Operational Systems Decision Time Presented by Division of External Affairs and Policy Georgia Department of Education 1.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Rhode Island Board of Governors for Higher Education
Advertisements

WELCOME BUDGET MANAGERS AND CHIEF FISCAL OFFICERS
Commission on Teacher Credentialing Inspire, Educate, and Protect the Students of California Commission on Teacher Credentialing Special Education 2012.
Foundations of American Education, Fifth Edition
Designing and Building a Results-Based Monitoring and Evaluation System: A Tool for Public Sector Management.
The Managing Authority –Keystone of the Control System
PRESENTED BY: RICHARD LAWRENCE, EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR OFFICE OF TITLE II, SCHOOL AND SCHOOL SYSTEM IMPROVEMENT JAN STANLEY, STATE TITLE I DIRECTOR WEST VIRGINIA.
A Principal’s Guide to Title I, Part A and LAP Requirements
WASHINGTON STATE PROVIDER APPLICATION Supplemental Educational Services.
Targeted Assistance & Schoolwide Programs NCLB Technical Assistance Audio April 18, :30 PM April 19, :30 AM Alaska Department of Education.
1 Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) U.S. Department of Education Adapted by TEA September 2003.
2 HOME DELIVERED MEALS Waiver Workshop Presented by: Regional and Local Services (RLS) Access and Intake /Area Agency on Aging (A&I/AAA) May 27-28, 2009.
Webinar: June 6, :00am – 11:30am EDT The Community Eligibility Option.
Roles and Responsibilities. Collaborative Efforts to Improve Student Achievement Guidelines for developing integrated planning and decision making processes.
The UEA House of Delegates Directing YOUR Association through the democratic process. 1.
Promotion and Tenure Workshop 1. Evaluation Procedure There is only one evaluation procedure leading to recommendations regarding promotion, tenure and.
Management Plans: A Roadmap to Successful Implementation
© 2006 TDA Development Draft and subject to amendments from consultation Performance Management Challenge for Schools PM workshops 23 October 2006.
A Roadmap to Successful Implementation Management Plans.
1 Texas Department of Agriculture The Food Service Management Company Contracting Process Food and Nutrition Division Texas Department of Agriculture.
Contract Fundamentals at Fresno State Doug Carey, Grants Administrator Office of Research and Sponsored Programs California State University, Fresno.
1 Monthly Rules Education Session January 2012 Transfer Eligibility.
Mississippi Special Education Advisory Panel Annual Report to the State Board of Education July 2009.
Connections for Classrooms Georgia Technology Grants & Related Funding Unified Infrastructure Funding to Enable Digital and Blended Learning.
High School Diplomas and the Ability-to-Benefit Alternative Carney McCullough U.S. Department of Education 1.
Evaluation Orientation Meeting Teacher Evaluation System
1 Implementation of the No Child Left Behind (NCLB) Highly Qualified Teacher & Paraprofessional Requirements December 2010.
SCHOOL SYSTEM FLEXIBILITY IN GEORGIA Overview and Comparison.
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Jack O’Connell, State Superintendent of Public Instruction California Department of Education Special Education Self-
Principles of Standards and Measures
Santa Barbara County SELPA Parentally Placed Students in Private School Training & Meaningful Consultation for Private School Representatives and Parent.
Ohio’s Vocational Rehabilitation Program Opportunities for Ohioans with Disabilities' (OOD) mission is to ensure individuals with disabilities achieve.
SCHOOL SYSTEM FLEXIBILITY IN GEORGIA Overview and Comparison Presentation to Education Works Leadership Institute September 16, 2013.
IE 2, CHARTER, AND STATUS QUO SCHOOL SYSTEMS Flexibility Options Comparison F EBRUARY 26, 2015 Ken Thompson Chief Financial Officer.
GaDOE Charter School Board Training Requirements Dr. Lynn Plunkett GCCA CEO WKSP January 23, 2015 TCSG’s Office of College & Career Transition Specialized.
Current Legal Issues in Risk Management February 16, 2011 Presented by: Phillip L. Hartley Harben, Hartley & Hawkins, LLP.
IE 2 and CHARTER SYSTEMS Accountability Comparison Sources of Information Governor’s Office of Student Achievement website Georgia Department of Education.
Forsyth County Schools Overview of the Proposed IE 2 Partnership Contract.
1 Proposed Changes to the Accreditation Process CDE Briefing for the Colorado State Board of Education March 5, 2008.
Supplemental Salaries. History School Board ask Personnel Policy Committee to look into supplemental pay Personnel Policy Committee formed a Supplemental.
9/2/20151 Ohio Family and Children First An overview of OFCF structure, membership, and responsibilities.
CONNECTICUT STATE DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION BUREAU OF EARLY CHILDHOOD EDUCATION Laboratory School and Model Early Childhood Learning Grant
WASHINGTON STATE PROVIDER APPLICATION Supplemental Educational Services.
DRAFT – Not for Circulation Investing in Innovation (i3) 2012 Development Competition Summary Document February 2012 Note: These slides are intended as.
Race to the Top (RTTT) Overview of Grant Competition Goals and Requirements 1.
Charter Schools and Charter Systems in Georgia Georgia Grantmakers Alliance Summer Meeting August 16, 2012.
SCHOOL ADVISORY COUNCIL TRAINING  A group intended to represent the broad school community and those persons closest to the students who will.
Fiscal Monitoring and Oversight Tecumseh Local School District January 8, 2013 Roger Hardin, Assistant Director Finance Program Services (614)
Presented by: Office of Independent Education and Parental Choice July 2012.
Oregon Public Charter Schools Oregon Department of Education August 2007.
FY 2010 Data Collections Workshop Follow Up Q & A Session.
Reporting Requirements for IR Charters and Authorizing Agencies v2.0, Reporting Requirements for Charter Schools and Authorizing Agencies.
Richard Woods, Georgia’s School Superintendent “Educating Georgia’s Future” gadoe.org Richard Woods, Georgia’s School Superintendent “Educating Georgia’s.
What is a Charter System?
© 2014, Florida Department of Education. All Rights Reserved. Charter Schools in Florida Friday, February 13, 2015 Mid-Year Transportation.
Oct. 13, 2015 Flagstaff Oct. 14, 2015 Phoenix Oct. 15, 2015 Tucson Arizona Charter Schools Program: Getting Ready for the 2016 Grant Cycle 1.
Presented By WVDE Title I Staff June 10, Fiscal Issues Maintain an updated inventory list, including the following information: description of.
Miller County School System STRATEGIC WAIVERS SCHOOL SYSTEM (IE2) FY17-23.
RICHMOND COUNTY SCHOOL SYSTEM COMMUNITY MEETING WESTSIDE HIGH SCHOOL JANUARY 12, 2015 School System Flexibility Options.
U.S. Department of Education Office of Special Education Programs Building the Legacy: IDEA 2004 Highly Qualified Teachers (HQT)
RICHMOND COUNTY SCHOOL SYSTEM COMMUNITY MEETING GLENN HILLS MIDDLE SCHOOL JANUARY 7, 2015 School System Flexibility Options.
Advisory Committee Meeting Richmond County School System Thursday, January 22, 2015.
District of innovation
Strategic Waivers School System/IE2 Application Process
Title III of the No Child Left Behind Act
Jackson County Schools Strategic Waiver School System Decision
Cobb County School District Charter Petition Training
Operational Systems “Decision Time”
Roles and Responsibilities
Roles and Responsibilities
Presentation transcript:

