) ODOT Key Number:
April 9, 2011 Mike Wieszchowski, P.E., PTOE Professional Traffic Operations Engineer Road Use Planning Guidelines to Protect Your Roadways.
Introduction Session 01 Matakuliah: S0753 – Teknik Jalan Raya Tahun: 2009.
TRACECA PROJECT EVALUATION. Construction of Unguri-Bronitsa border crossing point and access roads from Ukraine and Moldova.
1 Implementing the Concepts Environment Pre-Conference Workshop TRB MPOs Present and Future Conference August 27, 2006 Michael Culp FHWA Office of Project.
Welcome Opportunity to Learn – Public, Groups, Agencies and FS Patience Respect Ask.
RECONSTRUCTION OF County Route 1, Golden Shores Pkwy & Oatman Highway Public Information Meeting Golden Shores Senior Center Tuesday, June 3, 2015.
Texas Department of Transportation Corpus Christi District Harbor Bridge Project U.S. 181 (Harbor Bridge)/SH 286 (Crosstown Expressway) Citizens Advisory.
USA Parkway Project Welcome Public Information Meeting to the
Metropolitan Planning Organization for Blair County (Altoona MSA) Regional Long Range Transportation Plan Draft Agency Coordination Meeting (ACM)
Transportation Corridor Preservation and The Official Map Act.
Public Involvement Meeting December 10,  Introduce the project  Explain the benefits of the project  Discuss tasks completed since last public.
Comprehensive Plan Update. General, far-reaching vision to benefit the whole community Takes a long term view of issues Focuses on physical development.
REMOTE SENSING and the CSX RAIL RELOCATION EIS NCRST-E GICAP 2002 Workshop Session 3.
State Route 109 (Portland Bypass) Robertson & Sumner County, TN NEPA Public Hearing November 12, 2015.
Traditional Project Development Process ConstructionPlanningNEPA Design ROW CE, EIS, EA Location and Design Concept approval.
Context Sensitive Solutions Focus Group Session Lynn Purnell Parsons Brinckerhoff Prosperity Church Road Corridor December 8, 2005.
HIGHWAY DESIGN PROCESS & ROUTE LOCATION Spring 2016.
Urban Bicycle Networks Throughout Virginia I. Introduction This multimodal investment network is the incorporation of four urban bicycle studies and plans.
I-66 Corridor Improvements Morteza Farajian Interstate 66 Corridor Improvements From US Route 15 in Prince William County To Interstate 495 in Fairfax.
Texas Department of Transportation Corpus Christi District U.S. 181 (Harbor Bridge) Environmental Documentation and Schematic Development Citizens’ Advisory.
Geometric Design: General Concept CE331 Transportation Engineering.
Texas Department of Transportation Corpus Christi District U.S. 181 Harbor Bridge Project Environmental Documentation and Schematic Development Public.
Introductions Army Corps of Engineers Metro Parks Mayor’s Office HDR Engineering, Inc.
RIVERSTONE CONNECTION STUDY Task Force Meeting #4 June 19, 2013.
Secondary & Cumulative Effects Analysis Training Program Module 1: How to Determine Which Resources Should be Considered in a SCEA How to identify what.
Iron Range Tourism Bureau April 25, 2013 Hwy 53 Update.
PAC Meeting July 2, Agenda  Introductions and thanks  Project to date  Next steps  Questions.
CE 360Dr SaMeH1 Environmental Eng. 1 (CE 360) Associate Professor of Environmental Eng. Civil Engineering Department Engineering College Majma’ah University.
Texas Department of Transportation Corpus Christi District U.S. 181 Harbor Bridge Project Environmental Documentation and Schematic Development Citizens.
Alternative Alignments Public Meeting
Technical and Public Advisory Committee Meeting #3
Draft Transportation Element September 6, 2017
Overview What is the CEQA environmental review process?
Route Location 01 Reference: Nicholas J. Garber, Lester A. Hoel, TRAFFIC AND HIGHWAY ENGINEERING, Fourth Edition Ch. 14, page 691.
Introduction to transportation system
HIGHWAY DESIGN PROCESS & ROUTE LOCATION
Chicago to Council Bluffs-Omaha
Presentation transcript:

