Numbers we have to report AND Goals we have to set 14a. Successful student course completion rate for the fall 2012 semester 14b. Institution-set standard.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Cedarville University Accreditation Self-Study Plan Presented by Dr. Thomas Mach.

Advertisements

Academic Program and Unit Review at UIS Office of the Provost Fall 2014.

Instructor Teaching Impact. University Writing Program 150 sections of required writing courses per semester, taught by Instructors and GTAs 33 Instructors–

CHANGING THE EQUATION Preparing the Final Proposal.

Periodic Department Review A System of Affirmation LaMont Rouse Executive Director of Assessment, Accreditation & Compliance.

Develop Framework Library Self Study Strategic Directions & Prep of Self-study Report External Review & Report Final Report to Provost & Associate Provost,

Critical Book Review Due Dates March 3 rd -1 pg summary due (what you have read to this date, not the whole book)- 25pts March 10 th –Project proposal.

College of Education Graduate Programs Portfolio Workshop.

Key Communities and Objectives Outcomes- Based Assessment Telling the Story Results Closing the Loop.

Accreditation Update COLLEGE of Alameda Spring 2015.

First Draft Proposals at Classified Senate

Training for Implementation of CEC§ Creating AA-T and AS-T (SB 1440 Transfer Degrees) Spring 2011 February 1, 2011.

The Pathway to Success Enhance the Quality of Life of Staff and Faculty Goal 6 – Initiative 1.

WTCS Framework for Student Success WTCS Board Meeting March

Orientation for Academic Program Reviews

SOAR – Preparing for Launch Task Force Information January 2015.

GROWING LEADERS Opportunity. Engagement. Achievement. SSSP + SEP Steering Committee: August 26, 2014 Kathy Mendelsohn, Mark Sanchez, Brian.

SOAR – Preparing for Launch Author Information January 2015.

The Institutional Effectiveness Plan An Excellent Way to Convey Evidence of Assessment Ellen M. Boylan, Ph.D. Marywood University NEAIR – 33 rd Annual.

Periodic Program Review for Academics Affirming Excellence in Education LaMont Rouse Executive Director of Assessment, Accreditation & Compliance.

Strategic Directions at BC, Committee Presentations, Spring 2015 Kate Pluta, lead Liz Rozell, Academic Affairs Grace Commiso, Student Affairs.

Open Forum Educational Master Plan (EMP) Toyon Room June 4, 2015 E. Kuo FH IR&P.

Accreditation Update COLLEGE of Alameda Fall 2014.

CONTEXT FOR ACADEMIC STRATEGIC PLANNING AT UM Foundation for upcoming Accreditation process Identify key issues and opportunities to address over the next.

ESU’s NSSE 2013 Overview Joann Stryker Office of Institutional Research and Assessment University Senate, March 2014.

National Commission for Academic Accreditation & Assessment Developmental Reviews at King Saud University and King Faisal University.

NSSE 2013 How to Use Results (or “Why you should care about NSSE”) 8/26/

A Multi-Campus Model for Program Review & Integrated Institutional Planning Raúl Rodriguez, Ph.D., Chancellor 1.

Drake Curriculum Assessment Wabash Memo NSSE 2013 Results + Senior Focus Groups Report to Faculty Senate February 19, 2014 Kevin Saunders Stephanie Majeran.

Columbia University School of Engineering and Applied Science Review and Planning Process Fall 1998.

Curriculum at SCC and Role of the Senate Presented by Craig Rutan and Joyce Wagner SCC Academic Senate Fall 2013 Retreat.

+ using Integrated Planning & Budget In a Participatory Governance Context Realizing our Foothill Vision 20/20.

2013 Common Block Development Evaluation and Feedback February 26, 2014.

College of Education Graduate Programs

Measures and Targets For PVCC Strategic Plan PVCC New Life Sciences Building Fall 2009.

Northwest Accreditation. Sandra Elman Visit ( ) General Recommendations  pages maximum  3 major themes for all chapters (standards) Descriptive.

Assessment Committee 20 October Self Evaluation HAPS is the result of a process that began in 2012, the last Accreditation self- evaluation.

Committee on University Effectiveness Working Group on Institutional Assessment April 8, 2011.

SPC Advisory Committee Training - TAC Fall 2015 Institutional Research President’s Office 1 Abridged from the SPC Advisory Committee Training on October.

SPC Advisory Committee Training Fall 2015 Institutional Research President’s Office SPC 10/9/20151.

Program Review 2.0 Pilot 2 October Self Evaluation HAPS is the result of a process that began in 2012, the last Accreditation self- evaluation.

Program Review 2.0 Pilot 2 October Self Evaluation HAPS is the result of a process that began in 2012, the last Accreditation self- evaluation.

Measuring University Outreach and Engagement: CSLCE End of Semester Survey Nicole C. Springer Center for Service-Learning and Civic Engagement Michigan.

CONTEXT FOR ACADEMIC STRATEGIC PLANNING AT UM Foundation for upcoming Accreditation process Identify key issues and opportunities to address over the next.

Accreditation Update Self-Study Progress and Review MPC Flex Days Spring 2015.

Time to answer critical and inter-related questions: Whom will we serve? What will we offer? How will we serve them?

Educational Master Plan (EMP) Summer Timeline (Phase II) July 29, 2015 E. Kuo FH IR&P.

Educational Master Plan (EMP) Summer Timeline (Phase II) July 29, 2015 revised August 18, 2015 E. Kuo FH IR&P.

Revisiting Our Institution-Set Standards: Part II Bri Hays Campus-Based Researcher Presented to the Planning and Institutional Effectiveness Committee.

Assessment Committee 20 October Self Evaluation HAPS is the result of a process that began in 2012, the last Accreditation self- evaluation.

Institutional Planning and Effectiveness Integrated system of review that helps drive the overall mission of the College!!! Office of Institutional Research.

Los Angeles Valley College April 21, QUESTION 3: NEW GOALS & OBJECTIVES REFLECTING COLLEGE BASIC SKILLS INITIATIVE “ACTION PLANS”

TCF Volunteers Conference BG Sam Hines, Ph.D. Provost & Dean of the College 25 February

Strategic Plan: Goals, Objectives & Success Measures Administrative Forum, South Campus June 17,

1 Establishing a New Gallaudet Program Review Process Pat Hulsebosch Office of Academic Quality CUE – 9/3/08: CGE – 9/16/08.

Mission fulfillment: How do we know?

Dutchess Community College Middle States Self-Study 2015

2017 Strategic Planning Process

D Adapted from: Kaplan & Norton The YCCD District Mission, Vision, Values & Goals are Foundational to College Planning. All College EMP work aligns.

Strategic Planning Council December 8, 2006

UF Quest: Faculty Senate Presentation 3

Foothill College Accreditation Self-Study Update

Improving the First Year: Campus Discussion March 30, 2009

Presented To: College Planning Council

Foothill College Governance Redesign Update

Eagle Leadership Development Program

Accreditation & Institution Set Standards

Presented To: College Planning Council

PhD Registration and Assessment procedures

Cyclical Program Review

Presentation transcript:

Numbers we have to report AND Goals we have to set 14a. Successful student course completion rate for the fall 2012 semester 14b. Institution-set standard for student course completion rate 15a. Percent of students retained from fall 2011 to fall 2012 semesters 15b. Institution-set standard for student retention percentage 16a. Number of students who received a degree in the academic year 16b. Institution-set standard for student degree completion number 18a. Number of students who completed certificate requirements and received a certificate in the academic year 18b. Institution-set standard for student certificate completion number

Proposed PRBC Agenda for the Spring March 6 th : Program Review Process, Accreditation goal setting, Title V presentation March 13th: Initiative workgroups, Program review reading groups March 20th: Strategic Plan Initiative Reports, feedback on program review process/insights to date; shared governance effectiveness process proposal March 27 th : Initiative workgroups, program review reading groups April 10th: Shared governance structure, document, Initiative workgroup reports April 17th: Initiative workgroups, Program review reading groups April 24th: Program review conclusions session, preparation for 4/30 Flex Day May 1st: Flex feedback, connecting program review to resource allocation May 8th: Environmental scan, Classified prioritization May 15th: Assessing our effectiveness, planning for the future, summer retreat Dates in bold are PRBC Meeting dates.

Good of the Order Jennifer: anything to say about April Flex Day Opportunity for BSILI, conference opportunity and time to plan and develop projects with support. We have been asked to “opt-in” early, and we’d like to send teams—initiative groups (e.g., pathways, college up, diversity, etc) are possibles. This is a really great opportunity: interest? SLOAC: noticed on the Flex day planning, a note about impact of “outside changes.” Something we need to know?

PRBC Process for Program Review Deans review program reviews and summarize them. AND shared governance committees review pertinent sections and dean's summary. Deans and committees generate response. GOAL: INTEGRATION AND FEEDBACK Deans' summary and committee responses will use templates (accreditation style, noting excellence, good work, weaknesses, recommendations, and required action) AS WELL AS prioritize:1) short term and doable, 2) possible action but with challenges, 3) documented need, but no resources. GOAL: CONSISTENCY and PRIORITIZATION. Aggregate deans' summaries and committee responses. PRBC reviews draft, available to whole campus. DATE NEEDED: GOAL: TRANSPARENCY In progress: online library of submissions, templates, and cues. Paper copy provided to each shared governance committee. Deans and committees will work through April 24, with Dean's summaries due to committees as soon as possible. Final responses from committees will be due XXXXX. GOAL: PAPER TRAIL, INTEGRATION, FEEDBACK, TRANSPARENCY Discussion of draft at April XXXX meetings includes prioritization and recommendations, finalized on April 24 and made available. GOAL: COMPLETE IN TIMELY WAY, TRANSPARENCY Background: a READING GROUP will commit to dividing up and reading ALL program review documents. GOAL: ENSURE INTEGRATED PERSPECTIVE (Accreditation requirement)