Operational Systems Decision Time Presented by Division of External Affairs and Policy Georgia Department of Education 1

Selecting an Operational System Local school systems must choose to operate as an: – Investing in Educational Excellence – IE 2, or – Charter, or – Status Quo school system. Official Code of Georgia

Date to Remember IE 2 School systems must submit written notification of intent to the GaDOE no later than June 30, 2015* Charter School systems must submit written notification of intent to the GaDOE no later than June 30, 2015* Status Quo School systems must submit written notification of intent to the GaDOE no later than June 30, 2015* *Official Code of Georgia Annotated (OCGA) § (b) 3

Legal Reference IE 2 O.C.G.A. § through § Charter O.C.G.A. § through § Status Quo O.C.G.A. § Local Strategic Plan, Proposed Contract, SBOE Approval Process, Flexibility and Accountability, Loss of Governance, Funding, Charter Schools 4

Fiscal Impact IE 2 Possible savings through flexibility Regular QBE funding with more local school system expenditure controls Charter Possible savings through flexibility Regular QBE funding with more local expenditure controls Possible $100 per student in Charter Systems Status Quo Regular QBE funding *Contingent on funding by the Georgia General Assembly 5

Flexibility IE 2 School System seeks waivers – must include at least one of the following: class size; expenditure control; certification; salary schedule Charter School System must state if and how broad flexibility permitted by the Charter Schools Act will be utilized Status Quo State Board cannot authorize waivers or variances for: expenditure controls; certification; salary schedule; class size* * SBOE authorized to waive class size for reasons of hardship (O.C.G.A. § ) Link between flexibility and increased student performance 6

Governance IE 2 School System may maximize school level governance by granting local schools authority to determine how to reach goals Charter School System must provide each school with school-level governance and decision making over budgets, programs, personnel and/or innovation Status Quo Local board of education maintains governance 7

Contractual Partners IE 2 Local School System Board of Education and State Board of Education* Charter Local School System Board of Education and State Board of Education Status Quo NA *Governors Office of Student Achievement participates in the process. 8

Length of Contract IE 2 Initial term of contract is for 5 years Contract may be renewed if contract performance goals are met for at least three consecutive years Charter Initial term of contract is for 5 years, with few exceptions Subsequent contract term may range from 5 to 10 years if the charter contract goals are met Status Quo Not applicable 9

Performance Evaluation IE 2 Student performance goals are determined during contract negotiations Governors Office of Student Achievement monitors progress and reports to the State Board of Education System and schools must meet all federal and state accountability measures Charter Petition must include student performance measures at least above state averages GaDOE submits annual report to State Board of Education and Georgia General Assembly System and schools must meet all federal and state accountability measures Status Quo System and schools must meet all federal and state accountability measures 10

Consequences IE 2 Loss of governance of non-performing schools: conversion to charter school; operation by another school system; operation by private or non- profit entity Charter Termination or nonrenewal of charter School System becomes a Status Quo school system Status Quo Must meet all federal and state accountability measures including implementing consequence if schools and school system does not make AYP 11

Waiver Limitations IE 2 Cannot waive: *Federal rules/ regulations *State and local rules/regulations such as: insurance; physical health; school safety; assessment; QBE funding; etc. *Court orders, civil rights statutes *Conflicts of interest; unlawful conduct Charter Cannot waive: *Federal rules/ regulations *State and local rules/regulations such as: insurance; physical health; school safety; assessment; QBE funding; etc. *Court orders, civil rights statutes *Conflicts of interest; unlawful conduct Status Quo Can only apply for state waivers due to dire emergency 12

Unique Features IE 2 Flexibility proportionate to negotiated accountability for student performance School System Strategic Plan is a prerequisite to negotiations School System must conduct a public hearing to share Strategic Plan Charter Significant emphasis on parent/ community involvement, including maximum school level governance Flexibility proportionate to negotiated accountability for student performance School System must conduct at least two public hearings to receive public input Status Quo School System must conduct a public hearing to provide notice of the systems intent to select Status Quo Local board of education must sign statement that the school system has selected Status Quo 13

Decision Considerations What decision structure would best serve the strategies? What strategies can be used to close the gap? What are the gaps between goals and data? What are the goals of the district? What does the systems student performance data show now?

CentralizedDecentralized (Waivers) Waivers needed? How much school autonomy? IE2 Status Quo Charter System Charter Schools Centralize or Decentralize? YesNoPartial*Total** * Shared governance **Charter school governance Decision Considerations

Most Frequently Asked Questions

Does a school system have to implement one of the operational systems by June 30, 2015? No. A letter of intent is due no later than June 30, 2015 to the Georgia Department of Education. However, those school systems that select IE2 or Charter System are expected to be actively engaged in the developmental process in order to implement the selected operational system in a timely manner. 17

How long does the petition* process take if a system selects IE 2 or Charter System? If a school system submits an IE 2 or Charter System petition to the Georgia Department of Education sometime between July and December, the school systems implementation of the flexibility choice may be operational the following school year. Some school systems will want more time for implementation and may ask for an extension. (*Letter of Intent is a notification letter. A petition is the plan that was approved by the local board.) 18

May a school system change its decision after submitting a letter of intent? Yes, but all of the relevant requirements must be met. For example, if a school system decides to forego IE 2 in favor of Status Quo, public hearings must be held. May a school system that selected Status Quo by the June 30, 2015 deadline later apply for IE 2 or Charter System status? Yes. 19

How many school systems are IE 2 or Charter Systems? There are two (2) IE 2 School Systems and one pending. There are ten (10) Charter Systems and five (5) pending. How will the Georgia Department of Education handle a surge of IE 2 and Charter System petitions? The Department has developed a plan that includes the use of existing staff and external participants. All petitions will be reviewed in a timely manner, with a focus on quality. 20

How are the Highly Qualified requirements met if a system selects IE 2 or Charter System and asks for a certification waiver?* 1)Must hold a bachelors degree from a Georgia Professional Standards Commission (GaPSC) approved institution of higher education; 2)Have evidence of subject matter competence in the subjects they teach; 3)Have a teaching assignment that is appropriate for the core academic area/subject(s) in which the teacher serves as the teacher of record. 21 *For more information, please refer to the GaPSC website.

What action(s) must a school district take prior to June 30, 2015 if Status Quo is selected? If the district chooses Status Quo then it must: Conduct a public hearing for the purpose of providing public notice that such local school system is opting for the status quo. The hearing shall be advertised in a local newspaper of general circulation which shall be the same newspaper in which other legal announcements of the local board of education are advertised. School district must sign a statement that it is opting to be Status Quo. 22

What obligations must be met by IE 2 and Charter System Schools when serving students with disabilities? These service obligations remain unchanged. The Individuals with Disabilities in Education Act (IDEA) remains in effect for all public school systems receiving Federal funds. 23

Will school systems receive increased QBE funds if they select IE 2 or Charter System? No. Flexibility under the contract may not be used to generate additional state funding beyond state allotments. School systems will continue to receive FTE funds based on the current weighting system and the number of students enrolled in the school system by program area. Charter Systems are eligible for approximately $100 per student, if the funds are appropriated by the Georgia General Assembly. 24

Additional Information IE 2 and Status Quo Howard Hendley, Ed.D., Director Policy Division Allan Meyer, Assistant Director Policy Division

Additional Information Charter System Louis Erste, Director Charter Schools Division Marissa Key, Program Manager Charter Schools Division

Additional Information Operations Systems Garry McGiboney, Ph.D. Associate Superintendent Policy