Highway Location Study CE 453 Lecture 4 See also lab 2 and lab 4 instructions, and EIS lecture notes See also 04 DOT development process.doc Refs: Virginia Location Planning Ref. Wisconsin Law Iowa DOT Office of Location and Environment

Basic Principles for Hwy Location Roadway elements (curvature, grade, etc) must blend with each other to produce a system that provides for the easy flow of traffic at the design capacity, while meeting design criteria and safety standards. Should cause minimal disruption to historic and archeological sites and other land-use activities Garber and Hoel, 2002

Factors Considered in the Location Process Topography Social and demographic (including land use and zoning patterns) Terrain and soil conditions Garber and Hoel, 2002

Factors Considered in the Location Process Directness of route Serviceability of route to industrial and population areas Crossing of other transportation facilities (roads, railroads, rivers) –Intersect other roads at right angle Garber and Hoel, 2002

Factors Considered in the Location Process Environmental –Animal habitat –Location of recreational, historic and archeological sites –Noise, air, and water pollution Garber and Hoel, 2002

Factors Considered in the Location Process Economic –Construction –Maintenance costs –Road user costs –Road user benefits (i.e. travel time) –Adverse effects such as dislocation of people or businesses Garber and Hoel, 2002

Factors Considered in the Location Process Iowa DOT considers safety in the planning stage as well –i.e. paved shoulders Garber and Hoel, 2002

Location Steps Identify corridor limits Identify 3 classes of geographic constraint –No-build, somewhat sensitive, potential use Define alternative alignments – each one different to satisfy EIS requirements

Avoid or minimize impact on … Recreation and parks Public utilities Neighborhoods Religious institutions, cemeteries

Avoid or minimize impact on … Ecologically sensitive areas Natural and historical landmarks Businesses

Nice example of a project web site – PennDOT See “mapping” and other nice features of project web site

HOW IS HIGHWAY LOCATION DETERMINED? When Your Land Is Needed For Highway Use Author: Stephen D. Holowach 7/23/99 It is PennDOT’s goal to establish the most direct and useable highway facility at the least possible cost to the public. To accomplish this, PennDOT undertakes intensive studies on several possible routes in order to find the route that will result in the least possible inconvenience or injury to the public and the private landowner. Statistical data concerning the economy, population needs and traffic volume trends are analyzed for the area under study. Aerial and ground surveys are made, and consideration is given to such factors as safety, drainage and soil types. In addition, public meetings are held to discuss the proposed alternate locations.

RIGHT-OF-WAY? Right-of-Way is the term used to describe the right to pass over another’s land. When the Commonwealth acquires land for Highway Purposes it is actually obtaining “Right-of-Way” over land on which a public road ultimately will be built. It is a Constitutional right of the Commonwealth to acquire land for public purposes The term used to describe this right to acquire land, is “Eminent Domain”. Eminent Domain states that it is the inherent right of the State to acquire land when it is needed for public use. The Pennsylvania Department of Transportation will execute this right only when it will benefit the public.

What does a location study include? (VDOT) coalfieldprocess.asp coalfieldprocess.asp coalfieldprocess.asp Starting a location study involves fully defining the project, or "scoping" as it is often called. This process is an opportunity to identify issues and obtain comments from agencies, jurisdictions and the public early in the planning process. A "purpose and need" statement and the goals and objectives of the Location Study will be developed.

What does a location study include? (VDOT) coalfieldprocess.asp Alternatives Identification VDOT's Study Team will use technical data such as traffic counts and aerial mapping and early environmental evaluations to develop several possible road locations, or alternatives, within the Coalfields Expressway Study corridor. The goal of this phase is to identify reasonable alternatives that consider the input provided from communities, businesses and individuals as well as regional concerns. In developing alternatives, the Study Team will consider a number of new locations as well as upgrades of existing roads such as Virginia Route 83. The team will look at the deficiencies of the existing transportation network, including safety concerns and any planned improvements along the study corridor.

See also: