Www.arl.org E-Metrics Project Update 2003-04 American Library Assocation Orlando June 27, 2002 Sherrie Schmidt Dean of University Libraries Arizona State.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Managing your Loan Star Libraries Grant Part 3 Wendy Clark Jennifer Justus Texas State Library and Archives Commission.
Advertisements

The annual SCONUL Statistics Philip Payne JIBS workshop on management data in higher education libraries 1 st. June 2009.
ULAC Update By Lois Schultz February 27, Information Broker Cancelled 13 low use journals (62 uses) with savings of $20,000 Combined with the.
IMPACT OF JOURNAL CANCELLATIONS ON INTERLIBRARY LOAN DEMAND Rachel Fleming, Serials Librarian, Western Carolina University Kristin Calvert, Electronic.
Common Statistics Programs and Projects in Canadian Academic Libraries Sylvie Belzile Université de Sherbrooke Statistiques de bibliothèques au 21 e siècle:
The COUNTER Code of Practice for Books and Reference Works Peter Shepherd Project Director COUNTER UKSG E-Books Seminar, 9 November 2005.
Maryland Higher Education’s Research Gateway. Educating Maryland’s Workforce Maryland Higher Education’s Research Gateway Through cooperation and leveraged.
CFO Auditing Standards in the 21 st Century By James P. Kearney Performance Management Consulting, Inc. 27 July 2005.
Meeting of CAUL/CONZUL and CREPUQ Sub-Committee of Libraries Montréal, Québec, October 10, 2001 October 10, 2001 A Research Digital Library : a Proposal.
of Research Libraries Measures for Electronic Use: The ARL E-Metrics Project Statistics in Practice - Measuring & Managing IFLA.
Colorado State University Libraries Where we are, Where we're going
of Research Libraries Next Generation Statistics for Libraries: CAUL Forum 20 January 2003 Sydney, NSW The ARL E-Metrics Project.
State of the Library Technology1 Digital Reference at UCLA May 14, 2002.
Presentation Outline Background Program Requirements Orange County HPRP Plan HPRP Timeline Action Requested.
Presenter: Ira Bray Monday, September 14, :00 noon to 1:00 p.m. Infopeople webinars are supported by the U.S. Institute of.
Research Methods & Data AD140Brendan Rapple 2 March, 2005.
The ARL E-Metrics Project Measures for Electronic Resources ACRL/NEC Information Technology Interest Group May 17, 2002 Brinley Franklin Director, University.
DOCLINE Update Medical Library Association 2005 San Antonio, Texas Maria Elizabeth Collins National Library of Medicine, NIH/HHS.
DOCLINE Update Medical Library Association 2006 Phoenix, Arizona Maria Elizabeth Collins National Library of Medicine, NIH/HHS.
The Digital Journal Collection in Libraries -what Libraries Are doing -Impact on Scientists Carol Tenopir University of Tennessee
Resource Sharing Development and Challenge in Academic Libraries: the Case Study of CALIS Yao XiaoXia CALIS Administrative Center , PUL , shanghai.
Strategic Plan & System Initiatives Update September 2008.
Collections Support at UMKC Libraries Faculty Library Advisory Committee October 15, 2013.
Serenate1 Non-standard users: The Library Raf Dekeyser K.U.Leuven.
ARL Analysis – Briefing #4.b All Graphs Pat Burns, Interim Dean 2/5/ ARL Briefing #4.b.
1 Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act of 2006 Highlights and Timeframes for Implementation of the Act Terry Hurst DAS, Office of Grants,
1 Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act of 2006 Highlights and Timeframes for Implementation of the Act Terry Hurst DAS, Office of Grants,
ERIC and the WorldCat Registry Lawrence Henry ERIC Program Manager Joanna White WorldCat Registry Product Manager.
HPD Shelves DOCLINE OCLC Login Account Online Local & Distance Resources Local & Distance PatronsInteribrary Loan & Document Delivery.
1 The AccessText Network An Association of American Publishers Digital Text Portal Information Session July 23, 2009.
COUNTER and the development of standards for usage reports Marthyn Borghuis, Elsevier COUNTER Executive Committee For: CALISE-Taiwan.
When to Answer and When to Refer: Answering Non-Access Services Questions Suzanne van den Hoogen, MLIS January 2012.
Borrow or Buy? The Convergence of Interlibrary Loan and Collection Development Kristen N. Hindes Interlibrary Loan and Instruction Librarian Library and.
ARL Statistics In recognition of Kendon Stubbs’ contributions Webcast Washington, DC October 9, 2003 Martha Kyrillidou Senior Program Officer.
Pay Per View: A Library’s Perspective Beth R. Bernhardt Electronic Journals/Document Delivery Librarian University of North Carolina at Greensboro NC Serials.
College Library Statistics: Under Review Teresa A. Fishel Macalester College Iowa Private Academic Libraries March 22, 2007 Mount Mercy College, Iowa.
CBSOR,Indian Statistical Institute 30th March 07, ISI,Kokata 1 Digital Repository support for Consortium Dr. Devika P. Madalli Documentation Research &
By SAWSAN HABRE LEBANESE AMERICAN UNIVERSITY AMICAL Meeting #2 June 1-3, 2005 DDS/ILL
Brinley Franklin Vice Provost University of Connecticut Libraries.
Gathering, Integrating and Analyzing Usage Data: A look at collection analysis tools and usage statistics standards, and important questions to consider.
State Library Agency Survey (StLA) Process and Progress.
Access Services Sajjad ur Rehman. Services INTERLIBRARY LOAN l Libraries formally engaged in a consortium by applying some formal or informal code to.
of Research Libraries Library Metrics in a Changing Environment National Seminar of Libraries in Malaysia, May 25-27, 2004 Bruce.
NCSU Libraries Collections Budget Presentation University Library Committee November 6, 2014 Greg Raschke Associate Director for Collections and Scholarly.
Power to the People IU Bloomington Libraries’ Content Management System Doug Ryner, Tadas Paegle, Julie Hardesty.
Overview for Faculty. How We Got Here Inflationary Pressures (LJ, 2009 & Ebsco) % increase since 2005 by discipline: 31-58% 2010 annual inflation estimate.
Budget Overview Committee on the Library January 2014.
Public Library Survey FY 2015 SDC General Session December 08, 2015.
Serenate1 The librarian’s view Raf Dekeyser K.U.Leuven.
U.S. Department of Agriculture eGovernment Program eDeployment Kickoff August 26, 2003.
The Digital Journal Collection in Libraries - What Libraries Are Doing -Impact on Scientists Carol Tenopir University of Tennessee

NC Shared ILS (Integrated Library System) Library Cooperation Summit Boone, NC August 12, 2009.
NCSU Libraries Collections Budget Presentation University Library Committee October 28, 2013 Greg Raschke Associate Director for Collections and Scholarly.
10 Key Findings from the Survey of Academic Library Streaming Video National Media Market - November 9, 2014 deg farrelly - Arizona State University Jane.
Networked Information Resources Federated search, link server, e-books.
 All the 16 Finnish universities enter publications to their own publication registers and submit the information to the Finnish Ministry of Education.
1 Transforming the Global Knowledge Society: the Role of Libraries and Universities Keynote Address – Nanjing University- Penn State Visit, May 29, 2012.
Rebecca L. Mugridge LFO Research Colloquium March 19, 2008.
AN ARCHETYPE FOR INFORMATION ORGANIZATION AND CLASSIFICATION OCLC WorldCat.
Empowering Data: Persuasion Through Presentation
University Libraries RC Budget FY 2017
Amie Freeman, University of south Carolina
Improving Statistics Collection at Pitt
Le développement des collections: l’impact du numérique et les pratiques en émergence Development of Collections: The Impact of Electronic Resources.
WPLC OverDrive Collection Overview
ReCAP Data Part 2: Requests
Introduction to electronic resources management
Introduction to electronic resources management
Expenditure Management
Presentation transcript:

E-Metrics Project Update American Library Assocation Orlando June 27, 2002 Sherrie Schmidt Dean of University Libraries Arizona State University

Total Electronic Serials Expenditures,

Highlights ARL Supplementary Statistics Expenditures for electronic resources account for 25%, on average, of ARL institutions’ library materials budgets. ARL libraries reported spending more than $228 million on electronic resources. ARL libraries reported a total of $21,470,716 in additional funds spent on their behalf through a centrally funded consortium for purchasing electronic products and services. ARL libraries reported spending more than $13.1 million on document delivery/ interlibrary loan services. Expenditures for electronic serials have increased by 171% since the survey, and by more than 1800% since they were first reported, in (see line chart). In every year since , average expenditures on electronic resources have increased at least twice as fast, and in some cases up to six times faster, than average library materials expenditures (see bar graph).

Yearly Increases in Average Electronic Resources and Total Library Materials Expenditures

Growth of E-Metrics Project Participation

ARL E-Metrics Supplementary Statistics Survey Dec: Reviewed survey data elements (14) and definitions Jan-Feb: Revised definitions, added 4 elements based on feedback from Survey Coordinators Mar-Apr: Conducted phone calls, exchanges with participants to validate elements and definitions May: Presented unresolved questions to the ARL Statistics & Measurement Committee June: Added 1 data element (total=19), revised definitions per Committee feedback July-Aug: ARL Supplementary Statistics will be available online

ARL Supplementary Survey Data Elements –Number of / Expenditures for Networked Electronic Resources –Electronic journals purchased –Electronic “full-text” journals purchased –Electronic journals not purchased –Electronic reference sources –Electronic books –Use of Networked Electronic Resources and Services –Number of virtual reference transactions –Does your library offer federated searching across networked electronic resources? –Number of logins (sessions) to networked electronic resources –Number of queries (searches) in networked electronic resources –Number of items requested in networked electronic resources –Number of virtual visits –Library Digitization Activities –Number and Size of Library Digital Collections –Use of Library Digital Collections –Direct cost of digital collections construction and management –Volumes Held Collectively

Number of / Expenditure for Networked Electronic Resources Number of / expenditures for electronic journals purchased. –Free-with-print - Count number but not cost? –Embargoed journals - Count cost but not number? Number of electronic “full-text” journals purchased. –Previously, full-text distinction was ability to browse; now, not reliable –Solution: ARL will provide a list of non-browse-able titles that meet this criteria to ensure consistent data collection

Use of Networked Electronic Resources & Services Tracking logins, searches & queries –Dependent on publishers, vendors for data –E-Metrics prepares institutions to collect and manage data that is provided – : ask participants to distinguish between data provided for journals and/or databases in footnotes Virtual reference transactions –Process for tracking transactions varies - dedicated software vs. counting

Library Digitization Activities Definition of digital materials expanded to include items converted from other formats or “born-digital” items Challenges to defining digital “collection”? –Items grouped dynamically, temporarily –Items added to library independently of collection development plan - Institutional repository –Items more granular than journals or books - learning objects, data sets Difficult to identify digitization costs because personnel, equipment fills multiple roles in library

Volumes Held Collectively Data element suggested by ARL Statistics & Measurement Committee Defining criterion: The library has devoted financial resources for the purchase of these items and is taking responsibility for their availability through participation in a cooperative that supports shared ownership. Included in Supplementary Statistics

E-Metrics Project Timeline March 1: Draft version of Supplementary Survey circulated to participants, along with sample reporting spreadsheet. April 30: Deadline to confirm participation and identify which questions will/will not be reported June 30: First deadline to report interim data (FY 2003 ends) July 1: FY 2004 begins July 31: Review of interim data and follow up calls completed August 31: Second deadline to report interim data November 30: data due for Supplementary Survey December 17: Supplementary Survey closes